Original Article

Bone Marrow Transplantation (2007) 40, 151–155; doi:10.1038/sj.bmt.1705704; published online 28 May 2007

Post-Transplant Events

Antibiotic cycling to decrease bacterial antibiotic resistance: a 5-year experience on a bone marrow transplant unit

J Cadena1, C A Taboada2, D S Burgess3, J Z Ma4, J S Lewis II5, C O Freytes2,6 and J E Patterson5,6,7

  1. 1Department of Medicine, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
  2. 2Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
  3. 3School of Pharmacy, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA
  4. 4Department of Psychiatry, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
  5. 5Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
  6. 6Department of Medicine, South Texas Veterans Health Care System, San Antonio, TX, USA
  7. 7Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA

Correspondence: Dr J Cadena, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Drive, Mail Code 7881, San Antonio, TX 78229, USA. E-mail: cadenazuluag@uthscsa.edu

Received 15 January 2007; Revised 10 April 2007; Accepted 11 April 2007; Published online 28 May 2007.

Top

Abstract

Multidrug-resistant pathogens have important effects on clinical outcomes. Antibiotic cycling is one approach to control anti-microbial resistance, but few studies have examined cycling in hematology–oncology units. Antibiotic cycling was implemented in January 1999 at our hematology–oncology unit, alternating piperacillin-tazobactam (pip-tazo) and cefepime in 3 months periods, until June 2004. Clinical isolates were compared in post- and pre-intervention periods and with the susceptibility among the solid organ transplant intensive care unit (TICU) isolates. The rate of Gram-negative isolates remained stable. Among Gram-negatives, susceptibility to cefepime and pip-tazo remained stable. There was an increase in Enterococcus spp. (P=0.007), and susceptibility to ampicillin and vancomycin decreased (odds ratio (OR): 0.04, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.17–0.89 and OR: 0.23, 95% CI: 0.09–0.58). Compared with the TICU, there was increased susceptibility to pip-tazo and cefepime among enterics (OR: 7.32, 95% CI: 4.44–12.07 and OR: 8.82, 95% CI: 2.1–37.13) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (OR: 4.27, 95% CI: 1.47–12.4 and OR: 4.61, 95% CI: 1.75–12.1) and decreased susceptibility to ampicillin and vancomycin among enterococci (OR: 0.44, 95% CI: 0.30–0.63 and OR: 0.38, 95% CI: 0.26–0.56). Cycling was associated with preserved antibiotic susceptibility among Gram-negatives, but with an increase in Enterococcus spp. and vancomycin and ampicillin resistance among enterococci.

Keywords:

antibiotic resistance, antibiotic cycling, vancomycin resistant enterococci, hematology–oncology unit

Extra navigation

.

naturejobs

ADVERTISEMENT