Original Article
Bone Marrow Transplantation (2007) 40, 105–110; doi:10.1038/sj.bmt.1705685; published online 30 April 2007
Conditioning Regimens
Fludarabine and busulfan as a myeloablative conditioning regimen for allogeneic stem cell transplantation in high- and standard-risk leukemic patients
M Iravani1, M R Evazi1, S A Mousavi1, A R Shamshiri1, M Tavakoli1, A Ashouri1, S Samiee1, B Chahardovali1, K Alimoghaddam1, S H Ghaffari1 and A Ghavamzadeh1
1Hematology-Oncology and BMT Research Center, Medical Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
Correspondence: Dr AR Shamshiri, Hematology-Oncology and BMT Research Center, Shariati Hospital, Kargar Shomali Ave, Tehran 14114, Iran. E-mail: ar_shamshiri@yahoo.com
Received 24 April 2006; Revised 19 March 2007; Accepted 21 March 2007; Published online 30 April 2007.
Abstract
Busulfan and cyclophosphamide (BuCy) are currently the most widely used myeloablative regimen to treat malignancies with allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Fludarabine has considerable efficacy in both immunosuppression and tumor cells killing with a minimal extramedullary toxicity. We evaluated the efficacy of 40 mg/m2 fludarabine i.v. for 5 days and busulfan 4 mg/kg/day p.o. for 4 days as myeloablative conditioning regimen in 70 patients (median age 24 years) with acute leukemia or chronic phase of myelogenous leukemia. They all had human leukocyte antigen-matched sibling donors. The patients received 10
g/kg granulocyte colony stimulating factor (GCSF), 24 h after stem cell infusion until engraftment occurred. Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis included 3 mg/kg cyclosporine-A i.v. from day -2 to +6 followed by 12 mg/kg p.o. until day +60. The median time of neutrophil recovery (>0.5
109/l) and platelet recovery (>20
109/l) were 10 and 12 days, respectively. Mucositis (93%) and hepatic toxicity (16%) resolved with conservative therapy. The incidence of acute GVHD grade I-II and III-IV were 38.6 and 15.7% respectively. Overall survival and disease-free survival were 71 and 64% respectively with 17 months median follow-up for surviving patients. We conclude that FluBu may be used as a substitute for BuCy with almost the same efficacy and with a lower transplant adverse effect but to increase anti-leukemic effects, especially in acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients, it needs some modifications.
Keywords:
fludarabine, stem cell transplantation, transplantation conditioning, leukemia, myeloablative agonists
MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS
These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated
RESEARCH
Bone Marrow Transplantation Original Article
Impact of ABO incompatibility on outcome after allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation
Bone Marrow Transplantation Original Article
Patient's socioeconomic status as a prognostic factor for allo-SCT
Bone Marrow Transplantation Original Article
Bone Marrow Transplantation Original Article

