Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Post-Transplant Events

High rate of discordance between clinical and autopsy diagnoses in blood and marrow transplantation

Bone Marrow Transplantation volume 40, pages 1049–1053 (2007)Cite this article

Abstract

We analyzed autopsies performed in a Canadian blood and marrow transplantation (BMT) program. We aimed to assess variables that predict the performance of an autopsy, whether rates of autopsy are changing, and the rate of discordance between clinical and autopsy diagnoses. All deceased adult patients from January 1990 to December 2004 were reviewed. Autopsy rates were compared to a large teaching hospital. Of 476 myeloablative BMT patients, 225 died and 48 (27%) underwent autopsy. Autopsy was more likely in patients dying: <100 days post-BMT, in the intensive care unit, after allografting, and on weekends. Autopsy rates among BMT patients declined during the three time periods (1990–1994, 1995–1999, 2000–2004). The autopsy rate at the teaching hospital showed a similar downward temporal trend. Major and minor disagreements at autopsy were present in 16 (34%) and 14 (30%) of cases, respectively. There was no change in discordance rates over time. Thus, despite advances in diagnostic procedures, high levels of disagreement between clinical and autopsy diagnoses for BMT patients persist as autopsy rates decline. We recommend that the autopsy regains its role as a valuable investigation. This may become especially relevant in an era where patients with medical comorbidities are undergoing reduced-intensity BMT.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lowry F . Failure to perform autopsies means some MDs ‘walking in a fog of misplaced optimism’. CMAJ 1995; 153: 811–814.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Sinard JH . Factors affecting autopsy rates, autopsy request rates, and autopsy findings at a large academic medical center. Exp Mol Pathol 2001; 70: 333–343.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Allan DS, Belanger R, Busque L, Cohen S, Fish D, Roy DC et al. Maintaining high autopsy rates in a Canadian blood and marrow transplant program: preserving a diagnostic and research tool. Bone Marrow Transplant 2005; 35: 781–785.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Shojania KG, Burton EC, McDonald KM, Goldman L . Changes in rates of autopsy-detected diagnostic errors over time: a systematic review. JAMA 2003; 289: 2849–2856.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Spiliopoulou C, Papadodima S, Kotakidis N, Koutselinis A . Clinical diagnoses and autopsy findings: a retrospective analysis of 252 cases in Greece. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2005; 129: 210–214.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Avgerinos DV, Bjornsson J . Malignant neoplasms: discordance between clinical diagnoses and autopsy findings in 3,118 cases. APMIS 2001; 109: 774–780.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Burton EC, Troxclair DA, Newman III WP . Autopsy diagnoses of malignant neoplasms: how often are clinical diagnoses incorrect? JAMA 1998; 280: 1245–1248.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Xavier AC, Siqueira SA, Costa LJ, Mauad T, Nascimento Saldiva PH . Missed diagnosis in hematological patients—an autopsy study. Virchows Arch 2005; 446: 225–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Nichols L, Aronica P, Babe C . Are autopsies obsolete? Am J Clin Pathol 1998; 110: 210–218.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Burton JL, Wells M . The alder hey affair. Arch Dis Child 2002; 86: 4–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Veress B, Alafuzoff I . A retrospective analysis of clinical diagnoses and autopsy findings in 3042 cases during two different time periods. Hum Pathol 1994; 25: 140–145.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hofmeister CC, Marinier DE, Czerlanis C, Stiff PJ . Clinical utility of autopsy after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2007; 13: 26–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sonderegger-Iseli K, Burger S, Muntwyler J, Salomon F . Diagnostic errors in three medical eras: a necropsy study. Lancet 2000; 355: 2027–2031.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Scottolini AG, Weinstein SR . The autopsy in clinical quality control. JAMA 1983; 250: 1192–1194.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Britton M . Clinical diagnostics: experience from 383 autopsied cases. Acta Med Scand 1974; 196: 211–219.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Aalten CM, Samson MM, Jansen PA . Diagnostic errors; the need to have autopsies. Neth J Med 2006; 64: 186–190.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Combes A, Mokhtari M, Couvelard A, Trouillet JL, Baudot J, Henin D et al. Clinical and autopsy diagnoses in the intensive care unit: a prospective study. Arch Intern Med 2004; 164: 389–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ferguson RP, Burkhardt L, Hennawi G, Puthumana L . Consecutive autopsies on an internal medicine service. South Med J 2004; 97: 335–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Goldman L, Sayson R, Robbins S, Cohn LH, Bettmann M, Weisberg M . The value of the autopsy in three medical eras. N Engl J Med 1983; 308: 1000–1005.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Peacock SJ, Machin D, Duboulay CE, Kirkham N . The autopsy: a useful tool or an old relic? J Pathol 1988; 156: 9–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. The Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia Autopsy Working Party. The decline of the hospital autopsy: a safety and quality issue for healthcare in Australia. Med J Aust 2004; 180: 281–285.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Dimopoulos G, Piagnerelli M, Berre J, Salmon I, Vincent JL . Post mortem examination in the intensive care unit: still useful? Intensive Care Med 2004; 30: 2080–2085.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Juric G, Tentor D, Jakic-Razumovic J . Autopsy findings and clinical diagnoses: retrospective study of 3,117 autopsies. Croat Med J 1999; 40: 71–76.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Baddley JW, Stroud TP, Salzman D, Pappas PG . Invasive mold infections in allogeneic bone marrow transplant recipients. Clin Infect Dis 2001; 32: 1319–1324.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Grow WB, Moreb JS, Roque D, Manion K, Leather H, Reddy V et al. Late onset of invasive Aspergillus infection in bone marrow transplant patients at a university hospital. Bone Marrow Transplant 2002; 29: 15–19.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Ninin E, Milpied N, Moreau P, Andre-Richet B, Morineau N, Mahe B et al. Longitudinal study of bacterial, viral, and fungal infections in adult recipients of bone marrow transplants. Clin Infect Dis 2001; 33: 41–47.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Osarogiagbon RU, Defor TE, Weisdorf MA, Erice A, Weisdorf DJ . CMV antigenemia following bone marrow transplantation: risk factors and outcomes. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2000; 6: 280–288.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Yoo JH, Lee DG, Choi SM, Choi JH, Park YH, Kim YJ et al. Infectious complications and outcomes after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in Korea. Bone Marrow Transplant 2004; 34: 497–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Maertens J, Verhaegen J, Demuynck H, Brock P, Verhoef G, Vandenberghe P et al. Autopsy-controlled prospective evaluation of serial screening for circulating galactomannan by a sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for hematological patients at risk for invasive Aspergillosis. J Clin Microbiol 1999; 37: 3223–3228.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Herbrecht R, Letscher-Bru V, Oprea C, Lioure B, Waller J, Campos F et al. Aspergillus galactomannan detection in the diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis in cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 2002; 20: 1898–1906.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Maertens J, Verhaegen J, Lagrou K, Van EJ, Boogaerts M . Screening for circulating galactomannan as a noninvasive diagnostic tool for invasive aspergillosis in prolonged neutropenic patients and stem cell transplantation recipients: a prospective validation. Blood 2001; 97: 1604–1610.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Boeckh M, Gooley TA, Myerson D, Cunningham T, Schoch G, Bowden RA . Cytomegalovirus pp65 antigenemia-guided early treatment with ganciclovir versus ganciclovir at engraftment after allogeneic marrow transplantation: a randomized double-blind study. Blood 1996; 88: 4063–4071.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Haematology/Oncology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

    M D Seftel, M Ho, D Pruthi, M Rubinger, B Schacter & D Szwajcer

  2. Manitoba Blood and Marrow Transplant Program, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

    M D Seftel, S Orbanski, M Rubinger, B Schacter & D Szwajcer

  3. Health Sciences Centre, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

    M D Seftel, M Rubinger, B Schacter & D Szwajcer

  4. Epidemiology and Cancer Registry, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

    D Pruthi & A A Demers

  5. Department of Hematology/Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA

    C Bredeson

Authors
  1. M D Seftel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M Ho
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. D Pruthi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. S Orbanski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. M Rubinger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. B Schacter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. D Szwajcer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. C Bredeson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. A A Demers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M D Seftel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Seftel, M., Ho, M., Pruthi, D. et al. High rate of discordance between clinical and autopsy diagnoses in blood and marrow transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 40, 1049–1053 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bmt.1705855

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bmt.1705855

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links