Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Allografting

Patients' understanding of disease status and treatment plan at initial hematopoietic stem cell transplantation consultation

Abstract

Patients referred for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) often have knowledge deficits about their disease and overestimate their prognosis making it difficult initially to discuss potentially life-threatening transplant options. To determine patients' understanding of their disease and the adequacy of a 3-h consultation at our center, we developed a survey that measured perceived knowledge deficits of disease, prognosis, and emotional status before and after their initial consultation. Ninety nine consecutive eligible patients completed the survey. Although 76.7% claimed adequate information about their disease pre-HCST visit, 51.5 and 41.4% respectively lacked knowledge about their 1-year prognosis with and without any therapy. After the visit, 66.7% of the patients had obtained enough information to make an informed decision regarding HSCT versus 23.2% pre-visit, and a significant reduction in the need for further information was reported by 53.5% of patients (P<0.001). Patients were not overwhelmed or confused by the visit and there was a small but significant decrease in negative affect. Measures to increase patients understanding of their disease and its prognosis pre-HSCT consultation visit are warranted; however, a 3-h consultation visit provides the majority of patients with sufficient information to make an informed decision about the risk/benefit ratio of HSCT.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Weeks JC, Cook EF, O'Day SJ, Peterson LM, Wenger N, Reding D et al. Relationship between cancer patients' predictions of prognosis and their treatment preferences. JAMA 1998; 279: 1709–1714.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Dermatis H, Lesko LM . Psychosocial correlates of physician–patient communication at time of informed consent for bone marrow transplantation. Cancer Invest 1991; 9: 621–628.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Andrykowski MA, Brady MJ, Greiner CB, Altmaier EM, Burish TG, Antin JH et al. Returning to normal following bone marrow transplantation: outcomes, expectations, and informed consent. Bone Marrow Transplant 1995; 15: 573–581.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Eidinger RN, Schapira DV . Cancer patients' insight into their treatment, prognosis, and unconventional therapies. Cancer 1984; 53: 2736–2740.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Lee SJ, Fairclough D, Antin JH, Weeks JC . Discrepancies between patient and physician estimates for the success of stem cell transplantation. JAMA 2001; 285: 1034–1038.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Singer DA, Donnelly MB, Messerschmidt GL . Informed consent for bone marrow transplantation: identification of relevant information by referring physicians. Bone Marrow Transplant 1990; 6: 431–437.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Jacoby LH, Maloy B, Cirenza E, Shelton W, Goggins T, Balint J . The basis of informed consent for BMT patients. Bone Marrow Transplant 1999; 23: 711–717.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Patenaude AF, Rappeport JM, Smith BR . The physician's influence on informed consent for bone marrow transplantation. Theor Med 1986; 7: 165–179.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bichakjian C, Schwartz J, Wang T, Hall J, Johnson T, Biermann J . Melanoma information on the internet: often incomplete – a public health opportunity? J Clin Oncol 2002; 20: 134–141.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Berland G, Elliott M, Morales L, Algazy J, Kravitz R, Broder M et al. Health information on the internet: accessibility, quality, and readability in English and Spanish. JAMA 2001; 20: 2612–2621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hurley CL, Mumby PB, Di Iorio S, Stiff P . Gender and marital status predict depression and social support in bone marrow transplant patients. Annal Behav Med 2004; 27 (Suppl): S020.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hurley CL, Mumby PB, Stiff PJ . Predictors of noncompliance autologous bone marrow transplant patients. J Psycho-Oncol 2005; 14 (Suppl 1): 45.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P J Stiff.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stiff, P., Miller, L., Mumby, P. et al. Patients' understanding of disease status and treatment plan at initial hematopoietic stem cell transplantation consultation. Bone Marrow Transplant 37, 479–484 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bmt.1705264

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bmt.1705264

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links