Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Post-Transplant Events

Maintaining high autopsy rates in a Canadian blood and marrow transplant program: preserving a diagnostic and research tool

Bone Marrow Transplantation volume 35, pages 781–785 (2005)Cite this article

Summary:

Autopsy series have revealed patterns of injury in graft-versus-host disease and provided insight into infectious and toxic complications following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Overall autopsy rates have declined significantly in recent decades including specialized services such as neonatal medicine and cardiac care. However, rates of post-mortem exams at HSCT centers have not been specifically documented. We reviewed hospital records between 1992 and 2002 to determine overall autopsy rates at our hospital and within the HSCT program. Although the overall autopsy rate declined steadily from 24% in 1992 to 9% in 2002, rates of post-mortem exams in the HSCT program remained relatively stable at 32% (24–46%). Autopsy rates were not significantly different for recipients of allogeneic vs autologous transplants and no clear difference was observed for the proportion of autopsies requested on weekdays compared with weekends. Autopsies confirmed major clinical diagnoses and/or suspected causes of death in 45 of 61 autopsies (74%) and yielded major or minor disagreements in clinical diagnosis in 10 cases (16%) and seven cases (11%), respectively. The preservation of high rates of autopsy within our HSCT program demonstrates that specialized programs are able to maintain elevated rates of post-mortem examinations despite overall declining rates.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sinard JH . Factors affecting autopsy rates, autopsy request rates, and autopsy findings at a large academic medical center. Exp Mol Pathol 2001; 70: 333–343.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Brodlie M, Laing IA, Keeling JW, McKenzie KJ . Ten years of neonatal autopsies in a tertiary referral centre: retrospective study. BMJ 2002; 324: 761–763.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Burton EC, Troxclair DA, Newman III WP . Autopsy diagnoses of malignant neoplasms: how often are clinical diagnoses incorrect? JAMA 1998; 280: 1245–1248.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Thiele J, Varus E, Wickenhauser C et al. Regeneration of heart muscle tissue: quantification of chimeric cardiomyocytes and endothelial cells following transplantation. Histol Histopathol 2004; 19: 201–209.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Weimann JM, Charlton CA, Brazelton TR et al. Contribution of transplanted bone marrow cells to Purkinje neurons in human adult brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003; 100: 2088–2093.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Cogle CR, Yachnis AT, Laywell ED et al. Bone marrow transdifferentiation in brain after transplantation: a retrospective study. Lancet 2004; 363: 1432–1437.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Gunsilius E, Duba H-C, Petzer A et al. Evidence from a leukemia model for maintenance of vascular endothelium by bone-marrow-derived endothelial cells. Lancet 2000; 355: 1688–1691.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Marwick C . Pathologists request autopsy revival. JAMA 1995; 273: 1889–1891.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Akpek G, Chinratanalab W, Lee LA et al. Gastrointestinal involvement in chronic graft-vs-host disease: a clinicopathologic study. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2003; 9: 46–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. de Medeiros BC, de Medeiros CR, Werner B et al. Central nervous system infections following bone marrow transplantation: an autopsy report of 27 cases. J Hematother Stem Cells 2000; 9: 535–540.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bleggi-Torres LF, Werner B, Gasparetto EL et al. Intracranial hemorrhage following bone marrow transplantation: an autopsy study of 58 patients. Bone Marrow Transplant 2002; 29: 29–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bleggi-Torres LF, de Medeiros BC, Werner B et al. Neuropathological findings after bone marrow transplantation: an autopsy study of 180 cases. Bone Marrow Transplant 2000; 25: 310–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wojno KJ, Vogelsang GB, Beschorner WE et al. Pulmonary hemorrhage as a cause of death in allogeneic bone marrow recipients with severe acute graft-vs-host disease. Transplantation 1994; 57: 88–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. McKelvie PA, Rode J . Autopsy rate and a clinicopathological audit in an Australian metropolitan hospital – cause for concern? Med J Aust 1992; 156: 456–462.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bauer FW, Robbins SL . An autopsy study of cancer patients, I: accuracy of the clinical diagnoses (1955 to 1965) Boston City Hospital. JAMA 1972; 221: 1471–1474.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Wells HG . Relation of clinical to necropsy diagnosis in cancer and value of existing cancer statistics. JAMA 1923; 80: 737–740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chariot P, Witt K, Pautot V et al. Declining autopsy rate in a French hospital: physician's attitude to the autopsy and use of autopsy material in research publications. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2000; 124: 739–745.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Clayton SA, Sivak SL . Improving the autopsy rate at a university hospital. Am J Med 1992; 92: 423–428.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Haque AK, Patterson RC, Grafe MR . High autopsy rates at a university medical center. What has gone right? Arch Pathol Lab Med 1996; 120: 727–732.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We wish to acknowledge the assistance of Ms Karine Pelletier and Ms Michèle Joseph for their help in searching hospital databases. David Allan is a recipient of an unrestricted BMT Fellowship Award from Fujisawa Canada Inc.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Hematology, Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital and Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada

    D S Allan, R Bélanger, L Busque, S Cohen, D Fish, D C Roy & J Roy

Authors
  1. D S Allan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. R Bélanger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. L Busque
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. S Cohen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. D Fish
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. D C Roy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. J Roy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J Roy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Allan, D., Bélanger, R., Busque, L. et al. Maintaining high autopsy rates in a Canadian blood and marrow transplant program: preserving a diagnostic and research tool. Bone Marrow Transplant 35, 781–785 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bmt.1704869

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bmt.1704869

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links