Bone marrow transplantation (BMT) has been used to treat patients with leukemia, aplastic anemia, lymphomas, multiple myeloma, immune deficiency disorders and some solid tumors such as breast and ovarian cancers.1, 2 Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) is one of the most common microorganisms complicating transplantation1, 3 and the infection typically occurs between engraftment and day 120 in BMT recipients.4
Seroepidemiological studies have shown that approximately 60% of adults in developed countries and up to 100% of adults in developing countries are positive for antibodies against HCMV.5 BMT recipients negative for anti-HCMV antibody are at risk of primary infection.5 In addition, reactivation of latent HCMV is responsible for significant morbidity and mortality in BMT recipients, and HCMV pneumonia has a high mortality rate in patients who have received an allogeneic marrow transplant. The diagnosis of HCMV disease is complicated because of varying clinical presentations and inherent difficulties in diagnosis. There has been considerable interest in evaluating new methods to detect and identify latent and active HCMV infection in BMT patients, allowing early intervention with treatment.
In spite of the widespread use of PCR-based qualitative and quantitative HCMV detection techniques to detect and monitor antiviral treatment, the pp65 antigen assay (antigenemia) remains a reference method in the diagnosis and monitoring of active cytomegalovirus infection and has been evaluated in several clinical trials.6 However, the assay has several shortcomings, including its limited sensitivity in leukopenic hematopoietic stem cell recipients and the labor-intensive procedures.7, 8, 9 It has been recognized that HCMV DNA can be detected in different leukocyte fractions during active infection, including polymorphonuclear (PMN) leukocytes (a preferred site for virus replication).10, 11 In leukopenic patients, detection of even few molecules of viral DNA in PMN leukocytes may be more appropriate when pre-emptive therapy is predicted.
Similar to nested PCR, the double primer PCR assay has improved sensitivity in addition to specificity of reaction.12 Based on this knowledge, we undertook a cohort study to detect active HCMV infection or disease in BMT patients and also to determine the prognostic value of the PCR assay in this group of patients. The correlation between double primer PCR assay results and clinical features was also investigated. Results were then compared with the antigenemia assay as a quantitative reference method to identify active HCMV infection.
Materials and methods
Patients
Samples were taken from 26 allogeneic related BMT recipients at Namazi Hospital, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran between May 2002 and September 2003: 14 were male and 12 were female subjects; age range 6–42 years, median 19 years. Their underlying hematological diagnoses were leukemia (n=8), thalassemia major (n=14), Hodgkin's lymphoma (n=2) and aplastic anemia (n=2). HCMV serology status of donors (D+ or D-) and recipients (R+ or R-) was determined before transplantation by an ELISA method (G.E.N.E.S.I.S., England).
Surveillance samples were collected at 7–10 days prior to transplantation and then weekly from day 14 to 120 post transplantation. Clinical data were collected and analyzed prospectively by physicians who were blind to the laboratory data. Patients were conditioned according to a standard protocol. Patients with Hodgkin's lymphoma (n=2) received nonmyeloablative regimens, and others received myeloablative regimens. HCMV-related active diseases were defined according to Ljungman et al.13
Specimens
A total of 209 blood samples including peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMN) (n=177), PMN leukocytes (n=177) and plasma (n=209) from 26 BMT recipients were tested by an HCMV double primer PCR assay. Whole blood samples (n=177) were also tested by quantitative antigenemia assay.
Blood cell separation
The whole leukocyte fraction was isolated according to Stephen et al14 with a small modification. EDTA-anticoagulated blood was added to cold 0.84% NH4Cl solution (1:4 v/v). After 10 min incubation at 4°C, the mixture was centrifuged at 3000 g for 7 min. The cell pellets were resuspended in 1 ml of cold 0.84% NH4Cl for 5 min to rupture the remaining erythrocytes. After sedimentation, the leukocyte-enriched pellets were layered on top of 3–5 ml Ficoll–Hypaque density gradient medium (Ficoll, Lymphoprep, Nycomed, Netherlands) and centrifuged at 800 g for 25 min at room temperature. Mononuclear leukocytes were then isolated from the sediment, which contained PMN leukocytes. Cytospin slides were also obtained by centrifugation of 2
105 leukocytes on glass slides at 500 g (Cytospin 3, Shandon, England). The slides were dried at room temperature and fixed in cold acetone for the pp65 antigen detection assay.
All the plasma samples and leukocyte fractions (ie PBMN and PMN) were frozen at -70°C to be used for double primer PCR assay.
HCMV pp65 antigenemia assay
HCMV antigenemia assays were performed according to the manufacturer's instructions. All samples were evaluated for the presence of pp65 antigen using Brite Turbo assay (IQ, Netherlands).
DNA extraction from leukocytes
Frozen 100
l aliquots of white blood cells (WBCs) were thawed and DNA was extracted by the boiling method and sodium acetate–ethanol precipitation. PBMN and granulocytes were heated separately at 95°C for 20 min. The samples were then centrifuged at 14 000 rpm for 10 min. The supernatants were removed and transferred to new tubes. Sodium acetate (3 M, 10
l) and absolute ethanol (300
l) were added to each tube. Tubes were centrifuged at 14 000 rpm for 10 min. The supernatant was removed and 50–100
l of TE buffer (pH 7.8) was added to the pellets.
DNA extraction from plasma
A 100
l portion of the plasma sample was used in the standard phenol–chloroform nucleic acid extraction method.15
PCR amplification
The quality of DNA preparation from all samples was checked by amplification of a 110-bp fragment of the
-globin gene, using PCO3 and PCO4 primers.16 For qualitative HCMV DNA detection, two pairs of oligonucleotide primers specific for the fourth exon of the HCMV immediate early gene (IE) and HCMV late antigen (LA) were used in a multiplex format to generate fragments of 393 and 136 bp, respectively.12 A 5
l portion of extracted DNA was added to 45
l of a PCR mixture. All PCR reaction mixtures contained 120 mM KCl, 24 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.3, 200
M of each deoxynucleoside triphosphate, 2 mM MgCl2, 25 pmol of each primer and 2 U of Taq DNA polymerase in a final volume of 50
l. Thermocycling conditions were set up to an initial step or denaturation step (at 94°C for 3 min), followed by 35 cycles (at 94, 57 and 72°C), of which each lasted 1 min, the third with a 5-min extension at 72°C. The same process was repeated for amplification of the
-globin sequence. Subsequently, 10
l of each amplified product was analyzed by conventional gel electrophoresis followed by ethidium bromide staining (10
g/ml). Samples were retested in the event of positive results.
Each PCR processing procedure was performed in a physically separate room to prevent contamination. Negative controls were used to ensure that carryover contamination would not occur.
Determination of PCR sensitivity
DNA extracted from 10-fold serial dilution of plasmid DNA with 1 pg/
l concentration (supplied by Cinna Gennic, Tehran, Iran) was added to plasma or leukocyte samples (negative for HCMV DNA) to be used as a template for the PCR reaction. Conventional gel electrophoresis and ethidium bromide staining were then used to analyze the PCR amplification products.
Determination of PCR specificity
PCR specificity was determined using DNA extracted from the herpesvirus group including HSV-1, HSV-2, VZV, EBV and HHV-6 and from uninfected Vero and Hep-II cell lines.
Statistical analysis
Using SPSS software version 11.5,
2, two-tailed Fisher's exact test, bivariate and normal correlation methods were performed to analyze data and determination of any correlation between the presence of HCMV DNA in clinical samples and appearance of HCMV-associated signs and symptoms in patients.
Results
Determining the sensitivity and specificity of PCR
The PCR detection limit, which was evaluated by gel electrophoresis and ethidium bromide staining, was 500 copies of HCMV DNA per ml of specimen. The PCR specificity was determined using DNA extracted from a herpesvirus group other than HCMV. No amplification was noted by gel electrophoresis analysis.
HCMV antibody status
HCMV antibody was positive in 23 (88%) out of 26 donors and in 24 (92.3%) out of 26 BMT recipients. Overall, the pattern of HCMV antibody in both BMT donors and recipients was R-/D+=2, R+/D-=3, R+/D+=21 and R-/D-=0.
Monitoring of HCMV infection in BMT recipients by double primer PCR assay and by antigenemia
The double primer PCR assay was applied to 563 clinical samples of leukocytes and plasma. HCMV DNA was detected in 112 (19.9%) out of 563 samples. Of the 112 positive samples for HCMV DNA, five (4.5%) samples were only positive for the LA fragment, eight (7.1%) samples were only positive for the IE fragment and 99 (88.4%) samples were positive for both IE and LA fragments. Double primer PCR assay increased the number of positive samples by an average of 11.6%. An increase in the number of leukocytes (mean leukocyte number 4.7
103/
l) also increased the likelihood of detection of both IE and LA fragments in samples. The mean leukocyte number in samples, in which IE or LA fragments were detected, was 0.8
103 and 1.2
103/
l, respectively.
HCMV infection was detected in 16 out of 26 (61.5%) BMT patients during the monitoring period by either double primer PCR or antigenemia assay. Two HCMV-seronegative recipients received bone marrow from HCMV-seropositive donors and both of them developed HCMV disease during the study.
The double primer PCR assay detected HCMV DNA in the plasma of 12 (46.1%), PBMN of nine (34.6%) and PMN leukocytes of 14 (53.8%) patients out of the 26 BMT patients. In six (42.8%) of the 14 patients with positive PMN leukocytes, HCMV DNA was detected in their plasma samples 7–10 days before detection of DNA in PMN leukocytes. Meanwhile, the antigenemia assay was also positive (ie >4 granulocyte/2
105 leukocytes) in 14 (53.8%) out of the 26 patients. In the 14 patients with HCMV disease, no other microbiological findings were detected.
The results obtained with the double primer PCR assay were compared with the antigenemia assay results, and a significant association between results of the double primer PCR assay of PMN leukocytes and antigenemia for detection of active HCMV infection in all of the patients was found (r=1).
A diagnosis of symptomatic active HCMV infection was made12 in 14 out of 26 patients (53.8%). Of the 14 HCMV antigenemia and PMN leukocyte double primer PCR assay positive patients, 10 developed active disease including fever with leukopenia and pneumonia, and the remainder showed signs and symptoms including fever, gastritis, leukopenia and skin rash without respiratory symptoms. The clinical signs and symptoms of this group of patients are presented in Table 1. Significant association between a positive antigenemia assay and positive PMN leukocyte double primer PCR assay with development of pneumonia was identified (P=0.05). In one asymptomatic patient, HCMV DNA was detected in both plasma and PBMN leukocytes. However, HCMV infection was determined neither by the PMN leukocyte double primer PCR assay nor by the antigenemia assay.
Table 1 - Results of HCMV double primer PCR and antigenemia assays and their relation to clinical findings in bone marrow transplant patients.
Since physicians were blind to the laboratory data, in the case of HCMV disease, ganciclovir therapy was instituted on clinical grounds. In all patients treated with ganciclovir, the double primer PCR assay of PMN leukocytes and antigenemia assay became negative 10–14 days from the end of therapy. However, in some cases, HCMV DNA persisted in plasma even up to 30 days from the end of ganciclovir therapy. Only one (7.14%) of 14 HCMV symptomatic patient expired at day 90 post transplantation.
Discussion
Because seroprevalence of HCMV is very high (85–98%) and the primary infection is uncommon in BMT recipients, antiviral therapy is usually based on the clinical picture and laboratory diagnosis. Successful pre-emptive HCMV therapy in BMT patients depends on availability of a sensitive, specific and appropriate diagnostic test for detection of active HCMV infection. The antigenemia assay is an indicator of an active HCMV infection, but its use is limited to blood samples, which contain PMN leukocytes. This test should be performed within a 4-h period.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of a double primer PCR assay of plasma and leukocytes in BMT recipients and compare the PCR assay with the antigenemia assay and with the clinical situation.
We demonstrated that there is a positive direct correlation between positive HCMV antigenemia and HCMV DNA detection in PMN leukocytes by the PCR assay. Similar results have been already reported using real-time PCR.9, 17, 18
In this study, the PCR assay was easily capable of detecting 500 HCMV genomes/ml of clinical samples without nested PCR or hybridization assays. The sensitivity of multiplex PCR assays for detection of HCMV DNA in clinical samples of renal transplant recipients has already been described.12 It has been shown that the method is highly sensitive for identification of patients at risk of clinically significant infection by HCMV.
The overall incidence of HCMV viremia in this study was high: 61.5% of patients demonstrated at least one positive test sample. A possible explanation for this high rate is that positive results might be increased by using a double primer PCR assay. We have demonstrated that use of a double primer assay increases the number of positive samples by an average of 11.6% compared with using a monoprimer PCR assay. Similar results have been reported11 using the multiplex HCMV PCR assay for detection of active HCMV disease in renal transplant patients.11 We confirmed that an increase in the total number of leukocytes will increase simultaneous detection of IE and LA fragments in samples. In three samples from the 14 patients with HCMV disease, IE fragments, and in two other samples, LA fragments were solely detected. In the remaining samples, both IE and LA fragments were detected concurrently. There have been many studies evaluating the clinical utility of a PCR-based assay for detection of HCMV DNA.19, 20, 21 Many of these investigations have shown that the assay may be sensitive but has not enough clinical specificity to detect HCMV in patients who do not have active HCMV disease. However, we demonstrated a significant association between double primer PCR assay results of PMN leukocytes and antigenemia results in relation to clinical status of BMT patients. Furthermore, whenever the double primer PCR assay of PMN leukocytes is positive, development of active HCMV disease is very likely.
In our study, there was an asymptomatic patient with HCMV infection in whom HCMV DNA was detected in both his plasma and PBMN leukocytes. However, HCMV infection was diagnosed neither by the PMN leukocyte double primer PCR assay nor by the antigenemia assay. Our findings confirm that viral DNA detection in PMN leukocytes is associated with active HCMV infection. In this study, 14 out of 26 BMT recipients developed active HCMV infection, but the clinical features of HCMV disease were different in this group of patients. Of the symptomatic patients, 10 patients had HCMV pneumonia and the rest had other signs and symptoms such as fever, gastritis, leukopenia and skin rash without respiratory manifestations.
The data in this study have shown the simultaneous presence of HCMV DNA in more than 75% of plasma samples and leukocytes of BMT patients. The data also indicate that molecular detection of active HCMV infection is more sensitive when a double primer PCR assay is applied to PMNL rather than to plasma samples. Compared with the antigenemia assay, the relative sensitivities of the PCR assay with PMN leukocytes and plasma were 100 and 87.5%, respectively. The specificities of the PCR assay with PMN leukocytes and with plasma samples were 100 and 85.7%, respectively.
In leukopenic BMT recipients, plasma samples would be a good mechanism for monitoring HCMV activity. Because plasma PCR is usually positive in more than 42% of patients a few days before detection of HCMV DNA in PMN leukocytes, monitoring of HCMV activity by plasma PCR might lead to earlier prescribing of an antiviral drug and a reduction in mortality.
In conclusion, our results suggest that detection of HCMV DNA in PMN leukocytes of BMT patients by a double primer PCR assay might be an alternative method to an antigenemia assay. Serial blood samples positive with a double primer PCR assay or antigenemia assay are an indication for pre-emptive therapy in this group of patients. The double primer PCR assay indicates an active HCMV infection compared with antigenemia assay and the need to start antiviral therapy. However, quantitative PCR methods are necessary for monitoring antiviral treatment.
References
| 1. | Ochs L, Ou Shu X & Miller J et al. Late infections after allogeneic bone marrow transplant: comparison of incidence in related and unrelated donor transplant recipients. Blood 1995; 86: 3979−3986. | PubMed | ChemPort | |
| 2. | Maltezou HC, Kafetzis DA & Abisaid D et al. Viral infections in children undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplant. J Pediatr Infect Dis 2000; 19: 307−312. | Article | ChemPort | |
| 3. | Pass RF. Cytomegalovirus. In: Knipp DM, Howley PM (eds)Fields Virology 4th edn Lippincott-Williams & Wilkins 2001; pp 2675−2706. |
| 4. | Van Der Bij W, Schirm J & Torensma R et al. Comparison between viremia and antigenemia for detection of cytomegalovirus in blood. J Clin Micorbiol 1998; 26: 2531−2535. |
| 5. | Cope AV, Sweny P & Sabin C et al. Quantity of cytomegalovirus viruria is a major risk factor for cytomegalovirus disease after renal transplantation. J Med Virol 1997; 52: 200−205. | Article | PubMed | ChemPort | |
| 6. | Van Den Berg AP, Klompmaker IJ & Haagsma EB et al. Antigenemia in the diagnosis and monitoring of active cytomegalovirus infection after liver transplantation. J Infect Dis 1991; 164: 265−270. | PubMed | ChemPort | |
| 7. | Boeckh M, Hawkins G & Myerson D et al. Plasma PCR for cytomegalovirus DNA after allogeneic marrow transplantation: comparison with PCR using peripheral blood leukocytes, pp65 antigenemia, and viral culture. Transplantation 1997; 64: 108−113. | Article | PubMed | ChemPort | |
| 8. | Visser CE, Van zeijl CJG & De klerk EPA et al. First experiences with an accelerated CMV antigenemia test: CMV Brite Turbo assay. J Clin Virol 2000; 17: 65−68. | Article | PubMed | ChemPort | |
| 9. | Marianne L-V, Marie O & Richard D et al. Monitoring cytomegalovirus infection in adult and pediatric bone marrow transplant recipients by a real-time PCR assay performed with blood plasma marianne. J Clin Microbiol 2003; 41: 2040−2046. | Article | PubMed | ChemPort | |
| 10. | Erice A, Holm MA & Gill PC et al. Cytomegalovirus (CMV) antigenemia assay is more sensitive than shell vial cultures for rapid detection of CMV in polymorphonuclear blood leukocytes. J Clin Microbiol 1992; 30: 2822−2825. | PubMed | ChemPort | |
| 11. | Van der Bij W, Torensma R & Van son WJ et al. Rapid immunodiagnosis of active cytomegalovirus infection by monoclonal antibody staining of blood leucocytes. J Med Virol 1988; 25: 179−188. | PubMed | ChemPort | |
| 12. | Caballero OL, Menezes CL & Costa MC et al. Highly sensitive single-step PCR protocol for diagnosis and monitoring of human cytomegalovirus infection in renal transplant recipients. J Clin Microbiol 1997; 35: 3192−3197. | PubMed | ChemPort | |
| 13. | Ljungman P, Griffiths P & Paya C. Definitions of cytomegalovirus infection and disease in transplant recipients. Clin Infect Dis 2002; 34: 1094−1097. | Article | PubMed | |
| 14. | Stephen KN, Ho Chi-Yuen Lo & Ignatius KPC et al. Rapid cytomegalovirus pp65 antigenemia assay by direct erythrocyte lysis and immunofluorescence staining. J Clin Microbiol 1998; 36: 638−640. | PubMed | |
| 15. | Sambrook JK, Russell DW & Irwin N et al.Molecular Cloning. A Laboratory Manual Vol3 3rd edn Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press: New York 2001; p: A1.23. |
| 16. | Saiki RK, Gelfand DH & Stoffel S et al. Primer-directed enzymatic amplification of DNA with a thermostable DNA polymerase. Science 1988; 239: 487−491. | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort | |
| 17. | Yakushiji K, Gondo H & Kamezaki K et al. Monitoring of cytomegalovirus reactivation after allogeneic stem cell transplantation: comparison of an antigenemia assay and quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. Bone Marrow Transplant 2002; 29: 599−606. | Article | PubMed | ChemPort | |
| 18. | Yun Z, Lewensohn FI & Ljungman P et al. Real time monitoring of cytomegalovirus infections after stem cell transplantation using TaqMan polymerase chain reaction assays. Transplantation 2000; 27: 1733−1736. | Article | |
| 19. | Abecassis MM, Koffron AJ & Kaplan B et al. The role of PCR in the diagnosis and management of CMV in solid organ recipients. Transplantation 1997; 63: 275−279. | Article | PubMed | ChemPort | |
| 20. | Tanabe K, Tokumoto T & Ishikawa N et al. Comparative study of cytomegalovirus (CMV) antigenemia assay, polymerase chain reaction, serology, and shell vial assay in the early diagnosis and monitoring of CMV infection after renal transplantation. Transplantation 1997; 27: 1721−1725. | Article | |
| 21. | Roberts TC, Brennan DC & Buller RS et al. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction to predict occurrence of symptomatic cytomegalovirus infection and assess response to ganciclovir therapy in renal transplant recipients. J Infect Dis 1998; 178: 626−635. | PubMed | ChemPort | |
Acknowledgements
This project was financially supported by Tarbiat Moddares University, Tehran Iran and Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS
These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated
REVIEWS
CMV infections after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
Bone Marrow Transplantation Review
RESEARCH
Bone Marrow Transplantation Original Article
Bone Marrow Transplantation Original Article
Bone Marrow Transplantation Original Article
Bone Marrow Transplantation Original Article

