Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Engraftment

Reassessing the definition of myeloid engraftment after autotransplantation: it is not necessary to see 0.5 × 109/l neutrophils on 3 consecutive days to define myeloid recovery

Abstract

The time to myeloid recovery after autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is usually defined as the first of 3 consecutive days with an absolute neutrophil count (ANC) of 0.5 × 109/l (ANC500). Universal documentation of ANC500 for 3 consecutive days, historically required to ensure robust myeloid recovery, has become difficult with a trend towards early discharge and outpatient HSCT. We studied 90 autografted patients to see how frequently ANC declined after having reached 0.5 × 109/l. ANC500 was documented on 2 and 3 consecutive days in 14 and 63 patients, respectively. ANC increased by a median of 213% from the 1st to the 2nd day (rise in 75 and unchanged in two), and by a median of 142% from the 2nd day to the 3rd (rise in 60, unchanged in one, and decline in two; higher than the 1st day in the latter three). The increase from the 1st to the 3rd day was 13–3433% (median, 557%). Thus, in all 63 patients, no decline below ANC500 was seen, and the first day with ANC500 was also the first of 3 consecutive days with ANC500. The remaining 13 patients had repeat counts 2–7 days after the 1st day with ANC500 documenting further increase in ANC with no evidence of failed engraftment. These data show that the first day with ANC500 is also consistently the first of 3 consecutive days with ANC500 in autografted patients. Therefore, the traditional definition of myeloid engraftment should be changed to consider the first day with ANC500 as the day of engraftment without necessarily documenting ANC500 on the subsequent 1–2 days. This simple change in definition has significant implications for how data are reported to transplant registries and how peer-review organizations such as the Foundation for the Accreditation of Hematopoietic Cell Therapy (FAHCT) define completeness of data.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dreger P, Klöss M, Petersen B et al. Autologous progenitor cell transplantation: prior exposure to stem cell-toxic drugs determines yield and engraftment of peripheral blood progenitor cell but not of bone marrow grafts Blood 1995 86: 3970 3978

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Schmitz N, Linch DC, Dreger P et al. Randomised trial of filgrastim-mobilised peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation versus autologous bone-marrow transplantation in lymphoma patients (erratum: Lancet 1996; 347: 914) Lancet 1996 347: 353 357

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Davies SM, Kollman C, Anasetti C et al. Engraftment and survival after unrelated-donor bone marrow transplantation: a report from the national marrow donor program Blood 2000 96: 4096 4102

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bensinger WI, Martin PJ, Storer B et al. Transplantation of bone marrow as compared with peripheral-blood cells from HLA-identical relatives in patients with hematologic cancers New Engl J Med 2001 344: 175 181

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Laughlin MJ, Barker J, Bambach B et al. Hematopoietic engraftment and survival in adult recipients of umbilical-cord blood from unrelated donors New Engl J Med 2001 344: 1815 1822

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Spitzer G, Verma DS, Fisher R et al. The myeloid progenitor cell – its value in predicting hematopoietic recovery after autologous bone marrow transplantation Blood 1980 55: 317 323

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Graham-Pole J, Gee A, Emerson S et al. Myeloablative chemoradiotherapy and autologous bone marrow infusions for treatment of neuroblastoma: factors influencing engraftment Blood 1991 78: 1607 1614

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Weaver CH, Hazelton B, Birch R et al. An analysis of engraftment kinetics as a function of the CD34 content of peripheral blood progenitor cell collections in 692 patients after the administration of myeloablative chemotherapy Blood 1995 86: 3961 3969

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bensinger W, Appelbaum F, Rowley S et al. Factors that influence collection and engraftment of autologous peripheral-blood stem cells J Clin Oncol 1995 13: 2547 2555

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Freedman A, Neuberg D, Mauch P et al. Cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone dose intensification with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor markedly depletes stem cell reserve for autologous bone marrow transplantation Blood 1997 90: 4996 5001

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lee SJ, Weller E, Alyea EP et al. Efficacy and costs of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in allogeneic T-cell depleted bone marrow transplantation Blood 1998 92: 2725 2729

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Stiff P, Chen B, Franklin W et al. Autologous transplantation of ex vivo expanded bone marrow cells grown from small aliquots after high-dose chemotherapy for breast cancer Blood 2000 95: 2169 2174

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Dercksen MW, Rodenhuis S, Dirkson MK et al. Subsets of CD34+ cells and rapid hematopoietic recovery after peripheral-blood stem-cell transplantation J Clin Oncol 1995 13: 1922 1932

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Powles R, Mehta J, Kulkarni S et al. Allogeneic blood and bone-marrow stem-cell transplantation in haematological malignant diseases: a randomised trial Lancet 2000 355: 1231 1237

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Bensinger WI, Martin PJ, Storer B et al. Transplantation of bone marrow as compared with peripheral-blood cells from HLA-identical relatives in patients with hematologic cancers New Engl J Med 2001 344: 175 181

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by the Auxiliary Board of the Northwestern Memorial Hospital.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ali, M., Oyama, Y., Monreal, J. et al. Reassessing the definition of myeloid engraftment after autotransplantation: it is not necessary to see 0.5 × 109/l neutrophils on 3 consecutive days to define myeloid recovery. Bone Marrow Transplant 30, 749–752 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bmt.1703741

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bmt.1703741

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links