Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

CD34+ Cell Selection

CD34+ selection of autologous peripheral blood stem cells for transplantation following sequential cycles of high-dose therapy and mobilisation in multiple myeloma

Abstract

A potential problem of autologous transplantation in the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) is the infusion of tumor cells. CD34+ selection has been used to purge autografts in MM and it is also possible to reduce tumour cell contamination of autografts by cytotoxic drug therapy prior to peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) collection. To evaluate the effectiveness of a protocol combining multiple cycles of high-dose therapy and CD34+ selection to reduce tumour contamination of PBSC autografts, 34 MM patients were entered on a treatment schedule comprising two sequential cycles of mobilisation, CD34+ selection, and transplantation following high-dose therapy. In the second cycle of mobilisation there was a five-fold reduction in tumour contamination of the stem cell harvest (0.5 × 106/kg) compared with the first cycle (2.5 × 106/kg). In the 97 CD34+ selection procedures performed a median of 185 × 108 mononuclear cells (MNC) were processed yielding a median of 0.98 × 108 CD34+-enriched cells. CD34+ cells were enriched 68-fold from 1.3% to 88.6%. The median yield of CD34+ cells was 42.2%. Following CD34+ selection the tumour cell contamination of the leukapheresis product was reduced by a median of 2.7 logs. This study demonstrates that in multiple myeloma a significant reduction in the malignant contamination of stem cell autografts can be achieved by combining the in vivo purging effect of cytotoxic therapy with in vitro purging by CD34+ selection. Bone Marrow Transplantation (2000) 25, 1175–1184.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Vesole DH, Jagannath S, Glenn L, Barlogie B . Autotransplantation in multiple myeloma Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 1993 7: 613–630

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Fermand JP, Chevret S, Levy Y et al. The role of autologous blood stem cells in support of high-dose therapy for multiple myeloma Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 1992 6: 451–462

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Boccadoro M, Pileri A . Diagnosis, prognosis, and standard treatment of multiple myeloma Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 1997 11: 111–131

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gianni AM, Tarella C, Bregni M et al. High-dose sequential chemoradiotherapy, a widely applicable regimen, confers survival benefit to patients with high-risk multiple myeloma J Clin Oncol 1994 12: 503–509

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Brenner MK, Rill DR, Krance RA et al. Gene-marking to trace origin of relapse after autologous bone-marrow transplantation Lancet 1993 341: 85–86

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Moss TJ, Cairo M, Santana VM et al. Clonogenic circulating BM cells: implications regarding peripheral stem cell transplantation Blood 1994 83: 3085–3089

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bergsagel PL, Masellis-Smith A, Szczepek A et al. In multiple myeloma, clonotypic B lymphocyes are detectable among CD19+ peripheral blood cells expressing CD38, CD56, and monotypic Ig light chain Blood 1995 85: 436–447

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Pilarski LM, Massellis-Smith A, Szczepek A et al. Circulating clonotypic B cells in the biology of multiple myeloma: speculations on the origin of myeloma Leuk Lymphoma 1996 22: 375–383

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Henry JM, Sykes PJ, Brisco MJ et al. Comparison of myeloma cell contamination of bone marrow and peripheral blood stem cell harvests Br J Haematol 1996 92: 614–619

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Brown R, Luo X, Gibson J et al. Idiotypic oligonucleotide probes to detect myeloma cells by mRNA in situ hybridization Br J Haematol 1995 90: 113–118

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Billadeau D, Ahmann G, Greipp PR, Van Ness B . The bone marrow of multiple myeloma patients contains B cell populations at different stages of differentiation that are clonally related to the malignant plasma cell J Exp Med 1993 178: 1023–1031

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Gribben JG, Saporito I, Barber M et al. Bone marrows of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients with a bcl-2 translocation can be purged of polymerase chain reaction-detectable lymphoma cells using monoclonal antibodies and immunomagnetic bead depletion Blood 1992 80: 1083–1089

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Omede P, Tarella C, Palumbo A et al. Multiple myeloma: reduced plasma cell contamination in peripheral blood progenitor cell collections performed after repeated high-dose chemotherapy courses Br J Haematol 1997 99: 685–691

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Champlin R . Purging: the separation of normal from malignant cells for autologous transplantation Transfusion 1996 36: 910–918

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Schiller G, Vescio R, Freytes C et al. Transplantation of CD34+ peripheral blood progenitor cells after high-dose chemotherapy for patients with advanced multiple myeloma Blood 1995 86: 390–397

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Chopra R, Goldstone AH, McMillan AK et al. Double autologous bone marrow transplantation of acute leukaemia and lymphoma: forty cases Proc 5th International Symp of Autologous BMT, 1991

  17. Jagannath S, Vesole DH, Glenn L et al. Low risk intensive therapy for multiple myeloma with combined autologous bone marrow and blood stem cell support Blood 1992 80: 1666–1672

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Broun ER, Traycoff C, Graves V et al. A comparison of engraftment following high dose chemotherapy with autologous bone marrow transplantation with either full bone marrow or CD34+ cells isolated with the Baxter Isolex 300 Exp Hematol 1994 22: 775 (Abstr.)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bensinger WI . Should we purge? Bone Marrow Transplant 1998 21: 113–115

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Paulus U, Schmitz N, Viehman K et al. Combined positive/negative selection for highly effective purging of PBPC grafts: towards clinical application in patients with B-CLL Bone Marrow Transplant 1997 20: 415–420

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Anderson KC, Andersen J, Soiffer R et al. Monoclonal antibody-purged bone marrow transplantation therapy for multiple myeloma Blood 1993 82: 2568–2576

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Gobbi M, Cavo M, Tazzari PL et al. Autologous bone marrow transplantation with immunotoxin-purged marrow for advanced multiple myeloma Eur J Haematol 1989 51: 176–181

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Vescio RA, Schiller G, Stewart AK et al. Multicenter phase III trial to evaluate CD34+ selected versus unselected autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation in multiple myeloma Blood 1999 93: 1858–1868

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. McNiece I, Briddell R, Stoney G et al. Large-scale isolation of CD34+ cells using the Amgen cell selection device results in high levels of purity and recovery J Hematother 1997 6: 5–11

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Cremer FW, Kiel K, Sucker C et al. A rationale for positive selection of peripheral blood stem cells in multiple myeloma: highly purified CD34+ cell fractions of leukapheresis products do not contain malignant cells Leukemia 1997 11: (Suppl. 5) S41

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Vescio R, Hong C, Cao J et al. The hematopoietic stem cell antigen, CD34, is not expressed on the malignant cells in multiple myeloma Blood 1994 84: 3283–3290

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Szczepek AJ, Bergsagel PL, Axelsson L et al. CD34+ cells in the blood of patients with multiple myeloma express CD19 IgH mRNA and have patient-specific IgH VDJ gene rearrangements Blood 1997 89: 1824–1833

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Gazitt Y, Reading C, Hoffman R et al. Purified CD34+LinThy+ stem cells do not contain clonal myeloma cells Blood 1995 86: 381–389

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Tricot G, Gazitt Y, Leemhuis T et al. Collection, tumor contamination, and engraftment kinetics of highly purified hematopoietic progenitor cells to support high dose therapy in multiple myeloma Blood 1998 91: 4489–4495

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Van Riet I, Juge-Morineau N, Schots R et al. Persistence of residual tumour cells after cytokine-mediated ex vivo expansion of mobilised CD34+ blood cell in multiple myeloma Br J Haematol 1997 96: 403–411

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Rowley S, Loken M, Radich J et al. Isolation of CD34+ cells from blood stem cell components using the Baxter Isolex system Bone Marrow Transplant 1998 21: 1253–1262

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Beguin Y, Baudoux E, Sautois B et al. Hematopoietic recovery in cancer patients after transplantation of autologous peripheral blood CD34+ cells or unmanipulated peripheral blood stem and progenitor cells Transfusion 1998 38: 199–208

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Koc ON, Gerson SL, Phillips GL et al. Autologous CD34+ cell transplantation for patients with advanced lymphoma: effects of overnight storage on peripheral blood progenitor cell enrichment and engraftment Bone Marrow Transplant 1998 21: 333–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Durie BGM, Salmon SS . Staging, kinetics, and flow cytometry of multiple myeloma. In: Wiernik P, Canellos G, Kyle R, Schiffer C (eds) Neoplastic Diseases of the Blood Churchill Livingston: New York 1985 p 513

    Google Scholar 

  35. To LB, Haylock DN, Thorp DL et al. The optimisation of collection of peripheral blood stem cells for autotransplantation in acute myeloid leukaemia Bone Marrow Transplant 1989 4: 41–47

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. To LB, Haylock DN, Dowse T et al. A comparative study of the phenotype and proliferative capacity of peripheral blood CD34+ cells mobilised by 4 different protocols and those of steady phase peripheral blood and bone marrow CD34+ cells Blood 1994 84: 2930–2939

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Horvath N, Hahn U, Gibson J et al. Double high dose therapy and CD34+-selected blood progenitor rescue for the treatment of multiple myeloma (submitted)

  38. Gorin NC . Cryopreservation and storage of stem cells. In: Areman EM, Deeg HJ, Sacher RA (eds) Bone Marrow and Stem Cell Processing: A Manual of Current Techniques FA Davis Co: Philadelphia 1992 292–308

    Google Scholar 

  39. Dyson PG, Haylock DN, To LB . Cryopreservation of peripheral stem cells following processing. In: Areman EM, Deeg HJ, Sacher RA (eds) Bone Marrow and Stem Cell Processing: A Manual of Current Techniques FA Davis Co: Philadelphia 1992 352–354

    Google Scholar 

  40. McSweeney PA, Wells DA, Schults KE et al. Tumor-specific aneuploidy not detected in CD19+ B-lymphoid cells from myeloma patients in a multidimensional flow cytometric analysis Blood 1996 88: 622–632

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Harada H, Kawano MM, Huang N et al. A phenotypic difference of normal plasma cells from mature myeloma cells Blood 1993 81: 2658–2663

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Warburton P, Johsua DE, Ioannidis R et al. Characterisation of a t(14;18) germinal centre cell line. Abstracts Annual Scientific Meeting, Australian Society of Haematology, 60, 1990

  43. Szczepek A, Seeberger K, Wizniak J et al. A high frequency of circulating B cells share clonotypic Ig heavy-chain VDJ rearrangements with autologous bone marrow plasma cells in multiple myeloma as measured by single-cell and in situ reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction Blood 1998 92: 2844–2855

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Pope B, Brown R, Gibson J, Joshua D . Plasma cells in peripheral blood stem cell harvests from patients with multiple myeloma are predominantly polyclonal Bone Marrow Transplant 1997 20: 205–210

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We wish to acknowledge the expert assistance of Dr T Prasad in the examination of bone marrow smears and the technical assistance of B McClure, T Rawling and J Stevens in the performance of CD34+ selection procedures. The authors wish to thank Nexell Therapeutics Inc. (Irvine, CA, USA) for the provision of the Nexell Isolex 300SA and 300i Cell Selection Systems, reagents and disposables, and for an unrestricted research grant. The authors also wish to thank Schering-Plough (Australia) for the provision of GM-CSF and for support for data management.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dyson, P., Horvath, N., Joshua, D. et al. CD34+ selection of autologous peripheral blood stem cells for transplantation following sequential cycles of high-dose therapy and mobilisation in multiple myeloma. Bone Marrow Transplant 25, 1175–1184 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bmt.1702408

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bmt.1702408

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links