7TM Receptors

Subject Category: 7TM Receptors

Citation Information:
We recommend that any citations to information in the Guide are presented in the following format:

Alexander SPH, Mathie A, Peters JA (2008). Guide to Receptors and Channels (GRAC), 3rd edn. Br J Pharmacol153 (Suppl. 2): S1–S209.

Calcitonin, amylin, CGRP and adrenomedullin

S P H Alexander, A Mathie and J A Peters

Overview: Calcitonin (CT), amylin (AMY), calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and adrenomedullin (AM) receptors (nomenclature as agreed by NC-IUPHAR Subcommittee on CGRPs, AM, AMY, and CT receptors, see Poyner et al., 2002) are generated by the genes CALCR (which codes for the CT receptor) and CALCRL (which codes for the calcitonin receptor-like receptor, CL receptor, previously known as CRLR), whose function and pharmacology are altered in the presence of RAMPs (receptor activity-modifying protein). RAMPs are single TM domain proteins of ca. 130 amino acid, identified as a family of three members; RAMP1 (ENSG00000132329), RAMP2 (ENSG00000131477) and RAMP3 (ENSG00000122679). There are splice variants of the CT receptor; these in turn produce variants of the AMY receptor (see Poyner et al., 2002) The endogenous agonists are the peptides CT, alphaCGRP (also known as CGRP-I), betaCGRP (also known as CGRP-II), AMY (also known as islet-amyloid polypeptide, diabetes-associated polypeptide) and AM. There are species differences in peptide sequences, particularly for the CTs. AM2/Intermedin (AM2/IMD) can also activate CGRP1, AM1, AM2 and AMY1 receptors, albeit less potently than the cognate agonists (Ogoshi et al., 2003; Roh et al., 2004; Hay et al., 2005). CT receptor-stimulating peptide (CRSP) is another member of the family with selectivity for the CT receptor; it has not been found in humans (Katafuchi et al., 2003). BIBN4096BS is the most selective antagonist available, having a high selectivity for CGRP1 receptors, with a particular preference for those of primate origin. CGRP-(8–37) acts as an antagonist of CGRP (pKi 6.5–8.0) and inhibits some AM and AMY responses (7.0). It is inactive at CT receptors. Salmon calcitonin-(8–32) is an antagonist at both amylin and CT receptors. AC187, a salmon CT analogue, is also an antagonist at amylin and CT receptors. Human AM-(22–52) has some selectivity towards AM receptors, but with modest potency, limiting its use.


The agonists described represent the best available but their selectivity is limited. AM has appreciable affinity for CGRP receptors and some of its effects can be antagonised by CGRP-(8–37). CGRP can show significant cross-reactivity at amylin receptors and some AM receptors. Responsiveness to human CT can be affected by splice variation (at the rat C1b receptor it is very weak, Houssami et al., 1994). Particularly for AMY receptors, relative potency can vary with the type and level of RAMP present and can be influenced by other factors such as G-proteins (Tilakaratne et al., 2000).

Gs is a prominent route for effector coupling but other pathways (e.g. Ca2+ and nitric oxide) and G-proteins can be activated. The coupling can be affected by splice variants of the CT receptor (e.g. the 490 amino-acid form of the human receptor, CT(b), does not cause an increase in intracellular Ca2+ and might have low efficacy in generating cAMP).

There is evidence that CGRP-RCP (a 148 amino-acid hydrophilic protein, ENSG00000126522) is important for the coupling of the CL receptor to adenylyl cyclase (Evans et al., 2000). When co-expressed with RAMP2, the CL receptor produces an AM receptor (AM1). RAMP3 interacts with the CL receptor to give another receptor that is responsive to AM (AM2, Fraser et al., 1999). There is some evidence that these AM receptors are pharmacologically distinct (Hay et al., 2003). Transfection of hCT(a) with any RAMP can give a receptor with a high affinity for both salmon CT and AMY and varying affinity for different antagonists (Christopoulos et al., 1999; Hay et al., 2005, 2006). hCT(a)—RAMP1 has a high affinity for CGRP, unlike hCT(a)—RAMP3 (Christopoulos et al., 1999; Hay et al., 2005). However, AMY receptor phenotype is RAMP-type- and cell-line-dependent (Tilakaratne et al., 2000).

[125I]-Salmon calcitonin is the most common radioligand for calcitonin receptors but it has high affinity for amylin receptors and is also poorly reversible. [125I]-Tyr0-CGRP is widely used as a radioligand for CGRP receptors.

CGRP1 and CGRP2 subtypes have been proposed on the basis of the action of the agonists [Cys(ACM)2,7]CGRP or [Cys(Et)2,7]CGRP (putative CGRP2-selective agents) and antagonist CGRP-(8–37) (CGRP1-selective, pki 7.0–8.0, Juaneda et al., 2000). CL/RAMP1 represents the CGRP1 subtype previously described in native tissues and cell lines (Aiyar et al., 1996; McLatchie et al., 1998). There is not yet a clear molecular correlate for the CGRP2 receptor, although in some cases it may represent CGRP acting via AM2 or amylin receptors.

Keywords:

calcitonin, amylin, calcitonin gene-related peptide, adrenomedullin, RAMPs, RAMP1, RAMP2, RAMP3, BIBN4096BS, AM-(22–52), [125I]-CT, [125I]-BH-AMY, [125I]-alphaCGRP, [125I]-AM, CGRP-RCP, [125I]-Tyr0-CGRP, [Cys(ACM)2,7]CGRP, [Cys(Et)2,7]CGRP, CGRP-(8–37)

Abbreviations:

AC187, acetyl-[Asn30, Tyr32]salmon CT; AM2/IMD, AM2/intermedin; BIBN409BS, 1-piperidinecarboxamide, N-(2-[{5-amino-1-([4-{4-pyridinyl}-1-piperazinyl]carbonyl)pentyl}amino]-1-[{3,5-dibromo-4-hydroxyphenyl}methyl]-2-oxoethyl)-4-(1,4-dihydro-2-oxo-3[2H]-quinazolinyl); [Cys(ACM)2,7]CGRP, [acetamidomethyl-Cys2,7]CGRP; [Cys(Et)2,7]CGRP, [ethylamide-Cys2,7]CGRP

Top

References

Further Reading

  1. Brain SD, Cox HM (2006). Neuropeptides and their receptors: innovative science providing novel therapeutic targets. Br J Pharmacol 147: S202–S211. | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  2. Brain SD, Grant AD (2004). Vascular actions of calcitonin gene-related peptide and adrenomedullin. Physiol Rev 84: 903–934. | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  3. Durham PL (2004). CGRP receptor antagonists: a new choice for acute treatment of migraine? Curr Opin Investig Drugs 5: 731–735.
  4. Garcia MA, Martin-Santamaria S, de Pascual-Teresa B, Ramos A, Julian M, Martinez A (2006). Adrenomedullin: a new and promising target for drug discovery. Expert Opin Ther Targets 10: 303–317.
  5. Gibbons C, Dackor R, Dunworth W, Fritz-Six K, Caron KM (2007). Receptor activity-modifying proteins: RAMPing up adrenomedullin signaling. Mol Endocrinol 21: 783–796.
  6. Hay DL (2007). What makes a CGRP2 receptor? Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 34: 963–971.
  7. Hay DL, Poyner DR, Sexton PM (2006). GPCR modulation by RAMPs. Pharmacol Ther 109: 173–197. | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  8. Ishimitsu T, Ono H, Minami J, Matsuoka H (2006). Pathophysiologic and therapeutic implications of adrenomedullin in cardiovascular disorders. Pharmacol Ther 111: 909–927. | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  9. Lipton RB, Dodick DW (2004). CGRP antagonists in the acute treatment of migraine. Lancet Neurol 3: 332–33.
  10. Nikitenko LL, Fox SB, Kehoe S, Rees MC, Bicknell R (2006). Adrenomedullin and tumour angiogenesis. Br J Cancer 94: 1–7. | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  11. Poyner DR, Sexton PM, Marshall I, Smith DM, Quirion R, Born W et al. (2002). International union of pharmacology. XXXII. The Mammalian Calcitonin gene-related peptides, Adrenomedullin, Amylin, and Calcitonin receptors. Pharmacol Rev 54: 233–246. | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |

References

  1. Aiyar N et al. (1996). J Biol Chem 271: 11325–11329. | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  2. Christopoulos G et al. (1999). Mol Pharmacol 56: 235–242. | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  3. Doods H et al. (2000). Br J Pharmacol 129: 420–423. | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  4. Evans BN et al. (2000). J Biol Chem 275: 31438–31443. | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  5. Fraser NJ et al. (1999). Mol Pharmacol 55: 1054–1059. | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  6. Hay DL et al. (2003). Br J Pharmacol 140: 477–486. | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  7. Hay DL et al. (2005). Mol Pharmacol 67: 1655–1665. | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  8. Hay DL et al. (2006). Mol Pharmacol 70: 1984–1991. | Article |
  9. Houssami S et al. (1994). Endocrinology 135: 183–190. | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  10. Juaneda C et al. (2000). Trends Pharmacol Sci 21: 432–438. | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  11. Katafuchi T et al. (2003). J Biol Chem 278: 12046–12054. | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  12. McLatchie LM et al. (1998). Nature 393: 333–339. | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  13. Ogoshi M et al. (2003). Biochem Biophys Res Commun 311: 1072–1077. | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  14. Roh J et al. (2004). J Biol Chem 279: 7264–7274. | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  15. Tilakaratne N et al. (2000). J Pharmacol Exp Ther 294: 61–72. | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |

Extra navigation

.

naturejobs

natureproducts


ADVERTISEMENT