Review: Historical Perspectives in Pharmacology
Subject Category: Review Article
British Journal of Pharmacology (2007) 152, 53–61; doi:10.1038/sj.bjp.0707373; published online 2 July 2007
Origin and evolution of high throughput screening
D A Pereira1,2 and J A Williams1
1Exploratory Medicinal Sciences, Pfizer Global R&D, Groton, CT, USA
Correspondence: Dr JA Williams, Exploratory Medicinal Sciences, Pfizer Global Research and Development, Eastern Point Road, Groton, CT 6340, USA. E-mail: john.a.williams@pfizer.com
2Retired.
Received 28 February 2007; Revised 5 June 2007; Accepted 7 June 2007; Published online 2 July 2007.
Abstract
This article reviews the origin and evolution of high throughput screening (HTS) through the experience of an individual pharmaceutical company, revealing some of the mysteries of the early stages of drug discovery to the wider pharmacology audience. HTS in this company (Pfizer, Groton, USA) had its origin in natural products screening in 1986, by substituting fermentation broths with dimethyl sulphoxide solutions of synthetic compounds, using 96-well plates and reduced assay volumes of 50-100
l. A nominal 30mM source compound concentration provided high
M assay concentrations. Starting at 800 compounds each week, the process reached a steady state of 7200 compounds per week by 1989. Screening in the Applied Biotechnology and Screening Group was centralized with screens operating in lock-step to maximize efficiency. Initial screens were full files run in triplicate. Autoradiography and image analysis were introduced for 125I receptor ligand screens. Reverse transcriptase (RT) coupled with quantitative PCR and multiplexing addressed several targets in a single assay. By 1992 HTS produced 'hits' as starting matter for approximately 40% of the Discovery portfolio. In 1995, the HTS methodology was expanded to include ADMET targets. ADME targets required each compound to be physically detected leading to the development of automated high throughput LC-MS. In 1996, 90 compounds/week were screened in microsomal, protein binding and serum stability assays. Subsequently, the mutagenic Ames assay was adapted to a 96-well plate liquid assay and novel algorithms permitted automated image analysis of the micronucleus assay. By 1999 ADME HTS was fully integrated into the discovery cycle.
Keywords:
high throughput screening, natural products, synthetic compounds, DMSO, 96-well format, ADMET-HTS
Abbreviations:
ADMET, adsorption, distribution, excretion and toxicology; cAMP, cyclic adenosine monophosphate; CETP, cholesteryl ester transfer protein; DMF, dimethylformamide; DMSO, dimethyl sulphoxide; HTS, high throughput screening; LDL-R, low-density lipoprotein receptor; MTT, (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2, 5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide; MTTP, microsomal triglyceride transfer protein; PDE IV, phosphodiesterase IV; RT, reverse transcriptase; SAR, structure–activity relationships; TPX, 4-methylpentene-1copolymer


