TABLE 2
FROM:
Antiarrhythmic drug research
M J A Walker
BACK TO ARTICLETable 2. Contributions of various groups to the antiarrhythmic papers in the BJP
| Person | Laboratory | Number of papers | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UK | >10 | 5–10 | 4 | |
| Coker and others | Liverpool | + | ||
| Curtis and others | London | + | ||
| Witchel/Hancox and others | Bristol | + | ||
| Parratt and others | Glasgow | + | ||
| Vaughan Williams and others | Oxford | + | ||
| Europe | ||||
| Valenzuela/Delpon/Tomargo and others | Madrid | + | ||
| Papp/Vegh and others | Szeged | + | ||
| North America | ||||
| Giles and others | Calgary | + | ||
| Lucchesi and others | Ann Arbor | + | ||
| Walker and others | Vancouver | + | ||
| Campbell and others | Sydney | + | ||
For the sake of convenience, papers emanating from a particular laboratory, in the sense that it was the address for correspondence, or for most of the authors, have been identified and grouped for the purposes of the table. Obviously such quantitation is open to interpretation. Therefore, the data are presented in a qualitative manner using an arbitrary cut-off point of 4. The table is not an exact indication of who did what, but gives a sense of the origins, and of the flow of antiarrhythmic papers to the journal. In any one group members of the BPS are listed first.
