Mediators and Transmitters
Subject Categories: Review Article
British Journal of Pharmacology (2006) 147, S100–S108. doi:10.1038/sj.bjp.0706444
The glutamate story
Dedicated to the memory of John Davies and Hugh McLennan
Jeffrey C Watkins1 and David E Jane1
1Department of Pharmacology, MRC Centre for Synaptic Plasticity, School of Medical Sciences, University of Bristol, BS8 1TD
Correspondence: Jeffrey C. Watkins, E-mail: jeffwatkins@onetel.com
Abstract
Glutamatergic synaptic transmission in the mammalian central nervous system was slowly established over a period of some 20 years, dating from the 1950s. Realisation that glutamate and like amino acids (collectively known as excitatory amino acids (EAA)) mediated their excitatory actions via multiple receptors preceded establishment of these receptors as synaptic transmitter receptors. EAA receptors were initially classified as N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) and non-NMDA receptors, the latter subdivided into quisqualate (later AMPA) and kainate receptors after agonists that appeared to activate these receptors preferentially, and by their sensitivity to a range of differentially acting antagonists developed progressively during the 1970s. NMDA receptors were definitively shown to be synaptic receptors on spinal neurones by the sensitivity of certain excitatory pathways in the spinal cord to a range of specific NMDA receptor antagonists. Importantly, specific NMDA receptor antagonists appeared to be less effective at synapses in higher centres. In contrast, antagonists that also blocked non-NMDA as well as NMDA receptors were almost universally effective at blocking synaptic excitation within the brain and spinal cord, establishing both the existence and ubiquity of non-NMDA synaptic receptor systems throughout the CNS. In the early 1980s, NMDA receptors were shown to be involved in several central synaptic pathways, acting in concert with non-NMDA receptors under conditions where a protracted excitatory postsynaptic potential was effected in response to intense stimulation of presynaptic fibres. Such activation of NMDA receptors together with non-NMDA receptors led to the phenomenon of long-term potentiation (LTP), associated with lasting changes in synaptic efficacy (synaptic plasticity) and considered to be an important process in memory and learning. During the 1980s, it was shown that certain glutamate receptors in the brain mediated biochemical changes that were not susceptible to NMDA or non-NMDA receptor antagonists. This dichotomy was resolved in the early 1990s by the techniques of molecular biology, which identified two families of glutamate-binding receptor proteins (ionotropic (iGlu) and metabotropic (mGlu) receptors). Development of antagonists binding to specific protein subunits is currently enabling precise identification of discrete iGlu or mGlu receptor subtypes that participate in a range of central synaptic processes, including synaptic plasticity.
Keywords:
L-Glutamate, excitatory amino acids, ionotropic glutamate receptors, metabotropic glutamate receptors, synaptic transmission
Abbreviations:
AMPA, (S)-
-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methylisoxazole-4-propionic acid; BJP, British Journal of Pharmacology; BPS, British Pharmacological Society; CNQX, 6-cyano-7-nitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione; CNS, central nervous system; CPPG, (RS)-
-cyclopropyl-4-phosphonophenylglycine;
DGG,
-D-glutamylglycine; D
AA, D-
-aminoadipic acid; DAP,
,
-diaminopimelic acid; DAP5, D-2-amino-5-phosphonopentanoic acid; DCPG, (S)-3,4-dicarboxyphenylglycine; DH
E, dihydro-
-erythroidine; EAA, excitatory amino acid; EGLU, (S)-
-ethylglutamic acid; GABA,
-aminobutyric acid; 5HT, 5-hydroxytryptamine; HA-966, 3-amino-1-hydroxypyrrolidin-2-one; iGlu, ionotropic glutamate; Kain, kainic acid; L
AA, L-
-aminoadipic acid; LAP4, (S)-2-amino-4-phosphonobutanoic acid; L-Glu, L-glutamic acid; LTD, long-term depression; LTP, long-term potentiation; MAP4, (S)-
-methyl-2-amino-4-phosphonobutanoic acid; mGlu, metabotropic glutamate; NBQX, 2,3-dihydroxy-6-nitro-7-sulphamoyl-benzo[f]quinoxaline; NMDA, N-methyl-D-aspartic acid; ODAP,
-N-oxalyl-
,
-diaminopropionic acid; PICK1, protein interacting with C kinase-1; PLC, phospholipase C; PPDA, cis-1-(phenanthrene-2-carbonyl)piperazine-2,3-dicarboxylic acid; Quis, quisqualic acid; (R)-CPP-ene, (R)-(E)-4-(3-phosphonoprop-2-enyl)piperazine-2-carboxylic acid; (S)-4C3HPG, (S)-4-carboxy-3-hydroxyphenylglycine; (S)-MCPG, (S)-
-methyl-4-carboxyphenylglycine; trans-ACPD, trans-1-aminocyclopentane-1,3-dicarboxylic acid; UBP1112, (RS)-
-methyl-3-methyl-4-phosphonophenylglycine; UBP302, (S)-1-(2-amino-2-carboxyethyl)-3-(2-carboxybenzyl)pyrimidine-2,4-dione
MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS
These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated
NEWS AND VIEWS
Nature News and Views (23 Aug 1990)
Quisqualate receptor antagonists
Nature News and Views (20 Oct 1988)
RESEARCH
Activation of NMDA receptors reverses desensitization of mGluR5 in native and recombinant systems
Nature Neuroscience Article (01 Mar 1999)
Kainate receptors are involved in synaptic plasticity
Nature Letters to Editor (18 Nov 1999)


