It will come as no surprise to most clinicians involved in the treatment of primary brain tumours that there is little evidence of improvement in outcome between the late 1980s and the late 1990s. The majority of these tumours are gliomas and in this group most are high-grade tumours, which are notorious for having resisted the therapeutic endeavours that have improved outcome in so many other cancers. It is only in the last few years that new insights into the biology of gliomas and significant changes in the treatment of these tumours has occurred, which we predict will alter the outcome in the coming decade.
High-grade glial tumours typically present with a short history of focal neurological deficit, which progresses over days to weeks and may mimic a stroke-like illness. In most cases, a space-occupying lesion can be demonstrated on CT or MRI scanning and the diagnosis is confirmed by biopsy and/or resection, which is always subtotal because of the infiltrating nature of the disease. The much wider use of high-quality CT and MRI scans in patients presenting in this way during the late 1980s and 1990s accounts for some of the increased incidence of brain tumours reported during this time. During the same period, the classification of tumour subtypes was clarified in a new WHO classification in which glioblastoma was formally grouped with astrocytic tumours, but no major changes in disease definition occurred (Kleihues et al, 1993; Louis et al, 2007).
In Europe, the standard approach to management of these tumours, which has persisted until very recently has been maximal surgery followed by external beam radiotherapy. The influence of the extent of surgery has never been addressed in a randomised study although many series have suggested that it is a prognostic indicator (Wrensch et al, 2006). It is likely that improvements in surgical technique, particularly the use of stereotactic biopsy also contributed to more frequent diagnosis of tumour during this time period, but made little impact on outcome. During this time, the development of radiotherapy technology also meant that more patients were treated using CT-based techniques to improve definition and verification of the tumour target as well as radiation dosimetry. However, because of the apparent inherent radioresistance of these tumours these advances did not impact significantly on outcomes (Oppitz et al, 1999; Chan et al, 2002).
Against this background, the observed increase in incidence but lack of improvement in survival is not surprising. The fact that the overall survival (OS) actually worsened is probably because of increased diagnosis in patient groups that carry the worst prognosis, particularly the elderly and those with a poor performance status. The reversal of the deprivation gap is also most easily explained, as the authors suggest, by differences in access to imaging and diagnostic services so that the more affluent groups were more likely to be correctly diagnosed with a tumour, but in circumstances in which their prognosis remained very poor.
The rather depressing statistics presented in this paper make it clear that improvements in diagnosis and in technical aspects of treatment that occurred during the late 1980s and 1990s were insufficient to improve the outcome for brain tumour patients. More recently, however, the approach to diagnosis and treatment of these tumours has changed and there is now optimism that OS is beginning to improve in some tumour types. Advances in molecular techniques have allowed the definition of tumour subtypes that respond differently to treatment. Most significantly, it has been recognised that some glial tumours with specific chromosome abnormalities, particularly oligodendrogliomas with loss of 1p19q, respond favourably to chemotherapy and radiotherapy and represent a significantly better prognostic group (Cairncross et al, 2006; van den Bent et al, 2006). This has prompted ongoing investigation into the relevance of other genetic markers in gliomas and considerable effort is going in to identifying genomic profiles that may be useful as predictive or prognostic indicators (Dehais et al, 2006).
The most significant advance in treatment of glioma has been the demonstration that in grade IV tumours (glioblastoma), the addition of concomitant and adjuvant chemotherapy with temozolomide to postoperative radiotherapy can improve OS (Stupp et al, 2005). In this randomised study, patients allocated to temozolomide given continuously during radiotherapy and for an additional 6 months thereafter had median survival of 14.6 months compared with 12.1 months in the group treated with radiotherapy only and 2-year survivorship was increased from 11 to 26%. In a parallel translational study, the activity of the DNA repair enzyme MGMT was measured in tumour tissue. These data suggested that response to temozolomide may depend on the activity of this enzyme, as patients with methylation of the promoter region for the gene and therefore reduced activity levels, showed more benefit from the addition of temozolomide (Hegi et al, 2005). Ongoing studies will address the utility of this approach in other tumour types and contribute further to our understanding of the impact of tumour genotype and epigenetics on response to specific treatments. In parallel with the successful application of molecularly targeted agents in other tumours, the role of drugs that can target specifically upregulated growth factor pathways are also being explored in gliomas (Mellinghoff et al, 2005). This will define a more individualised treatment approach that will complement ongoing developments in brain imaging, neurosurgical and radiotherapy technology.
The development of new individualised approaches to treating these tumours will mean that coordination between neuropathologists and the multidisciplinary team responsible for managing these patients will become essential for treatment optimisation. It will also provide an impetus to include more of these patients in well-designed clinical studies that can further define the role of specific interventions in well-defined tumour subgroups.
Change history
16 November 2011
This paper was modified 12 months after initial publication to switch to Creative Commons licence terms, as noted at publication
References
Cairncross G, Berkey B, Shaw E, Jenkins R, Scheithauer B, Brachman D, Buckner J, Fink K, Souhami L, Laperierre N, Mehta M, Curran W (2006) Phase III trial of chemotherapy plus radiotherapy compared with radiotherapy alone for pure and mixed anaplastic oligodendroglioma: Intergroup Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Trial 9402. J Clin Oncol 24: 2707–2714
Chan JL, Lee SW, Fraass BA, Normolle DP, Greenberg HS, Junck LR, Gebarski SS, Sandler HM (2002) Survival and failure patterns of high-grade gliomas after three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy. J Clin Oncol 20: 1635–1642
Dehais C, Laigle-Donadey F, Marie Y, Kujas M, Lejeune J, Benouaich-Amiel A, Pedretti M, Polivka M, Xuan KH, Thillet J, Delattre JY, Sanson M (2006) Prognostic stratification of patients with anaplastic gliomas according to genetic profile. Cancer 107: 1891–1897
Hegi ME, Diserens AC, Gorlia T, Hamou MF, de Tribolet N, Weller M, Kros JM, Hainfellner JA, Mason W, Mariani L, Bromberg JE, Hau P, Mirimanoff RO, Cairncross JG, Janzer RC, Stupp R (2005) MGMT gene silencing and benefit from temozolomide in glioblastoma. N Engl J Med 352: 997–1003
Cairncross G, Berkey B, Shaw E, Jenkins R, Scheithauer B, Brachman D, Buckner J, Fink K, Souhami L, Laperierre N, Mehta M, Curran W, Intergroup Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Trial 9402 (2006) Phase III trial of chemotherapy plus radiotherapy compared with radiotherapy alone for pure and mixed anaplastic oligodendroglioma: Intergroup Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Trial 9402. J Clin Oncol 24: 2707–2714
Kleihues P, Burger PC, Scheithauer BW (1993) The new WHO classification of brain tumours. Brain Pathology 3: 255–268
Louis DN, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD, Cavanee WK, Burger PC, Jouvet A, Scheithauer BW, Kleihues P (2007) The 2007 WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system. Acta Neuropathol 114: 97–109
Mellinghoff IK, Wang MY, Vivanco I, Haas-Kogan DA, Zhu S, Dia EQ, Lu KV, Yoshimoto K, Huang JH, Chute DJ, Riggs BL, Horvath S, Liau LM, Cavenee WK, Rao PN, Beroukhim R, Peck TC, Lee JC, Sellers WR, Stokoe D, Prados M, Cloughesy TF, Sawyers CL, Mischel PS (2005) Molecular determinants of the response of glioblastomas to EGFR kinase inhibitors. N Engl J Med 353: 2012–2024
Oppitz U, Maessen D, Zunterer H, Richter S, Flentje M (1999) 3D-recurrence-patterns of glioblastomas after CT-planned postoperative irradiation. Radiother Oncol 53: 53–57
Stupp R, Mason WP, van den Bent MJ, Weller M, Fisher B, Taphoorn MJ, Belanger K, Brandes AA, Marosi C, Bogdahn U, Curschmann J, Janzer RC, Ludwin SK, Gorlia T, Allgeier A, Lacombe D, Cairncross JG, Eisenhauer E, Mirimanoff RO, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Brain Tumor Radiotherapy Groups, National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group (2005) Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. N Engl J Med 352: 987–996
van den Bent MJ, Carpentier AF, Brandes AA, Sanson M, Taphoorn MJ, Bernsen HJ, Frenay M, Tijssen CC, Grisold W, Sipos L, Haaxma-Reiche H, Kros JM, van Kouwenhoven MC, Vecht CJ, Allgeier A, Lacombe D, Gorlia T (2006) Adjuvant procarbazine, lomustine, and vincristine improves progression-free survival but not overall survival in newly diagnosed anaplastic oligodendrogliomas and oligoastrocytomas: a randomized European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer phase III trial. J Clin Oncol 24: 2715–2722
Wrensch M, Rice T, Miike R, McMillan A, Lamborn KR, Aldape K, Prados MD (2006) Diagnostic, treatment, and demographic factors influencing survival in a population-based study of adult glioma patients in the San Francisco Bay Area. Neuro Oncol 8: 12–26
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
From twelve months after its original publication, this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Short, S. Survival from brain tumours in England and Wales up to 2001. Br J Cancer 99 (Suppl 1), S102–S103 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6604604
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6604604