Clinical Study

British Journal of Cancer (2008) 98, 1745–1752. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6604384 www.bjcancer.com
Published online 27 May 2008

Factors that predict early treatment failure for patients with locally advanced (T4) breast cancer

E Montagna1, V Bagnardi2,3,4, N Rotmensz2, J Rodriguez5, P Veronesi5,6, A Luini5, M Intra5, E Scarano1, A Cardillo1, R Torrisi1, G Viale6,7, A Goldhirsch8 and M Colleoni1

  1. 1Research Unit in Medical Senology, Department of Medicine, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
  2. 2Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
  3. 3Department of Statistics, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
  4. 4Frontier Science and Technology Research Foundation, Southern Europe, Milan, Italy
  5. 5Division of Senology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
  6. 6University of Milan School of Medicine, Milan, Italy
  7. 7Division of Pathology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
  8. 8Department of Medicine, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy

Correspondence: Dr E Montagna, E-mail: emilia.montagna@ieo.it

Received 10 January 2008; Revised 19 March 2008; Accepted 20 March 2008.

Top

Abstract

Locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) is associated with dire prognosis despite progress in multimodal treatments. We evaluated several clinical and pathological features of patients with either noninflammatory (NIBC, cT4a-c) or inflammatory (IBC, cT4d) breast cancer to identify subset groups of patients with high risk of early treatment failure. Clinical and pathological features of 248 patients with LABC, who were treated with multimodality treatments including neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical surgery and radiotherapy were reassessed. Tumour samples obtained at surgery were evaluated using standard immunohistochemical methods. Overall, 141 patients (57%) presented with NIBC (cT4a-c, N0-2, M0) and 107 patients (43%) with IBC (cT4d, N0-2, M0). Median follow-up time was 27.5 months (range: 1.6–87.8). No significant difference in terms of recurrence-free survival (RFS) (P=0.72), disease-free survival (DFS) (P=0.98) and overall survival (OS) (P=0.35) was observed between NIBC and IBC. At the multivariate analysis, patients with ER- and PgR-negative diseases had a significantly worse RFS than patients with ER- and/or PgR-positive diseases (hazard ratio: 2.47, 95% CI: 1.33–4.59 for overall). The worst RFS was observed for the subgroup of patients with endocrine nonresponsive and HER2-negative breast cancer (2-year RFS: 57% in NIBC and 57% in IBC) A high Ki-67 labelling index (>20% of the invasive tumour cells) and the presence of peritumoral vascular invasion (PVI) significantly correlated with poorer RFS in overall (HR 2.69, 95% CI: 1.61–4.50 for Ki-67>20% and HR 2.27, 95% CI: 1.42–3.62 for PVI). Patients with endocrine nonresponsive LABC had the most dire treatment outcome. High degree of Ki-67 staining and presence of PVI were also indicators of higher risk of early relapse. These factors should be considered in therapeutic algorithms for LABC.

Keywords:

prognostic factors, preoperative therapy, surgery, locally advanced breast cancer