Molecular Diagnostics
British Journal of Cancer (2008) 98, 1830–1838. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6604378 www.bjcancer.com
Published online 27 May 2008
Prognostic molecular markers with no impact on decision-making: the paradox of gliomas based on a prospective study
M Wager1, P Menei2, J Guilhot3, P Levillain4, S Michalak5, B Bataille1, J-L Blanc1, F Lapierre1, P Rigoard1, S Milin4, F Duthe3, D Bonneau6, C-J Larsen7 and L Karayan-Tapon7
- 1Neurosurgery Department, University Hospital, Poitiers, France
- 2Neurosurgery Department, University Hospital, Angers, France
- 3Clinical Investigation Centre, INSERM 802, University Hospital, Poitiers, France
- 4Department of Pathology, University Hospital, Poitiers, France
- 5Department of Pathology, University Hospital, Angers, France
- 6Department of Medical Genetics, University Hospital, Angers, France
- 7Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, University Hospital, Poitiers, France
Correspondence: Dr M Wager, Service de Neurochirurgie: H3A Tour Jean Bernard, 2 Rue de la Miletrie, BP 577, CHU La Miletrie 86 021 Poitiers Cedex, France. E-mail: m.wager@chu-poitiers.fr
Received 2 January 2008; Revised 19 March 2008; Accepted 7 April 2008.
Abstract
This study assessed the prognostic value of several markers involved in gliomagenesis, and compared it with that of other clinical and imaging markers already used. Four-hundred and sixteen adult patients with newly diagnosed glioma were included over a 3-year period and tumour suppressor genes, oncogenes, MGMT and hTERT expressions, losses of heterozygosity, as well as relevant clinical and imaging information were recorded. This prospective study was based on all adult gliomas. Analyses were performed on patient groups selected according to World Health Organization histoprognostic criteria and on the entire cohort. The endpoint was overall survival, estimated by the Kaplan–Meier method. Univariate analysis was followed by multivariate analysis according to a Cox model. p14ARF, p16INK4A and PTEN expressions, and 10p 10q23, 10q26 and 13q LOH for the entire cohort, hTERT expression for high-grade tumours, EGFR for glioblastomas, 10q26 LOH for grade III tumours and anaplastic oligodendrogliomas were found to be correlated with overall survival on univariate analysis and age and grade on multivariate analysis only. This study confirms the prognostic value of several markers. However, the scattering of the values explained by tumour heterogeneity prevents their use in individual decision-making.
Keywords:
adult gliomas, outcome prediction, markers, RT-PCR, LOH, decision-making
MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS
These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated
RESEARCH
Dynamics of chemosensitivity and chromosomal instability in recurrent glioblastoma
British Journal of Cancer Original Article
