Clinical Study
British Journal of Cancer (2007) 97, 1642–1647. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6604094 www.bjcancer.com
Published online 13 November 2007
Does chemotherapy-induced neutropaenia result in a postponement of adjuvant or neoadjuvant regimens in breast cancer patients? Results of a retrospective analysis
M Debled1, N Houédé1, N Madranges1, C Donamaria2, A Floquet1, M Durand1 and Louis Mauriac1
- 1Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
- 2Department of Pharmacy, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
Correspondence: Dr M Debled, Département d'Oncologie Médicale, Institut Bergonié, 229 cours de l'Argonne, Bordeaux 33000, France. E-mail: debled@bergonie.org
Received 25 July 2007; Revised 14 October 2007; Accepted 17 October 2007; Published online 13 November 2007.
Abstract
In 2005, 224 patients received adjuvant/neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer in a single institution according to daily practices. Regimens consisted of epirubicin-based chemotherapy (FEC100, four or six cycles), or three cycles of FEC100 followed by three cycles of docetaxel. An absolute blood count was carried out every 3 weeks, 1–3 days before planned chemotherapy cycle. Overall, 1238 cycles were delivered. An absolute neutrophil count (ANC) <1.5
109 l-1 before planned chemotherapy was found in 171 cycles. Of these, 130 cycles (76%) were delivered as planned regardless of whether ANC levels recovered, and 41 (24%) were delayed. None of these patients developed a febrile neutropaenia. Haematopoietic support (granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)) was required in 12 cycles. We found that the majority of patients with an ANC <1.5
109 l-1 before planned chemotherapy received planned doses, without complications and need for G-CSF.
Keywords:
breast, chemotherapy, adjuvant; neutropaenia, dose intensity
