Translational Therapeutics

British Journal of Cancer (2006) 95, 879–888. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6603344 www.bjcancer.com
Published online 12 September 2006

Antineoplastic effects of rosiglitazone and PPARbold italic gamma transactivation in neuroblastoma cells

I Cellai1, S Benvenuti1, P Luciani1, A Galli2, E Ceni2, L Simi3, S Baglioni1, M Muratori4, B Ottanelli2, M Serio1, C J Thiele5 and A Peri1

  1. 1Endocrine Unit, Department of Clinical Physiopathology, Center for Research, Transfer and High Education on Chronic, Inflammatory, Degenerative and Neoplastic Disorders (DENOThe), University of Florence, Florence, Italy
  2. 2Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Clinical Physiopathology, Center for Research, Transfer and High Education on Chronic, Inflammatory, Degenerative and Neoplastic Disorders (DENOThe), University of Florence, Florence, Italy
  3. 3Clinical Biochemistry Unit, Department of Clinical Physiopathology, Center for Research, Transfer and High Education on Chronic, Inflammatory, Degenerative and Neoplastic Disorders (DENOThe), University of Florence, Florence, Italy
  4. 4Andrology Unit, Department of Clinical Physiopathology, Center for Research, Transfer and High Education on Chronic, Inflammatory, Degenerative and Neoplastic Disorders (DENOThe), University of Florence, Florence, Italy
  5. 5Pediatric Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA

Correspondence: Professor A Peri, Endocrine Unit, Department of Clinical Physiopathology, University of Florence, Viale Pieraccini, 6, 50139 Florence, Italy. E-mail: a.peri@dfc.unifi.it

Revised 19 July 2006; Accepted 20 July 2006; Published online 12 September 2006.

Top

Abstract

Neuroblastoma (NB) is the most common extracranial solid tumour in infants. Unfortunately, most children present with advanced disease and have a poor prognosis. In the present study, we evaluated the role of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor italic gamma (PPARitalic gamma) agonist rosiglitazone (RGZ) in two NB cell lines (SK-N-AS and SH-SY5Y), which express PPARitalic gamma. Rosiglitazone decreased cell proliferation and viability to a greater extent in SK-N-AS than in SH-SY5Y. Furthermore, 20 muM RGZ significantly inhibited cell adhesion, invasiveness and apoptosis in SK-N-AS, but not in SH-SY5Y. Because of the different response of SK-N-AS and SH-SY5Y cells to RGZ, the function of PPARitalic gamma as a transcriptional activator was assessed. Noticeably, transient transcription experiments with a PPARitalic gamma responsive element showed that RGZ induced a three-fold increase of the reporter activity in SK-N-AS, whereas no effect was observed in SH-SY5Y. The different PPARitalic gamma activity may be likely due to the markedly lower amount of phopshorylated (i.e. inactive) protein observed in SK-N-AS. To our knowledge, this is the first demonstration that the differential response of NB cells to RGZ may be related to differences in PPARitalic gamma transactivation. This finding indicates that PPARitalic gamma activity may be useful to select those patients, for whom PPARitalic gamma agonists may have a beneficial therapeutic effect.

Keywords:

PPARitalic gamma, rosiglitazone, neuroblastoma

Top

MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS

These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated