Molecular Diagnostics
British Journal of Cancer (2006) 95, 496–505. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6603283 www.bjcancer.com
Published online 1 August 2006
Cellular senescence in naevi and immortalisation in melanoma: a role for p16?
V C Gray-Schopfer1,2, S C Cheong1,7, H Chong3, J Chow3, T Moss4, Z A Abdel-Malek5, R Marais2, D Wynford-Thomas6 and D C Bennett1
- 1Division of Basic Medical Sciences, St George's, University of London, Cranmer Terrace, SW17 0RE, UK
- 2The Institute for Cancer Research, London SW3 6JB, UK
- 3Division of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, St George's, University of London, London SW17 0RE, UK
- 4Department of Plastic Surgery, St George's Hospital, London SW17 0QT, UK
- 5Department of Dermatology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45267, USA
- 6Department of Pathology, University of Wales College of Medicine, Cardiff, UK
Correspondence: Professor DC Bennett, E-mail: dbennett@sgul.ac.uk
7Present address: The Cancer Research Initiatives Foundation, Selangor, Malaysia
Revised 26 June 2006; Accepted 26 June 2006; Published online 1 August 2006.
Abstract
Cellular senescence, the irreversible proliferative arrest seen in somatic cells after a limited number of divisions, is considered a crucial barrier to cancer, but direct evidence for this in vivo was lacking until recently. The best-known form of human cell senescence is attributed to telomere shortening and a DNA-damage response through p53 and p21. There is also a more rapid form of senescence, dependent on the p16-retinoblastoma pathway. p16 (CDKN2A) is a known melanoma susceptibility gene. Here, we use retrovirally mediated gene transfer to confirm that the normal form of senescence in cultured human melanocytes involves p16, since disruption of the p16/retinoblastoma pathway is required as well as telomerase activation for immortalisation. Expression (immunostaining) patterns of senescence mediators and markers in melanocytic lesions provide strong evidence that cell senescence occurs in benign melanocytic naevi (moles) in vivo and does not involve p53 or p21 upregulation, although p16 is widely expressed. In comparison, dysplastic naevi and early (radial growth-phase, RGP) melanomas show less p16 and some p53 and p21 immunostaining. All RGP melanomas expressed p21, suggesting areas of p53-mediated senescence, while most areas of advanced (vertical growth-phase) melanomas lacked both p16 and p21, implying escape from both forms of senescence (immortalisation). Moreover, nuclear p16 but not p21 expression can be induced in human melanocytes by oncogenic BRAF, as found in around 80% of naevi. We conclude that cell senescence can form a barrier to melanoma development. This also provides a potential explanation of why p16 is a melanoma suppressor gene.
Keywords:
cellular senescence, immortalisation, melanoma, naevus, p16, p53
MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS
These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated
NEWS AND VIEWS
Cancer Ins and outs of tumour control
Nature News and Views (31 Jul 2008)
Nature News and Views (04 Aug 2005)
RESEARCH
Response to Gray-Schopfer et al. and Michaloglou et al.
Journal of Investigative Dermatology Letter
A genome-wide scan for naevus count: linkage to CDKN2A and to other chromosome regions
European Journal of Human Genetics Article Response
