Molecular Diagnostics
British Journal of Cancer (2006) 95, 347–354. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6603261 www.bjcancer.com
Published online 11 July 2006
Expression and prognostic impact of the protein tyrosine phosphatases PRL-1, PRL-2, and PRL-3 in breast cancer
I Radke1, M Götte1, C Kersting2, B Mattsson1, L Kiesel1 and P Wülfing1
- 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Str. 33, D-48149 Münster, Germany
- 2Gerhard-Domagk-Institute of Pathology, University of Münster, Domagkstr. 17, D-48149 Münster, Germany
Correspondence: Dr I Radke, E-mail: Isabel.Radke@ukmuenster.de
Received 13 February 2006; Revised 23 May 2006; Accepted 12 June 2006; Published online 11 July 2006.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate the expression of the protein tyrosine phosphatases (PTP) PRL-1, PRL-2, and PRL-3 in human breast cancer and to evaluate its clinical and prognostic significance. PRL-PTP mRNA expression was examined in malignant (n=7) and nonmalignant (n=7) cryoconserved breast tissue samples as well as in eight breast cancer cell lines by RT–PCR. Furthermore, protein expression of PRL-3 was analysed semiquantitatively by immunohistochemistry in ductal breast carcinoma in situ (n=135) and invasive breast cancer (n=147) by use of tissue microarray technology (TMA). In 24 lymph node-positive patients we selected the corresponding lymph node metastases for analysis of PRL-3 expression, and a validation set (n=99) of invasive breast cancer samples was examined. Staining results were correlated with clinicopathological parameters and long-term follow-up. PRL-3 mRNA expression was significantly higher in malignant compared to benign breast tissue. For PRL-1 and PRL-2 expression no significant differences were observed. Staining of TMAs showed PRL-3 expression in 85.9% ductal carcinoma in situ and 75.5% invasive breast carcinomas. Analysis of survival parameters revealed a shorter disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with PRL-3-positive carcinomas, and in particular a significantly shorter DFS in nodal-positive patients with PRL-3 overexpressing tumours as compared to PRL-3-negative breast carcinomas (66
7 months (95% CI, 52–80) vs 97
9 months (95% CI, 79–115); P=0.032). Moreover, we found a more frequent expression of PRL-3 in lymph node metastases as compared to the primary tumours (91.7 vs 66.7%; P=0.033). Our results suggest that PRL-3 might serve as a novel prognostic factor in breast cancer, which may help to predict an adverse disease outcome.
Keywords:
immunohistochemistry, breast cancer, PRL-3, PTP4A3, prognostic factor
MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS
These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated
REVIEWS
Molecular foundations of cancer: New targets for intervention
Nature Medicine Review (01 Apr 1995)
RESEARCH
Identification of IGFBP-6 as an effector of the tumor suppressor activity of SEMA3B
Oncogene Original Article
British Journal of Cancer Original Article
British Journal of Cancer Original Article
Expression patterns of angiogenic and lymphangiogenic factors in ductal breast carcinoma in situ
British Journal of Cancer Original Article
