Molecular Diagnostics

British Journal of Cancer (2006) 95, 347–354. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6603261 www.bjcancer.com
Published online 11 July 2006

Expression and prognostic impact of the protein tyrosine phosphatases PRL-1, PRL-2, and PRL-3 in breast cancer

I Radke1, M Götte1, C Kersting2, B Mattsson1, L Kiesel1 and P Wülfing1

  1. 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Str. 33, D-48149 Münster, Germany
  2. 2Gerhard-Domagk-Institute of Pathology, University of Münster, Domagkstr. 17, D-48149 Münster, Germany

Correspondence: Dr I Radke, E-mail: Isabel.Radke@ukmuenster.de

Received 13 February 2006; Revised 23 May 2006; Accepted 12 June 2006; Published online 11 July 2006.

Top

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the expression of the protein tyrosine phosphatases (PTP) PRL-1, PRL-2, and PRL-3 in human breast cancer and to evaluate its clinical and prognostic significance. PRL-PTP mRNA expression was examined in malignant (n=7) and nonmalignant (n=7) cryoconserved breast tissue samples as well as in eight breast cancer cell lines by RT–PCR. Furthermore, protein expression of PRL-3 was analysed semiquantitatively by immunohistochemistry in ductal breast carcinoma in situ (n=135) and invasive breast cancer (n=147) by use of tissue microarray technology (TMA). In 24 lymph node-positive patients we selected the corresponding lymph node metastases for analysis of PRL-3 expression, and a validation set (n=99) of invasive breast cancer samples was examined. Staining results were correlated with clinicopathological parameters and long-term follow-up. PRL-3 mRNA expression was significantly higher in malignant compared to benign breast tissue. For PRL-1 and PRL-2 expression no significant differences were observed. Staining of TMAs showed PRL-3 expression in 85.9% ductal carcinoma in situ and 75.5% invasive breast carcinomas. Analysis of survival parameters revealed a shorter disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with PRL-3-positive carcinomas, and in particular a significantly shorter DFS in nodal-positive patients with PRL-3 overexpressing tumours as compared to PRL-3-negative breast carcinomas (66plusminus7 months (95% CI, 52–80) vs 97plusminus9 months (95% CI, 79–115); P=0.032). Moreover, we found a more frequent expression of PRL-3 in lymph node metastases as compared to the primary tumours (91.7 vs 66.7%; P=0.033). Our results suggest that PRL-3 might serve as a novel prognostic factor in breast cancer, which may help to predict an adverse disease outcome.

Keywords:

immunohistochemistry, breast cancer, PRL-3, PTP4A3, prognostic factor