Clinical Study

British Journal of Cancer (2006) 94, 507–512. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6602959 www.bjcancer.com
Published online 24 January 2006

Feasibility of familial PSA screening: psychosocial issues and screening adherence

J Sweetman1, M Watson2, A Norman3, Z Bunstead1, P Hopwood4, J Melia5, S Moss5, R Eeles6, D Dearnaley1 and C Moynihan1

  1. 1Academic Department of Radiotherapy, Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Trust, Downs Road, Sutton, Surrey SM2 5PT, UK
  2. 2Department of Psychological Medicine, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Downs Road, Sutton, Surrey SM2 5PT, UK
  3. 3Department of Computing and Information, The Royal Marsden NHS Trust, and Institute of Cancer Research, Downs Road, Sutton, Surrey SM2 5PT, UK
  4. 4Department of Psycho-Oncology, The Christie Hospital, Manchester M20 4XB, UK
  5. 5Cancer Screening Evaluation Unit, Institute of Cancer Research Brookes Lawley Building, 15 Cotswold Road, Sutton, Surrey SM2 5NG, UK
  6. 6Translational Cancer Genetics Team, Institute of Cancer Research & Cancer Genetics Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Downs Road, Sutton, Surrey SM2 5PT, UK

Correspondence: C Moynihan, E-mail: clare.moynihan@icr.ac.uk

Received 19 October 2005; Accepted 12 December 2005; Published online 24 January 2006.

Top

Abstract

This study examined factors that predict psychological morbidity and screening adherence in first-degree relatives (FDRs) taking part in a familial PSA screening study. Prostate cancer patients (index cases – ICs) who gave consent for their FDRs to be contacted for a familial PSA screening study to contact their FDRs were also asked permission to invite these FDRs into a linked psychosocial study. Participants were assessed on measures of psychological morbidity (including the General Health Questionnaire; Cancer Worry Scale; Health Anxiety Questionnaire; Impact of Events Scale); and perceived benefits and barriers, knowledge; perceived risk/susceptibility; family history; and socio-demographics. Of 255 ICs, 155 (61%) consented to their FDRs being contacted. Of 207 FDRs approached, 128 (62%) consented and completed questionnaires. Multivariate logistic regression revealed that health anxiety, perceived risk and subjective stress predicted higher cancer worry (P=0.05). Measures of psychological morbidity did not predict screening adherence. Only past screening behaviour reliably predicted adherence to familial screening (P=0.05). First-degree relatives entering the linked familial PSA screening programme do not, in general, have high levels of psychological morbidity. However, a small number of men exhibited psychological distress.

Keywords:

prostate cancer, psychological morbidity, screening, adherence, cancer distress

Top

MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS

These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated

Extra navigation

naturejobs

  • Biochemical Pharmacologist

    • Eisai London Research Laboratories Ltd
    • Hatfield, United Kingdom
  • Postdoctoral Position

    • McGill University
    • Goodman Cancer Centre, McGill University, Cancer Pavilion, 1160 Pine Avenue West, Room 414, Montreal, Quebec , Canada, H3A 1A3

natureproducts