Clinical Study
British Journal of Cancer (2006) 94, 55–61. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6602910 www.bjcancer.com
Published online 13 December 2005
SCOTROC 2B: feasibility of carboplatin followed by docetaxel or docetaxel–irinotecan as first-line therapy for ovarian cancer
A R Clamp1, J Mäenpää2, D Cruickshank3, J Ledermann4, P M Wilkinson5, R Welch5, S Chan6, P Vasey7, B Sorbe8, A Hindley9 and G C Jayson1 for the Scottish Gynaecological Cancer Trials Group
- 1Cancer Research UK Department of Medical Oncology, Christie Hospital, Manchester M20 4BX, UK
- 2Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Tampere University Hospital, FIN-33521 Tampere, Finland
- 3Women and Children's Directorate, James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough TS4 3BW, UK
- 4Department of Oncology, University College London, London W1P 8BT, UK
- 5Department of Clinical Oncology, Christie Hospital, Manchester M20 4BX, UK
- 6Nottingham City Hospital, Nottingham NG5 1PB, UK
- 7Division of Oncology, Cancer Care Services, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Queensland 4029, Australia
- 8Department of Gynecological Oncology, Örebro University Hospital, SE-701 85 Örebro, Sweden
- 9Rosemere Cancer Centre, Royal Preston Hospital, Fullwood, Preston PR2 9HT, UK
Correspondence: Dr GC Jayson, Cancer Research UK Department of Medical Oncology, Christie Hospital NHS Trust, Wilmslow Road, Withington, Manchester M20 4BX, UK. E-mail: Gordon.Jayson@christie-tr.nwest.nhs.uk
Revised 11 November 2005; Accepted 18 November 2005; Published online 13 December 2005.
Abstract
The feasibility of combination irinotecan, carboplatin and docetaxel chemotherapy as first-line treatment for advanced epithelial ovarian carcinoma was assessed. One hundred patients were randomised to receive four 3-weekly cycles of carboplatin (area under the curve (AUC) 7) followed by four 3-weekly cycles of docetaxel 100 mg m-2 (arm A, n=51) or docetaxel 60 mg m-2 with irinotecan 200 mg m-2 (arm B, n=49). Neither arm met the formal feasibility criterion of an eight-cycle treatment completion rate that was statistically greater than 60% (arm A 71% (90% confidence interval (CI) 58–81%; P=0.079; arm B 67% (90% CI 55–78%; P=0.184)). Median-dose intensities were >85% of planned dose for all agents. In arms A and B, 15.6 and 12.2% of patients, respectively, withdrew owing to treatment-related toxicity. Grade 3–4 sensory neurotoxicity was more common in arm A (1.9 vs 0%) and grade 3–4 diarrhoea was more common in arm B (0.6 vs 3.5%). Of patients with radiologically evaluable disease at baseline, 50 and 48% responded to therapy in arms A and B, respectively; at median 17.1 months' follow-up, median progression-free survival was 17.1 and 15.9 months, respectively. Although both arms just failed to meet the formal statistical feasibility criteria, the observed completion rates of around 70% were reasonable. The addition of irinotecan to first-line carboplatin and docetaxel chemotherapy was generally well tolerated although associated with increased gastrointestinal toxicity. Further exploratory studies of topoisomerase-I inhibitors in this setting may be warranted.
Keywords:
taxane, docetaxel, carboplatin, irinotecan, ovarian, cancer
MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS
These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated
NEWS AND VIEWS
Chemotherapy Irinotecan or etoposide as front-line therapy for SCLC?
Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology News and Views (01 Oct 2009)
