Clinical Study

British Journal of Cancer (2006) 94, 55–61. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6602910 www.bjcancer.com
Published online 13 December 2005

SCOTROC 2B: feasibility of carboplatin followed by docetaxel or docetaxel–irinotecan as first-line therapy for ovarian cancer

A R Clamp1, J Mäenpää2, D Cruickshank3, J Ledermann4, P M Wilkinson5, R Welch5, S Chan6, P Vasey7, B Sorbe8, A Hindley9 and G C Jayson1 for the Scottish Gynaecological Cancer Trials Group

  1. 1Cancer Research UK Department of Medical Oncology, Christie Hospital, Manchester M20 4BX, UK
  2. 2Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Tampere University Hospital, FIN-33521 Tampere, Finland
  3. 3Women and Children's Directorate, James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough TS4 3BW, UK
  4. 4Department of Oncology, University College London, London W1P 8BT, UK
  5. 5Department of Clinical Oncology, Christie Hospital, Manchester M20 4BX, UK
  6. 6Nottingham City Hospital, Nottingham NG5 1PB, UK
  7. 7Division of Oncology, Cancer Care Services, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Queensland 4029, Australia
  8. 8Department of Gynecological Oncology, Örebro University Hospital, SE-701 85 Örebro, Sweden
  9. 9Rosemere Cancer Centre, Royal Preston Hospital, Fullwood, Preston PR2 9HT, UK

Correspondence: Dr GC Jayson, Cancer Research UK Department of Medical Oncology, Christie Hospital NHS Trust, Wilmslow Road, Withington, Manchester M20 4BX, UK. E-mail: Gordon.Jayson@christie-tr.nwest.nhs.uk

Revised 11 November 2005; Accepted 18 November 2005; Published online 13 December 2005.

Top

Abstract

The feasibility of combination irinotecan, carboplatin and docetaxel chemotherapy as first-line treatment for advanced epithelial ovarian carcinoma was assessed. One hundred patients were randomised to receive four 3-weekly cycles of carboplatin (area under the curve (AUC) 7) followed by four 3-weekly cycles of docetaxel 100 mg m-2 (arm A, n=51) or docetaxel 60 mg m-2 with irinotecan 200 mg m-2 (arm B, n=49). Neither arm met the formal feasibility criterion of an eight-cycle treatment completion rate that was statistically greater than 60% (arm A 71% (90% confidence interval (CI) 58–81%; P=0.079; arm B 67% (90% CI 55–78%; P=0.184)). Median-dose intensities were >85% of planned dose for all agents. In arms A and B, 15.6 and 12.2% of patients, respectively, withdrew owing to treatment-related toxicity. Grade 3–4 sensory neurotoxicity was more common in arm A (1.9 vs 0%) and grade 3–4 diarrhoea was more common in arm B (0.6 vs 3.5%). Of patients with radiologically evaluable disease at baseline, 50 and 48% responded to therapy in arms A and B, respectively; at median 17.1 months' follow-up, median progression-free survival was 17.1 and 15.9 months, respectively. Although both arms just failed to meet the formal statistical feasibility criteria, the observed completion rates of around 70% were reasonable. The addition of irinotecan to first-line carboplatin and docetaxel chemotherapy was generally well tolerated although associated with increased gastrointestinal toxicity. Further exploratory studies of topoisomerase-I inhibitors in this setting may be warranted.

Keywords:

taxane, docetaxel, carboplatin, irinotecan, ovarian, cancer

Top

MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS

These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated

NEWS AND VIEWS

Chemotherapy Irinotecan or etoposide as front-line therapy for SCLC?

Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology News and Views (01 Oct 2009)