Clinical Study

British Journal of Cancer (2005) 93, 1319–1323. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6602874 www.bjcancer.com
Published online 6 December 2005

Patients' preferences for adjuvant endocrine therapy in early breast cancer: what makes it worthwhile?

V M Duric1, L J Fallowfield2, C Saunders3, J Houghton4, A S Coates5 and M R Stockler1,6

  1. 1NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
  2. 2Cancer Research UK, Psychosocial Oncology Group, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton, East Sussex, BN1 9QG, UK
  3. 3University Department of Surgery, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Australia
  4. 4Clinical Trials Group, Department of Surgery, Royal Free and University College Medical School, London, UK
  5. 5School of Public Health, University of Sydney and The Cancer Council, Sydney, Australia
  6. 6Sydney Cancer Centre – RPA and Concord Hospitals, Sydney, Australia

Correspondence: Professor L Fallowfield, E-mail: L.J.Fallowfield@sussex.ac.uk

Received 8 August 2005; Revised 17 October 2005; Accepted 18 October 2005.

Top

Abstract

Adjuvant endocrine therapy improves recurrence and survival rates, but has side effects and is inconvenient. The aim of this study was to determine the preferences of premenopausal women who had adjuvant endocrine therapy in a randomised trial. In all, 85 (or eighty-five) women completed semistructured interviews 6–30 months after finishing adjuvant endocrine therapy. Hypothetical scenarios based on known potential survival times (5 or 15 years) and rates (60% or 80% at 5 years) without adjuvant endocrine therapy were used to determine the smallest gains women judged necessary to make their adjuvant endocrine therapy worthwhile. Although a third of the women considered gains of 1% in survival rates or 6 months in survival times sufficient to make their adjuvant endocrine therapy worthwhile, more than half the women required gains of at least 5% in survival rates or 3 years in survival time as necessary to make adjuvant endocrine therapy worthwhile. Larger benefits were required by women who had longer treatment, worse side effects, and by those who were treated with goserelin alone. The route of administration (tablet vs injection) did not affect preferences and some women judged small benefits sufficient to make their adjuvant endocrine therapy worthwhile, but many women required larger benefits than their counterparts in similar studies of preferences for adjuvant chemotherapy.

Keywords:

adjuvant endocrine therapy, early breast cancer, patient preferences

Top

MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS

These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated

REVIEWS

Oestrogen as a neuroprotective hormone

Nature Reviews Neuroscience Review (01 Jun 2002)

NEWS AND VIEWS

Medical oncology Zoledronic acid prevents bone loss in early-stage breast cancer

Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology News and Views (01 Apr 2009)

Medical oncology Endocrine-therapy-related symptoms and breast cancer

Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology News and Views (01 Jun 2009)