Clinical Study
British Journal of Cancer (2005) 93, 41–45. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6602675 www.bjcancer.com
Published online 28 June 2005
A randomised controlled trial of nurse-managed trial conclusion following early phase cancer trial participation
Contributors: KC initiated the study, participated in the study set up, supervised the training of the trial nurses, helped analyse the data and produce the final report. EW participated in setting up the study, was responsible for data collection, management and entry, participated in the data analysis and helped produce the final report. RE helped analyse the qualitative data and helped produce the final report. SA provided advice and support for the randomisation aspects of the study and TA helped with the statistical analysis and presentation of the data. KC, TA and EW wrote the paper. All authors commented on all drafts. KC and EW are the guarantors.
K Cox1, E Wilson1, A Arthur1, R Elkan1 and S Armstrong2
- 1School of Nursing, University of Nottingham, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK
- 2Trent Institute for Health Services Research, University of Nottingham, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK
Correspondence: Professor K Cox, E-mail: Karen.cox@Nottingham.ac.uk
Received 18 February 2005; Revised 11 April 2005; Accepted 24 April 2005; Published online 28 June 2005.
Abstract
The effect of a nurse-managed intervention, for early phase cancer trial participants at trial conclusion, on psychosocial outcomes was evaluated at two cancer centres in the Midlands, England using a randomised controlled trial. It involved 117 patients who were participating in an early phase cancer clinical trial. It was a nurse-managed trial exit, which included a trial exit interview, trial feedback information leaflet and telephone follow-up compared with standard care at trial conclusion. Psychological distress at 1 week and 4–6 weeks post-trial conclusion, patient's knowledge and understanding and patient's satisfaction were assessed. The results showed there was no significant difference between the two groups regarding scores for anxiety and depression at time one and time two. There is some suggestion that the intervention reduced anxiety from trial conclusion to follow-up (P=0.27). Patients in both groups felt they had contributed to cancer research through trial participation. However, intervention patients were more likely to feel that they knew how the trial was going (P<0.001), knew how other people in the trial were doing (P=0.001), had all the feedback they needed about the trial they took part in (P<0.01) and knew how they would be followed up (P=0.02). Patient satisfaction with the intervention was high (median score=4.5 where 5 is greatest satisfaction). In conclusion, nurse-managed trial conclusion led to positive outcomes for patients who had recently completed a clinical trial.
Keywords:
clinical trials, nurse-managed care, randomised controlled trial, trial conclusion
MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS
These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated
REVIEWS
Do-it-yourself guide: how to use the modern single-molecule toolkit
Nature Methods Review (01 Jun 2008)
