Translational Therapeutics
British Journal of Cancer (2005) 92, 1684–1689. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6602564 www.bjcancer.com
Published online 19 April 2005
Preclinical relevance of dosing time for the therapeutic index of gemcitabine–cisplatin
X M Li1, K Tanaka1,2, J Sun1,3, E Filipski1, L Kayitalire4, C Focan5 and F Lévi1
- 1INSERM E 354 'Chronothérapeutique des Cancers' and Université Paris XI, Hôpital Paul Brousse, 14-16 Avenue Paul Vaillant Couturier, Villejuif 94800, France
- 2Department of Surgery, Yokohama City University Hospital, Yokohama 236-0004, Japan
- 3Department of Applied Technology, Cancer Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510060, China
- 4Eli Lilly and Co., Indianapolis, Indiana 46225, USA
- 5Chronotherapy Group of European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Les Cliniques Saint Joseph, 4000 Liège, Belgium
Correspondence: Dr XM Li, E-mail: li@vjf.inserm.fr
Revised 23 February 2005; Accepted 14 March 2005; Published online 19 April 2005.
Abstract
The relevance of gemcitabine timing for chronotherapeutic optimisation was investigated. Healthy mice received multiple doses of gemcitabine (120, 160 or 200 mg kg-1 injection (inj)-1) at one of six circadian times (3, 7, 11, 15, 19 or 23 h after light onset – HALO) on days 1, 4, 7 and 10 or a single dose of gemcitabine (400 mg kg-1) at 11 or 23 HALO
cisplatin (5 mg kg-1 at 1 min, 4 or 8 h later). Mice bearing Glasgow osteosarcoma received multiple doses of gemcitabine (200 mg kg-1 inj-1) at 11 or 23 HALO
cisplatin (5 mg kg-1 inj-1 at 1 min or 4 h later) on days of 10, 13, 16 and 19 following tumour inoculation. A circadian rhythm in body weight loss was statistically validated, with 1030 HALO corresponding to the least toxic time (95% CL, 0800 to 1300). Gemcitabine dosing produced least body weight loss and least neutropenia after injection at 11 vs 23 HALO, whether the drug was given alone or with cisplatin (P=0.001). Gemcitabine–cisplatin tolerability was improved by dosing gemcitabine at 11 HALO and CDDP at 15 HALO (P<0.001). The administration of this schedule to tumour-bearing mice increased median survival three-fold as compared to treatments where both drugs were given simultaneously at 11 or 23 HALO (P=0.02). The optimal schedule would correspond to the delivery of gemcitabine upon awakening and cisplatin near mid-activity in cancer patients.
Keywords:
chronopharmacology, gemcitabine, cisplatin, Glasgow osteosarcoma, mice
MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS
These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated
RESEARCH
Modern Pathology Original Article
Circadian time dependence of cisplatin urinary kinetics
Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics Original Article
