British Journal of Cancer

FIGURES AND TABLES

FROM:

The expected burden of mesothelioma mortality in Great Britain from 2002 to 2050

J T Hodgson, D M McElvenny, A J Darnton, M J Price and J Peto

BACK TO ARTICLE
Figure 1 - Unfortunately we are unable to provide accessible alternative text for this. If you require assistance to access this image, please contact help@nature.com or the author

Figure 1.

(A) Mesothelioma death rates by 5-year cohort and age group for males born 1878–1937 (note: The earlier cohorts are to the lower right of the chart). (B) Mesothelioma death rates by 5-year cohort and age group for males born 1938–1982 (note: The earlier cohorts are to the upper left of the chart).

Full figure and legend (56K)
Figure 2 - Unfortunately we are unable to provide accessible alternative text for this. If you require assistance to access this image, please contact help@nature.com or the author

Figure 2.

Mesothelioma deaths by sex and year.

Full figure and legend (54K)
Figure 3 - Unfortunately we are unable to provide accessible alternative text for this. If you require assistance to access this image, please contact help@nature.com or the author

Figure 3.

Average annual male mesothelioma death rates per million by age and time period.

Full figure and legend (52K)
Figure 4 - Unfortunately we are unable to provide accessible alternative text for this. If you require assistance to access this image, please contact help@nature.com or the author

Figure 4.

(A) Observed and fitted deaths by year of birth. (B) Observed and fitted deaths by age. (C) Observed and fitted mesothelioma deaths by year of death, with derived exposure index. (D) Number of observed and fitted mesothelioma deaths for 1955–1980 yearly birth cohorts.

Full figure and legend (70K)
Figure 5 - Unfortunately we are unable to provide accessible alternative text for this. If you require assistance to access this image, please contact help@nature.com or the author

Figure 5.

(A) Fitted import index for nonclearance model with best approximating weighting of actual import series (amosite+0.7 times crocidolite. (B). Fitted import index for clearance model with best approximating weighting of actual import series (amosite+2.2 times crocidolite).

Full figure and legend (59K)
Table 1 - Estimated parameter values from optimal Poisson's regression model - Unfortunately we are unable to provide accessible alternative text for this. If you require assistance to access this image, please contact help@nature.com or the author

Table 1 - Estimated parameter values from optimal Poisson's regression model.

Full table
BACK TO ARTICLE