Clinical Study

British Journal of Cancer (2005) 92, 15–20. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6602268 www.bjcancer.com
Published online 14 December 2004

A randomised phase II trial of docetaxel vs docetaxel and irinotecan in patients with stage IIIb–IV non-small-cell lung cancer who failed first-line treatment

F M Wachters1, H J M Groen1, B Biesma2, F M N H Schramel3, P E Postmus4, J A Stigt5 and E F Smit4,6

  1. 1Department of Pulmonary Diseases, University Hospital Groningen, PO Box 30.001, 9700 RB Groningen, the Netherlands
  2. 2Department of Pulmonary Diseases, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, PO Box 90.153, 5200 ME s Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands
  3. 3Department of Pulmonary Diseases, St Antonius Hospital, PO Box 2500, 3430 EM Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
  4. 4Department of Pulmonary Diseases, Vrije Universiteit Medical Center, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB Amsterdam, the Netherlands
  5. 5Department of Pulmonary Diseases, Isala Clinics, PO Box 10.400, 8000 GK Zwolle, the Netherlands
  6. 6Department of Pulmonary Diseases, Martini Hospital, PO Box 30.033, 9700 RM Groningen, the Netherlands

Correspondence: Dr HJM Groen, E-mail: h.j.m.groen@int.azg.nl

Received 9 July 2004; Revised 20 October 2004; Accepted 20 October 2004; Published online 14 December 2004.

Top

Abstract

Response rate and toxicity of second-line therapy with docetaxel (75 mg m-2) or docetaxel, irinotecan, and lenogastrim (60 mg m-2, 200 mg m-2, and 150 mug m-2 day-1, respectively) were compared in 108 patients with stage IIIb–IV non-small-cell lung cancer. Addition of irinotecan to docetaxel does not improve response rate, and increases gastrointestinal toxicity.

Keywords:

carcinoma, non-small-cell lung, clinical trial, phase II, docetaxel, irinotecan, second-line chemotherapy

Top

MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS

These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated