Molecular and Cellular Pathology
British Journal of Cancer (2004) 91, 277–281. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6601948 www.bjcancer.com
Published online 15 June 2004
Predicting aggressive outcome in T1N0M0 breast cancer
South-Western Finland Breast Cancer Group: I Parvinen, L Kauhava, P Immonen-Räihä, O Räsänen, L Pylkkänen, A Kaljonen, P Kronqvist, P Klemi, Departments of Pathology and Oncology, University of Turku, Raisio Regional Hospital, Cancer Society of South Western Finland, Finnish National Fund for Research and Development Sitra, and City of Turku, Finland
P Kronqvist1, T Kuopio2, M Nykänen2, H Helenius1, J Anttinen2, P Klemi1 and South-Western Finland Breast Cancer Group
- 1Departments of Pathology and Statistics, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
- 2Jyväskylä Central Hospital, Jyväskylä, Finland
Correspondence: Dr P Kronqvist, Department of Pathology, University of Turku, Kiinamyllynkatu 10, 20520 Turku, Finland. E-mail: pauliina.kronqvist@tyks.fi
Revised 3 February 2004; Accepted 27 April 2004; Published online 15 June 2004.
Abstract
Despite the excellent overall prognosis, unpredictable breast cancer recurrences and deaths also occur among T1N0M0 patients. We have evaluated clinically applicable methods for identifying aggressive outcome in T1N0M0 breast cancer. The material is based on aggressive T1N0M0 invasive ductal and lobular carcinomas diagnosed in Turku University Hospital and Jyväskylä Central Hospital, Finland, during 1987–1997. We studied all the T1N0M0 breast cancers that had led to recurrency or death (n=21, 95% T1cN0M0) during the follow-up period (4–14 years). The study is based on statistical analyses of matched case–control data in which the prognostic factors of each individual patient with aggressive disease were compared with control patients (n=45) individually matched by tumour size, age at diagnosis, histological type of tumour and length of follow-up. The cancer cases were examined for clinically applicable conventional and immunohistochemical pathologic prognostic factors. High Ki-67 immunopositivity was the strongest prognosticator of breast cancer death or recurrence in T1N0M0 breast cancer. Also, high p53 immunopositivity, low oestrogen receptor immunopositivity and Her-2/neu oncogene amplification by chromogen in situ hybridisation were reliable indicators of unfavourable outcome. Our statistical methods also allowed us to determine for the present material a range of clinical significance for each immunohistochemical prognostic feature with the associated relative risk for breast cancer death and recurrence. The paper suggests guidelines for predicting aggressive outcome in T1N0M0 breast cancer.
Keywords:
breast cancer, tumour size, prognosis
