Genetics and Genomics

British Journal of Cancer (2004) 91, 1835–1841. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6602202 www.bjcancer.com
Published online 26 October 2004

Investigation of the role of SDHB inactivation in sporadic phaeochromocytoma and neuroblastoma

D Astuti1, M Morris1,2, C Krona3, F Abel3, D Gentle1,2, T Martinsson3, P Kogner4, H P H Neumann5, R Voutilainen6,7, C Eng8, P Rustin9, F Latif1,2 and E R Maher1,2

  1. 1Section of Medical and Molecular Genetics, Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, University of Birmingham, The Medical School, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
  2. 2Cancer Research UK Renal Molecular Oncology Research Group, University of Birmingham, The Medical School, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
  3. 3Department of Clinical Genetics, Gothenburg University, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Ostra, S-416 85 Gothenburg, Sweden
  4. 4Childhood Cancer Research Unit, Department of Woman and Child Health, Karolinska Institute, Karolinska Hospital, S-171 76 Stockholm, Sweden
  5. 5Medizinische Universitatsklinik, Hugstetter Str. 55, D-79106 Freiburg, Germany
  6. 6Department of Paediatrics, Kuopio University Hospital, FIN-70211 Kuopio, Finland
  7. 7Department of Pathology, Haartman-Institute, FIN-00014 University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
  8. 8Clinical Cancer Genetics and Human Cancer Genetics Programs, Comprehensive Cancer Center, the Division of Human Genetics, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
  9. 9INSERM U393 Handicaps Génétique de l'Enfant, Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades, 149, rue de Sèvres, 75015 Paris, France

Correspondence: Professor ER Maher, E-mail: E.R.Maher@bham.ac.uk

Received 10 May 2004; Revised 31 August 2004; Accepted 2 September 2004; Published online 26 October 2004.

Top

Abstract

Germline mutations in the succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) (mitochondrial respiratory chain complex II) subunit B gene, SDHB, cause susceptibility to head and neck paraganglioma and phaeochromocytoma. Previously, we did not identify somatic SDHB mutations in sporadic phaeochromocytoma, but SDHB maps to 1p36, a region of frequent loss of heterozygosity (LOH) in neuroblastoma as well. Hence, to evaluate SDHB as a candidate neuroblastoma tumour suppressor gene (TSG) we performed mutation analysis in 46 primary neuroblastomas by direct sequencing, but did not identify germline or somatic SDHB mutations. As TSGs such as RASSF1A are frequently inactivated by promoter region hypermethylation, we designed a methylation-sensitive PCR-based assay to detect SDHB promoter region methylation. In 21% of primary neuroblastomas and 32% of phaeochromocytomas (32%) methylated (and unmethylated) alleles were detected. Although promoter region methylation was also detected in two neuroblastoma cell lines, this was not associated with silencing of SDHB expression, and treatment with a demethylating agent (5-azacytidine) did not increase SDH activity. These findings suggest that although germline SDHB mutations are an important cause of phaeochromocytoma susceptibility, somatic inactivation of SDHB does not have a major role in sporadic neural crest tumours and SDHB is not the target of 1p36 allele loss in neuroblastoma and phaeochromocytoma.

Keywords:

SDHB, methylation, neuroblastoma, phaeochromocytoma

Top

MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS

These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated

NEWS AND VIEWS

Casting an eye on the Krebs cycle

Nature Genetics News and Views (01 Oct 2008)