TABLE 5
FROM:
Diagnostic accuracy for different strategies of image-guided breast intervention in cases of nonpalpable breast lesions
R M Pijnappel, M van den Donk, R Holland, W P Th M Mali, J L Peterse, J H C L Hendriks and P H M Peeters
BACK TO ARTICLETable 5. Comparison of histologic findings of LCNB stereotactic guided to histological findings of surgical excision
| Histologic findings of surgical excision | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No surgical confirmationa | Nonconclusive | Benign | High risk | DCIS | Invasive carcinoma | Total | |
| LCNB stereotactic | |||||||
| Nonconclusive | 1 (NC) | 1 (NC) | 2 | ||||
| Benign | 8 | 10 (A) | 1 (A) | 3 (M) | 22 | ||
| High risk | 2 (A) | 1 (A) | 2 (U HR) | 5 | |||
| DCIS | 8 (A) | 3 (U DCIS) | 11 | ||||
| Invasive carcinoma | 1 | 22 (A) | 23 | ||||
| Total | 9 | 0 | 13 | 2 | 14 | 25 | 63 |
a No surgical confirmation in the hospital where the stereotactic-guided LCNB was performed.
NC=nonconclusives; A=agreements; M=misses; U=underestimates.
