TABLE 4
FROM:
Diagnostic accuracy for different strategies of image-guided breast intervention in cases of nonpalpable breast lesions
R M Pijnappel, M van den Donk, R Holland, W P Th M Mali, J L Peterse, J H C L Hendriks and P H M Peeters
BACK TO ARTICLETable 4. Comparison of histologic findings of LCNB US-guided to histological findings of surgical excision
| Histologic findings of surgical excision | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No surgical confirmationa | Nonconclusive | Benign | High risk | DCIS | Invasive carcinoma | Total | |
| LCNB US-guided | |||||||
| Nonconclusive | 1 | 1 (NC) | 3 (NC) | 5 | |||
| Benign | 34 | 17 (A) | 2 (A) | 2 (M) | 6 (M) | 61 | |
| High risk | 1 | 1 (A) | 1 (U HR) | 3 | |||
| DCIS | 5 (A) | 3 (U DCIS) | 8 | ||||
| Invasive carcinoma | 3 | 48 (A) | 51 | ||||
| Total | 39 | 0 | 18 | 3 | 7 | 61 | 128 |
a No surgical confirmation in the hospital where the US-guided LCNB was performed. US-guided=ultrasound guided.
NC=nonconclusives; A=agreements; M=misses; U=underestimates.
