British Journal of Cancer

FIGURES AND TABLES

FROM:

Vascular density and phenotype around ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast

N B Teo, B S Shoker, C Jarvis, L Martin, J P Sloane and C Holcombe

BACK TO ARTICLE
Figure 1 - Unfortunately we are unable to provide accessible alternative text for this. If you require assistance to access this image, please contact help@nature.com or the author

Figure 1.

Simplified diagram of an individual focus of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and peripheral area where the periductal microvessels were counted.

Full figure and legend (44K)
Figure 2 - Unfortunately we are unable to provide accessible alternative text for this. If you require assistance to access this image, please contact help@nature.com or the author

Figure 2.

(A) Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) stained immunohistochemically using the CD34 antibody revealing a rim of positive vessels, (B) same area stained for vWF. There is a striking difference in the number of positive cells with the two antibodies in this case.

Full figure and legend (46K)
Figure 3 - Unfortunately we are unable to provide accessible alternative text for this. If you require assistance to access this image, please contact help@nature.com or the author

Figure 3.

(A) Non-cancerous lobules stained immunohistochemically using the CD34 antibody revealing a rim of positive vessels, (B) same area stained for vWF. There is also a striking difference in the number of positive cells with the two antibodies in this case.

Full figure and legend (48K)
Figure 4 - Unfortunately we are unable to provide accessible alternative text for this. If you require assistance to access this image, please contact help@nature.com or the author

Figure 4.

Relationship between microvessel density (MVD) and nuclear grade in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) without invasive carcinoma using four types of endothelial markers. The boxes represent the mean values and the whiskers represent 95% confidence interval of the mean. (LNG=low nuclear grade, ING=intermediate nuclear grade, HNG=high nuclear grade).

Full figure and legend (7K)
Figure 5 - Unfortunately we are unable to provide accessible alternative text for this. If you require assistance to access this image, please contact help@nature.com or the author

Figure 5.

Relationship between microvessel density (MVD) and core area in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) without invasive carcinoma using four types of endothelial markers. (1=vWF, 2=CD31, 3=CD141, 4=CD34).

Full figure and legend (6K)
Figure 6 - Unfortunately we are unable to provide accessible alternative text for this. If you require assistance to access this image, please contact help@nature.com or the author

Figure 6.

Relationship between microvessel density (MVD) and degree of necrosis in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) with and without invasive carcinoma. The boxes represent the mean values and the whiskers represent 95% confidence interval of the mean. (Degree of necrosis: (1) no necrosis, (2) 1–50% of DCIS focus has necrosis, (3) >50% of DCIS focus has necrosis).

Full figure and legend (4K)
Figure 7 - Unfortunately we are unable to provide accessible alternative text for this. If you require assistance to access this image, please contact help@nature.com or the author

Figure 7.

Relationship between degree of necrosis and core area in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) with and without invasive carcinoma. The boxes represent the mean values and the whiskers represent 95% confidence interval of the mean. (Degree of necrosis: (1) no necrosis, (2) 1–50% of DCIS focus has necrosis, (3) >50% of DCIS focus has necrosis).

Full figure and legend (3K)
BACK TO ARTICLE