Main

Epigenetic silencing of tumour suppressor genes (TSGs) by promoter methylation represents a key mechanism for their inactivation during tumorigenesis (Baylin and Ohm, 2006). Aberrant widespread promoter hypermethylation of TSG is typical of colorectal cancers (CRCs) displaying the CpG Island Methylator Phenotype or CIMP (Toyota et al, 1999), whereas somatic biallelic hypermethylation of the hMLH1 promoter is associated with the microsatellite instability (MSI) phenotype in sporadic CRCs (Kane et al, 1997). Microsatellite instability results from inactivation of the DNA mismatch repair system and is observed in approximately 15% of CRCs (12% sporadic and 3% associated with Lynch syndrome), whereas the remaining 85% of CRCs are microsatellite stable (MSS) and often display chromosomal instability (CIN; Grady and Carethers, 2008; Boland and Goel, 2010; Pino and Chung, 2010). Microsatellite unstable tumours typically arise in the proximal colon, display mucinous histology, as well as lymphocytic infiltration, are clinically favourable compared with MSS tumours but respond poorly to 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy (Sinicrope and Sargent, 2012). Sporadic MSI tumours associated with CIMP are tightly associated with mutation in BRAF gene (V600E; Weisenberger et al, 2006). Although the importance of methylation in defining different CRC subtypes is now unfolding, the specific methylation events that contribute to these subtypes are still unclear.

The WNT signaling pathway in vertebrates is divided into the canonical and non-canonical (Veeman et al, 2003; Logan and Nusse, 2004). Activation of the canonical WNT/β-catenin signaling leads to tumorigenesis in many cancers, including CRC (Reya and Clevers, 2005). An important function of the β-catenin-independent or non-canonical WNT signaling is the regulation of planar cell polarity (PCP; Barrow, 2006). The PCP pathway is important for directing polarisation of cells orthogonal to the axis of apical–basal polarity within the plane of an epithelium. Van-Gogh-like 2 (VANGL2) is a member of the non-canonical WNT/PCP signaling pathway, originally identified in Drosophila melanogaster, which is critical for establishment of the PCP of cells within epithelial sheets (Taylor et al, 1998; Wolff and Rubin, 1998). Van-Gogh-like 2 encodes a predicted four-pass transmembrane scaffolding protein with a PDZ domain-binding motif at the carboxy-terminus involved in protein–protein interactions (Torban et al, 2004; Iliescu et al, 2011). Van-Gogh-like 2 has been reported to interact with Rac1 (a small Rho-like GTPase) to regulate adherens junctions during PCP signaling in vertebrates (Lindqvist et al, 2010). Moreover, VANGL2 has been found to interact with Rack1 (receptor for activated C kinase 1) and this interaction is required for VANGL2 membrane localisation and PCP signaling (Li et al, 2011). Recently, VANGL2 has been demonstrated to form with Ror2 (receptor tyrosine kinase-like orphan receptor 2), a WNT-5a-induced receptor complex essential to establish PCP. In humans and mice (Lp/Lp homozigotes), VANGL2 mutations lead to miscarried fetuses with neural tube defects (Kibar et al, 2001; Lei et al, 2010; Kibar et al, 2011). In addition, VANGL2 has been also shown to regulate collective migration and invasion of human fibrosarcoma cells regulating matrix metalloproteinase 14 (MMP14) membrane trafficking (Cantrell and Jessen, 2010; Williams et al, 2012). A possible role of VANGL2 in CRC has not been investigated yet.

In an attempt to shed more light on epigenetically silenced genes in CRC, we identified VANGL2 during a cRNA microarray screening of a panel of CRC cell lines treated with the demethylating agent 5-aza. First, we analysed VANGL2 promoter methylation and expression in CRC cell lines. Then, we investigated the promoter methylation status of this gene in 418 sporadic CRC cases examining associations with clinico-pathological characteristics. We found that VANGL2 promoter methylation is associated with MSI subtype and BRAF mutation. As promoter methylation in non-canonical ligands and receptors has been associated with MSI in CRC patients (Rawson et al, 2011) and WNT/β-catenin activation in CRC cell lines (Ying et al, 2008; Lara et al, 2010), we hypothesised that loss of VANGL2 by aberrant promoter hypermethylation in MSI CRCs could have a pro-tumorigenic role in CRC via WNT/β-catenin activation. Here we report that ectopic expression of VANGL2 can suppress cell growth and clonogenicity by WNT/β-catenin suppression, suggesting that VANGL2 could be a TSG in CRC.

Materials and Methods

Cell lines and treatments

Colorectal cancer cell lines RKO, SW480, SW48, HCT116, LOVO, DLD1, LS174T, SW620, Caco2, HT29 and SW837 were obtained from ATCC (Manassas, VA, USA). In our laboratory, all cells are tested and authenticated every 6 months using known genetic and epigenetic markers. Cells were cultured in IMDM or Leibovitz medium (the latter only for SW620) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 100 U ml−1 penicillin, 100 μg ml−1 streptomycin and 2 mM glutamine (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Cells were maintained at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 incubator.

5-Aza-2′deoxycytidine (5-aza) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St Louis, MO, USA) and the treatment was performed on RKO, SW480, SW48, HCT116, LOVO cell lines at 1–5 μM for 96 h.

The full VANGL2-coding sequence was cloned into the pCMV-Tag1 expression vector (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA, USA), using SacI and KpnI restriction enzymes (NEB, Ipswich, MA, USA). Transfection of pCMV-VANGL2 was performed using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen), following the manufacturer’s protocol, and after 48 h, cells were selected using G418 at a concentration established with the killing curve (1.5 mg ml−1 for SW480 and 0.4 mg ml−1 for HCT116).

Bisulphite sequencing and methylation-specific PCR (MSP)

The methylation status of the VANGL2 promoter in CRC cell lines and tissues was determined by bisulphite sequencing and MSP after treating 1 μg of DNA with sodium bisulphite with the Epitect Bisulfite Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA), following the manufacturer’s protocol. Modified DNA was used as a template for PCR reactions. For the bisulphite sequencing, primers amplifying a sequence located in the 5′UTR between −15128 and −14863 from the transcriptional start codon, containing 42 CpGs, were selected. Two microliters of PCR products were ligated into the TOPO vector (Invitrogen) and, after transformation, at least eight clones per sample were sequenced in both directions with M13 primers. Methylation-specific PCR was performed in a representative region of the 5′UTR, spanning −15072 through −14978 from the transcriptional start codon. Primer sequences are listed in Supplementary Table 1.

RNA extraction and quantitative RT–PCR

RNA extraction from cells was performed with TRIzol (Invitrogen) and 2 μg of total RNA were retrotranscribed using oligo-dT and MMLV reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen). Quantification of VANGL2 was performed by quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR (Q-RT–PCR) using Taqman Gene Expression Assay (Hs00393412_m1, Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, CA, USA). GAPDH was used as reference gene. The relative quantification of VANGL2 gene expression was performed with the comparative CT method (2−ΔΔCt), using the untreated cell line (CTRL) or a pool of healthy subjects as a calibrator. For 5-aza experiments, a ratio between VANGL2 mRNA expression after and before 5-aza treatment was calculated. Each evaluation was performed in triplicate.

Protein extraction and western blotting

Total protein extraction from cell lines was performed using RIPA buffer (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA) supplemented with protease and phosphatase inhibitors (Roche, NJ, USA). Forty micrograms of proteins were separated on a 10% SDS–PAGE, transferred onto PVDF membrane (GE Healthcare, NJ, USA) and probed with the following primary antibodies: goat anti-VANGL2 at 1 : 1000 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) and mouse anti-β-actin at 1 : 1000 (Sigma-Aldrich). After incubation with the specific secondary antibody, proteins were visualised using the ECL Plus Chemiluminescence system with a Storm 840 PhosphorImager (GE Healthcare). The housekeeping protein β-actin was used to normalise protein expression levels.

Luciferase activity assay

One-microgram per well of TOPflash TCF reporter plasmid (Millipore, MA, USA) was co-transfected with a thymidine kinase promoter-driven Renilla luciferase (40 ng per well) plasmid as a reference control (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). Luciferase activity was assayed 24 h after using the Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay System (Promega), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Luciferase activity was normalised to Renilla activity. Experiments were performed in triplicate.

Immunofluorescence

Cells were seeded onto glass coverslips at 60% confluence, fixed with 2% paraformaldehyde and permeabilised with 0.2% Triton X-100. Cells were incubated with mouse anti-β-catenin antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) and secondary Texas Red-conjugated anti-mouse antibody (Dako Cytomation, Glostrup, DK, USA).

Colony-forming assay

Cells were seeded at the density of 100 cells per well in six-well plates, and after 2 weeks cells were fixed with 0.5% crystal violet in paraformaldehyde. The total number of visible colonies was counted. Three independent experiments were performed in triplicate.

Clinical samples

Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues from 418 sporadic CRC were obtained from the Department of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano (Milan, Italy; ‘Milan samples’) and from the Clinical Department of Radiological and Histopathological Sciences, S.Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna (Bologna, Italy; ‘Bologna samples’). Seventeen FFPE normal colon samples were obtained from the Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Infectious Diseases, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany. Information about grading was missing from 12 samples.

Informed written consent was obtained before procedures. Institutional Review Board approval was granted for this study.

DNA extraction and BRAF and KRAS mutational analyses

DNA extraction was done by tissue microdissection from tumour areas of FFPE tissue slides using the QIAamp DNA Mini kit according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Qiagen). BRAF exon 15, which contains the V600E mutation, and KRAS codon 12/13 mutations were amplified using primers reported in Supplementary Table 1. PCR was performed for 30 cycles as follows: 95 °C for 30 s, 57 °C for 30 s and 72 °C for 30 s. This was followed by an extension step at 72 °C for 10 min. PCR products were separated on an agarose gel, purified and sequenced using a Beckman Coulter sequencer CEQ 8000 (Beckman Coulter, Milan, Italy). BRAF data were obtained from 172 samples.

Microsatellite instability testing

Microsatellite instability was assessed differently in the two sets of patients. In ‘Bologna samples’, MSI was tested using five mononucleotide markers (Ricciardiello et al, 2005). A high degree of MSI was defined as the presence of mutations in 30% of the markers; a low degree of MSI (MSI-L) was defined as at least one mutation in <30% of the markers; MSS was defined as no mutant markers (Boland et al, 1998). For statistical purposes, MSI-L cancers were considered together with MSS. In ‘Milan samples’, MSI was tested using the mononucleotide markers BAT26 and BAT25 and defined by frameshifts at either one or both markers. Loss of expression of MMR proteins was confirmed in all MSI CRC by immunohistochemistry (Laghi et al, 2008). Microsatellite data were available from 392 samples.

Statistical analysis

Unpaired t-tests were used to evaluate the mean differences between two groups for the continuous variables. Chi-square and Fisher’s exact test were applied to analyse categorical variables. Correspondence analysis, a graphic exploratory technique, was used to explore associations between different categories (Greenacre, 1984) in two- and multi-way contingency tables. Logistic regression analysis was used to analyse associations between different categories. JMP version 8.02 (Cary, NC, USA), SAS version 9.2 (Cary, NC, USA) and BMDP Statistical Software Inc. (BMDP PC-90 Statistical Software, Los Angeles, CA, USA) were used for the statistical analysis. Significance was assigned at P<0.05.

Results

Van-Gogh-like 2 expression in CRC cell lines is regulated by promoter methylation

We identified VANGL2 gene expression using a cRNA microarray approach to find new epigenetically regulated targets in CRC cell lines with different molecular profiles (RKO and SW48, MSI-CIMP; HCT116 and LOVO, MSI-Lynch; SW480, MSS) after treatment with the demethylating agent 5-aza (Supplementary Figure 1). Q-RT–PCR was performed to confirm the cRNA microarray data (Figure 1A). We found that VANGL2 expression was higher in 5-aza-treated RKO, LOVO, SW48 (P<0.05) and HCT116 (although not reaching a statistical significance in HCT116) compared with untreated cell lines. No differences were found in SW480 after treatment with 5-aza (unpaired t-test) (Figure 1A).

Figure 1
figure 1

Epigenetic regulation of VANGL2 in a panel of CRC cell lines with different MSI status. (A) Ratio between VANGL2 mRNA expression in each cell line after and before 5-aza treatment (ratio 5-aza vs ctrl; (B) Representative bisulphite sequencing on five different clones. Methylation status of each individual promoter is shown as a row of CpG sites (empty dot=CpG unmethylated; solid dot=CpG methylated); (C) Methylation-specific PCR (MSP: U= unmethylated; M=methylated). *P<0.05 (unpaired t-test).

To explore the potential role of methylation in the regulation of VANGL2 mRNA expression, we analysed the VANGL2 promoter and 5′UTR looking for CpG islands. Bisulphite sequencing of multiple clones of RKO, SW48, HCT116, LOVO and SW480 was performed to determine the methylation status of the VANGL2 promoter and 5′UTR in these cell lines (Figure 1B). Moreover, MSP was done on six additional CRC cell lines with different MSI status (MSI: LS174T and DLD1; MSS: Caco2, SW620, SW837 and HT29; Figure 1C). We found that the VANGL2 promoter was fully methylated in RKO, SW48, HCT116 and DLD1; partially methylated in LOVO, LS174T and SW837; and unmethylated in SW480, SW620 and HT29. Then, Q-RT-PCR was performed to measure VANGL2 mRNA level in the full panel of CRC cell lines (Figure 2A). In accordance with VANGL2 promoter methylation status, we found higher expression of VANGL2 mRNA in the unmethylated cell lines compared with methylated and partially methylated cell lines (Figure 2B). Interestingly, we found higher expression of VANGL2 in MSS cell lines compared with MSI cells lines, although it did not reach statistical significance (Figure 2C). Our data indicate that VANGL2 promoter hypermethylation is associated with VANGL2 silencing in CRC cell lines, and is frequent in MSI cell lines.

Figure 2
figure 2

VANGL2 mRNA expression in CRC cell lines. (A) Quantitative RT–PCR of VANGL2 mRNA; GAPDH was used as normaliser; (B) mean VANGL2 mRNA expression by methylation status (M=methylated; P=partially methylated; U=unmethylated); (C) mean VANGL2 mRNA expression by MSI status. *P<0.05.

VANGL2 is methylated in CRC tissues

To determine whether VANGL2 is methylated in clinical specimens, we analysed VANGL2 promoter by MSP in 17 normal colon and 418 primary CRC tissues. Clinico-pathological features of CRC patients are reported in Table 1; MSI in ‘Bologna samples’ was 13.6% (16 MSI; 102 MSS); MSI ‘Milan samples’ was 6.93% (19 MSI; 255 MSS). A representative image of MSP analysis on patient samples is reported in Supplementary Figure 2; methylation was defined as the presence of a solid methylation-specific fragment in MSP gels. We found that VANGL2 promoter was methylated in 106 out of 418 CRC patients (25.3%), but in none of the normal colon tissues. We examined associations between VANGL2 methylation and clinico-pathological features (χ2 and Fisher’s exact test were applied). Interestingly, VANGL2 methylation was significantly more common in MSI tumours than in MSS tumours (P<0.0001, Table 2). This relationship was reflected in associations between VANGL2 methylation and MSI-associated tumour features, including higher grade (P=0.0002), proximal colon location (P<0.0001) and BRAF V600E mutation (P=0.002; Table 2). Furthermore, a multi-way correspondence analysis confirmed a strong clustering among VANGL2 methylation, MSI, BRAF V600E mutation, higher grade and proximal colon location, whereas a weaker association was found among Vangl2 unmethylated, MSS, BRAF wild type, left colon and lower-intermediate grade (Supplementary Figure 3). In addition, a regression analysis was performed to confirm that Vangl2 methylation is independently associated with higher grade, proximal colon location and BRAF mutation (Supplementary Table 2). This data suggest that VANGL2 promoter hypermethylation is associated with MSI and CIMP CRC in vivo, confirming our findings in vitro.

Table 1 Clinico-pathological characteristics of CRC patients
Table 2 Association of VANGL2 promoter methylation with clinico-pathological features. Chi square and Fisher’s exact test were applied

Van-Gogh-like 2 expression in CRC cells inhibits cell growth and clonogenicity

To evaluate the functional role of VANGL2 in CRC cell lines, we transfected a VANGL2-expressing vector and its control vector into SW480 cells. After G418 selection, we compared proliferation and colony-forming abilities in SW480-CTRL and SW480-VANGL2. MTT assay showed that ectopic expression of VANGL2 induced a significant reduction in SW480 cell proliferation (P=0.0019; Figure 3A). Moreover, VANGL2 overexpression significantly inhibited colony formation (P=0.0004; Figure 3B). This latter result was confirmed after the stable overexpression of VANGL2 in HCT116, a cell line that shows VANGL2 promoter methylation (P=0.0121, Figure 3C).

Figure 3
figure 3

VANGL2 suppresses cell growth and clonogenicity by canonical WNT modulation. (A) Van-Gogh-like 2 inhibits cell growth in SW480-VANGL2 cells, and (B) colony formation in SW480-VANGL2 cells; (C) VANGL2 inhibits cell colony formation in HCT116-VANGL2. *P=0.0004; **P=0.0121. AU=arbitrary units.

Van-Gogh-like 2 expression in CRC cells inhibits WNT/β-catenin signaling

To study the effect of VANGL2 modulation on canonical WNT/β-catenin signaling, we determined β-catenin levels by immunofluorescence microscopy (Figure 4A) and analysed β-catenin/TCF-dependent transcription in luciferase reporter assays (Figure 4B, left) before and after VANGL2 overexpression in SW480. In VANGL2-transfected SW480 cells, β-catenin levels were decreased compared with SW480-CTRL (Figure 4A). These results suggest that VANGL2 negatively regulates intracellular levels of β-catenin. In accordance with downregulation, the luciferase activity of the TCF luciferase reporter TOPflash was significantly decreased (about 47%) in SW480-VANGL2 cells (P=0.0002; Figure 4B, left). This result further confirmed that VANGL2 counteracts canonical WNT signaling in CRC cells. We also studied the effect of VANGL2 on the expression of two β-catenin target genes, Cyclin D1 and c-Myc (Figure 4B, right). Our results show a downregulation of Cyclin D1 and c-Myc in SW480-VANGL2, in accordance with the decrease of β-catenin intracellular levels and activity.

Figure 4
figure 4

VANGL2 represses canonical WNT signaling. (A) Immunofluorescence microscopy for β-catenin in SW480. (B) VANGL2 decreases β-catenin/TCF luciferase reporter activity (left) and transcription of β-catenin target genes cyclin-D1 and C-Myc (right) in SW480-VANGL2; *P=0.0002.

Discussion

In this study, we found that the expression of VANGL2, a transmembrane protein that participates in non-canonical WNT signaling, is regulated by promoter hypermethylation in CRC cell lines. In addition, the VANGL2 promoter is frequently aberrantly methylated in CRC tissues displaying MSI. Importantly, we demonstrate that forced overexpression of VANGL2 inhibits proliferation and colony-forming ability in CRC cell lines, and this effect can be mediated by inhibition of canonical WNT signaling. Our results support the concept that loss of VANGL2 activates canonical WNT signaling, with a potential pro-tumourigenic effect in CRC.

CRC is the third leading cause of cancer deaths in the United States (Siegel et al, 2012). Colorectal cancer develops as a consequence of genetic and epigenetic alterations in TSGs and oncogenes that lead to genomic instability, a feature that affects all pathways involved in CRC pathogenesis (Grady and Carethers, 2008). Most CRCs arise through the CIN pathway and are characterised by aneuploidy, loss of heterozygosity and are MSS (Pino and Chung, 2010). Approximately 15% of CRCs arise through the MSI pathway, which is a hallmark of DNA-mismatch repair-deficient CRCs. Sporadic MSI CRCs exhibit unique clinico-pathologic features such as diploidy, poor differentiation, mucinous histology, lymphocytic infiltrates, older age, proximal colon location, BRAF V600E mutation, a better prognosis and resistance to 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy, which distinguishes them from CIN tumours. BRAF V600E mutation is strongly associated with CIMP (Weisenberger et al, 2006). In this study, we found that VANGL2 gene expression is controlled by promoter hypermethylation. Indeed, pharmacological treatment with the demethylating agent 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine strongly upregulated the expression of VANGL2 in the fully methylated cell lines RKO and SW48 (models of MSI-CIMP; both hypermethylated at hMLH1) and in the hemi-methylated cell line LOVO (a model of Lynch syndrome, mutated at hMSH2). A smaller increase in VANGL2 re-expression was found in HCT116 (a model of Lynch syndrome, mutated at hMLH1) that has a VANGL2 promoter more heavily methylated compared with other cell lines. As expected, no differences in the expression of VANGL2 after 5-aza treatment were found in SW480, a model of MSS CRC with a low rate of methylation at CpGs islands. Additional confirmation that promoter methylation represses VANGL2 expression was found in the analysis of a panel of 11 CRC cell lines. Increased mean VANGL2 levels were associated with unmethylated and partially methylated (or hemi-methylated) cell lines compared with fully methylated ones. Although there is an overall correlation between Vangl2 promoter methylation and lack of expression, there are some exceptions to this. For instance, HCT116 cells have a highly methylated promoter but express VANGL2 at a level comparable to LOVO and SW837 (hemimethylated cell lines). With respect to the VANGL2 promoter region investigated in this study, we cannot exclude that a wider promoter portion could account for its expression, thus also possibly explaining for VANGL2 pattern in HCT116 cells. Interestingly, VANGL2 levels were lower in MSI CRC cell lines, suggesting that VANGL2 methylation is predominant in this subtype, even if the sample size was too limited for statistical analyses. In accordance with this observation, we found that VANGL2 promoter methylation is a feature of MSI CRCs. Importantly, VANGL2 methylation was associated with clinico-pathologic features of this subtype (i.e., higher grade, proximal colon location, BRAF V600E mutation), also independently from MSI. The association of Vangl2 methylation with BRAF V600E mutation suggests an association with CIMP that is tightly connected with sporadic MSI, though we did not analyse CIMP markers. Constitutive activation of the WNT/β-catenin signaling pathway occurs in nearly all CRCs due to both genetic and epigenetic mechanisms. Most CRCs harbour somatic mutations in APC or, less frequently, in β-catenin or AXIN2 (Segditsas and Tomlinson, 2006), whereas epigenetic silencing has been reported for APC and for the WNT antagonists SFRP, DKK-1 and WIF1 (Hiltunen et al, 1997; Suzuki et al, 2004; Taniguchi et al, 2005; Aguilera et al, 2006). Epigenetic changes have been reported in non-canonical WNT proteins such as WNT5a (Ying et al, 2008) and Ror2 (Lara et al, 2010). It is known that WNT5a signals through Ror2 to inhibit β-catenin signaling (Oishi et al, 2003), and recently, it has been shown that VANGL2 forms a WNT5a-induced receptor complex with Ror2 to transduce its signal (Gao et al, 2011). Consistent with these findings, we found that the forced overexpression of VANGL2 in SW480, a cell line that expresses both WNT-5a and Ror-2 proteins (Ying et al, 2008; Lara et al, 2010), results in strong inhibition of WNT/β-catenin signaling and the target genes Cyclin D1 and c-Myc by reducing intracellular β-catenin protein expression. In addition, our finding that VANGL2 inhibits colony-forming ability and growth of CRC cells is consistent with the effect of WNT5a and Ror2 overexpression in CRC cell lines (Ying et al, 2008; Lara et al, 2010). These lines of evidence suggest that VANGL2 might act as a tumour suppressor in CRC, and are in agreement with its role as invasion suppressor in fibrosarcoma cells (Cantrell and Jessen, 2010). We speculate that the epigenetic inactivation of VANGL2 in MSI CRCs could be advantageous in this subtype of cancers that might benefit from an increase in β-catenin activity and WNT signaling.

In conclusion, the data reported here add important new insights into the precise methylation events that contribute to MSI CRCs biology and might be useful to better understand the behaviour of this distinct class of tumours.