Clinical Study
British Journal of Cancer (2009) 101, 1671–1675. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6605359 www.bjcancer.com
Published online 13 October 2009
Colonoscopic surveillance improves survival after colorectal cancer diagnosis in inflammatory bowel disease
M W M D Lutgens1, B Oldenburg1, P D Siersema1, A A van Bodegraven2, G Dijkstra3, D W Hommes4, D J de Jong5, P C F Stokkers6, C J van der Woude7 and F P Vleggaar1 On behalf of the Initiative on Crohn and Colitis (ICC)
- 1Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- 2Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- 3Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
- 4Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- 5Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- 6Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- 7Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Correspondence: Dr FP Vleggaar, University Medical Center Utrecht, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands. E-mail: f.vleggaar@umcutrecht.nl
Received 16 June 2009; Revised 27 August 2009; Accepted 4 September 2009; Published online 13 October 2009.
Abstract
Background:
Colonoscopic surveillance provides the best practical means for preventing colorectal cancer (CRC) in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients. Strong evidence for improved survival from surveillance programmes is sparse.
Method:
The aim of this study was to compare tumour stage and survival of IBD patients with CRC who were a part of a surveillance programme with those who were not. A nationwide pathology database (PALGA (pathologisch anatomisch landelijk geautomatiseerd archief)) was consulted to identify IBD patients with CRC treated in all eight university hospitals in The Netherlands over a period of 15 years. Patients were assigned to the surveillance group when they had undergone one or more surveillance colonoscopies before a diagnosis of CRC. Patients who had not undergone surveillance served as controls. Tumour stage and survival were compared between the two groups.
Results:
A total of 149 patients with IBD-associated CRC were identified. Twenty-three had had colonoscopic surveillance before CRC was discovered. The 5-year CRC-related survival rate of patients in the surveillance group was 100% compared with 74% in the non-surveillance group (P=0.042). In the surveillance group, only one patient died as a consequence of CRC compared with 29 patients in the control group (P=0.047). In addition, more early tumour stages were found in the surveillance group (P=0.004).
Conclusions:
These results provide evidence for improved survival from colonoscopic surveillance in IBD patients by detecting CRC at a more favourable tumour stage.
Keywords:
inflammatory bowel disease, colorectal cancer, surveillance, survival, tumour stage, IBD, CRC
