Research abstract
British Dental Journal 202, E8 (2007)
doi:10.1038/bdj.2007.45
Verifiable CPD Paper:
The acceptability of dually-qualified dental hygienist-therapists to general dental practitioners in South-East Scotland
M. K. Ross1, R. J. Ibbetson2 and S. Turner3
- There is a distinct lack of knowledge of the clinical remit of this group of dental care professionals.
- Dentists should be informed about the substantial contribution hygienist-therapists could make to patient care.
- Dentists working in larger practices who already employed a hygienist or vocational trainee were more positive in their view of hygienist-therapists.
Abstract
Aims Recent UK legislation allows dental therapists or jointly-qualified dental hygienist-therapists to work in the general dental service. This study aimed to investigate the extent of dentists' knowledge of the clinical remit of jointly qualified hygienist-therapists, their willingness to consider employing such a professional, and factors associated with these two measures.
Materials and methods A postal questionnaire was sent to 616 NHS-registered dentists in South-East Scotland. Analysis and classification of responses to open-ended questions used standard non-parametric statistical tests and quantitative techniques.
Results Following two mailings, a 50% (n = 310) response rate was obtained. A total of 65% of dentists worked in a practice employing a dental hygienist, while only 2% employed a dental therapist. Hygienists tended to work in larger practices. Dentists' knowledge of the clinical remit of the dually-qualified hygienist-therapist was found to be limited, reflecting a restricted and inaccurate view of the professional remit of a hygienist-therapist. The majority (64%) said they would consider employing a hygienist-therapist in their practice, rising to 72% amongst dentists already working with a hygienist. Reasons given by dentists who were negative about this prospect were sought. Those who worked with a hygienist tended to refer to lack of physical space, whilst those who did not tended to cite reservations on clinical skills, competence and responsibilities, or on the costs involved.
Conclusions This study identified considerable ignorance and negativity among dentists about the nature and clinical remit of this group of professionals. Dually-qualified hygienist-therapists will be in a position to treat much of the routine disease that exists within the population, and dentists may benefit from education in relation to the substantial contribution these individuals could potentially make to patient care.
- Senior Lecturer, Edinburgh Postgraduate Dental Institute, The University of Edinburgh, 4th Floor, Lauriston Building, Lauriston Place, Edinburgh, EH3 9HA
- Professor of Primary Dental Care/Director, Edinburgh Postgraduate Dental Institute, The University of Edinburgh, 4th Floor, Lauriston Building, Lauriston Place, Edinburgh, EH3 9HA
- Senior Researcher, Edinburgh Postgraduate Dental Institute, The University of Edinburgh, 4th Floor, Lauriston Building, Lauriston Place, Edinburgh, EH3 9HA
Correspondence to: M. K. Ross1 e-mail: Margaret.K.Ross@ed.ac.uk
MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS
These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated
RESEARCH
Fully mobilizing host defense: Building better vaccines
Nature Biotechnology Research Review (01 Nov 1998)
Attitudes of general dental practitioners in Wales towards employing dental hygienist-therapists
BDJ Research (10 Nov 2007)
A survey of the workload of dental therapists/hygienist-therapists employed in primary care settings
BDJ Research (09 Feb 2008)
Activity and education of clinical dental technicians: a UK survey
BDJ Research (24 Nov 2007)
Educational needs and employment status of Scottish dental hygienists
British Dental Journal Original Article
