Practice abstract
British Dental Journal 200, 493 - 496 (2006)
Published online: 13 May 2006 | doi:10.1038/sj.bdj.4813524
Verifiable CPD Paper:
An audit of referral practice for patients with impacted palatal canines and the impact of referral guidelines
- If diagnosed early, interceptive extraction of the deciduous canine can correct the path of eruption of the permanent canine and prevent impaction.
- GDPs have a key role in the early detection and referral of such cases.
- In this audit, GDP referral practice for patients with impacted maxillary canines was generally poor.
- Clinical guidelines even with some additional supporting education were ineffective in improving the referral practice.
- Further investigation is required of alternative methods to improve the uptake of such information.
Abstract
Objective To assess referral practice for patients presenting with impacted palatal maxillary canines, and to develop and evaluate the effectiveness of referral guidelines.
Design Prospective clinical audit.
Setting Southend and Basildon district general hospitals.
Subjects and methods The 'gold' standard was identified as regular dental attenders with unerupted palatal canines being referred by 12 years old, with a wait of no longer than 20 weeks from referral to assessment. Data were collected and compared to the defined standard. An algorithm outlining the correct management was developed and distributed to all local dentists. The cycle was repeated for a similar time period.
Results Ninety-eight per cent of patients were seen within 20 weeks during both cycles while the referrals increased from 85 to 109 patients. The percentage of patients referred by 12 years of age increased from 16.5% to 27% (p = 0.09). During the first cycle 82% of patients presented with retained deciduous maxillary canines. This was reduced to 76% during the second cycle (p = 0.29).
Conclusion Referral practice was generally poor when compared to the recommended good practice. More patients were referred after distribution of the guidelines, but the percentage referred by the recommended age was not statistically significantly improved.
- Specialist Registrar, Orthodontic Department, Southend Hospital, Prittlewell Chase, Westclif on Sea, Essex, SS0 0RY
- Consultant, Orthodontic Department, Southend Hospital, Prittlewell Chase, Westclif on Sea, Essex, SS0 0RY
Correspondence to: T Hassan1 e-mail: tasnim1000@yahoo.co.uk
