Research Summary abstract
British Dental Journal 200, 445 (2006)
Published online: 22 April 2006 | doi:10.1038/sj.bdj.4813561
Research Summary:
Acceptability of revalidation to GDPs
J Lafferty1
- Revalidation is more robust than recertification.
- The process of revalidation will give a structure to continuing professional development.
- Appraisal or mentoring of revalidees by peers was seen as essential to the acceptability and feasibility of the process.
Abstract
Aim
To investigate the acceptablility of a pilot scheme of revalidation to general dental practitioners.
Method
Ten general dental practitioners completed portfolios of evidence of being up to date and fit to practise. This portfolio was assessed by a panel of three experts, using an assessment tool developed specifically for that purpose. An action research methodology was used to evaluate participants' perceptions, consisting of a focus group and semi-structured interviews. The views of the assessors on the portfolio and its assessment were collected using a questionnaire.
Results
The views of the participants on revalidation, the pilot scheme portfolio and its use, who should assess it and how its use could be supported were collected. Also areas of difficulty in using the portfolio were identified, along with suggestions for improving it and alternative ways of evidencing competence. Assessors noted that the quality of evidence was adequate, but also made suggestions for improvement of the portfolio.
Conclusions
The pilot scheme appears to have been acceptable to the dentists in this scheme, given some caveats. The assessors felt that appraisal would significantly enhance any substantive scheme.
- General Dental Practitioner, Sheffield (GDC Revalidation Working Group 2001-2005)