Article | Open

Female Adult Aedes albopictus Suppression by Wolbachia-Infected Male Mosquitoes

  • Scientific Reports 6, Article number: 33846 (2016)
  • doi:10.1038/srep33846
  • Download Citation
Received:
Accepted:
Published online:

Abstract

Dengue, chikungunya and zika viruses are pathogens with an increasing global impact. In the absence of an approved vaccine or therapy, their management relies on controlling the mosquito vectors. But traditional controls are inadequate, and the range of invasive species such as Aedes albopictus (Asian Tiger Mosquito) is expanding. Genetically modified mosquitoes are being tested, but their use has encountered regulatory barriers and public opposition in some countries. Wolbachia bacteria can cause a form of conditional sterility, which can provide an alternative to genetic modification or irradiation. It is unknown however, whether openly released, artificially infected male Ae. albopictus can competitively mate and sterilize females at a level adequate to suppress a field population. Also, the unintended establishment of Wolbachia at the introduction site could result from horizontal transmission or inadvertent female release. In 2014, an Experimental Use Permit from the United States Environmental Protection Agency approved a pilot field trial in Lexington, Kentucky, USA. Here, we present data showing localized reduction of both egg hatch and adult female numbers. The artificial Wolbachia type was not observed to establish in the field. The results are discussed in relation to the applied use of Wolbachia-infected males as a biopesticide to suppress field populations of Ae. albopictus.

Introduction

Because of its success with many agricultural pests, there has been substantial effort invested in developing Sterile Insect Technique (SIT) to control medically important mosquito species. However, irradiation damage affecting mosquito fitness can impact efficacy. Maternally inherited Wolbachia bacteria can cause a form of conditional sterility known as Cytoplasmic Incompatibility (CI) in many insect species, including mosquitoes1. Contained trials show fewer negative fitness effects associated with some Wolbachia-infected strains, relative to radiation-induced sterility2. A prior field trial demonstrated that cytoplasmic incompatibility resulting from inundative male releases could suppress a population of Culex mosquitoes3. However, the Culex demonstration was constrained by an inability to manipulate Wolbachia infections and construct artificial Wolbachia infection types, and therefore the approach could not be extended to additional Culex populations or other important mosquito species.

Following invention of a method to generate artificial Wolbachia infection types4, much of the effort devoted to developing applied Wolbachia-based approaches has focused on a method known as population replacement, in which the introduction of Wolbachia-infected individuals are intended to establish the artificial Wolbachia infection type within the targeted mosquito population5,6. This can be pursued if the Wolbachia has desirable traits in the targeted population, such as Wolbachia interference with pathogen transmission7. While there are multiple examples of successful Wolbachia establishment, there are additional examples in which population replacement has not resulted8. Because Wolbachia is maternally inherited, population replacement approaches require the introduction of Wolbachia-infected females. Because female mosquitoes can bite, blood feed and transmit pathogens, there are ethical considerations, and biosafety regulations can restrict open release of female mosquitoes9,10. In contrast, male mosquitoes do not bite or blood feed, and repeated, inundative releases of male mosquitoes is the foundation of SIT-type approaches7.

We have previously developed strains of Ae. albopictus that are infected artificially with different Wolbachia types11. The wPip infection type from Culex pipiens displays desirable characteristics for an applied population suppression approach, including high maternal inheritance rates, little measurable adverse effects on adult male competitiveness, and high cytoplasmic incompatibility levels2. Because laboratory tests are not necessarily predictive of outcomes in the field, we began working with regulatory authorities in the USA to obtain permits for open release field trials and began characterizing a field site in Lexington, Kentucky, USA as a potential test site. This location is typical suburban Ae. albopictus habitat and was selected due to its close proximity to the rearing facility and its robust Ae. albopictus population12.

To provide a ‘before/after comparison,’ the field sites were monitored in 2013, prior to the introduction of incompatible males, using BG traps and ovitraps. The goals were to characterize Ae. albopictus egg hatch rate, adult female and adult male number, with the intention to compare the resulting data with similar measurements made the subsequent year, during the incompatible male introductions. Furthermore, the 2013 field data served as the basis for selecting the site for the 2014 intervention. The 2013 results were grouped, analyzed and discussed in terms of the resulting incompatible male introduction and non-introduction areas. These were subsequently referred to as the Treated and Untreated areas, respectively. Importantly, the Treated area did not receive incompatible males or any other Ae. albopictus abatement measures in 2013. But to simplify and facilitate comparisons, we refer to the areas using the same terminology as 2014.

The overall number of adult female Ae. albopictus collected in 2013 did not differ between the Treated and Untreated areas, and a similar pattern of seasonal population increase and decline was observed at both areas (Fig. 1a). Relatively few females were collected early in the season, i.e., June collections accounted for few of the total females collected for the year. Approximately a third of the total collected females were from July and an additional third in August. The population size declined in September as the weather became cooler, drier and the population went into diapause, and by October, few Ae. albopictus were collected.

Figure 1
Figure 1

Mean (a) number of female adult Ae. albopictus collected using BG traps and (b) percent hatch of Ae. albopictus eggs collected using oviposition traps at the Treated and Untreated sites in the 2013 field season. There were no incompatible males introduced at either site in 2013. Bars show 95% confidence intervals.

Fewer Ae. albopictus males were collected in BG traps (Fig. S1), relative to the females caught in the same traps. A lower capture rate of males with BG traps is consistent with prior reports13,14. For both areas, the percent sex ratio of BG collected adults averaged 79 ± 15% (Mean ± Std Dev). The seasonal pattern of males was similar to that described for females above. No difference was observed in the male number, comparing between the Treated and Untreated areas for each month (p > 0.17).

Ovitraps were placed in May 2013, and the earliest eggs were observed in June. The percent egg hatch remained at approximately 65% at both areas through August and was subsequently observed to decline in September (p < 0.0001), as eggs at both areas began to enter into diapause (Fig. 1b). Comparing between the two areas for each month, no statistical difference was observed in egg hatch (p > 0.21), and similar numbers of eggs were collected between the two areas (data not shown).

In 2014, after receiving an Experimental Use Permit from the USA Environmental Protection Agency (89668-EUP-1) for the open release of Ae. albopictus males infected with the wPip Wolbachia type, field collections of eggs and adults were started in June. At the Untreated area, the overall seasonal pattern was similar to that in the preceding year. Relatively few females were collected in June, followed by a population size increase in July and August (Fig. 2a). The overall population density remained high in September at the Untreated area. With the onset of cooler weather in October, the population declined and few additional adults were collected. The pattern of males was similar to that of 2013, with fewer adult males collected in BG traps, relative to females collected in the same traps (Fig. S2). The overall percent sex ratio of BG collected adults in the Untreated area was 80 ± 12% (Mean ± Std Dev).

Figure 2
Figure 2

Mean (a) number of female adult Ae. albopictus collected using BG traps and (b) percent hatch of Ae. albopictus eggs collected using oviposition traps at the Treated and Untreated sites in the 2014 field season. In 2014, incompatible males were introduced at the Treated site only. Bars show 95% confidence intervals.

At the Treated area, incompatible male introductions began in June 2014 with approximately 5,000 males introduced twice a week, for a total of 10,000 males per week. Males were released from a single location. Incompatible male introductions continued through September, for a total of 17 weeks. In total, 182,000 incompatible males were introduced into the Treated area. BG trap collections showed more males collected within the Treated area in June (χ2(1,N = 89) = 12.301, p < 0.0005) and July (χ2(1,N = 108) = 11.959, p < 0.0005), compared to the Untreated area (Fig. S2). Within the Treated area, the number of collected adult males and the sex ratio of collected adults were both correlated with distance from the male introduction point (Fig. S3). This is consistent with expectations for a point release of incompatible males, which are dispersing away from the release point over time.

Early season comparison between the Treated and Untreated areas show no difference in female number in June and July (Fig. 2a). During the peak months for mosquito density, fewer Ae. albopictus females were collected at the Treated area in August (χ2(1,N = 97) = 7.012, p < 0.0081) and September (χ2(1,N = 104) = 10.309, p < 0.0013), compared to collections in the Untreated area during the same periods. BG trap collections within the Treated area did not show a correlation between adult female number and distance from the male introduction point (p > 0.13).

Cytoplasmic incompatibility is characterized by early developmental arrest of embryos. Therefore, if the difference in adult female number between the Treated and Untreated areas were due to cytoplasmic incompatibility, a reduction in egg hatch would be expected. The egg hatch at the Treated area was lower (Fig. 2b) than that observed in the Untreated area in June (χ2(1,N = 146) = 13.087, p < 0.0003), July (χ2(1,N = 209) = 44.917, p < 0.0001) and August (χ2(1,N = 200) = 51.0174, p < 0.0001). In September, the egg hatch declined at both areas, which is consistent with expectations for the onset of diapause. Similar numbers of eggs were collected at the Untreated and Treated sites (data not shown).

Consistent with expectations for an effect caused by incompatible matings between wild-type females and introduced males, eggs that were collected further from the male introduction point experienced higher egg hatch rates (Fig. 3). Significant correlations between egg hatch and distance from the male introduction point were observed in July and August. Similar but non-significant trends were observed in June and September (Fig. 3). The latter may reflect complicating factors of egg diapause, i.e., lower egg hatch results during short day-length periods in the spring and fall (Fig. 2). Conducting a similar analysis on the 2013 data, examining for a decline in hatch rate across the same trap locations (i.e., prior to incompatible male releases) did not detect a correlation between hatch rate and location.

Figure 3: Egg hatch is correlated with distance from the male introduction point, among sites within the Treated area.
Figure 3

Eggs that were collected closer to the male introduction point experienced a lower hatch rate in July (R2 = 0.105, F(1,129) = 14.96, p < 0.0002) and August (R2 = 0.158, F(1,118) = 21.94, p < 0.0001). Similar but non-significant trends were observed in June and September (p > 0.13).

Wolbachia is maternally inherited. Therefore the unintentional introduction of wPip infected females could lead to the establishment of the wPip infection type in the targeted Ae. albopictus population. To monitor for wPip establishment, a subset of eggs collected from the Treated area were hatched, reared to adult, and assessed for Wolbachia type using PCR. PCR assays of resulting female adults were repeated twice a month. The following spring, additional PCR assays were conducted with eggs collected in May 2015. None of the PCR tested individuals were infected with the wPip Wolbachia type (n = 61).

To examine for a potential effect of inundative releases on non-targeted mosquitoes occurring at the Treated site, non-Ae. albopictus mosquitoes collected in BG traps were also monitored. Other than Ae. albopictus, relatively few additional mosquito species were collected using the BG traps (Fig. S4). A majority of these were Culex spp, with a total of 105 females and 67 males collected between June and September. Additional species totaled 30 females and 2 males, most of which were Aedes triseriatus, a native mosquito that often co-occurs with Aedes albopictus14. Sporadic, rare collections of Toxorhychites rutilus, Orthopodmyia signifiera, Anopheles quadrimaculatus, Aedes japonicus and Aedes trivittatus were also identified. Comparing between the Treated and Untreated areas, no difference was observed in the number of non-target mosquito species that were collected.

Weather patterns are important drivers of mosquito population dynamics. Comparing the weather conditions between years, the 2014 field season was generally warmer than 2013 (Fig. S5). Furthermore, 2013 was wetter early in the season, relative to early season 2014. In contrast, more rainfall occurred late in the 2014 season, compared to the 2013 late season. Taken together, the late season of 2014 was both wetter and warmer than 2013, which is correlated to a generally larger mosquito population in 2014, relative to 2013. Specifically, in the Untreated area, more females were observed in the late season 2014, compared to late season 2013.

Based on prior mark release recapture studies of Ae. albopictus male dispersal in urban environments15, we estimate the Treatment area to encompass ~12.5 ha, which gives an introduction rate of ~800 incompatible males/ha/week, which is a relatively modest introduction rate compared to prior studies, e.g., 14,000–100,000/ha/wk16,17.

The study site is notable also in that it is not isolated from immigrating, indigenous Ae. albopictus. Prior MRR studies estimate female Ae. albopictus to travel up to 290 m over their lifetime18. Therefore Ae. albopictus females originating outside the Treatment area can readily move into and across the area. Furthermore, females that mate with incompatible males inside the Treated area can exit the area, diluting the ability to detect an effect. Female dispersal may have contributed to the observed lack of correlation between adult female number and distance from the male introduction point.

The results demonstrate a significant reduction in the overall number of adult females within the Treatment area, compared to that of the Untreated area. This result is notable, given the relatively small size of the treatment area and the introduction of incompatible males from a single point. A dogma for SIT-type studies is that the approach must be ‘area wide,’ i.e., at a scale exceeding the normal flight range of the targeted insect. Or alternatively, trials are often conducted on ecological or physical islands, where the population is insulated from immigration16,17,19. As described above, small scale tests in which the population is not isolated can be complicated by ‘edge effects,’ e.g., mated, indigenous females that immigrate into the area are less likely to be affected by the incompatible males, because females tend towards monogamy20. The results shown here suggest an additional method in which point releases of incompatible males cause localized reductions of adult Ae. albopictus females.

For experimental purposes, the Wolbachia pesticide method has been used in isolation here. But it is emphasized that the downstream integration of the Wolbachia approach with additional control methods may improve overall cost and efficiency. For example, integration with chemical or biological larvicides would not be anticipated to negatively affect the introduced incompatible males, and because the impact of each incompatible male is greater when there are fewer competing males, population reduction caused by a larvicide may have a synergistic effect.

In conclusion, the results suggest the feasibility of Wolbachia as a pesticide against Ae. albopictus and encourage additional work examining the approach within different ecological contexts and at a larger scale. While entomological endpoints made up the present study, future large-scale work within disease endemic areas can allow measuring for an effect on pathogen transmission. Because Wolbachia is known to cause cytoplasmic incompatibility in other mosquitoes, similar field trials might be conducted with additional medically important species, e.g., Ae. aegypti and Culex pipiens.

Methods

Mosquito stocks, egg hatch, rearing and introduction

The methods used to construct the artificially-infected Ae. albopictus strain have been described previously11,21. In brief, the wPip Wolbachia infection was microinjected into an aposymbiotic strain of Ae. albopictus. Laboratory crosses of the resulting strain show wPip males to be competitive and fully incompatible with naturally-infected Ae. albopictus females2,22.

Colony rearing was at 29 °C, 73% RH and a photoperiod of 16:8 light:dark. Larvae were reared in pans (Pactive, Lake Forest, IL) containing 500 ml of filtered water and fed liver powder (MP Biomedicals LLC, Solon, OH) ad libitum. Adults were provided a constant supply of 10% sucrose and held in 24.5 cm3 cages (MegaView Science Co., Taichung, Taiwan). Adults in all experiments were blood fed using sausage casing stretched over a 20 ml plastic cup (Pactive, Lake Forest, IL), filled with approximately 10 ml of bovine blood and heated to 37 °C.

Pupae were separated by sex using a mechanical separation device (John Hock Co., Gainsville, FL, USA). Pupae designated for releases were allowed to eclose in a cage, and the resulting adults were examined to remove any residual females.

The sites were selected in 2013. Homeowner voluntary agreement to participate in the study drove the initial site selection. The field sites are suburban area in Lexington, KY, USA. Lexington is located at the edge of the Cumberland Plateau with an average elevation of 294 m above sea level. Lexington is the second largest city in Kentucky, with a population density of 354 people per square kilometer. Lexington is in the northern periphery of a humid subtropical climate zone with four distinct seasons. While temperature extremes are unusual, Lexington is subject to rapid changes in temperature. Precipitation is fairly constant year round, with an average of 75 to 100 mm per month.

The Treated site is defined as a 250 m radius around a single release point [GPS: 38.022, −84.515]. Untreated sites are located near the release point (≤1.5 km), such that they were of similar habitat and experienced similar rainfall, temperature and humidity, but were located outside the typical flight range of Ae. albopictus mosquitoes15,22, i.e., greater than 250 m away from the release point. In 2013, using BG traps and ovicups, eight and six sites were monitored in the Untreated and Treated areas, respectively. In 2014, eleven and fifteen sites were monitored in the Untreated and Treated areas, respectively.

No incompatible male releases were performed in 2013. All sites were monitored in the absence of male introductions. Following receipt of the EPA permit, an initial release rate of 10,000 mosquitoes/week was targeted based on prior Mark Release Recapture studies that suggested that this rate would achieve a 10:1 ratio of Incompatible:Indigenous males (data not shown). Introduced males were divided into two releases of 5,000 per week, with the intent to better sustain numbers of active, incompatible males. Males were transported to the field in cardboard mailing tubes (2″ diameter; Art Wall Kraft #P2030K-6).

Field Monitoring

The adult population was monitored using BG Sentinel traps with the BG lure (Biogent Sentinel, Regensburg, Germany). Traps were run for 24 hours once per week, and the collected mosquitoes were frozen and identified using a Leica EZ4D microscope (Leica Microsystems Inc, Buffalo Grove, IL, USA). Percent sex ratio is calculated as number of adult females divided by the total number of adults collected. Artificial ovisites used to monitor eggs consisted of a plastic cemetery vase (Reiss Innovations LLC, Manchester, CT, USA) lined with heavy seed germination paper (Anchor Paper Co., Saint Paul, MN USA) and containing approximately 100 ml of water. The paper within ovitraps was replaced weekly. Collected eggs were held for seven days for maturation, counted and then submerged to hatch. To improve the overall egg hatch and achieve hatch rates similar to that observed with lab reared mosquitoes, the methods used during the egg holding period were altered between the 2013 and 2014 field seasons. Specifically, in 2014 the papers were kept damp and within a humid plastic box, compared to 2013 when papers were allowed to dry on tabletops. With each year, egg papers from the Treated and Untreated sites were manipulated identically. Hatched and unhatched eggs were counted using the dissection scope. To examine for unintended establishment of the wPip infection at the field site, a subset of larvae hatching from collected eggs were reared to adults and PCR tested using the orf7A primer set. Weather data was downloaded from a local weather station (Weather Underground; wunderground.com).

PCR

PCR was used to monitor Wolbachia infection type. Early in the season, PCR assays were performed once per three weeks. Later in the season, the frequency was increased to once per week. Adult mosquitoes were homogenized in 100 μl of buffer containing 10 mM Tris-HCL, 1 mM EDTA, and 50 mM NaCl, at pH 8.2. After homogenization, samples were incubated at 100 °C five min and centrifuged at 16,000 g for five min. The orf7A (orf7-Af, GCTAATAGCACGAAATCGAAAC; orf7-Ar, AT T TCTCTAC-GACAGT TCTCC) primer set was used to diagnose the wPip infection23. The general Wolbachia primers WspecF: 5′-CATACCTATTCGAAGGGATAG-3′ and wspecR: 5′-AGCTTCGAGTGAAACCAATTC-3′, were used to detect the naturally occurring Wolbachia type found in wild type Aedes albopictus24. 12S mitochondrial primers (12SAI-AAACTAGGATTAGATACCCTATTAT and 12SBI-AAGAGCGACGGGCGATGTGT) were used to amplify mitochondria DNA as a positive control for template DNA quality25. Culex pipiens females (naturally infected with wPip) were used for a positive control in PCR rxns. For all reactions, one μl of the isolated DNA was amplified in 50 mM KCl, 20 mM Tris–HCl (pH 8.4), 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.25 mM dNTPs, 0.5 mM primers, and 1 U Taq DNA polymerase in a total volume of 20 ml. Samples were denatured for three min at 94 °C, cycled 35 times at 94, 62, and 72 °C (1 min each), followed by a 10 min extension at 72 °C using a PTC-200 Thermal Cycler (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). A volume of eight μl of each amplification was separated on 1.5% agarose gels, stained with GelRed (Biotium, Hayward, CA, USA), and visualized under ultraviolet illumination.

Statistical analyses

Statistical analyses were performed using JMP 12.2 and SAS 9.3 software (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). Non-parametric analysis was used (Wilcoxon) to compare within months and between areas in the number of adults and egg hatch rates. A Steel Dwass multiple comparison test was used to examine within area and across months. A bonferroni correction was used when multiple tests were compared.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Mains, J. W. et al. Female Adult Aedes albopictus Suppression by Wolbachia-Infected Male Mosquitoes. Sci. Rep. 6, 33846; doi: 10.1038/srep33846 (2016).

References

  1. 1.

    , & Wolbachia: master manipulators of invertebrate biology. Nat Rev Microbiol 6, 741–751 (2008).

  2. 2.

    et al. Comparison of irradiation and Wolbachia based approaches for sterile-male strategies targeting Aedes albopictus. PLoS One 11, e0146834–15 (2016).

  3. 3.

    Eradication of Culex pipiens fatigans through cytoplasmic incompatibility. Nature 216, 383–384 (1967).

  4. 4.

    , & Wolbachia establishment and invasion in an Aedes aegypti laboratory population. Science 310, 326–328 (2005).

  5. 5.

    , & Wolbachia strains for disease control: ecological and evolutionary considerations. Evol Appl 8, 751–768 (2015).

  6. 6.

    , , , & Application of wMelPop Wolbachia strain to crash local populations of Aedes aegypti. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 9, e0003930 (2015).

  7. 7.

    Beyond insecticides: new thinking on an ancient problem. Nat Rev Microbiol 11, 181–193 (2013).

  8. 8.

    et al. Field evaluation of the establishment potential of wMelPop Wolbachia in Australia and Vietnam for dengue control. Parasites & Vectors 8, 563 (2015).

  9. 9.

    , , , & Considerations for the use of human participants in vector biology research: A tool for investigators and regulators. Vector-Borne Zoonot 15, 89–102 (2015).

  10. 10.

    et al. Research ethics. Managing risks of arthropod vector research. Science 288, 2321–2322 (2000).

  11. 11.

    , , & Wolbachia strain wPip yields a pattern of cytoplasmic incompatibility enhancing a Wolbachia-based suppression strategy against the disease vector Aedes albopictus. Parasites & Vectors 5, 254 (2012).

  12. 12.

    et al. Comparative host feeding patterns of the Asian Tiger Mosquito, Aedes albopictus, in urban and suburban Northeastern USA and implications for disease transmission. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 8, e3037 (2014).

  13. 13.

    et al. Trapping the Tiger: Efficacy of the novel BG-Sentinel 2 with several attractants and carbon dioxide for collecting Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) in Southern France. J. Med. Ent. 53, 460–465 (2016).

  14. 14.

    & A multiyear surveillance for Aedes albopictus with Biogents Sentinel trap counts for males and species composition of other mosquito species. J. Am. Mosq. Control Assoc. 30, 122–125 (2014).

  15. 15.

    et al. Dispersal and Survival of Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) Males in Italian Urban Areas and Significance for Sterile Insect Technique Application. J. Med. Ent. 47, 1082–1091 (2010).

  16. 16.

    et al. Suppression of a field population of Aedes aegypti in Brazil by sustained release of transgenic male mosquitoes. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 9, e0003864 (2015).

  17. 17.

    et al. Successful suppression of a field mosquito population by sustained release of engineered male mosquitoes. Nat Biotechnol 30, 828–830 (2012).

  18. 18.

    , , , & Study of Aedes albopictus dispersal in Rome, Italy, using sticky traps in mark-release-recapture experiments. Med. Vet. Entomol. 24, 361–368 (2010).

  19. 19.

    et al. Open release of male mosquitoes infected with a Wolbachia biopesticide: field performance and infection containment. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 6, e1797 (2012).

  20. 20.

    & Male mating performance and cytoplasmic incompatibility in a wPip Wolbachia trans-infected line of Aedes albopictus (Stegomyia albopicta). Med. Vet. Entomol. 27, 377–386 (2013).

  21. 21.

    , , , & Characterization of a New Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae)–Wolbachia pipientis (Rickettsiales: Rickettsiaceae) Symbiotic Association Generated by Artificial Transfer of the wPip Strain From Culex pipiens (Diptera: Culicidae). J. Med. Ent. 47, 179–187 (2010).

  22. 22.

    , , , & Wolbachia density and cytoplasmic incompatibility in Aedes albopictus: concerns with using artificial Wolbachia infection as a vector suppression tool. PLoS One 10, e0121813–e0121819 (2015).

  23. 23.

    & Molecular discrimination of Wolbachia in the Culex pipiens complex: Evidence for variable bacteriophage hyperparasitism. Insect Mol Biol 13, 365–369 (2004).

  24. 24.

    & Wolbachia infection frequencies in insects: evidence of a global equilibrium? Proc. R. Soc. Lond. [Biol.] 267, 1277–1285 (2000).

  25. 25.

    , , , & 16S rRNA phylogenetic analysis of the bacterial endosymbionts associated with cytoplasmic incompatibility in insects. PNAS 89, 2699–2702 (1992).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Katherine Evans, Jeannie Haak and Karen Dobson for technical assistance. This work was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health [AI-098179] and the Kentucky Cabinet for Economic Development [KSTC-184-512-12-142, KSTC-184-512-14-198].

Author information

Affiliations

  1. MosquitoMate, Inc., 2520 Regency Rd., Lexington, KY 40503, USA

    • James W. Mains
    • , Corey L. Brelsfoard
    •  & Stephen L. Dobson
  2. Biotechnology Regulatory Consultant, 8322 Sharon Dr., Frederick, MD 21704, USA

    • Robert I. Rose
  3. Department of Entomology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40546, USA.

    • Stephen L. Dobson

Authors

  1. Search for James W. Mains in:

  2. Search for Corey L. Brelsfoard in:

  3. Search for Robert I. Rose in:

  4. Search for Stephen L. Dobson in:

Contributions

J.W.M., C.L.B. and S.L.D. wrote the main manuscript text and prepared figures. B.R. led regulatory activities required for the field studies. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Competing interests

J.W.M., C.L.B. and S.L.D. are paid employees of MosquitoMate, a for-profit company. S.L.D. is a Full Professor at the University of Kentucky. B.R. is a paid consultant for MosquitoMate. This does not alter our adherence to all Scientific Reports policies.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephen L. Dobson.

Supplementary information

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Creative Commons BYThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/