Abstract
Artemisinin resistance in Plasmodium falciparum threatens global efforts in the elimination or eradication of malaria. Several studies have associated mutations in the PfATP6 gene in conjunction with artemisinin resistance, but the underlying molecular mechanism of the resistance remains unexplored. Associated mutations act as a biomarker to measure the artemisinin efficacy. In the proposed work, we have analyzed the binding affinity and efficacy between PfATP6 and artemisinin in the presence of L263D, L263E and L263K mutations. Furthermore, we performed virtual screening to identify potential compounds to inhibit the PfATP6 mutant proteins. In this study, we observed that artemisinin binding affinity with PfATP6 gets affected by L263D, L263E and L263K mutations. This in silico elucidation of artemisinin resistance enhanced the identification of novel compounds (CID: 10595058 and 10625452) which showed good binding affinity and efficacy with L263D, L263E and L263K mutant proteins in molecular docking and molecular dynamics simulations studies. Owing to the high propensity of the parasite to drug resistance the need for new antimalarial drugs will persist until the malarial parasites are eventually eradicated. The two compounds identified in this study can be tested in in vitro and in vivo experiments as possible candidates for the designing of new potential antimalarial drugs.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
The medicinal use of artemisinin (qinghaosu) from sweet wormwood (Artemisia annua) was explored in 1970 by Chinese scientist; since then it serves as a primary chemotherapy agent in antimalarial treatment. The number of malaria patients curing with artemisinin combined therapies has been increased exponentially1 but the accurate molecular mechanism of action is still controversial2. Artemisinin is a sesquiterpene lactone endoperoxide containing a structural feature called peroxide bridge and assumed to be crucial for the mode of action1. Initial research suggests that the mechanism of action of artemisinin is by heme-dependent activation of an endoperoxide bridge occurring within the parasite’s food vacuole3,4. However, localization of artemisinin to the parasite and not food vacuole membranes5 and killing of tiny rings lacking haemozoin argue against the food vacuole being a major site of drug action6. Some other studies proposed a different mode of action of artemisinin, which is based on compound structural resemblance and the sesquiterpene moieties of thapsigargin. Thapsigargin is a plant product from Thapsia garganica shows structural similarities to artemisinin. Thapsigargin is considered as a highly selective inhibitor of Sarco/endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+-ATPase (SERCA). Based on this it was hypothesized that artemisinin may act in a similar way, but selectively to inhibit the SERCA of the malarial parasite. PfATP6 is the only SERCA-type Ca2+-ATPase enzyme present in the malarial parasite and it is considered to be the suitable molecular target for artemisinin5. An in vitro examination also suggests that artemisinin inhibit the SERCA-type Ca2+-ATPase orthologue (PfATP6) of P. falciparum in Xenopus oocytes7.
The successful progress of the elimination of malaria with artemisinin combination therapy is now hindered by the spreading antimalarial drug resistance. Artemisinin resistance is evident from slow parasite clearance8,9 and which affects the susceptibility of ring stage parasites10,11,12,13,14. In western Cambodia first artemisinin resistance was reported8,9 followed by resistance rates for artemisinin based combination therapies were exponentially increasing15. Artemisinin resistance is also declared in mainland Southeast Asia; here it emerges independently and started to spread rapidly16,17,18,19. Amino acid mutation at position 263 of PfATP6 enzyme tremendously affects the sensitivity of the enzyme to artemisinin and is located in the artemisinin binding pocket20. In vitro studies in X. laevis oocytes elucidated that the substitution of a single amino acid residue L263A or L263S resulted in an approximately three-fold increase or decrease in sensitivity to artemisinin. Particularly the substitution of L263E leads to complete abolishment of interaction by artemisinin20. However, this observation was not extended to P. falciparum, where introduction of the L263E mutation through transgenics resulted in borderline non-significant changes in the 50% inhibitory concentrations (IC50s) for artemisinin and its derivatives21. Recent report from Uhlemann et al. in 201220 stated the reconfirmation of their previous conclusion that single amino acid mutations in PfATP6 can abolish sensitivity to artemisinin, as shown by the results obtained with PfATP6 mutants L263D, L263E and L263K. These observations hypothesised that mutations in the particular residue L263 residing in drug binding pocket might affect the affinity of the drug and consecutively cause decreased susceptibility to artemisinin.
In the proposed study, we carried out molecular modeling of malaria PfATP6 protein and molecular docking between wild type PfATP6-Artemisinin and mutant type (L263D, L263E and L263K)-Artemisinin to elucidate the detailed mechanism of binding action. Further structure-based virtual screening was performed to identify novel lead molecules to inhibit the mutant PfATP6 proteins. To ensure the stability of protein-ligand complexes 50 ns united atom molecular dynamics simulation was performed thrice for the wild type and mutant type PfATP6-Artemisinin and mutant PfATP6-Virtually screened compounds.
Results
Homology modeling of malarial PfATP6 protein
The protein sequence of PfATP6 is compossed of 1228 amino acids residues retrieved from the UniProt22 database. In BLAST sequence similarity analysis PfATP6 of Plasmodium falciparum obtained highest sequence homology (45% identity) with Endoplasmic Reticulum Ca2+-Atpase (SERCA) from the bovine muscle of Bos taurus. The tertiary structure of PfATP6 can be modelled by using the crystal structure of the SERCA homologue (PDB: 3TLM, resolution 2.95A°)23. Modelling of PfATP6 enzyme based on templates (1IWO and 2DQS) and docking of artemisinin derivative on to it was reported earlier by Jung et al. and Naik et al.24,25. They observed good correlation between the computational binding affinity results and in vitro antimalarial sensitivity. Both 1IWO and 2DQS templates are from the same organism Oryctolagus cunniculus bound with thapsigargin but having closed conformation of calcium pump. In order to select the best template for 3D model construction phylogenetic tree analysis was performed between malarial PfATP6, 3TLM, 1IWO and 2DQS protein sequences. From the phylogenetic analysis result it is observed that malarial PfATP6 protein sequence and SERCA protein sequence from the bovine muscle of Bos taurus are evolutionarily more close (Fig. 1). Moreover, the binding affinity achieved by several docking and scoring methods could not differentiate between inhibitor and non-inhibitor in closed model of PfATP6. In this study, our ultimate goal is to seek a plausible mechanism action of artemisinin binding with wild and L263 mutant PfATP6 enzyme. Hence we studied from the model which is built using open conformation template (3TLM) of the enzyme to see the dynamic effect of protein-ligand complex along with the solvent. The sequences of PfATP6 and the bovine muscle of Bos taurus SERCA were aligned using ClustalW 2.0.126. The 3D structure of PfATP6 protein (Fig. 2) was constructed by using Modeller 9.1527,28. The quality of the refined PfATP6 model was assessed by PRO-CHECK29. The distribution of the Psi/Phi torsion angles of the best model is represented by a Ramachandran plot (Fig. 3), which shows 85.1% of residues are in most favored regions, 11.8% in additional allowed regions, 2.2% in generously allowed regions and 0.9% in disallowed regions. The calculated Ramachandran Z-score is 0.168, meaning that there is a good agreement between the PfATP6 model and the SERCA template.
Docking analysis of artemisinin with wild and mutant (L263D, L263E and L263K) malarial PfATP6 proteins
Artemisinin (Fig. 4) has been suggested to inhibit the in vitro activity of the malarial PfATP6 protein30,7. Several studies have been attempted to find the binding mechanism of artemisinin with malarial PfATP6 protein23,24. Additionally protein structure based drug design approaches have followed to optimise inhibitor binding specificity25,31. In this study, we explored the appropriate binding conformation and affinity of artemisinin with wild and mutant PfATP6 proteins using a computational docking program Auto Dock Vina32. The PfATP6 protein’s ligand binding residues were identified with thapsigargin as the reference ligand. The ligand binding site is close to the centre of the four transmembrane helices. Even minor conformational change in these helices could affect the Ca2+ binding sites and there by change the movement of ions to the luminal spaces or cytosol33,34,35. The active site residues of PfATP6 consists of LEU263, PHE264, GLN267, ILE977, ILE981, ALA985, ASN1039, LEU1040, ILE1041 and ASN1042. In this computational docking analysis, artemisinin perfectly binds at the active site residues of PfATP6 enzyme (Fig. 5A) which are inconsistent with the results reported earlier24,31. However, in the mutant PfATP6 proteins (L263D, L263E and L263K) artemisinin binds with different residues when compared to the wild type-artemisinin binding sites (Fig. 5B–D). The difference in the binding residues in mutant protein will indeed change the complementarities of artemisinin bindings with mutant PfATP6 proteins. Shape complementarity and non-covalent interactions are the crucial factors involved in the maintenance of protein-ligand stability. Van der Waals forces, hydrogen bonds and electrostatic interactions are the primary non-covalent bonds that enhances the protein-ligand affinity. Calculating the non-covalent bond interaction energy is the important parameter in understanding the binding affinity between the protein-ligand molecules. Number of hydrogen bonds arises between the protein-ligand was calculated in Autodock vina. Artemisinin form three hydrogen bonds with wild type PfATP6 protein and one hydrogen bond with L263D, L263E and L263K mutant protein structures. The binding energies between PfATP6 proteins and the inhibitor molecule artemisinin were calculated to be −8.4 kcal/mol, −7.2 kcal/mol, −7.4 kcal/mol and −7.1 kcal/mol for the wild type, L263D, L263E and L263K complexes respectively (Supplementary Table 1). The wild type-artemisinin complex obtained highest number of hydrogen bonds and binding energy, where as mutant complexes obtained less number of hydrogen bonds and binding energy. From this docking analysis it is concluded that these mutations L263D, L263E and L263K affected the binding affinity of artemisinin with PfATP6 protein and gives a theoretical assessment of the binding mechanism of PfATP6 wild and mutant proteins with antimalarial drug artemisinin.
PfATP6 mutant proteins structure-based virtual screening and docking studies
Different studies reported that single point mutations on PfATP6 of the malarial parasite were able to modulate the affinity of artemisinin for the protein and influencing efficacy and toxicity by affecting the artemisinin binding pocket7,20. In this study also molecular docking analysis resulted that the PfATP6 mutations (L263D, L263E and L263K) affected the artemisinin binding affinity. The resistance of this malarial protein to the traditional artemisinin treatments has led to extensive work in discovering new drugs to treat malaria. In silico, virtual screening of chemical compounds is the fastest and most suitable method for identifying novel drug on the basis of target structures36,37. Virtual screening of the existing compound have advantages over the de novo drug design approach because screened lead compounds can be immediately subjected to biological testing. Molecular docking is a robust method primary aim is to calculate binding affinities between a target protein and a ligand. Docking utilizes a defined search pattern to identify the most appropriate orientation of molecules and the binding score that describe the affinity of different conformations38,39. For virtual screening, we retrieved 393 similar compounds like artemisinin from the PubChem database. Subsequently, docking analyses were performed between mutant PfATP6 proteins (L263D, L263E and L263K) and the screened compounds (Supplementary Table 2). Among the 393 compounds docked with the mutant structures, CID 10595058 binds with L263D and L263E and exhibits high binding affinity of −8.2 kcal/mol and −8.1 kcal/mol respectively (Fig. 6). This compound form three hydrogen bonds with L263D and L263E mutant protein structures (Fig. 7A,B). CID 10625452 (Fig. 8) binds with L263K mutant protein and exhibits high binding affinity −7.9 kcal/mol and forms two hydrogen bonds (Fig. 7C).
Analyzing molecular dynamics simulation studies
To verify the molecular docking binding affinity results robust or fortune molecular dynamics simulations analysis was performed for PfATP6-Artemisinin, L263D-Artemisinin, L263E- Artemisinin, L263K-Artemisinin, L263D-10595058, L263E-10595058 and L263K-10625452 protein-ligand complexes. The backbone RMSD informations for the wild and mutant type PfATP6-Artemisinin (Supplementary Fig. 1) and PfATP6-Virtually screened lead (Supplementary Fig. 2B) complexes were obtained from the respective trajectories. RMSD of second molecular dynamics run showed more stable convergence in comparison with other two runs was considered for further analysis. The backbone RMSD of wild type and mutant PfATP6-Artemisinin complexes attained stable equilibration after ~10 ns. But high flucations was observed for mutant PfATP6-Artemisinin complexes through out the simulation period and this reveals the existance of bad complementarity between mutant PfATP6 and artemisinin. For PfATP6-Virtually screened lead complexes immediate elevation in the RMSD was observed in the first ~2000 ps due to the kinetic shock introduced during initial dynamic process. Later, the system maintained stable deviation pattern for the remaining simulation period. The overall energy was fluctuated around mean energy with the system equilibrating at one atmospheric pressure and at temperature of 310 K. The molecular dynamics simulation RMSD of the molecules attained stable after ~20000 ps at the equilibrium. The PfATP6-Virtually screened lead complex trajectories attained stable RMSD values around ~20000 ps indicating the stable binding affinity of the protein-ligand complexes. The initial and final structure of the protein-ligand complexes retrived from the trajectories were shown in the Supplementary Figs 3 and 4.
Furthermore, to gain the knowledge on the contribution of micro-factors involvement in maintaining the binding affinity between protein-ligand complex, hydrogen bonds between molecules were analysed for wild type and mutant type PfATP6-Artemisinin and PfATP6-Virtually screened lead complexes in the simulation period of last 10 ns. The number of hydrogen bonds formed between wild type and mutant type PfATP6-Artemisinin (Supplementary Fig. 5) and PfATP6-Virtually screened compounds (Fig. 9) were analysed. Wild type PfATP6-Artemisinin obtained one to five hydrogen bonds in the last 10 ns simulation period. But the mutant type PfATP6 L263D, L263E and L263K obtained less number of hydrogen bonds 0 to 2, 0 to 2 and 0 to 3 respectively with anti-malarial drug artemisinin. This shows binding affinity of artemisinin drastically affected in the presence of L263 mutations at the binding pocket of target PfATP6 protein. The numbers of hydrogen bonds formed between L263D-10595058, L263E-10595058 and L263K-10625452 complexes were observed as 1 to 4, 1 to 4 and 1 to 3 respectively. The number of hydrogen bonds between the mutant proteins L263D, L263E and L263K with their respective virtually screened lead compounds is almost similar to the wild type PfATP6-Artemisinin complex. These results provided the evidence that the selected compounds have great calibre to function as strong inhibitors to the specific PfATP6 mutant protein.
The minimum distance between wild type and mutant type PfATP6-Artemisinin (Supplementary Fig. 6) and PfATP6-Virtually screened lead (Fig. 10) complexes were analyzed. The minimum distance between wild type PfATP6-Artemisinin is observed as ~1.5 to ~1.7 nm in the last 10 ns simulation period. But the minimum distance of mutants L263D, L263E and L263K with artemisinin were observed high as ~2.5 to ~2.7 nm, ~2.4 to ~2.6 nm and ~2.4 to ~2.7 nm respectively. The minimum distance between L263D-10595058, L263E-10595058 and L263K-10625452 mutant proteins with virtually screened lead complexes is observed as ~2.1 to ~2.3 nm, ~2.4 to ~2.6 nm and ~2.4 to ~2.6 nm respectively. The minimum distance between the mutant proteins and their respective lead compounds is much higher than the wild type PfATP6-Artemisinin complex. Even though the distances are slightly high but mutant PfATP6 proteins and virtually screened compounds are maintained stable contact and distance throughout the simulation period.
The area measured by the probe rolling on the surface of the proteinis referred as the solvent-accessible surface area (SASA). This solvent effect is important in maintaining protein stability and act as a driving force for protein folding is to be found in the burial of hydrophobic region. Likewise, this charged effect accompanies protein-ligand interaction processes and reason for protein orientation maintenance. In molecular dynamic simulations, this accessible surface area of molecules are measured by using a sphere of water molecules40. SASA was calculated for both the wild type and mutant PfATP6 proteins. From Fig. 11, it was observed that the wild-type PfATP6 have SASA of ~133 nm2 to ~147 nm2 in the last 10 ns simulation period but the mutant complexes L263D, L263E and L263K obtained less SASA of ~130 nm2 to ~142 nm2, ~132 nm2 to ~145 nm2 and ~127 nm2 to ~138 nm2 respectively. Compared with the wild type, all three mutated proteins obtained less SASA. This indicates that there might be orientational change in the protein surface because of the amino acid residue shift from the accessible area to buried region.
Discussion
Owing to the emerging resistance to existing antimalarial drugs there is a need for discovering novel drugs to treat malaria. Medicines for malaria venture and other product development partnerships initiated various drug discovery programs that reach milestone development of potential new antimalarial lead molecules41,42, which are currently under clinical trials. Despite these successes, it is important to maintain early phase drug discovery to prevent the antimalarial drug development pipeline from draining43,44. Rational post genomic drug discovery is based on the protein structure based screening of compounds from large chemical libraries either by high throughput or virtual screening methods. The primary focus of protein structure based drug design approach is the identification of a suitable drug. The target structure must essential for the survival of the parasite and sufficiently different from the similar family of proteins in the host species to be inhibited specifically/selectively. The emergence of resistance first-line antimalarial treatment drug artemisinin has recently begun to affect the processing of patients suffering from P. falciparum infections in western Cambodia8,9. If the artemisinin resistance spreads, large population will be affected in public health, as there is no suitable drug to treat P. falciparum. Therefore, there is an immediate requirement in understanding the mechanisms of action of artemisinin because this information may contribute to set a pipeline for monitoring emerging resistance and further for the development of new antimalarial drugs45.
Protein 3D modeling and molecular docking simulations studies of the PfATP6 sequence suggested that artemisinin might interact directly with malarial PfATP621,29,30. So far, few genes have been proposed to be associated with reduced sensitivities to artemisinin, but till now none of the hypothesis has been proved46. Even though several studies have been conducted to elucidate the mechanism of artemisinin binding but the predicted mechanism of action is not completely understood, since PfATP6 molecular biology is the lack of phylogenetically close 3D structures that could serve as template.
In this study, we followed a systematic computational approach to explore the mechanism of binding action of artemisinin with PfATP6 protein and also elucidated the molecular basis of the artemisinin resistance to L263 mutations. Since the target PfATP6 protein structure yet not resolved, PfATP6 3D structure constructed through homology modelling by using 3TLM as a template structure. But in previous studies 1IWO and 2DQS protein’s 3D structure were used as a template for the 3D structural construction for malarial PfATP6 protein. Sequence similarity and phylogenetic comparison between malarial PfATP6, 3TLM, 1IWO and 2DQS protein sequences revealed that malaria PfATP6 and 3TLM protein sequence are evolutionarily closest. Our ultimate goal of this study is to elucidate the mechanistic action of artemisinin binding with wild and L263 mutant PfATP6 enzyme in open conformation model. Hence in this study 3TLM structure was used as the template to construct malarial PfATP6 3D structure. For structural analysis, we modelled the mutant (L263D, L263E and L263K) structures by using spdbv software. Following that, energy minimization was performed for the wild type and mutant PfATP6 proteins using steepest descent force field to maintain the geometry of the modelled protein. Next, docking analyses were performed between the wild type and mutant PfATP6 protein with drug artemisinin. Important factors maintaining the protein-ligand affinity were analysed. Binding energy between the mutant protein and drug revealed less binding affinity for the mutant structures with antimalarial drug artemisinin. Notably, artemisinin interacting residues differ in the mutant proteins and formed less number of hydrogen bonds than the wild type PfATP6 protein. These results confirmed that structural changes occurred in the PfATP6 protein because of L263 mutations. To identify a suitable inhibitor, structure-based virtual screening and docking analysis was performed. A total of 393 compounds that are structurally similar to antimalarial drug artemisinin were retrieved from the PubChem database. Each compound was individually docked with L263D, L263E and L263K mutant structures of malarial PfATP6 protein. CID 10595058 binds with L263D and L263E and this compound forms three hydrogen bonds with each of the mutant structure. CID 10625452 binds with L263K and forms two hydrogen bonds with L263K mutant structure.
Furthermore, we performed 50 ns MD simulation analysis on the wild type and mutant type PfATP6-Artemisinin and PfATP6-Virtually screened lead complexes. MD simulation analysis provides insights into the protein-ligand binding affinity and interactions at the atomic scale. Basic parameters RMSD, hydrogen bond formation, minimum distance and SASA were examined on last 10 ns of protein-ligand simulation trajectories for PfATP6-Artemisinin, L263D-Artemisinin, L263E-Artemisinin, L263K-Artemisinin, L263D-10595058, L263E-10595058 and L263K-10625452 complexes. In the molecular stability change analysis all the mutant PfATP6-Artemisinin and mutant PfATP6-Virtually screened lead complexes obtained higher RMSD values than the wild type PfATP6-Artemisinin complex. Hydrogen bond formation between the protein and ligand served as the main contributor in maintaining the affinity and stability of the molecules. The substitution of amino acid changed the electrostatic potential in PfATP6 protein surface and affected the artemisinin binding. However, the virtually selected lead compound obtained strong binding affinity towards the mutant proteins and having the capability to maintain a stable number of hydrogen bonds during the simulation period. In all three mutant complexes (L263D-10595058, L263E-10595058 and L263K-10625452) almost same number of hydrogen bonds was observed as similar to wild type-artemisinin complex. The minimum distance formed between mutated proteins and the virtually screened potential lead compounds were slightly higher than the wild type PfATP6-artemisisn complex. Eventhough the distance is higher but it would not affect the affinity between molecules since the observed distance falls under the cut-off radii of non-bonded bonds formation limits. In SASA analysis, less solvent accessible surface were observed in all three mutant proteins in compare with wild type PfATP6 protein. Less accessible areas in mutant proteins might affect the probability of interactions between PfATP6 and artemisinin. Subsequently SASA results revealed that the occurance of mutations in the PfATP6 protein changed the hydrophilic and hydrophobic areas of the mutant PfATP6 proteins and affected the artemisinin binding.
Conclusion
Despite increased support for malaria control over the past decade, the malaria burden remains high in many endemic countries. Prompt treatment with artemisinin based combination therapy targeted towards those confirmed to have malaria is a key malarial control strategy. Although artemisinin is a primary and quickly responding antimalarial drug, the curative rate of patients treated with P. falciparum malaria is decreased because of the emerging drug resistance. Due to the high propensity of the parasite to become drug resistant the need for new antimalarial drugs will persist until the malarial parasites are eventually eradicated. Because of several factors, the three-dimensional structure of plasmodial proteins is not yet resolved through the physical approach. However, recent advancement in the computational techniques will helpful partially to overcome the traditional approach difficulties. This study is such one which describes the three-dimensional structure of malarial PfATP6 protein and then different in silico strategies were used to evaluate the resistant mechanism with artemisinin and well as subsequent rational approaches for identifying new lead molecules. The two compounds identified in this study can be tested in vitro and in vivo experiments as possible candidates for the designing of potential antimalarial medicines.
Materials and Methods
Protein homology modeling and refinement
The PfATP6 enzyme sequence of P. falciparum was obtained from UniProt22 database. The BLAST server47 was used to search the closest sequence of PfATP6 in the RCSB Protein Data Bank. The high proportion of amino acid sequence identity between the target PfATP6 and endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+-ATPase (Serca) from bovine muscle (45% homology) indicates that crystal structure of the latter are good models, can be used as templates. The SERCA 3D structure of bovine muscle was obtained from the RCSB Protein Data Bank (PDB: 3TLM)23. The sequence alignment of PfATP6 with SERCA as a reference was performed using ClustalW 2.0.1 by applying the default parameters. Protein reconstruction was achieved with Modeller 9.15 on the entire PfATP6 sequence27,28. The refinement was made with the loop model class. The quality of each Modeller refined model was evaluated with PROCHECK (version 3.5.4)29. The final model was chosen from both the PROCHECK results and the Modeller energy score. Hydrogen atoms were added and the PfATP6 structure was minimized using the Gromos96 43a1 force field48,49.
Docking and virtual screening
AutoDock is the widely accepted molecular docking programs and requires a set of preparation steps for general screening50. Included in this process are preparations of acceptable ligands and a receptor macromolecule, calculation of maps and creation of folders for each ligand. AutoDock Vina is the updated version of AutoDock program with improved molecular docking and virtual screening strategies and was approximately two orders of magnitude faster than AutoDock432. Vina uses a gradient optimisation method in its local optimisation procedure. The calculation of the gradient effectively gives the optimisation algorithm a “sense of direction” from a single evaluation. By utilizing the multi threading, Vina can produce fastest calculationon docking analysis by taking advantage of multiple CPUs or CPU cores. The assessment of the speed and accuracy of Vina during the flexible re-docking of 190 protein-ligand complexes demonstrated that the AutoDock4 training set was processed almost two orders of magnitude faster and with a significant improvement in binding mode prediction accuracy. Furthermore, Vina can further reduce computational time by utilising multiple CPU cores. The tool, VcPpt was used for high throughput virtual screening of compounds, VcPpt is an independently developed software package for flexible protein-ligand docking by the Biochem Lab solution.
Molecular dynamic simulations protocol
Molecular dynamics simulations of wild-type and mutant protein-ligand complexes were performed using Gromacs 5.0 software51. The force field used for energy minimization was Gromos96 43a148,49. The structures were solvated using a simple point charge (SPC) water box with a dimension of 52.0 Å. At physiological pH all the protein-ligand complexes obtained negative charges and to neutralize the system counter ions (Na+) were added in to the simulation box. Then, all the atoms in the box were energy minimized by applying the steepest descent algorithm. Next to the energy minimization, furthermore three steps have been followed i.e heating the system, equilibrating the system and finally the production of trajectories. The NPT (constant number of particles, pressure and temperature) ensemble and then the NVT (constant number of particles, volume and temperature) ensemble was performed at 300 K for 50000 ps52. Finally, the production of MD simulation was performed for 50 ns at 300 K. The covalent bonds were constrained by the Linear Constraint Solver (LINCS) algorithm53. The Particle Mesh Ewald (PME) method was used to calculate electrostatic interactions54. The cut-off radii for Coulomb interactions and van der Waals were fixed at 10.0 Å and 14.0, respectively.
By utilizing GROMACS utilities the trajectories obtained from each simulations were completely analyzed55. The utilities g_rms, g_hbond, g_mindist and g_sas were used to plot RMSD, the number of hydrogen bonds formed between molecules, the minimum distances between molecules and solvent-accessible surface area (SASA) of proteins respectively. The numbers of hydrogen bonds and the minimum distance formed between protein-ligand complexes were calculated to explain the stability of the complexes. SASA analysis was performed to identify the traceable area of a molecule and all graphs were generated using the XM grace tool56.
Additional Information
How to cite this article: N., N. et al. Mechanism of artemisinin resistance for malaria PfATP6 L263 mutations and discovering potential antimalarials: An integrated computational approach. Sci. Rep. 6, 30106; doi: 10.1038/srep30106 (2016).
References
Klayman, D. L. Qinghaosu (artemisinin): an antimalarial drug from China. Science 228, 1049–1055 (1985).
Arrow, K. J., Panosian, C. B. & Geltband, H. Saving Lives, Buying Time. (National Academies Press), doi: 10.17226/11017 (2004).
Jefford, C. W. Why artemisinin and certain synthetic peroxides are potent antimalarials. Implications for the mode of action. Curr. Med. Chem. 8, 1803–1826 (2001).
Pandey, A. V., Tekwani, B. L., Singh, R. L. & Chauhan, V. S. Artemisinin, an endoperoxide antimalarial, disrupts the hemoglobin catabolism and heme detoxification systems in malarial parasite. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 19383–19388 (1999).
Ellis, D. S. et al. The chemotherapy of rodent malaria, XXXIX. Ultrastructural changes following treatment with artemisinine of Plasmodium berghei infection in mice, with observations of the localization of [3H]-dihydroartemisinine in P. falciparum in vitro. Ann. Trop. Med. Parasitol. 79, 367–374 (1985).
Ter Kuile, F., White, N. J., Holloway, P., Pasvol, G. & Krishna, S. Plasmodium falciparum: in vitro studies of the pharmacodynamic properties of drugs used for the treatment of severe malaria. Exp. Parasitol. 76, 85–95 (1993).
Eckstein-Ludwig, U. et al. Artemisinins target the SERCA of Plasmodium falciparum. Nature 424, 957–961 (2003).
Noedl, H. et al. Evidence of artemisinin-resistant malaria in western Cambodia. N. Engl. J. Med. 359, 2619–2620 (2008).
Dondorp, A. M. et al. Artemisinin resistance in Plasmodium falciparum malaria. N. Engl. J. Med. 361, 455–467 (2009).
Saralamba, S. et al. Intrahost modeling of artemisinin resistance in Plasmodium falciparum. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, 397–402 (2011).
Witkowski, B. et al. Reduced artemisinin susceptibility of Plasmodium falciparum ring stages in western Cambodia. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 57, 914–923 (2013).
Mok, S. et al. Artemisinin resistance in Plasmodium falciparum is associated with an altered temporal pattern of transcription. BMC Genomics 12, 391 (2011).
Witkowski, B. et al. Novel phenotypic assays for the detection of artemisinin-resistant Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Cambodia: in-vitro and ex-vivo drug-response studies. Lancet. Infect. Dis. 13, 1043–1049 (2013).
Chotivanich, K. et al. Laboratory detection of artemisinin-resistant Plasmodium falciparum. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 58, 3157–3161 (2014).
World Health Organization Global Malaria Programme. Status report on artemisinin resistance. WHO/HTM/GMP/20149, 2014. Geneva: The Organization (2014).
Phyo, A. P. et al. Emergence of artemisinin-resistant malaria on the western border of Thailand: a longitudinal study. Lancet (London, England) 379, 1960–1966 (2012).
Amaratunga, C. et al. Artemisinin-resistant Plasmodium falciparum in Pursat province, western Cambodia: a parasite clearance rate study. Lancet. Infect. Dis. 12, 851–858 (2012).
Kyaw, M. P. et al. Reduced susceptibility of Plasmodium falciparum to artesunate in southern Myanmar. PLoS One 8, e57689 (2013).
Hien, T. T. et al. In vivo susceptibility of Plasmodium falciparum to artesunate in Binh Phuoc Province, Vietnam. Malar. J. 11, 355 (2012).
Uhlemann, A. C. et al. A single amino acid residue can determine the sensitivity of SERCAs to artemisinins. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 12, 628–629 (2005).
Valderramos, S. G. et al. Identification of a mutant PfCRT-mediated chloroquine tolerance phenotype in Plasmodium falciparum. PLoS Pathog. 6, e1000887 (2010).
Yip, Y. L., Lachenal, N., Pillet, V. & Veuthey, A.-L. Retrieving mutation-specific information for human proteins in UniProt/Swiss-Prot Knowledgebase. J. Bioinform. Comput. Biol. 5, 1215–1231 (2007).
Sacchetto, R. et al. Crystal structure of sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+-ATPase (SERCA) from bovine muscle. J. Struct. Biol. 178, 38–44 (2012).
Jung, M., Kim, H., Nam, K. Y. & No, K. T. Three-dimensional structure of Plasmodium falciparum Ca2+ -ATPase(PfATP6) and docking of artemisinin derivatives to PfATP6. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 15, 2994–2997 (2005).
Naik, P. K. et al. The binding modes and binding affinities of artemisinin derivatives with Plasmodium falciparum Ca2+-ATPase (PfATP6). J. Mol. Model. 17, 333–357 (2011).
Larkin, M. A. et al. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 23, 2947–2948 (2007).
Sali, A. & Blundell, T. L. Comparative protein modelling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. J. Mol. Biol. 234, 779–815 (1993).
Fiser, A., Do, R. K. & Sali, A. Modeling of loops in protein structures. Protein Sci. 9, 1753–1773 (2000).
Laskowski, R. A., MacArthur, M. W., Moss, D. S. & Thornton, J. M. PROCHECK: a program to check the stereochemical quality of protein structures. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 26, 283–291 (1993).
Gardner, M. J. et al. Genome sequence of the human malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum. Nature 419, 498–511 (2002).
Garah, F. B. E., Stigliani, J.-L., Cosledan, F., Meunier, B. & Robert, A. Docking studies of structurally diverse antimalarial drugs targeting PfATP6: no correlation between in silico binding affinity and in vitro antimalarial activity. ChemMedChem 4, 1469–1479 (2009).
Trott, O. & Olson, A. J. AutoDock Vina: improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization and multithreading. J. Comput. Chem. 31, 455–461 (2010).
Toyoshima, C., Nakasako, M., Nomura, H. & Ogawa, H. Crystal structure of the calcium pump of sarcoplasmic reticulum at 2.6 A resolution. Nature 405, 647–655 (2000).
Toyoshima, C. & Nomura, H. Structural changes in the calcium pump accompanying the dissociation of calcium. Nature 418, 605–611 (2002).
Ogawa, H., Stokes, D. L., Sasabe, H. & Toyoshima, C. Structure of the Ca2+ pump of sarcoplasmic reticulum: a view along the lipid bilayer at 9-A resolution. Biophys. J. 75, 41–52 (1998).
Ripphausen, P., Nisius, B., Peltason, L. & Bajorath, J. Quo vadis, virtual screening? A comprehensive survey of prospective applications. J. Med. Chem. 53, 8461–8467 (2010).
Clark, D. E. What has virtual screening ever done for drug discovery? Expert Opin. Drug Discov. 3, 841–851 (2008).
Cheng, T., Li, Q., Zhou, Z., Wang, Y. & Bryant, S. H. Structure-based virtual screening for drug discovery: a problem-centric review. AAPS J. 14, 133–141 (2012).
Meng, X. Y., Zhang, H. X., Mezei, M. & Cui, M. Molecular docking: a powerful approach for structure-based drug discovery. Curr. Comput. Aided. Drug Des. 7, 146–157 (2011).
Gerlt, J. A., Kreevoy, M. M., Cleland, W. W. & Frey, P. A. Understanding enzymic catalysis: the importance of short, strong hydrogen bonds. Chem. Biol. 4, 259–267 (1997).
Charman, S. A. et al. Synthetic ozonide drug candidate OZ439 offers new hope for a single-dose cure of uncomplicated malaria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, 4400–4405 (2011).
Rottmann, M. et al. Spiroindolones, a potent compound class for the treatment of malaria. Science 329, 1175–1180 (2010).
Müller, I. B. & Hyde, J. E. Antimalarial drugs: modes of action and mechanisms of parasite resistance. Future Microbiol. 5, 1857–1873 (2010).
Sa, J. M., Chong, J. L. & Wellems, T. E. Malaria drug resistance: new observations and developments. Essays Biochem. 51, 137–160 (2011).
Haynes, R. K. et al. Artemisone a highly active antimalarial drug of the artemisinin class. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 45, 2082–2088 (2006).
Ding, X. C., Beck, H. P. & Raso, G. Plasmodium sensitivity to artemisinins: magic bullets hit elusive targets. Trends Parasitol. 27, 73–81 (2011).
Altschul, S. F. et al. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 25, 3389–3402 (1997).
Gunsteren, W. F. van . Biomolecular Simulation: The GROMOS96 Manual and User Guide. (Biomos ; Zurich, (1996).
Oostenbrink, C., Villa, A., Mark, A. E. & van Gunsteren, W. F. A biomolecular force field based on the free enthalpy of hydration and solvation: the GROMOS force-field parameter sets 53A5 and 53A6. J. Comput. Chem. 25, 1656–1676 (2004).
Morris, G. M. et al. AutoDock4 and AutoDockTools4: Automated docking with selective receptor flexibility. J. Comput. Chem. 30, 2785–2791 (2009).
Hess, B., Kutzner, C., van der Spoel, D. & Lindahl, E. GROMACS 4: Algorithms for Highly Efficient, Load-Balanced and Scalable Molecular Simulation. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 4, 435–447 (2008).
Berendsen, H. J. C., Postma, J. P. M., van Gunsteren, W. F., DiNola, A. & Haak, J. R. Molecular dynamics with coupling to an external bath. J. Chem. Phys. 81, 3684 (1984).
Hess, B., Bekker, H., Berendsen, H. J. C. & Fraaije, J. G. E. M. LINCS: A linear constraint solver for molecular simulations. J. Comput. Chem. 18, 1463–1472 (1997).
Essmann, U. et al. A smooth particle mesh Ewald method. J. Chem. Phys. 103, 8577 (1995).
Van Der Spoel, D. et al. GROMACS: fast, flexible and free. J. Comput. Chem. 26, 1701–1718 (2005).
Turner, P. J. XMGRACE, Version 5.1.19. Central for costal and Land-Margin Research; Oregon Graduate Institute of Science and Technology, Beaverton, ORE, USA (2005).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Research Grants Council of Hong Kong 212613 and Faculty Research Grant of Hong Kong Baptist University FRG/14-15/063 and FRG2/13-14/056. The authors take this opportunity to thank the management of VIT University, Galgotias University and CMCH Vellore for providing the facilities and encouragement to carry out this work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
N.N., G.P.D.C., C.C., K.V. and T.K.D. were involved in design, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation of the data. N.N., G.P.D.C., C.C., K.V., B.V., T.K.D. and S.R. were involved in interpretation of the data and drafting the manuscript. A.L., Z.G. and H.Z. supervised the entire study and was involved in design, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation of the data and drafting the manuscript. The manuscript was reviewed and approved by all the authors G.P.D.C., C.C. and H.Z.
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
About this article
Cite this article
N., N., C., G., Chakraborty, C. et al. Mechanism of artemisinin resistance for malaria PfATP6 L263 mutations and discovering potential antimalarials: An integrated computational approach. Sci Rep 6, 30106 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep30106
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep30106
This article is cited by
-
Molecular surveillance of Kelch-13 gene in Plasmodium falciparum field isolates from Mayurbhanj District, Odisha, India, and in silico artemisinin-Kelch-13 protein interaction study
Parasitology Research (2023)
-
β-Sitosterol could serve as a dual inhibitor of Trypanosoma congolense sialidase and phospholipase A2: in vitro kinetic analyses and molecular dynamic simulations
Molecular Diversity (2023)
-
Evaluation of antiplasmodial activity in silico and in vitro of N-acylhydrazone derivatives
BMC Chemistry (2022)
-
Targeting oncogenic Notch signaling with SERCA inhibitors
Journal of Hematology & Oncology (2021)
-
Antimalarial and anticancer properties of artesunate and other artemisinins: current development
Monatshefte für Chemie - Chemical Monthly (2021)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.