Abstract
Osteoporosis is a prominent disorder affecting over 200 million people worldwide. Recently, semaphorins have been implicated in the cell-cell communication between osteoclasts and osteoblasts and have been associated with the progression of osteoporosis. Previously, we demonstrated that knockdown of semaphorin4d (Sema4d) using siRNA delivered with a bone-targeting system prevented bone loss in an osteoporotic animal model. Here, we used this bone-specific technology containing siRNA-Sema4d and fabricated a PLLA scaffold capable of enhancing bone repair following fracture. We investigated the ability of the implant to release siRNA-Sema4d into the surrounding tissues over time and to influence new bone formation in a 3 mm femur osteoporotic defect model in ovariectomized rats. Delivery of the bone-targeting system released from PLLA scaffolds began 2 hours post-implantation, peaked at 1 day and was sustained over a 21 day period. μCT analysis demonstrated a significantly higher bone volume/total volume bone mineral density and number of osteoblasts in the rats that were transplanted with scaffolds loaded with siRNA-Sema4d. These results confirm the specific role of Sema4d in bone remodeling and demonstrate that significant increases in the speed and quality of new bone formation occur when siRNA-Sema4d is delivered via a PLLA scaffold.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Osteoporosis is a global healthcare issue with an increasing socio-economic burden. It is caused by an imbalance between bone-forming osteoblasts and bone-resorbing osteoclasts1,2. Over 200 million people are affected worldwide3, with the majority of patients being white or Asian women over 65 years old4. For decades, research has shown that osteoporotic patients demonstrate reduced healing after bone injury5. Fractures are more common and their healing potential is drastically reduced5. The disease is caused by hyper-activity of osteoclasts, which affects the bone remodeling cycle and limits the ability of the incoming bone-forming osteoblasts to lay new bone matrix2,6,7,8,9,10.
At present, the two major pharmacological approaches for the treatment of osteoporosis are as follows: stimulation of bone formation via anabolic agents (such as parathyroid hormone) or prevention of bone resorption via anti-resorptives (such as bisphosphonates, calcitonin, raloxifene and estrogen replacement therapy)11. Semaphorins have recently been targeted as molecules with osteoporosis treatment potential. They are directly implicated in the cell-cell communication between osteoclasts and osteoblasts and may be a novel target for the treatment of osteoporosis12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21. Furthermore, the overexpression of semaphorin4d (Sema4d) in bone tissues has been associated with osteoporosis in an animal model22. A Sema4d knockout animal model recently demonstrated an increase in bone thickness and density, further implicating Sema4d in the bone remodeling cycle.
Previously, we have developed a site-specific bone-targeting drug delivery system consisting of polymeric nanoparticles containing an siRNA-mediated gene knockdown system for Sema4d23. This system specifically targets native bone and releases siRNA-Sema4d onto bone surfaces occupied by osteoclasts. Weekly injections of this system significantly improved bone formation in both an early and late phase osteoporotic animal model by re-balancing the bone remodeling cycle23.
While most of the current osteoporosis research focuses on fracture prevention using a variety of pharmacological agents, the treatment of osteoporosis-related defects following fracture has not been as well studied. Therefore, in this study, we fabricated a specific bone replacement material from poly-L-lactic acid (PLLA) scaffolds to promote bone formation in an osteoporotic phenotype and studied this in 3 mm femur defects in ovariectomized (OVX) rats. The PLLA scaffolds were then loaded with a bone-specific targeting system that contained siRNA-Sema4d to improve bone remodeling and new bone formation was investigated.
Materials and Methods
Preparation and characterization of PLLA
Four groups were used for all animal experiments: 1) drilled control, 2) PLLA alone, 3) PLLA-(Asp8-(STR-R8)) and 4) PLLA-(Asp8-(STR-R8)-siRNA-Sema4d. Porous PLLA scaffolds were prepared using a previously described freeze-drying method24. Briefly, 1g PLLA (Sigma #765112; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, USA) was dispersed in 10 ml dioxane (Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd, Shanghai, China) under vigorous stirring until completely dissolved. Then, the mixture was rapidly transferred to a freezer at −35 °C overnight to solidify the solvent and induce solid–liquid phase separation. This solidified mixture was then maintained at −80 °C for 2 h and subsequently transferred into a freeze-drying vessel (Christ Beta 1–15, Germany) for 48 h until dried. Scaffolds were then sterilized and lyophilized. The Asp8-(STR-R8)-siRNA-Sema4d (covalently linked) bone targeting system was fabricated as previously described23. Briefly, the packaging of siRNA (GenePharma, Suzhou, China) was performed according to a protocol adapted from DNA transfection experiments25. Asp8-Stearyl-R8 (1.5 μl) (ChinaPeptides Co., Ltd, Shanghai, China) was diluted in 50 μl of unsupplemented Neurobasal medium (Gibco®, USA) and combined with 10 pmol of siRNA in 50 μL of unsupplemented Neurobasal medium. The solution was incubated for 5 min at room temperature. The PLLA (0.01 g) was then incubated with 1 ml of Asp8-(STR-R8)-siRNA-Sema4d solution or Asp8-(STR-R8) solution (5 OD/ml) at 4 °C overnight to allow complete infiltration. These complexes were then frozen by immersion at −80 °C for 2 h and subsequently lyophilized.
Animals and surgical procedures
Mature female Wistar rats (12 weeks old, mean body weight 250 g) were purchased and used for this study. All handling and surgical procedures were approved by the Ethics Committee for Animal Research, Wuhan University, China. The methods were carried out in “accordance” with the approved guidelines. Animals received food and water ad libitum and were housed at a constant temperature of 22 °C. For surgery, the animals were place under general anesthesia using an intraperitoneal injection of chloral hydrate (Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd, Shanghai, China, 10%, 4 ml/kg body weight) and all operations were performed under sterile conditions with a minimally invasive surgical technique. Postoperatively, penicillin (40,000 IU/ml, 1 ml/kg) was injected each day for 3 days. There were no signs of inflammation or other notable anomalies.
Osteoporosis model
The animals were acclimatized to the new laboratory surroundings for one week. The osteoporotic animal model was established using a bilateral ovariectomy (OVX)26. Briefly, under general anesthesia, the rats received 10 mm linear incisions bilaterally in the lumbar skin. Both ovaries were gently removed. The tissue layers were then repositioned and sutured. Following surgery, buprenorphine (0.05 mg/kg) was administered by subcutaneous injection for pain management.
Femoral defect model
Standardized 3 mm femoral cylindrical defects were created in ovariectomized animals 2 months after the bilateral removal of the ovaries. The osteoporosis model should have been established at this time point according to previous studies27,28. A distal femoral epiphysis linear skin incision (approximately 1 cm) was performed bilaterally. The femoral condyles were then exposed by blunt dissection of the muscles surrounding the femurs. A 2.8 mm diameter reamer was used to create a 3.0 mm diameter anteroposterior bicortical channel perpendicular to the shaft axis (Supplemental Fig. 1A (reprint with permission from Cheng et al.27)). The bur was irrigated at a slow speed (800 rpm) and rinsed with saline solution to avoid thermal necrosis of the cells and tissues. The bone fragments were washed out of the cavity using the saline solution. Scaffolds (3 mm in diameter by 5 mm in thickness) were gently placed bilaterally according to a randomized group allocation. The incisions were then closed. Buprenorphine (0.05 mg/kg) was administered by subcutaneous injection for postoperative pain management.
Pharmacokinetics study
PLLA scaffolds were cut using custom trays (3 mm in diameter and 5 mm in thickness), gently loaded with rhodamine-labeled Asp8-(STR-R8) and placed within the femurs. Samples were collected at 0 hours, 12 hours, 1 day, 3 days, 7 days, 14 days and 21 days post-operation to assess the duration and location of drug distribution. The fluorescence signal was detected using a Xenogen IVIS imaging system (Xenogen, Alameda, Ca, USA) as previously described23.
Bone regeneration
To study bone regeneration in the osteoporotic femoral defect, the rats were divided into four groups: 1) drilled control, 2) filled with PLLA, 3) filled with PLLA-(Asp8-(STR-R8)) and 4) filled with PLLA-(Asp8-(STR-R8)-siRNA-Sema4d) (n = 15 in all groups). Rats were sacrificed at 2, 4 and 8 weeks after femoral surgery. The defect, size, shape and location are presented in supplemental Fig. 1. The rats were divided into four groups with 6 defects per group per time point.
Micro-CT (μCT) analysis of osteogenesis in the femoral defect
After harvesting at each time point, the femurs were removed intact and fixed in 4% freshly prepared formaldehyde for 24 h at 4 °C. The μCT imaging system (μCT50, Scanco Medical, Brüttisellen, Switzerland) was used to evaluate the osteogenesis within the defect region. The study parameters used were previously reported26,29,30,31. The scanning parameters, reconstructed parameters and analysis parameters were entered into the μCT scanner. A consistent volume of interest (VOI) was located in the central 2.5-mm-diameter region of the 3-mm-diameter defect. The middle third (by length) was used to evaluate the level of bone regeneration. Mineralized bone tissue was differentially segmented with a fixed low threshold (value = 184). The bone volume fractions (BV/TV), trabecular thickness (Tb.Th) and tissue mineral density were automatically collected and analyzed using the μCT software as previously described26,29,30,31. Representative sections were taken from the vertical view and a representative cube of VOI was acquired by 3D reconstruction.
Histological observation and analysis
Following μCT scanning, femurs were removed and decalcified in 10% EDTA. The solution was changed twice weekly for 3 weeks. The samples were embedded in paraffin with the long axis parallel to the base plane. Serial sections (5 μm) were cut and mounted on polylysine-coated slides. The samples were analyzed using H&E staining and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) staining (Sigma #387A; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, USA) in accordance with the manufacturer’s protocol. The expression of SEMA4D and osteocalcin (BGLAP) were detected according to the following immunohistochemical procedure. The samples were deparaffinized, rehydrated and washed. The sections were then processed for antigen retrieval by using trypsin and then incubated with 0.3% hydrogen peroxide for 20 min followed by incubation with normal goat serum. The sections were incubated with a primary antibody specific for SEMA4D (1:250; 14422-1-AP, Proteintech. Inc., US) or BGLAP (1:200; BA1677-1, Boster, China) for 2 h at 37 °C. The sections were then incubated using the SP 9000 immunohistochemical kit (Zhongshan Biotechnology Co., Ltd, China) and visualized with 3, 3-diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride (DAB) (Zhongshan Biotechnology Co., Ltd, China). The sections were counterstained with hematoxylin. TRAP-positive osteoclasts were stained red and were identified by the presence of three or more nuclei. Each defect was assayed in triplicate for each of the 6 animals per group at the 3 time points (54 samples per group).
Statistical analysis
Statistical analyses were performed using a one-way ANOVA and the Student-Newman-Keuls test. Results were considered statistically significant at p < 0.05. All data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD).
Results
Sustained and localized release in vivo
Images of a representative femur filled with PLLA scaffold incorporating rhodamine-labeled Asp8-(STR-R8) depict the kinetics of the sustained and localized drug distribution for a period of 21 days (Fig. 1). The release of (measurable) Asp8-(STR-R8) was used as a surrogate marker for the release of siRNA-Sema4d. The rhodamine-labeled Asp8-(STR-R8) was released from PLLA scaffolds over time but restricted to the defect and adjacent bone tissue. The highest labeling was observed at 1 day post-implantation of the scaffold and labeling was maintained (albeit in low quantities) for 21 days (Fig. 1).
μCT analysis of osteogenesis in the femoral defect
Representative images of bone regeneration in the femoral defect, performed by 3D reconstruction for each group, are shown in Fig. 2. A minimal amount of new bone formation was found in the unfilled defects at all time points (Fig. 2). The three defects filled with scaffolds demonstrated improved bone formation and mineralization compared to the unfilled defects. The siRNA-Sema4d treated group regenerated the highest amounts of mineralized bone (Fig. 2). Quantitative analyses demonstrated that the bone volume, trabecular thickness and tissue mineral density of the siRNA-Sema4d treated group were significantly higher than those of the PLLA filled group at 8 weeks post-operation (Fig. 3). The unfilled group had the lowest values of all treatment groups at 4 and 8 weeks post-operation (Fig. 3).
Histological and immunohistochemical analysis
Representative images of H&E staining of the femoral defect are shown in Fig. 4. At 2 weeks post-implantation, bone regeneration was observed at the periphery of the defect sites in all groups in which the defects were filled with scaffolds. There were no significant differences between groups and only a small amount of new bone regeneration had occurred (Fig. 4). At 4 weeks post-implantation, the unfilled group demonstrated little to no new bone formation. Bone formation had not improved further at 8 weeks post-surgery (Fig. 4). The scaffold groups had a significantly larger bone area than did the controls at both 4 and 8 weeks (Fig. 4). The scaffolds that were pre-loaded with siRNA-Sema4d further supported new bone formation compared to all other treatment modalities at 4 and 8 weeks.
Quantitative analysis was used to determine the number of Sema4d-stained cells (Fig. 5), the number of osteoblasts (Fig. 6) and the number of osteoclasts (Fig. 7). Staining of Sema4d positive cells demonstrated a 3-fold decrease in such cells at 2, 4 and 8 weeks in scaffolds that contained siRNA-Sema4d. This result confirmed the functioning of the in vivo knockdown system (Fig. 5). The number of osteoblasts was counted in the histological sections, which were also stained with BGLAP (Fig. 6). No difference in osteoblast number was observed at 2 weeks between all groups implanted with scaffolds. However, the scaffolds with siRNA-Sema4d led to significantly higher number of osteoblasts at 4 weeks than did the control scaffolds and returned to baseline PLLA control values by 8 weeks (Fig. 6). TRAP-positive osteoclasts were observed in all four groups around newly formed bone, with no differences among the three implanted scaffold groups (Fig. 7).
Discussion
Recently, semaphorins have been targeted as molecules that are directly implicated in the cell-cell cross-talk between osteoclasts and osteoblasts12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21. They were originally identified as axon-guidance molecules but have since also been demonstrated to have important roles outside the nervous system. They play key roles in cell migration, cell-cell communication, tissue development and angiogenesis32,33,34,35,36,37. Their specific targeted delivery is important because of their widespread activity in the nervous system and other tissues. We previously developed a site specific targeting system with D-Asp823. When intravenously injected into rats (over 4 weeks), we were able to locate and target bone with little to no delivery to surrounding tissues23. In the present study, we developed a scaffold carrying siRNA-Sema4d and investigated its release into bone tissues over time. In the past few years, siRNA has been investigated for the treatment of various diseases because of its ability to silence various genes responsible for pathology38,39,40,41. At 1 day post-implantation, the release of the vector had peaked and then gradually decreased over time (Fig. 1). The bone targeting system was expressed in the shaft of the femur. The delivery of this targeting system to bony tissues near the fracture site is a desirable feature because the development of osteoporosis leads to a reduction in bone specifically in the trabecular regions. The delivery system has previously been shown to target native bone undergoing bone remodeling. In the present study, we demonstrated that local implantation of this system into tissues with low bone density (an osteoporotic animal model) may improve the regeneration of bone following fracture/bone defects. Therefore, local implantation of a scaffold system that is both a bone replacement material and an osteopromotive agent may result in improved fracture healing in patients.
It has previously been reported from studies of knockout animals that the role of Sema4d in osteoclast activity is mediated by its receptor, Plexin-B1, which is expressed by osteoblasts16,42. There is now increasing evidence from pre-clinical studies that Sema4d is expressed at a higher level in osteoporotic animals22. Therefore, Sema4d is an important and viable target for gene silencing. In our previous study, we demonstrated that the knockdown of Sema4d in osteoclasts, which were co-cultured with bone marrow stromal cells, led to an increase in alkaline phosphatase activity. It also increased the mineralization potential and the upregulation of the genes encoding collagen 1 and osteocalcin as assessed by real-time PCR23. The present study further supports these results by demonstrating that the local implantation of this scaffold system increased tissue mineral density and BV/TV (Figs 2, 3, 4). The staining of Sema4d-positive cells was significantly decreased (over 3-fold) compared to blank or scaffold controls (Fig. 5). The scaffold system had little to no effect on the number of osteoclasts following transfection with siRNA-Sema4d and thereby did not halt the bone remodeling cycle (commonly reported during bisphosphonate use). One limitation of this study is that it does not focus on the activity of osteoclasts. Further research is needed to determine the potential effects of this system on the resorption properties of osteoclasts in vitro.
Conclusions
The PLLA scaffold containing siRNA-Sema4d improved new bone formation in an osteoporotic animal model. The knockdown of Sema4d in osteoclasts did not affect the number of osteoclasts on the bone surface. However, the number of osteoblasts significantly increased, suggesting that Sema4d has a role in the cross-talk between osteoclasts and osteoblasts. The field of biomaterials faces many challenges in meeting the globally increasing demand for the repair of osteoporosis related fractures. We demonstrate that the site specific delivery of a bone-targeted gene knockdown system significantly improved new bone formation in osteoporosis related bone defects.
Additional Information
How to cite this article: Zhang, Y. et al. Bone scaffolds loaded with siRNA-Semaphorin4d for the treatment of osteoporosis related bone defects. Sci. Rep. 6, 26925; doi: 10.1038/srep26925 (2016).
References
Tontonoz, P. & Pei, L. M. Fat’s loss is bone’s gain. J Clin Invest 113, 805–806, doi: 10.1172/Jci200421311 (2004).
Rodan, G. A. & Martin, T. J. Therapeutic approaches to bone diseases. Science 289, 1508–1514, doi: 8794 (2000).
Cooper, C., Campion, G. & Melton, L. J. 3rd . Hip fractures in the elderly: a world-wide projection. Osteoporos Int 2, 285–289 (1992).
Teitelbaum, S. L. Stem cells and osteoporosis therapy. Cell Stem Cell 7, 553–554, doi: S1934-5909(10)00517-5 (2010).
Namkung-Matthai, H. et al. Osteoporosis influences the early period of fracture healing in a rat osteoporotic model. Bone 28, 80–86 (2001).
Moazzaz, P. et al. Estrogen-dependent actions of bone morphogenetic protein-7 on spine fusion in rats. Spine 30, 1706–1711, doi: 00007632-200508010-00005 (2005).
Hao, Y. J. et al. Changes of microstructure and mineralized tissue in the middle and late phase of osteoporotic fracture healing in rats. Bone 41, 631–638, doi: S8756-3282(07)00511-X (2007).
Namkung-Matthai, H. et al. Osteoporosis influences the early period of fracture healing in a rat osteoporotic model. Bone 28, 80–86, doi: S8756-3282(00)00414-2 (2001).
Cao, Q. et al. The mechanism of anti-osteoporosis effects of 3-hydroxybutyrate and derivatives under simulated microgravity. Biomaterials 35, 8273–8283, doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.06.020 (2014).
Mirsaidi, A. et al. Therapeutic potential of adipose-derived stromal cells in age-related osteoporosis. Biomaterials 35, 7326–7335, doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.05.016 (2014).
Silva, B. C. & Bilezikian, J. P. New approaches to the treatment of osteoporosis. Annu Rev Med 62, 307–322, doi: 10.1146/annurev-med-061709-145401 (2011).
Irie, N. et al. Bidirectional signaling through ephrinA2-EphA2 enhances osteoclastogenesis and suppresses osteoblastogenesis. J Biol Chem 284, 14637–14644, doi: 10.1074/jbc.M807598200 (2009).
Sutton, A. L. et al. Semaphorin 3B is a 1, 25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3-induced gene in osteoblasts that promotes osteoclastogenesis and induces osteopenia in mice. Mol Endocrinol 22, 1370–1381, doi: 10.1210/me.2007-0363 (2008).
Takegahara, N. et al. Plexin-A1 and its interaction with DAP12 in immune responses and bone homeostasis. Nat Cell Biol 8, 615–622, doi: 10.1038/ncb1416 (2006).
Zhao, C. et al. Bidirectional ephrinB2-EphB4 signaling controls bone homeostasis. Cell Metab 4, 111–121, doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2006.05.012 (2006).
Negishi-Koga, T. et al. Suppression of bone formation by osteoclastic expression of semaphorin 4D. Nat Med 17, 1473–1480, doi: 10.1038/nm.2489 (2011).
Leah, E. Bone : Finding that osteoclasts repel osteoblast activity through Sema4D reveals novel target for bone-boosting therapies. Nat Rev Rheumatol 7, 681, doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2011.175 (2011).
Delorme, G., Saltel, F., Bonnelye, E., Jurdic, P. & Machuca-Gayet, I. Expression and function of semaphorin 7A in bone cells. Biol Cell 97, 589–597, doi: 10.1042/bc20040103 (2005).
Fukuda, T. et al. Sema3A regulates bone-mass accrual through sensory innervations. Nature 497, 490–493, doi: 10.1038/nature12115 (2013).
Hayashi, M. et al. Osteoprotection by semaphorin 3A. Nature 485, 69–74, doi: 10.1038/nature11000 (2012).
Ohlsson, C. Bone metabolism in 2012: Novel osteoporosis targets. Nat Rev Endocrinol 9, 72–74, doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2012.252 nrendo.2012.252 (2013).
Dacquin, R. et al. Control of bone resorption by semaphorin 4D is dependent on ovarian function. PloS one 6, e26627, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0026627 (2011).
Zhang, Y., Wei, L., Miron, R. J., Shi, B. & Bian, Z. Anabolic Bone Formation Via a Site Specific Bone Targeting Delivery System by Interfering with Semaphorin 4D Expression. J Bone Min Res. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.2322 (2014).
Zhang, Y. et al. Combination of scaffold and adenovirus vectors expressing bone morphogenetic protein-7 for alveolar bone regeneration at dental implant defects. Biomaterials 28, 4635–4642, doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.07.009 (2007).
Tonges, L. et al. Stearylated octaarginine and artificial virus-like particles for transfection of siRNA into primary rat neurons. RNA 12, 1431–1438, doi: 10.1261/rna.2252206 (2006).
Zhang, Y., Cheng, N., Miron, R., Shi, B. & Cheng, X. Delivery of PDGF-B and BMP-7 by mesoporous bioglass/silk fibrin scaffolds for the repair of osteoporotic defects. Biomaterials 33, 6698–6708, doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.06.021 (2012).
Cheng, N. et al. Porous CaP/silk composite scaffolds to repair femur defects in an osteoporotic model. J Mater Sci Mater Med 24, 1963–1975, doi: 10.1007/s10856-013-4945-y (2013).
Wei, L., Miron, R. J., Shi, B. & Zhang, Y. Osteoinductive and Osteopromotive Variability among Different Demineralized Bone Allografts. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, doi: 10.1111/cid.12118 (2013).
Liao, L. et al. Osteogenic properties of PBLG-g-HA/PLLA nanocomposites. PLoS One 9, e105876, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0105876 (2014).
Wei, L. et al. A comparative study of Sr-incorporated mesoporous bioactive glass scaffolds for regeneration of osteopenic bone defects. Osteoporos Int 25, 2089–2096, doi: 10.1007/s00198-014-2735-0 (2014).
Zhang, Y. et al. Bone grafting material in combination with Osteogain for bone repair: a rat histomorphometric study. Clin Oral Investig, doi: 10.1007/s00784-015-1532-2 (2015).
Larrivee, B., Freitas, C., Suchting, S., Brunet, I. & Eichmann, A. Guidance of vascular development: lessons from the nervous system. Circ Res 104, 428–441, doi: 10.1161/circresaha.108.188144 (2009).
Suzuki, K., Kumanogoh, A. & Kikutani, H. Semaphorins and their receptors in immune cell interactions. Nat Immunol, 9, 17–23, doi: 10.1038/ni1553 (2008).
Tran, T. S., Kolodkin, A. L. & Bharadwaj, R. Semaphorin regulation of cellular morphology. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 23, 263–292, doi: 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.22.010605.093554 (2007).
Huber, A. B., Kolodkin, A. L., Ginty, D. D. & Cloutier, J. F. Signaling at the growth cone: ligand-receptor complexes and the control of axon growth and guidance. Annu Rev Neurosci. 26, 509–563, doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.26.010302.081139 (2003).
Dickson, B. J. Molecular mechanisms of axon guidance. Science 298, 1959–1964, doi: 10.1126/science.1072165 (2002).
Tamagnone, L. & Comoglio, P. M. Signalling by semaphorin receptors: cell guidance and beyond. Trends Cell Biol. 10, 377–383 (2000).
Qi, W. et al. Efficient siRNA transfection to the inner ear through the intact round window by a novel proteidic delivery technology in the chinchilla. Gene Ther 21, 10–18, doi: 10.1038/gt.2013.49 (2014).
Yang, Q. et al. AAV-based shRNA silencing of NF-kappaB ameliorates muscle pathologies in mdx mice. Gene Ther 19, 1196–1204, doi: 10.1038/gt.2011.207 (2012).
Yoshizawa, H. et al. TGF-beta-siRNA delivery with nanoparticles inhibits peritoneal fibrosis. Gene Ther. doi: 10.1038/gt.2014.116 (2015).
Zhang, Y. & Friedlander, R. M. Using non-coding small RNAs to develop therapies for Huntington’s disease. Gene Ther 18, 1139–1149, doi: 10.1038/gt.2011.170 (2011).
Janssen, B. J. et al. Structural basis of semaphorin-plexin signalling. Nature 467, 1118–1122, doi: 10.1038/nature09468 (2010).
Acknowledgements
We thank Jingtao Zhu, Yanbing Zhao and Qin Zhou for their technical assistance. This work was supported by the Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University (NCET-11-0414) and the funds of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81271108 to YF Zhang and 81120108010 (International cooperation and exchange projects) to Z. Bian) and the Pre-National Basic Research Program of China (973 Plan) (2012CB722404 to Z. Bian).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Y.Z. and L.W. performed the experiments. Y.Z., L.F. and R.J.M. prepared the figures. Y.Z., R.J.M., B.S. and Z.B. wrote the manuscript. All authors reviewed and approved the final manuscript.
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, Y., Wei, L., Miron, R. et al. Bone scaffolds loaded with siRNA-Semaphorin4d for the treatment of osteoporosis related bone defects. Sci Rep 6, 26925 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep26925
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep26925
This article is cited by
-
Hallmarks of peripheral nerve function in bone regeneration
Bone Research (2023)
-
Targeting strategies for bone diseases: signaling pathways and clinical studies
Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy (2023)
-
Neuro–bone tissue engineering: emerging mechanisms, potential strategies, and current challenges
Bone Research (2023)
-
Delivery of RNAi-Based Therapeutics for Bone Regeneration
Current Osteoporosis Reports (2020)
-
Sema4D expression and secretion are increased by HIF-1α and inhibit osteogenesis in bone metastases of lung cancer
Clinical & Experimental Metastasis (2019)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.