Abstract
Hypertrophic scar (HS) is a serious fibrotic skin condition with currently no satisfactory therapy due to undefined molecular mechanism. FAK and Src are two important non-receptor tyrosine kinases that have been indicated in HS pathogenesis. Here we found both FAK and Src were activated in HS vs. normal skin (NS), NS fibroblasts treated with TGF-β1 also exhibited FAK/Src activation. Co-immunoprecipitation and dual-labelled immunofluorescence revealed an enhanced FAK-Src association and co-localization in HS vs. NS. To examine effects of FAK/Src activation and their interplay on HS pathogenesis, site-directed mutagenesis followed by gene overexpression was conducted. Results showed only simultaneous overexpression of non-phosphorylatable mutant FAK Y407F and phosphomimetic mutant Src Y529E remarkably down-regulated the expression of Col I, Col III and α-SMA in cultured HS fibroblasts, alleviated extracellular matrix deposition and made collagen fibers more orderly in HS tissue vs. the effect from single transfection with wild-type or mutational FAK/Src. Glabridin, a chemical found to block FAK-Src complex formation in cancers, exhibited therapeutic effects on HS pathology probably through co-deactivation of FAK/Src which further resulted in FAK-Src de-association. This study suggests FAK-Src complex could serve as a potential molecular target and FAK/Src double deactivation might be a novel strategy for HS therapy.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Hypertrophic scarring (HS) is a common fibro-proliferative disorder that typically follows burns and other injuries involving the deep dermis which is predominantly occupied by the overgrown dermal fibroblasts and the excessive extracellular matrix (ECM)1. The formation and development of HS are closely accompanied with the extravagant secretion of various cytokines, such as TGF-β2,3, which is suggested to stimulate the growth of granulation tissues and promote the transformation of fibroblasts into proliferative and more contractile myofibroblast-type cells4, which is identified by the expression of α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) and in turn secretes abundant ECM proteins, including fibrous collagens that cause scar formation and organ fibrosis. However, the existing therapies for HS are rather restricted largely because of the quite limited understanding of the underlying mechanism and involved signaling pathway.
Focal adhesion kinase (FAK) and Src are two important non-receptor tyrosine kinases that have been indicated to be involved in the process of would healing5,6,7. FAK is found at focal adhesions, the sites of integrin clustering at the cell–ECM interface, where it provides both signaling and scaffolding functions8. FAK is activated in a range of tumor cells and its increased activity correlates with the malignancy and invasiveness of various tumors9,10. Recent studies have implied FAK as a central mediator of fibrogenesis and highlighted this kinase as a potential therapeutic target in fibrotic diseases11, for instance, the inhibition of FAK might represent a novel therapy for scarring disorders12.
The cellular form of the Src gene (c-Src) is the first proto-oncogene that was first discovered in the vertebrate genome in 1970s13. The coding product of c-Src is Src and its activity is regulated by tyrosine phosphorylation at two different residues with opposing effects. Phosphorylation at Tyr529 deactivates Src, while phosphorylation at Tyr416 results in Src activation14. Recent studies have showed that Src was activated in cells along the wounding edge of cultured mouse corneal epithelial cells15 and it integrated early wound responses and late epimorphic regeneration in zebrafish16, suggesting Src might play a significant role in various stages of wound healing. However, its involvement in HS pathogenesis has less been investigated.
FAK and Src often work as a functional protein complex in various tissues and cells. FAK-Src complex-mediated signaling pathways are normally required in tumor progression. For instance, inhibiting the formation of FAK-Src complex by glabridin was found to reduce cancer cell proliferation and motility17. To some extent, HS is considered as a kind of benign skin tumor due to its excessive and rapid cell overgrowth, however, if FAK-Src protein complex exists and exerts roles in HS remains to be clarified. In addition, if the regulation of the activated status of FAK-Src complex would affect HS formation, development and progress also needs to be investigated.
In this study, we first evaluated the active status of FAK and Src in HS vs. normal skin (NS) both in vivo and in vitro by assessing relative expression levels of activating forms p-FAK-Tyr407 and p-Src-Tyr416, as well as deactivating form p-Src-Tyr529. Then we compared the difference on FAK-Src interaction between HS and NS by co-immunoprecipitation and dual-labelled immunofluorescence. Next we performed site-directed mutagenesis followed by gene overexpression to suppress the activity of FAK or Src in HS and tried to examine if regulating FAK/Src activity would improve HS pathology. Finally, glabridin that has been reported to inhibit FAK-Src complex formation in cancer cells was utilized to further confirm the importance of FAK/Src activation on HS pathogenesis.
Results
Both FAK and Src are activated in hypertrophic scar-derived dermis in vivo
The protein levels of FAK, Src and their corresponding phosphorylated forms p-FAK-Tyr407, p-Src-Tyr529 and p-Src-Tyr416 between normal skin dermis (ND) and hypertrophic scar dermis (HD) were first compared (Fig. 1A–C). Results showed that the total protein levels of FAK and Src were the same between ND and HD (Fig. 1A), the relative levels of activating froms p-FAK-Tyr407 and p-Src-Tyr416 were significantly up-regulated by ~3-fold (Fig. 1B,C), while the deactivating form p-Src-Tyr529 was down-regulated by ~50% (Fig. 1C) in HD, indicating the activation of both FAK and Src in HD. Immunohistochemistry was then performed to evaluate tissue distribution/localization of p-FAK-Tyr407 (Fig. 1D), FAK (Fig. 1E), p-Src-Tyr529 (Fig. 1F) and Src (Fig. 1G) in ND and HD. Results showed that both FAK- (Fig. 1E) and Src- (Fig. 1G) positively stained fibroblast percentages remained the same (~30%) between ND and HD, while p-FAK-Tyr407- (Fig. 1D) and p-Src-Tyr529- (Fig. 1G) positively stained fibroblast rates in HD were remarkably up-regulated to ~30% vs. ~10% in ND or down-regulated to ~20% vs. ~40% in ND, respectively. These IHC results were consistent with immunoblotting data.
Both FAK and Src are activated in hypertrophic scar-derived fibroblasts in vitro
The protein expression of FAK, Src and their corresponding phosphorylated forms p-FAK-Tyr407, p-Src-Tyr529 and p-Src-Tyr416 in normal skin fibroblasts (NF) and hypertrophic scar fibroblasts (HF) were examined (Fig. 2A–C). Results showed that total protein levels of FAK and Src were the same between NF and HF (Fig. 2A), the relative levels of activating froms p-FAK-Tyr407 and p-Src-Tyr416 were significantly up-regulated by ~3-fold (Fig. 2B,C), while the deactivating form p-Src-Tyr529 was down-regulated by ~60% (Fig. 2C) in HF, indicating the activation of both FAK and Src in HF, which coincides with in vivo data in Fig. 1. Immunocytofluorescence was used to further reflect the fluorescence intensity and cellular localization of p-FAK-Tyr407 (Fig. 2D) and p-Src-Tyr529 (Fig. 2E) in NF and HF. Results showed that p-FAK-Tyr407 immunostaining was predominantly detected at nuclei in both NF and HF with HF displaying much more intensive staining than NF (Fig. 2D). In contrast, p-Src-Tyr529 exhibited cytoplasm staining in both NF and HF with much stronger staining in NF than that in HF (Fig. 2E).
Both FAK and Src are activated upon TGF-β1 stimulation in cultured normal skin-derived fibroblasts
TGF-β1 is known as a key regulatory cytokine involved in hypertrophic scar pathogenesis, here we tried to investigate whether TGF-β1 stimulation would affect the expression of p-FAK-Tyr407, FAK, p-Src-Tyr529, p-Src-Tyr416 and Src in normal skin fibroblasts. Immunoblotting results showed that both FAK and Src levels did not change after TGF-β1 (5 ng/ml) treatment (Fig. 3A), while the relative expression of p-FAK-Tyr407 (Fig. 3B) and p-Src-Tyr416 (Fig. 3C), as well as p-Src-Tyr529 (Fig. 3C) were significantly up- or down-regulated, respectively. These changes started as early as 1 h post-TGF-β1 treatment and lasted up to 24 h post-treatment (Fig. 3A–C). These in vitro findings further verified results in Figs 1 and 2.
The functional protein complex FAK-Src is activated in hypertrophic scar
FAK and Src were known to form a functional protein complex in various cells and tissues18. In this study, we found FAK was structurally associated with Src in both ND (Fig. 4A) and NF (Fig. 4B), while their interaction was remarkably induced by ~2- or ~4-fold in HD (Fig. 4A) and HF (Fig. 4B), respectively. Dual-labelled immunofluorescence analysis showed that the co-localization (as shown in orange in merged images) of FAK with Src was much stronger in HD (lower panel in Fig. 4C) than that in ND (upper panel in Fig. 4C). These results support the notion that FAK and Src could form FAK-Src protein complex under both normal and pathological skin conditions by protein–protein interaction. In addition, the differential FAK-Src interaction between normal skin and hypertrophic scar as our results shown may suggest that FAK-Src complex is crucial in the regulation of scar formation and progression.
Simultaneous deactivation of FAK and Src by co-overexpressing FAK and Src mutants significantly down-regulates the expression of Col I, Col III and a-SMA in cultured HS fibroblasts
Having demonstrated that the expression of p-FAK-Tyr407 and p-Src-Tyr529 was notably up-regulated and down-regulated in hypertrophic scar, respectively, site-directed mutagenesis followed by gene overexpression was conducted to examine the function of FAK at Tyr407 and Src at Tyr529 in scar pathogenesis. Non-phosphorylatable FAK mutant at Tyr407 (FAK Y407F) and phosphomimetic Src mutant at Tyr529 (Src Y529E) were constructed by site-directed mutagenesis in which the Tyr residue was replaced by Phe (Y407F) or Glu (Y529E), respectively. These mutants were then overexpressed in hypertrophic scar-derived fibroblasts between 3rd to 4th sub-passages, with the empty vector pcDNA3.1(+) or wild-type FAK or Src serving as control. Immunoblotting analysis showed an increase of 50% ~ 70% in FAK protein level when cells were transfected with plasmid containing wild-type or mutational FAK vs. empty vector (Fig. 5A,B, lane 2, 3, 6 vs. lane 1), while transfection with wild-type or mutational Src did not affect FAK level compared to empty vector (Fig. 5A,B, lane 4, 5 vs. lane 1). As expected, transfection with wild-type FAK significantly up-regulated p-FAK-Tyr407 level by ~75% vs. empty vector (Fig. 5A,C, lane 2 vs. lane 1), while transfection with plasmid containing FAK Y407F mutant resulted in remarkable decrease of p-FAK-Tyr407 level vs. wild-type FAK (Fig. 5A,C, lane 3, 6 vs. lane 2). Also, transfection with wild-type or mutational Src did not affect p-FAK-Tyr407 level compared to empty vector (Fig. 5A,C, lane 4, 5 vs. lane 1). On the other hand, overexpression of wild-type Src or Src Y529E mutant induced a 2-fold increase in Src level (Fig. 5A,D, lane 4, 5, 6 vs. lane 1) or a 4-fold increase in p-Src-Tyr529 level (Fig. 5A,E, lane 4, 5, 6 vs. lane 1) vs. empty vector, respectively, while transfection with wild-type or mutational FAK did not affect either Src (Fig. 5A,D, lane 2, 3 vs. lane 1) or p-Src-Tyr529 protein level (Fig. 5A,E, lane 2, 3 vs. lane 1) compared to empty vector. It was noted that overexpression of either wild-type or mutational Src could dramatically increase p-Src-Tyr529 level vs. wild-type Src (Fig. 5A,E, line 5, 6 vs. lane 4). Importantly, only simultaneous deactivation of FAK and Src by co-transfection of HS fibroblasts with FAK Y407F and Src Y529E was able to significantly decrease all three ECM protein levels: Col I (Fig. 5A,F, lane 6 vs. lane 1), Col III (Fig. 5A,G, lane 6 vs. lane 1) and α-SMA (Fig. 5A,H, lane 6 vs. lane 1) compared to empty vector, although single transfection of FAK Y407F, wild-type Src or Src Y529E also reduced Col III expression level to some extent compared to empty vector (Fig. 5A,G, lane 3, 4, 5 vs. lane 1). Unexpectedly, single transfection with FAK, FAK Y407F or wild-type Src even up-regulated Col I level compared to empty vector (Fig. 5A,F, lane 2, 3, 4 vs. lane 1).
Simultaneous deactivation of FAK and Src improves extracellular matrix deposition and collagen fiber arrangement in hypertrophic scar tissue
Various FAK or Src constructs were transfected into HS tissue and immunoblotting was first performed to confirm the successful transfection in vivo. Results showed that Transfection with plasmids containing FAK mutant up-regulated total FAK protein level and transfection with plasmids containing Src mutant up-regulated both Src and p-Src-Tyr529 protein levels compared to endogenous FAK or Src level (Fig. 6A–E), further demonstrating the effective transfection in vivo. H&E staining was then conducted to observe the effect of single or simultaneous transfection with FAK and/or Src mutants on extracellular matrix deposition. Results revealed that scar tissue transfected with empty vector showed excessive ECM deposition (Fig. 6F), which is consistent with the pathological feature of hypertrophic scar. Single transfection of FAK Y407F or Src Y529E ameliorated ECM deposition only to some extent (~25%) (Fig. 6F), while co-transfection with these two mutants remarkably reduced ECM deposition by ~60% (Fig. 6F). Masson staining has been commonly used for detecting collagens in various tissues. In this study we performed Masson staining to observe collagen expression and its arrangement in scars after transfection of various constructs. Results revealed that scar tissue transfected with empty vector exhibited massive and disordered collagen fibers (Fig. 6G). Single transfection of FAK Y407F or Src Y529E ameliorated collagen arrangement only to some extent (Fig. 6G), while co-transfection of these two mutants remarkably improved the texture of scar tissue, exhibiting significantly lightened collagen staining and more organized arrangement (Fig. 6G).
Inhibiting the formation of FAK-Src complex by glabridin reduces ECM protein expression and improves collagen fiber arrangement
Glabridin, a chemical that was found able to block the formation of FAK-Src complex and reduced the aggressiveness of cancer cells17, was employed in the study to further verify if it would also affect the pathogenesis of hypertrophic scar. Immunoblotting results showed that glabridin deactivated both FAK and Src in hypertrophic scar fibroblasts as demonstrated by the down-regulated p-FAK-Tyr407 and p-Src-Tyr416 protein levels, also the up-regulated p-Src-Tyr529 level (Fig. 7A). Co-immunoprecipitation revealed glabridin significantly reduced the association between FAK and Src in HS fibroblasts (Fig. 7B). In addition, glabridin remarkably decreased the three major ECM protein Col I, Col III and a-SMA levels in HS fibroblasts (Fig. 7C). When glabridin was used to treat HS tissue, it induced a significant reduction in ECM deposition (Fig. 7D) and made collagen fiber more arranged (Fig. 7E). These findings collectively further suggested that disruption of FAK-Src complex probably through the deactivation of FAK and Src would improve HS pathology.
Discussion
Hypertrophic scar is pathologically a significant skin fibrotic disease and the major characteristics of HS are the over-proliferation and activation of dermal fibroblasts, as well as the metabolic disorder of collagen-based ECM proteins19. Statistically, the incidence of HS ranges from 40~70% following surgery and up to 91% following burn injury7. However, there is currently no effective therapeutically relevant targets for HS treatment largely due to the undefined molecular mechanism.
With the development of molecular biology, more and more protein kinases have been discovered and identified as drug targets to cure diseases, such as Src, FAK and so on. Src has been involved in various cellular signaling events such as cell proliferation, migration, adhesion to ECM, as well as tumorigenesis. The inhibition of c-Src family was found to suppress the proliferation and migration of dermal fibroblasts induced by TGF-β1, restrain the enhanced expression of α-SMA and the activation of FAK20. Moreover, the prohibited activation of fibroblasts and macrophages could further repress scar formation. Src integrates its activity into intracellular signaling networks by either phosphorylation at Tyr416, dephosphorylation at Tyr529, or through its substrates including FAK21,22.
FAK is another significant non-receptor protein tyrosine kinase which is expressed ubiquitously with essential roles in cell proliferation and migration. FAK has been implicated in HS formation and development. A recent study has shown that FAK was activated after cutaneous injury23 and the fibroblast-specific FAK knockout mice have substantially less inflammation and fibrosis than control mice in a model of hypertrophic scar formation23. The phosphorylation of FAK at Tyr407 or Tyr397 is normally required for FAK activation and various FAK-mediated cell behaviors24. In this study, we have identified that FAK and Src were significantly activated in HS vs. NS both in vivo (Fig. 1) and in vitro (Fig. 2), indicated by the up-regulated p-FAK-Tyr407 and p-Src-Tyr529 protein levels, as well as the down-regulated p-Src-Tyr529 level, suggesting the involvement of the activation of these two kinases in HS pathogenesis.
Would healing as well as subsequent scar formation is a process that recruits multiple cell types and various cytokines, such as TGF-β. Our results showed that FAK and Src were significantly activated after TGF-β1 stimulation in normal skin-derived fibroblasts (Fig. 3), further confirming that FAK and Src are involved in TGF-β-mediated signaling pathway in HS pathogenesis.
FAK and Src have been found to trigger the downstream signaling by forming a functional protein complex that is involved in various cellular events, including tumor growth and metastasis, as well as the control of cell shape and focal contact turnover during cell motility. The formation of FAK-Src complex commences with the activation of Src, the activated Src then trans-phosphorylated the kinase domain of FAK, which in turn bands to Src and forms the FAK-Src signaling complex. Our results showed that the interaction between FAK and Src assessed by co-immunoprecipitation (Fig. 4A,B) and their association visualized by dual-labelled immunofluorescence (Fig. 4C) were remarkably enhanced in HS compared to those in NS.
Since HS is a pathologically fibro-proliferative disorder of dermal wound healing characterized by excessive ECM accumulation, the exaggerated deposition and attenuated degradation of type I and type III collagens are the major cause during HS formation. Thus, based on above findings, we were eager to reveal if the abundant collagen deposition could be effectively improved by manipulating the phosphorylated status of FAK and/or Src? Combining site-directed mutagenesis and gene overexpression techniques with FAK Tyr407 replaced by non-phosphorylatable phenylalanine (F) and Src Tyr529 replaced by phosphomimetic mutant glutamate (E), our results revealed that only simultaneous suppression of FAK activation by overexpressing FAK Y407F mutant and Src activation by overexpressing Src Y529E mutant could obviously down-regulate the expression levels of both Col I (Fig. 5A,F) and Col III (Fig. 5A,G), reduced ECM accumulation (Fig. 6F) and ameliorated collagen arrangement (Fig. 6G), suggesting the synergistic action of FAK and Src on HS pathogenesis.
Src inhibition was found to suppress the accumulation of myofibroblasts and macrophages in the healing wound and reduce the formation of hypertrophic scar after wound closing in a rabbit ear scar model, without delaying the wound closing process20. Our results showed that although the single deactivation of Src by overexpressing phosphomimetic mutant Src Y529E did not affect the protein expression of Col I (Fig. 5A,F) and α-SMA (Fig. 5A,H) vs. control (empty vector), it significantly reduced Col III level (Fig. 5A,G) and slightly alleviated ECM deposition (Fig. 6F) and improved the collagen fiber arrangement (Fig. 6G).
The inhibition of FAK was found to effectively reduce α-SMA expression in human fibroblasts and scar formation in vivo23. FAK was also deactivated in xiamenmycin-induced inhibition of profibrotic effects25. A recent study showed that FAK RNAi in HS fibroblasts decreased the expression of TGF-β and α-SMA, inhibited cell proliferation and reduced collagen synthesis26. Our results showed that the single deactivation of FAK by overexpressing the non-phosphorylatable mutant FAK Y407F slightly but significantly down-regulated Col III expression vs. control (empty vector) (Fig. 5A,G), mildly improved collagen fiber arrangement (Fig. 6G) and alleviated ECM deposition (Fig. 6F). However, this did not affect α-SMA level (Fig. 5A,H), even more, it induced a surge of Col I level (Fig. 5A,F).
In keloid, another kind of skin scar, the distribution of focal adhesion complex observed by FAK immunofluorescence staining was different from that in control fibroblasts27, suggesting FAK might play a general role in skin fibrotic diseases. Moreover, in addition to well-established roles of Src in tumorigenesis, Src performs a proinflammatory function by stimulating intracellular signal transduction, leading to acute inflammatory responses, which is one of the key steps in would healing process. It is likely that the interplay between FAK-Tyr407 and Src-Tyr529 in regulating HS fibrosis may involve other yet to be identified regulatory partners, such as c-Yes, MAPKs. Further investigation is warranted to identify additional phosphorylation events and the signaling inputs from downstream molecules that are involved. In summary, this report demonstrates that the involvement of FAK/Src activation in HS pathogenesis, which further results in a de-association of FAK-Src complex, produces synergistic effects on regulating ECM deposition and collagen arrangement. These findings thus suggest FAK-Src complex as a potential molecular target and disrupting FAK-Src association by manipulating FAK/Src activation status might be an effective method to treat HS or related fibrotic diseases.
Materials and Methods
Ethics statement
The use of human sample (including scar and normal skin tissues) was conducted under the protocol (No: XJYYLL-2013190) reviewed and approved by Institutional Ethical Committee of the Fourth Military Medical University (FMMU) and the experiments were carried out in accordance with the approved guidelines.
Antibodies
All antibodies were obtained commercially and the appropriate working dilutions are listed in Table 1.
Cell culture and treatment
Hypertrophic scar and surrounding normal skin tissues were obtained from six patients (age ranges from 18- to 45-year old) undergoing plastic surgery between Jun 2013 to Jun 2014 in Department of Burns and Cutaneous Surgery in Xijing Hospital (Xi’an, China). Before the experiment, all patients were informed about the purpose and procedures of the study and voluntarily agreed to provide both scar and normal skin tissues. Written consent was obtained from all participants and all protocols were approved by the Ethics Committee of Xijing Hospital, which is affiliated with the FMMU. Patients received no treatment before skin excision. The dermal portion from scar and normal skin was minced and incubated in a solution of collagenase type I (Sigma–Aldrich, St. Louise, MO) at 0.1 mg/ml at 37 °C for 3 h to isolate fibroblasts. Cells were then pelleted and grown in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) (Gibco, Grand Island, NY) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (Gibco), 100 U/ml penicillin and 100 U/ml streptomycin and cultured at 37 °C in a 5% (v/v) CO2 humidified atmosphere. Normal skin-derived fibroblasts with 70~80% confluence were incubated for 12 h in serum-depleted medium and then treated with TGF-β1 at 5 ng/ml (PeproTech, Rocky Hill, NJ). 24 h thereafter, total proteins from fibroblasts in each sample were prepared for western blot analysis. Glabridin was purchased from Dalian Meilun Biotechnology Co. Ltd. (Dalian, China. Cat# 59870-68-7, Lot# N0706AS), dissolved in DMSO and used at 100 μM as final working concentration to treat either HS fibroblasts or tissues.
Western blot analysis
Tissues or fibroblasts were washed with ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and lysed using RIPA buffer supplemented with protease and phosphatase inhibitor mixtures (Heart Biological Technology Co. Ltd., Xi’an, China) on ice. Lysates were separated by centrifugation at 4 °C and 14000 × g for 10 min. Protein concentration was determined by BCA assay (Pierce, Rockford, IL). 50 μg total protein in each sample was subjected to sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and transferred onto PVDF membranes (Millipore, Bedford, MA). After blocking with 5% non-fat milk, membranes were incubated with specific antibody at appropriate dilutions as listed in Table 1. On the next day, membranes were incubated with horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated secondary antibody at 1:2000 dilution at 37 °C for 1 h. Then the immunoreactive proteins were visualized by using ECL western blotting detection reagents (Millipore, Billerica, MA) and detected by using MultiImage Light Cabinet Filter Positions (Alpha Innotech, San Leandro, CA).
Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP)
Lysates from normal skin and hypertrophic scar tissues or their corresponding fibroblasts were prepared in immunoprecipitation (IP) lysis buffer (10 mM Tris, 0.15 M NaCl, 1% NP-40 and 10% glycerol, pH 7.4 at 22 °C) supplemented with protease and phosphatase inhibitor cocktails (Sigma–Aldrich) according to the manufacturer’s instructions as described earlier28. 500 μg tissue lysates or 300 μg fibroblast lysates for each sample were first pre-cleaned with 2 μg normal rabbit IgG and incubated for 1 h before being precipitated with 10 ml protein A/G agarose beads (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) for 1 h, then the supernatant was collected by centrifuging at 1000 × g for 5 min. This pre-cleaning step removed non-specific interacting proteins from lysates. Thereafter, the obtained lysates were incubated with 2 μg normal rabbit IgG as negative control or specific rabbit anti-Src antibody for Co-IP on a Labnet Mini LabRoller Rotator (Labnet, Edison, NJ) at 4 °C overnight, to be followed by the incubation with 20 ml protein A/G agarose beads to extract the immunocomplexes. Thereafter, beads were washed with IP lysis buffer three times and the immunocomplexes were extracted in SDS sample buffer at 100 °C followed by immunoblot analysis.
Immunohistochemistry
Normal skin and hypertrophic scar tissues were fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin solution overnight, then embedded in paraffin and cut at 4-μm thickness. Sections were quenched with 3% hydrogen peroxide, blocked with 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA), then incubated with specific primary antibody at appropriate dilution (as indicated in Table 1) overnight, followed by incubation with HRP-conjugated secondary antibody for 1 h. DAB was used as the chromogenic agent and hematoxylin was used for nuclei counterstaining.
Immunofluorescence staining
Normal skin and hypertrophic scar tissue sections or fibroblasts were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 10 min, permeabilized with Triton X-100 for 10 min and blocked with 1% BSA for 1 h at room temperature. Cells were then incubated with specific anti-target protein antibody at 4 °C overnight, followed by incubation with Alexa Fluor® 488- (green) and/or 555- (red) conjugated secondary antibody (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) for 1 h. DAPI was used for nuclear staining. Images were digitally captured by the FSX100 Bio Imaging Navigator (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) and analyzed by Image-Pro Plus 6.0 system (Media Cybernetics, Silver Spring, MD).
Construction of mutant FAK and Src mammalian expression vectors
The full-length coding sequences of wild-type human FAK (GenBank accession no. L13616.1) and Src (GenBank accession no. NM_005417.4), including start and stop codons, were amplified from human hypertrophic scar-derived fibroblast cDNA by PCR using primers listed in Table 2 and they were individually cloned into the KpnI/XhoI sites of the pcDNA3.1(+) Mammalian Expression Vector (Invitrogen). The mutation of FAK-Tyr407 or Src-Tyr529 to phenylalanine (Phe) or glutamic acid (Glu), respectively, was performed by three-step mutagenic PCR29, using the wild-type FAK or Src construct as the template. Each desired mutation was introduced by the amplification of two overlapping portions of FAK or Src using two primer pairs (a mutagenic primer paired with a flanking primer with the opposite orientation; Table 2). The two PCR products were then fused together by overlap extension29, from which the full-length cDNA was amplified with primers listed in Table 2. The cDNA encoding the full-length FAK, Src, or their corresponding mutant FAK Y407F or Src Y529E was individually cloned into pcDNA3.1(+) Mammalian Expression Vector. All sequences were verified by direct DNA sequencing to confirm the full-length and mutant cDNA constructs. For the transfection into hypertrophic scar-derived fibroblasts, plasmid DNA was prepared with a HiSpeed Plasmid Midi Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany).
Overexpression of wild-type and mutant FAK and Src in hypertrophic scar fibroblast cultures
Hypertrophic scar fibroblasts were isolated from the dermal portion of scar tissues and plated in 60-cm2 dishes. Fibroblasts that cultured between 3rd to 4th generation were used in this study. After 24 h-incubation, cells were transfected with: empty vector group: 5 μg pcDNA3.1(+); pcDNA3.1(+)/FAK group: 2.5 μg pcDNA3.1(+)/FAK + 2.5 μg pcDNA3.1(+); pcDNA3.1(+)/FAK Y407F group: 2.5 μg pcDNA3.1(+)/FAK Y407F + 2.5 μg pcDNA3.1(+); pcDNA3.1(+)/Src group: 2.5 μg pcDNA3.1(+)/Src + 2.5 μg pcDNA3.1(+); pcDNA3.1(+)/Src Y529E group: 2.5 μg pcDNA3.1(+)/Src Y529E + 2.5 μg pcDNA3.1(+); or [pcDNA3.1(+)/FAK Y407F + pcDNA3.1(+)/Src Y529E] group: 2.5 μg pcDNA3.1(+)/FAK Y407F + 2.5 μg pcDNA3.1(+)/Src Y529E, by using Lipofectamine 2000 Transfection Reagent (Invitrogen). Western blot analysis was carried out after an additional 72 h.
Ex vivo tissue culture of hypertrophic scar
The ex vivo tissue culture of hypertrophic scar was performed as described previously30. Briefly, the scar tissue was cut into 10 × 10 mm block and then transfected with: empty vector group: 20 μg pcDNA3.1(+); pcDNA3.1(+)/FAK Y407F group: 10 μg pcDNA3.1(+)/FAK Y407F + 10 μg pcDNA3.1(+); pcDNA3.1(+)/Src Y529E group: 10 μg pcDNA3.1(+)/Src Y529E + 10 μg pcDNA3.1(+); or [pcDNA3.1(+)/FAK Y407F + pcDNA3.1(+)/Src Y529E] group: 10 μg pcDNA3.1(+)/FAK Y407F + 10 μg pcDNA3.1(+)/Src Y529E, by using Lipofectamine 2000 transfection reagent (Invitrogen) in a 100 μl volume. This injection was performed intra-dermally into scar tissues. Scar tissues were incubated for 7 days with the culture medium exchanged daily. Tissues were then fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, followed by routine H&E or Masson trichrome staining according to standard protocols as described earlier31. The quantification of ECM and collagen fiber deposition has been analyzed by Image J software.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS program, version 13.0. In cases n = 4, Mann-Whitney U test was used for paired comparison (Figs 1, 2, 3, 4 and 7), Kruskal-Wallis was used for the comparison among four groups (only selected comparisons were shown) (Fig. 6F,G). In cases n = 5, after data were tested and satisfied for normal distribution and equal variance, one-way ANOVA was used and followed by Newman–Keuls test for comparisons among six (Fig. 5) or four groups (Fig. 6A–E) (only selected comparisons were shown). P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Additional Information
How to cite this article: Su, L. et al. Simultaneous deactivation of FAK and Src improves the pathology of hypertrophic scar. Sci. Rep. 6, 26023; doi: 10.1038/srep26023 (2016).
References
Armour, A., Scott, P. G. & Tredget, E. E. Cellular and molecular pathology of HTS: basis for treatment. Wound Repair Regen. 15, S6–17 (2007).
Beanes, S. R., Dang, C., Soo, C. & Ting, K. Skin repair and scar formation: the central role of TGF-beta. Expert Rev Mol Med. 5, 1–22 (2003).
Liu, W., Wang, D. R. & Cao, Y. L. TGF-beta: a fibrotic factor in wound scarring and a potential target for anti-scarring gene therapy. Curr Gene Ther. 4, 123–136 (2004).
Sarrazy, V., Billet, F., Micallef, L., Coulomb, B. & Desmoulière, A. Mechanisms of pathological scarring: role of myofibroblasts and current developments. Wound Repair Regen. 19, S10–15 (2011).
Wong, V. W. et al. Loss of keratinocyte focal adhesion kinase stimulates dermal proteolysis through upregulation of MMP9 in wound healing. Ann Surg. 260, 1138–1146 (2014).
Tamura, M. et al. High glucose levels inhibit focal adhesion kinase-mediated wound healing of rat peritoneal mesothelial cells. Kidney Int. 63, 722–731 (2003).
Rathor, N. et al. Src-mediated caveolin-1 phosphorylation regulates intestinal epithelial restitution by altering Ca(2+) influx after wounding. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 306, G650–658 (2014).
David, F. S., Zage, P. E. & Marcantonio, E. E. Integrins interact with focal adhesions through multiple distinct pathways. J Cell Physiol. 181, 74–82 (1999).
Luo, M. & Guan, J. L. Focal adhesion kinase: a prominent determinant in breast cancer initiation, progression and metastasis. Cancer Lett. 289, 127–139 (2010).
Zhao, J. & Guan, J. L. Signal transduction by focal adhesion kinase in cancer. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 28, 35–49 (2009).
Zhang, P. et al. Focal adhesion kinase mediates atrial fibrosis via the AKT/S6K signaling pathway in chronic atrial fibrillation patients with rheumatic mitral valve disease. Int J Cardiol. 168, 3200–3207 (2013).
Rustad, K. C., Wong, V. W. & Gurtner, G. C. The role of focal adhesion complexes in fibroblast mechanotransduction during scar formation. Differentiation. 86, 87–91 (2013).
Yeatman, T. J. A renaissance for SRC. Nat Rev Cancer. 4, 470–480 (2004).
Gonfloni, S., Weijland, A., Kretzschmar, J. & Superti-Furga, G. Crosstalk between the catalytic and regulatory domains allows bidirectional regulation of Src. Nat Struct Biol . 7, 281–286 (2000).
Xu, K. P., Yin, J. & Yu, F. S. SRC-family tyrosine kinases in wound- and ligand-induced epidermal growth factor receptor activation in human corneal epithelial cells. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 47, 2832–2839 (2006).
Yoo, S. K., Freisinger, C. M., LeBert, D. C. & Huttenlocher, A. Early redox, Src family kinase and calcium signaling integrate wound responses and tissue regeneration in zebrafish. J Cell Biol. 199, 225–234 (2012).
Tsai, Y. M. et al. Glabridin inhibits migration, invasion and angiogenesis of human non-small cell lung cancer A549 cells by inhibiting the FAK/rho signaling pathway. Integr Cancer Ther. 10, 341–349 (2011).
Bolós, V., Gasent, J. M., López-Tarruella, S. & Grande, E. The dual kinase complex FAK-Src as a promising therapeutic target in cancer. Onco Targets Ther . 3, 83–97 (2010).
Shi, J. et al. Anti-fibrotic actions of interleukin-10 against hypertrophic scarring by activation of PI3K/AKT and STAT3 signaling pathways in scar-forming fibroblasts. PLos one. 9, e98228 (2014).
Sun, X. et al. LCB 03-0110, a novel pan-discoidin domain receptor/c-Src family tyrosine kinase inhibitor, suppresses scar formation by inhibiting fibroblast and macrophage activation. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 340, 510–519 (2012).
Bjorge, J. D., Pang, A. & Fujita, D. J. Identification of protein-tyrosine phosphatase 1B as the major tyrosine phosphatase activity capable of dephosphorylating and activating c-Src in several human breast cancer cell lines. J Biol Chem. 275, 41439–41446 (2000).
Bjorge, J. D., Jakymiw, A. & Fujita, D. J. Selected glimpses into the activation and function of Src kinase. Oncogene. 19, 5620–5635 (2000).
Wong, V. W. et al. Focal adhesion kinase links mechanical force to skin fibrosis via inflammatory signaling. Nat Med . 18, 148–152 (2011).
Lie, P. P. et al. Focal adhesion kinase-Tyr407 and -Tyr397 exhibit antagonistic effects on blood-testis barrier dynamics in the rat. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109, 12562–12567 (2012).
Liu, X. J. et al. Xiamenmycin attenuates hypertrophic scars by suppressing local inflammation and the effects of mechanical stress. J Invest Dermatol. 133, 1351–1360 (2013).
Chen, R. et al. Focal adhesion kinase (FAK) siRNA inhibits human hypertrophic scar by suppressing integrin α, TGF-β and α-SMA. Cell Biol Int. 38, 803–808 (2014).
Arndt, S., Schmidt, J., Wacker, E., Karrer, S. & Bosserhoff, A. K. Fussel-15, a new player in wound healing, is deregulated in keloid and localized scleroderma. Am J Pathol. 178, 2622–2631 (2011).
Su, L., Cheng, C. Y. & Mruk, D. D. Drug transporter, P-glycoprotein (MDR1), is an integrated component of the mammalian blood-testis barrier. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 41, 2578–2587 (2009).
Vallejo, A. N., Pogulis, R. J. & Pease, L. R. PCR Mutagenesis by Overlap Extension and Gene SOE. CSH Protoc . 2008, pdb.prot4861 (2008).
Yasuoka, H., Larregina, A. T., Yamaguchi, Y. & Feghali-Bostwick, C. A. Human skin culture as an ex vivo model for assessing the fibrotic effects of insulin-like growth factor binding proteins. Open Rheumatol J . 2, 17–22 (2008).
Shi, J. H. et al. Reduced expression of microtubule-associated protein 1 light chain 3 in hypertrophic scars. Arch Dermatol Res. 304, 209–215 (2012).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by Xijing Hospital Natural Science Funds for Distinguished Young Scientists (No: XJZT14J06 to L.S.) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no: 81171811 to D.H.).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
D.H. and L.S. designed research; L.S., X.L., X.W. and B.H. performed research; S.H., J.G., Y.L. and J.S. contributed new reagents/analytic tools; L.S., H.Z. and B.Z. analyzed data; L.S. and D.H. wrote and revised the paper.
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Su, L., Li, X., Wu, X. et al. Simultaneous deactivation of FAK and Src improves the pathology of hypertrophic scar. Sci Rep 6, 26023 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep26023
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep26023
This article is cited by
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.