Abstract
Metaldioxide & metaldichalcogenide monolayers are studied by means of Density Functional Theory. For an accurate reproduction of the electronic structure of transition metal systems, the spin orbit interaction is considered by using fully relativistic pseudopotentials (FRUP). The electronic and spin properties of MX_{2} (M = Sc, Cr, Mn, Ni, Mo & W and X = O, S, Se & Te) were obtained with FRUP, compared with the scalar relativistic pseudopotentials (SRUP) and with the available experimental results. Among the differences between FRUP and SRUP calculations are giant splittings of the valence band, substantial band gap reductions and semiconductor to metal or nonmagnetic to magnetic “transitions”. MoO_{2}, MoS_{2}, MoSe_{2}, MoTe_{2}, WO_{2}, WS_{2} and WSe_{2} are proposed as candidates for spintronics, while CrTe_{2}, with μ ~ 1.59 μ_{B}, is a magnetic metal to be experimentally explored.
Introduction
The synthesis of single layer graphene in 2004^{1} has been the trigger for a colossal amount of studies that uncovered the novel physical properties present in two dimensional (2D) materials^{2,3,4,5,6,7}, which in turn evolved in a complete new branch of theoretical and experimental research within condensed matter physics^{8,9,10,11,12,13,14}.
These works have led to significant advancements of emerging technologies with 2D materials^{6,8} such as: micro and nanoelectronics^{1,15,16,17}, sensing^{18,19}, energy storage^{20,21}, energy conversion^{22,23,24}, photonics^{25,26}, optoelectronics^{7}, magnetoresistance^{27} and spintronics/valleytronics^{28,29,30,31}; motivating the search for new 2D semiconducting materials.
The effort to isolate different layered materials started almost simultaneous to the first isolation of single layer graphene^{3}. The mechanical cleavage of MoS_{2} and NbSe_{2} 2D crystals opened the research towards quasitwo dimensional transitionmetal dichalcogenides (2DMX_{2})^{32}, materials with a nonzero band gap (E_{g}) and a doable architecture realization into electronic heterostructures^{33,34}. For example, single layer MoS_{2}, an hexagonal two dimensional transition metal dichalcogenide (Fig. 1a,b)^{3,9,29,30,35}, presents a large intrinsic band gap of 1.8 eV, and has been proposed as a perfect transistor^{9} with potential application in spintronic devices^{28,29,36,37}.
Although in some cases theoretical studies of 2D materials had preceded their physical isolation^{32,38,39}, recently the experimental results incentivize addressing the subject by different theoretical approaches. In particular, the use of Density Functional Theory (DFT) has promptly contributed with suitable results on the electronic, vibrational and optical properties of several 2D materials, in particular of 2DMX_{2}^{11,12,40}.
The amount of DFT studies for 2DMX_{2} in different configurations is vast, for example: studies of the physical properties of 2DMX_{2} under dimensional confinement in the shape of ribbons^{41}, the formation of 2DMX_{2} heterostructures^{13}, the effect of external electric fields^{42,43,44}, the effect of defects in the morphology by atomic doping^{45}, the alteration by chemical functionalization^{46,47} or the effect of applying mechanical strain^{40,48,49}.
Experimentally, some studies report 2DMX_{2} spintronics^{27,29,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59}, however only few computational works have explicitly considered the spinorbit effect in selected compounds, i.e. MoS_{2}, MoSe_{2}, MoTe_{2}, WS_{2}, WSe_{2} and WTe_{2}^{30,49,54,59,60,61,62,63,64}.
Theoretically and with DFT, the use of fully relativistic pseudopotentials, rather than of scalar ones, accuratelly predict the dispersion of transition metals d orbitals^{28,65,66,67}, thus the importance of their use to calculate the electronic properties of 2DMX_{2}. A remarkable feature predicted by considering the spin orbit effects in nonmagnetic semiconductors 2DMX_{2} is the splitting of their valence bands, which cannot be observed with the common scalar pseudopotential approximations^{28}. Furthermore, experiments with MoS_{2}, MoSe_{2}, MoTe_{2}, WS_{2}, WSe_{2} and WTe_{2} confirm the “giant” spin orbit effects, supporting the use of fully relativistic pseudopotentials and positioning them as candidates for valleytronics^{29,34,50,68,69}. Specifically, MoTe_{2} has been recently proposed as an outstanding material for excitonic devices^{51,56}.
Therefore, the main motivation of the present work is to present the most commonly reported 2DMX_{2} semiconductors^{11} in the frame of fully relativistic calculations, unveiling the effects of the spinorbit interaction, specifically in the following 2Dcompounds: ScO_{2}, ScS_{2}, ScSe_{2}, CrO_{2}, CrS_{2}, CrSe_{2}, CrTe_{2}, MnO_{2}, NiO_{2}, NiS_{2}, NiSe_{2}, MoO_{2}, MoS_{2}, MoSe_{2}, MoTe_{2}, WO_{2}, WS_{2} and WSe_{2}. In this text, the electronic properties of the selected materials are presented, emphasizing the difference between calculations with the spin orbit interaction and without it, and comparing with the available experimental results. Within the results, separate sections are dedicated to the magnetic and nonmagnetic semiconductors. A criterion of the spin orbit effect is reported in terms of the shrinkage of the band gap and the splitting of the valence band maximum (VBM).
Results
Although 2DMX_{2} compounds could exist either in the honeycomb (H, trigonal prismatic), centered honeycomb (T, octahedral) or distorted honeycomb (T′)^{70} structures, in this work we performed calculations focusing in the semiconducting 2DMX_{2}, specifically in their more energetically stable forms according to theoretical DFT calculations. Thus the majority of the structures were studied in the H configuration, with the exception of MnO_{2} and NiX_{2} studied in the T configuration (Fig. 1). Additionally, a special mention is done to metallic WTe_{2} in its most stable T′ structure, for its relevance^{16,49}.
Starting with the lattice parameters and the electronic band gaps as obtained by SRUP (after the benchmark with Vanderbilt pseudopotential calculations, as explained in the methodology), we compare our generalized gradient approximation (GGA) results with those reported in ref. 11 obtained with DFT within the local density approximation (LDA). The lattice parameters from our calculations are shown in Table 1 (all atomic coordinates are available in Supplementary Information, SI); they turned to be roughly 2% larger than those reported in ref. 11, a consequence from a finer cutoff thresholds used in our calculations, and from the underestimation of the LDA approach. In contrast, our values strictly reproduce the results obtained with the GGA approximation by Rasmussen et al.^{14} and Zibouche et al.^{64}. In 2D systems, the electronic properties are highly sensitive to minor changes in the lattice parameters^{40}, thus the cohesive energies (E_{C}) and E_{g}s in our work are slightly different to those reported by Ataca et al.^{11} and Kang et al.^{62}. However our E_{g}s are very close to the scalar relativistic results by Zibouche et al.^{64}.
The general features of all the band structures calculated with SRUP closely reproduce those reported in refs 11, 14, 64 and 71; specifically the existence of a band gap and the presence of magnetism, as shown in Table 1. The E_{C}s relative to the free constituent atoms calculated with SRUP are also presented in Table 1. There, E_{C}[MX_{2}] = E_{T}[M] + 2E_{T}[X] − E_{T}[MX_{2}], where E_{T}[MX_{2}] is the total energy of the MX_{2} and E_{T}[M] and E_{T}[X] the total energies of the corresponding free M and X atoms. Although in general, the presented E_{C}s are slightly larger than those reported by Ataca et al.^{11} (due to the use of finer force and energy cutoff thresholds in the present work), the trend is preserved, i.e. the highest cohesive energy belongs to MO_{2}, and it decreases for MS_{2}, MSe_{2}, with the lowest value for MTe_{2}. After full geometry optimization relaxations performed with SRUP, the final atomic positions and cell parameters were used as input in the FRUP geometry optimization calculations. Neither the atomic positions, nor the cell parameters differ between FRUP and SRUP optimizations (all geometry data is available in SI).
Regarding the values of band gaps and magnetizations (μ), when the spin orbit is not taken into account (i.e. SRUP calculations), CrX_{2}, NiX_{2}, MoX_{2} and WX_{2} behave as nonmagnetic semiconductors, while MnO_{2} and ScX_{2} behave as magnetic, with μ values in good agreement with those reported in refs 11, 12, 14, 64 and 72 (see Table 1 and Fig. 2). Noncollinear calculations (i.e. FRUP calculations) are carried out in order to include the spin orbit effect. As a result, CrTe_{2} and NiSe_{2} present a change in their behavior from semiconductor to metal; moreover, CrTe_{2} turns from nonmagnetic to magnetic with a large μ of 1.59 μ_{B}, in clear contrast to the μ = 0 reported by Ataca et al.^{11} and Rasmussen et al.^{14}.
A clear effect of FRUP calculations is the splitting of originally spin degenerated bands as calculated with SRUP (Fig. 3 and Table 2). In particular, this effect in the bands close to the band gap is reflected in the difference between SRUP and FRUP band gaps, here reported as .
FRUP results are presented in the following subsections. The compounds are categorized according to their magnetic behavior as obtained with SRUP calculations, and sub classified according to their most stable structure, either belonging to the H or T families, i.e.: CrX_{2}, MoX_{2} and WX_{2} (X = O, S, Se and Te) belong to the nonmagnetic H family, NiX_{2} (X = O, S and Se) to the nonmagnetic T family, ScX_{2} (X = S, Se and Te) belong to the magnetic H structures and finally MnO_{2} is the only member of the magnetic T family.
0.1 Nonmagnetic
In this section the compounds that calculated with SRUP resulted nonmagnetic are analyzed; first we present MX_{2} structures with M = Cr, Mo and W, which are more stable in the H configuration, followed by NiX_{2} with the mos stable configuration in the T structure.
All MX_{2}s with X = O present indirect band gaps as calculated with SRUP (continuum blue lines in Fig. 2), with their E_{g}s values increasing as the atomic number grows, i.e. from a value of 0.381 eV for CrO_{2} to a value of 0.898 eV for MoO_{2} and finally a value of 1.349 eV for WO_{2}. The VBMs are situated in the Γ points, whereas the conduction band minimums (CBM), are at the K points. In contrast, when X = S, Se and Te, (and M = Cr, Mo and W), the band gaps are direct, reducing as the atomic number grows (see band gap reduction from left to right in Fig. 2). For all the direct semiconducting H structures, both VBMs and CBMs are located at the K points.
H structures
MO_{2}
In general, MO_{2} structures present a small difference between bands calculated with FRUP and SRUP. Their ΔE_{g}s are around a few meV (first column of Figs 2 and 3, and Table 2). However, the effect of the spin orbit inclusion is more noticeable around the K points, where locally flat VBMs calculated with SRUP split for FRUP calculations (e.g. the giant splitting = 556 meV for HWO_{2} in Fig. 2 and Table 2). These locally flat bands obtained with SRUP result from an accumulation of d orbitals, emerging from the transition metals^{73} (see the density of states (DOS) in the SI Figs 1, 3 and 5, where narrow bands appear between −2.5 and −1.0 eV). In contrast, these bands disperse when the FRUP approximation is used^{73} (compare SI 1, 3 and 5 with SI 2, 4 and 6 respectively). Thus, it is required to consider the spin orbit interaction in order to obtain accurate electronic structures of systems involving transition metals^{65,66}. Here WO_{2} is proposed as an experimental case of study in spintronic/valleytronics^{29,62}.
CrX_{2} with X = S, Se and Te
Bulk CrS, CrSe and CrTe compounds, in contrast with their corresponding 2D nonmagnetic semiconductor structures, present magnetism^{74}. The calculations for 2D CrX_{2} systems with FRUP yield a small effect due to the spin orbit interaction. For CrS_{2} and CrSe_{2}, they remain as semiconductors (Figs 2 and 3). Differently, for CrTe_{2} the inclusion of spin orbit interaction turns it from a nonmagnetic semiconductor with a band gap of 0.534 eV, to a magnetic metal with a μ of 1.59 μ_{B}; in agreement with its metallic magnetic behavior reported by Lebegue et al.^{12}. Looking at the local DOS (LDOS) in Fig. 4, it is clear that the principal contributions around the VBM and CBM, without spinorbit effect, are mainly due to the contribution of the Cr 3d and Te 5p orbitals; specifically the , and 3d_{xy} orbitals that disperse in some degree when the fully relativistic approximation is considered^{60} (Figs 2 and 4). CrTe_{2} presents a ΔE_{g} = 534 meV, the largest among all the systems reported in this work. CrS_{2} and CrSe_{2} present small VBM splittings, at the K points, of 69 and 95 meV respectively. In contrast CrTe_{2} presents a giant splitting of 2.32 eV, with the already mentioned magnetic moment of 1.59 μ_{B}.
For the sake of completeness, we looked into the experimentally reported structures at the Inorganic Crystal Structure Database (ICSD), finding the existence of CrS_{2} (ICSD 75420)^{75}, CrSe_{2} (ICSD 626718)^{76} and TlCrTe_{2} (ICSD 152836)^{77} as layered bulk materials, either in the T or T′ forms. From these information, 2D structures of CrS_{2}, CrSe_{2} and CrTe_{2} were built in the T′, T and T forms respectively. The structures were geometry optimized and their electronic properties calculated (see band structures and DOSs in the SI Figs 16–21). For both approximations, SURP and FRUP the systems in the T or T′ structures are metallic. Regarding the cohesive energies, the structures in the T or T′ forms are ~1.65, 0.54, and 0.76 eV less stable than the above mentioned semiconducting H structures, respectively. The FRUP results for CrS_{2}, CrSe_{2} and CrTe_{2} in the T and T′ structures present magnetism, with μ ~ 1.09, 0.08 and 0.33 μ_{B} respectively, in contrast with the non magnetic H CrS_{2} and CrSe_{2} semiconductors, and with the magnetic metal H CrTe_{2} with μ = 1.59 μ_{B}.
MoX_{2} with X = S, Se and Te
Now we present the results for some of the most studied metaldichalcogenide monolayers; mainly MoS_{2} and MoSe_{2}^{3,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,29,34,50,64} and the emerging MoTe_{2}^{51,55,56,64}. The effect of the spin orbit inclusion in their band gaps is shown in Fig. 3. For this group, the largest ΔE_{g} is for MoS_{2} with a value of 155 meV. Experimentally available E_{g}s shown in Table 2 present a fair agreement with the calculated values.
Considering the effect around the K point, the trend is the same as for Cr and W (Table 2); the VBMs split with the bands separation growing from S to Te as the atomic number increases. As mentioned before, with FRUP, the DOSs of the valence bands are disperse near the Fermi Energy (E_{F}), in contrast to some narrow peaks present in DOSs obtained with SRUP (SI, Figs 3 and 4).
Theoretically, the splittings at the K point for MoS_{2}, MoSe_{2} and MoTe_{2} are 151, 188 and 219 meV respectively (Table 2), data in a good agreement with refs 60, 61, 62 and 64, providing extra benchmarks for the used FRUP pseudopotentials. Experimentally, the energy differences between A and B excitons, attributed to the spinorbit induced valence band splitting, measured via photoluminescence (PL) has been reported for MoS_{2}, MoSe_{2} and MoTe_{2} as shown in Table 2 ^{35,51,53,55,56,59,78,79}. Calculated splittings are close to the experimental values attributed to the exciton binding energy in the case of MoS_{2} and MoSe_{2}. For MoTe_{2}, the calculated value of 219 meV is close to two of the experimentally reported values, and in contrast with a higher value of 580 meV in ref. 51.
The orbitalprojected DOS for MoTe_{2} in Fig. 4 is presented in order to show the accumulation of Mo 4d orbitals close to the E_{F}. Specifically the , and 4d_{xy} ones are the closest to the E_{F}, and therefore, the orbitals where the splittings are expected to occur and actually occur, as shown in the MoTe_{2} panel of Fig. 2, where the VBM splits in two bands^{32,73} (Table 2).
The giant spinorbitinduced spin splitting supports the proposal of MoS_{2}, MoSe_{2} and MoTe_{2} as candidates for their experimental valleytronics studies^{29,30,31}.
WX_{2} with X = S and Se
Finalizing the nonmagnetic H compounds, the group of WX_{2} is analyzed. As in the previous cases, there is a growing tendency in ΔE_{g} as the atomic number of the chalcogenide species increases (Fig. 3). The experimental and theoretical values of E_{g}s are close.
Regarding the VBM splittings, the values are reported at the K points in Table 2. As for MoS_{2} and MoSe_{2}, the results for WS_{2} and WSe_{2} are in agreement with those reported in refs 60, 61, 62 and 64, in both terms, of band gap and VBM splitting. Experimental value, from the energy difference between the A and B excitons for WS_{2} is reported in Table 2 in good agreement with the calculated one. Here WO_{2} is proposed as an experimental case of study in spintronic/valleytronics ^{29,62}.
Since some theoretical studies report WTe_{2} system as a semiconductor in the H structure^{11,62,64}, here we calculate it finding that the H structure is a metastable one with a bandgap of 1.060(0.649) eV for SRUP(FRUP) (See band structure and DOS in Fig. 15 of SI). This structure present a giant ΔE_{g} of 411 eV and a VBM splitting at the K point of 609 meV. However, we also looked into the experimentally reported structures at the ICSD, finding the existence of WTe_{2} (ICSD 73323)^{80} as layered bulk material in the T′ form. We built the T′ structure, optimized it and found it ~0.03 eV more stable in terms of cohesive energy with respect to the meta stable H structure. Interestingly, the T′ WTe_{2} system is metallic from SRUP and FRUP calculations (see band structure and DOS in Figs 22 and 23 of SI), in agreement with the experimental and theoretical data in refs 16, 27 and 49.
T structure
NiX_{2} with X = O, S and Se
NiX_{2} systems are the only compounds in the energetically more stable T configuration of the nonmagnetic group (Fig. 1c,d). The VBM of NiO_{2} presents a bimodal behavior around the Γ point, whereas the CBM is located at 3/4 of the M − Γ path. In the case of NiS_{2} and NiSe_{2} the VBMs are closer to the Γ point and the CBMs locate in the Γ − K path, almost at the K point. All the band gaps for Ni systems are indirect.
Figure 2 shows that NiO_{2} and NiS_{2} are indirect semiconductor for both, SRUP and FRUP calculations. The spin orbit inclusion produces negligible alterations at their band structures with VBM splittings ~1 meV. Within this group, the case of interest is NiSe_{2}, indirect semiconductor for SRUP and metallic when the spin orbit effect is considered^{41} (Fig. 2). A close up to the two highest SRUP valence bands (SI Fig. 9) reveals a degeneration for the VBM exactly at the Γ point. In contrast, FRUP brakes the degeneration with a giant band splitting of 302 meV, turning metallic as a result of the Fermi level crossing by the VBM.
0.2 Magnetic
In this last section we present all the compounds that calculated with SRUP are magnetic semiconductors in agreement with ref. 14, specifically TMnO_{2}, HScO_{2}, HScS_{2} and HScSe_{2} (Fig. 5). After the inclusion of the spin orbit interaction the magnetic and semiconductor characters remain, with magnetization(band gap) of 2.98(1.23), 1.0(1.52), 0.97(0.72) and 0.84(0.45) μ_{B}(eV) respectively. To explore the effect of spin orbit, the focus is on the regions of the band structure where spin degeneration appears, as previously done for the NiSe_{2} band degeneration.
ScX_{2} with X = O, S and Se
This group presents the H structure as the energetically more stable configurations (Fig. 5 and Table 1). The VBMs and CBMs calculated with FRUP and SRUP coincide; however, the antepenultimate and penultimate bands present some differences between FRUP and SRUP calculations. Zooming into the band structures allows to appreciate the effect of the inclusion of spin orbit (SI Fig. 14), with splitting of the referred bands ~10, 30 and 100 meV at the Γ point for ScO_{2}, ScS_{2} and ScSe_{2} respectively. Furthermore, the SRUP (FRUP) energy difference between the antepenultimate and the penultimate bands at the K point are 160(209) and 133(322) meV for ScS_{2} and ScSe_{2}, respectively, i.e. band splittings ~50 and 190 meV. H ScO_{2} presents an E_{g} and a μ of 1.521 eV and 1μ_{B} respectively, in agreement with ref. 11 and in contrast with the work by Loh et al.^{81} reporting an antiferromagnetic metal behavior. Regarding ScS_{2}, Zhang et al. have reported an E_{g} of 0.74 eV and a μ of 1 μ_{B}^{71}, in perfect agreement with our SRUP calculations.
MnO_{2}
A magnetic semiconductor with T structure, is the last compound presented in this work: MnO_{2}, with an E_{g} of 1.23 eV and a μ = 2.98 μ_{B}, in good agreement with refs 14, 72 and 82 respectively (Fig. 5 and Table 1).
The inclusion of spin orbit for this compound is reflected at the bands below the VBM, specifically in the region close to the Γ point (SI, Fig. 11, from −1.4 to −1.0 eV). The band splitting with FRUP is 30 meV and its μ is not altered.
Discussion
With a benchmarking purpose, the present work addresses by means of fully relativistic DFT calculations, the effect of the spin orbit interaction in a thorough study of the electronic and spin properties for several semiconductor monolayer transition metal dioxide and dichalcogenides.
MoS_{2}, MoSe_{2}, MoTe_{2}, WS_{2}, WSe_{2} and WTe_{2} exist as van der Waals solids (their crystalline structure is presented in SI) and have been the focus of several experimental and theoretical works. In this paper the developed fully relativistic potentials were benchmarked by comparison with previous theoretical results, and more importantly, by comparing the VBM spin splitting with the experimentally available results from PL, confirming the validity of the potentials derived in this work.
Although the focus has been on the previous mentioned materials, we have also turn our attention towards those materials that could exist in 3D and can be exfoliated into 2D materials.
In particular, regarding the MO_{2} family, they exist in the rutilelike form and have not been yet experimentally reported, neither in the H or T forms. Therefore, our results for M = Sc, Cr, Mn, Ni, Mo and W in MO_{2} systems, were only compared with theoretical works, presenting, in general, a good agreement, unless the case of ScO_{2}, which we found as a magnetic semiconductor in agreement with ref. 11 but in contrast with the metallic behavior reported in ref. 81.
The spinorbit effects are presented with a growing tendency as the atomic number increases (Table 2). The general feature in the block of dioxide transition metal monolayers is an indirect band gap (from Γ to K), with orbitals around E_{F} mainly due to presence of oxide porbitals. The metal dobitals are not present around E_{F}, and even that the valence bands split around the Kpoint, do not affect the values of the E_{g}s. Motivating a future systematic study on the effects of spinorbits in the rutilelike systems.
The giant spinorbit effects found in several nonmagnetic semiconductors, supports the proposal of new materials as promising candidates for technological applications in valleytronics and spintronics (e.g. MoO_{2}, MoTe_{2}, NiSe_{2}, WS_{2}, WSe_{2} and WTe_{2})^{28,29,30,60,83}. CrTe_{2} was found to behave as magnetic metal (with μ ~ 1.59 μ_{B}) when using FRUP versus its semiconductor behavior when calculated with SRUP.
Within the magnetic semiconductors FRUP calculations, for metallic dioxides, the results almost coincide with the calculations not considering the spin orbit effect.
Finally, metallic dichalcogenide magnetic semiconductors are not affected in their main features, only at their inner valence bands, specifically in the regions where SRUP calculations present points of degeneration, appearing shifts and splits of bands.
This work confirms the requirement of using a fully relativistic pseudopotential approximation in order to accurately predict properties in most of the monolayers involving transition metals.
Methods
Abinitio calculations were performed with the Quantum ESPRESSO (QE)^{84} plane wave DFT and Density Functional Perturbation Theory code, available under the GNU Public License^{85}. Spin polarized scalar relativistic calculations were performed for all the systems, and, in order to include the spinorbit interaction, fully relativistic approximation was adopted^{65,66}.
With the aim of using suitable pseudopotentials for transition metals, and generated by the same generation scheme, RRKJ pseudopotentials were chosen^{86}. Scalar relativistic ultrasoft pseudopotentials (SRUP) and fully relativistic ultrasoft pseudopotentials (FRUP) for Mo, Ni, Se, S, O and Te, were accessible in the QE website repository^{84} within the RRKJ scheme. Meanwhile the pseudopotentials for Sc, Cr, Mn and W were not available and were generated through the ld1.x code, as implemented in QE^{84}.
In order to benchmark the generated RRKJ pseudopotentials, the systems (MX_{2} with M = Sc, Cr, Mn and W, and X = O, S, Se and Te) were constructed and their lattice parameters and band structure calculated. Lattice parameters and band structures of all these structures were also calculated with the available pseudopotentials in the QE repository, specifically using PBE in the Vanderbilt scheme. The results from the RRKJ and the Vanderbilt pseudopotnentials were compared with perfect matching. Fully relativistic ultras of pseudopotentials (FRUP) were then built.
For the exchangecorrelation, we used the PerdewBurkeErnzerhof (PBE) and GGA^{87,88}. For the planewave basis sets, in all cases, we used converged energy cutoffs higher than 612 eV. The convergence energy parameter between consecutive self consistent field calculations was chosen as 10^{−7} eV. The maximum force acting on converged structures was smaller than 0.003 eV/Å, and the stress in the periodic direction was lower than 0.001 GPa. For the BrillouinZone integrations, MonkhorstPack grids^{89} of 16 × 16 × 1 kpoints were used. The starting magnetization was randomly set to 1/2 μ_{B} on the metallic atoms.
Geometry optimization was performed using the conjugate gradient method, and the relaxed atomic positions and lattice parameters in the xy plane were obtained. For all H structures the relaxation was performed with symmetry constrains, providing the energetic minimum of the system. The size of the supercell in the z direction was fixed to 10 Å, providing enough distance to simulate 2D crystals, assuring isolation with the parallel adjacent supercell images.
Additional Information
How to cite this article: ReyesRetana, J. A. and CervantesSodi, F. Spinorbital effects in metaldichalcogenide semiconducting monolayers. Sci. Rep. 6, 24093; doi: 10.1038/srep24093 (2016).
References
 1.
Novoselov, K. S. et al. Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films. Science 306, 666–669 (2004).
 2.
Katsnelson, M., Novoselov, K. & Geim, A. Chiral tunnelling and the klein paradox in graphene. Nat Phys 2, 620–625 (2006).
 3.
Novoselov, K. S. et al. Twodimensional atomic crystals. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 10451–10453, doi: 10.1073/pnas.0502848102 (2005).
 4.
Novoselov, K. et al. Twodimensional gas of massless dirac fermions in graphene. Nature 438, 197–200 (2005).
 5.
Zhang, Y., Tan, Y.W., Stormer, H. L. & Kim, P. Experimental observation of the quantum hall effect and berry’s phase in graphene. Nature 438, 201–204 (2005).
 6.
Chhowalla, M. et al. The chemistry of twodimensional layered transition metal dichalcogenide nanosheets. Nat Chem 5, 263–275 (2013).
 7.
Wang, Q. H., KalantarZadeh, K., Kis, A., Coleman, J. N. & Strano, M. S. Electronics and optoelectronics of twodimensional transition metal dichalcogenides. Nat Nanotechnol 7, 699–712 (2012).
 8.
Ferrari, A. C. et al. Science and technology roadmap for graphene, related twodimensional crystals, and hybrid systems. Nanoscale 7, 4598–4810, doi: 10.1039/C4NR01600A (2015).
 9.
Radisavljevic, B., Radenovic, A., Brivio, J., Giacometti, V. & Kis, A. Singlelayer MoS_{2} transistors. Nat Nanotechnol 6, 147–150 (2011).
 10.
Coleman, J. N. et al. Twodimensional nanosheets produced by liquid exfoliation of layered materials. Science 331, 568–571, doi: 10.1126/science.1194975 (2011).
 11.
Ataca, C., Sahin, H. & Ciraci, S. Stable, singlelayer MX_{2} transitionmetal oxides and dichalcogenides in a honeycomblike structure. J. Phys. Chem. C 116, 8983–8999, doi: 10.1021/jp212558p (2012).
 12.
Lebègue, S., Björkman, T., Klintenberg, M., Nieminen, R. & Eriksson, O. Twodimensional materials from data filtering and ab initio calculations. Phys. Rev. X 3, 031002 (2013).
 13.
Terrones, H., LópezUrías, F. & Terrones, M. Novel heterolayered materials with tunable direct band gaps by sandwiching different metal disulfides and diselenides. Sci. Rep. 3, 1549, doi: 10.1038/srep01549 (2013).
 14.
Rasmussen, F. A. & Thygesen, K. S. Computational 2D materials database: Electronic structure of transitionmetal dichalcogenides and oxides. J. Phys. Chem. C 119, 13169–13183, doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b02950 (2015).
 15.
Lu, W. & Lieber, C. M. Nanoelectronics from the bottom up. Nat Mater 6, 841–850 (2007).
 16.
Qian, X., Liu, J., Fu, L. & Li, J. Quantum spin hall effect in twodimensional transition metal dichalcogenides. Science 346, 1344–1347, doi: 10.1126/science.1256815 (2014).
 17.
Fang, H. et al. Highperformance single layered WSe_{2} pFETs with chemically doped contacts. Nano Lett 12, 3788–3792 (2012).
 18.
Schwierz, F. Graphene transistors. Nat Nanotechnol 5, 487–496 (2010).
 19.
Fowler, J. D. et al. Practical chemical sensors from chemically derived graphene. ACS Nano 3, 301–306 (2009).
 20.
Chang, K. & Chen, W. Lcysteineassisted synthesis of layered MoS_{2}/graphene composites with excellent electrochemical performances for lithium ion batteries. ACS Nano 5, 4720–4728 (2011).
 21.
Bhandavat, R., David, L. & Singh, G. Synthesis of surfacefunctionalized WS_{2} nanosheets and performance as Liion battery anodes. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 3, 1523–1530, doi: 10.1021/jz300480w (2012).
 22.
Beal, A., Hughes, H. & Liang, W. The reflectivity spectra of some group VA transition metal dichalcogenides. J. Phys. C Solid State 8, 4236 (1975).
 23.
Chandra, S., Singh, D., Srivastava, P. & Sahu, S. Electrodeposited semiconducting molybdenum selenide films. ii. optical, electrical, electrochemical and photoelectrochemical solar cell studies. J Phys D: Appl Phys 17, 2125 (1984).
 24.
Alharbi, F. et al. Abundant nontoxic materials for thin film solar cells: Alternative to conventional materials. Renew Energ 36, 2753–2758 (2011).
 25.
Gokus, T. et al. Making graphene luminescent by oxygen plasma treatment. ACS Nano 3, 3963–3968 (2009).
 26.
Eda, G. et al. Blue photoluminescence from chemically derived graphene oxide. Adv Mater 22, 505 (2010).
 27.
Ali, M. N. et al. Large, nonsaturating magnetoresistance in WTe_{2}. Nature 514, 205–208 (2014).
 28.
Awschalom, D. & Samarth, N. Trend: Spintronics without magnetism. Physics 2, 50 (2009).
 29.
Mak, K. F., He, K., Shan, J. & Heinz, T. F. Control of valley polarization in monolayer MoS_{2} by optical helicity. Nat Nanotechnol 7, 494–498 (2012).
 30.
Xiao, D., Liu, G.B., Feng, W., Xu, X. & Yao, W. Coupled spin and valley physics in monolayers of MoS_{2} and other groupVI dichalcogenides. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 196802, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.196802 (2012).
 31.
Cao, T. et al. Valleyselective circular dichroism of monolayer molybdenum disulphide. Nat Commun 3, 887 (2012).
 32.
Mattheiss, L. F. Band structures of transitionmetaldichalcogenide layer compounds. Phys. Rev. B 8, 3719–3740, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.8.3719 (1973).
 33.
Geim, A. & Grigorieva, I. Van der waals heterostructures. Nature 499, 419–425 (2013).
 34.
Gong, Y. et al. Vertical and inplane heterostructures from WS_{2}/MoS_{2} monolayers. Nat Mater 13, 1135–1142, doi: 10.1038/nmat4091 (2014).
 35.
Splendiani, A. et al. Emerging photoluminescence in monolayer MoS_{2}. Nano Lett 10, 1271–1275, doi: 10.1021/nl903868w (2010).
 36.
Dresselhaus, G. Spinorbit coupling effects in zinc blende structures. Phys. Rev. 100, 580 (1955).
 37.
Bychkov, Y. A. & Rashba, E. I. Oscillatory effects and the magnetic susceptibility of carriers in inversion layers. J. Phys. C Solid State 17, 6039 (1984).
 38.
Duplock, E. J., Scheffler, M. & Lindan, P. J. Hallmark of perfect graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 225502 (2004).
 39.
Nakada, K., Fujita, M., Dresselhaus, G. & Dresselhaus, M. S. Edge state in graphene ribbons: Nanometer size effect and edge shape dependence. Phys. Rev. B 54, 17954 (1996).
 40.
Johari, P. & Shenoy, V. B. Tuning the electronic properties of semiconducting transition metal dichalcogenides by applying mechanical strains. ACS Nano 6, 5449–5456 (2012).
 41.
ReyesRetana, J., Naumis, G. & CervantesSodi, F. Centered honeycomb NiSe_{2} nanoribbons: Structure and electronic properties. J. Phys. Chem. C 118, 3295–3304, doi: 10.1021/jp409504f (2014).
 42.
Lu, N. et al. MoS_{2}/MS_{2} heterobilayers: bandgap engineering via tensile strain or external electrical field. Nanoscale 6, 2879–2886 (2014).
 43.
Li, H.M. et al. Metalsemiconductor barrier modulation for high photoresponse in transition metal dichalcogenide field effect transistors. Sci. Rep. 4 4041, doi: 10.1038/srep04041 (2014).
 44.
Santos, E. J. & Kaxiras, E. Electrically driven tuning of the dielectric constant in MoS_{2} layers. ACS Nano 7, 10741–10746 (2013).
 45.
Yue, Q., Chang, S., Qin, S. & Li, J. Functionalization of monolayer MoS_{2} by substitutional doping: a firstprinciples study. Phys. Lett. A 377, 1362–1367 (2013).
 46.
Ao, L. et al. Functionalization of a gase monolayer by vacancy and chemical element doping. Phys Chem Chem Phys 17, 10737–10748 (2015).
 47.
Voiry, D. et al. Covalent functionalization of monolayered transition metal dichalcogenides by phase engineering. Nat Chem 7, 45–49 (2015).
 48.
Guo, H., Lu, N., Wang, L., Wu, X. & Zeng, X. C. Tuning electronic and magnetic properties of early transitionmetal dichalcogenides via tensile strain. J. Phys. Chem. C 118, 7242–7249 (2014).
 49.
Duerloo, K.A. N., Li, Y. & Reed, E. J. Structural phase transitions in twodimensional Moand Wdichalcogenide monolayers. Nat Commun 5, 4214, doi: 10.1038/ncomms5214 (2014).
 50.
Zeng, H., Dai, J., Yao, W., Xiao, D. & Cui, X. Valley polarization in MoS_{2} monolayers by optical pumping. Nat Nanotechnol 7, 490–493 (2012).
 51.
Yang, J. et al. Robust excitons and trions in monolayer MoTe_{2}. ACS Nano 9, 6603–6609 (2015).
 52.
Zhao, Y., Zhang, Y., Yang, Z., Yan, Y. & Sun, K. Synthesis of MoS_{2} and MoO_{2} for their applications in H_{2} generation and lithium ion batteries: a review. Sci Technol Adv Mat 14, 043501 (2013).
 53.
Ji, Q. et al. Epitaxial monolayer MoS_{2} on mica with novel photoluminescence. Nano Lett 13, 3870–3877 (2013).
 54.
Tongay, S. et al. Thermally driven crossover from indirect toward direct bandgap in 2D semiconductors: MoSe_{2} versus MoS_{2}. Nano Lett 12, 5576–5580 (2012).
 55.
Ruppert, C., Aslan, O. B. & Heinz, T. F. Optical properties and band gap of singleand fewlayer MoTe_{2} crystals. Nano Lett 14, 6231–6236 (2014).
 56.
Chen, B. et al. Environmental changes in MoTe_{2} excitonic dynamics by defectsactivated molecular interaction. ACS Nano 9, 5326–5332, doi: 10.1021/acsnano.5b00985 (2015).
 57.
Hwang, W. S. et al. Transistors with chemically synthesized layered semiconductor WS_{2} exhibiting 10^{5} room temperature modulation and ambipolar behavior. Appl Phys. Lett. 101, 013107 (2012).
 58.
Gutiérrez, H. R. et al. Extraordinary roomtemperature photoluminescence in triangular WS_{2} monolayers. Nano Lett 13, 3447–3454 (2012).
 59.
Kozawa, D. et al. Photocarrier relaxation pathway in twodimensional semiconducting transition metal dichalcogenides. Nat Commun 5, 4543, doi: 10.1038/ncomms5543 (2014).
 60.
Zhu, Z. Y., Cheng, Y. C. & Schwingenschlögl, U. Giant spinorbitinduced spin splitting in twodimensional transitionmetal dichalcogenide semiconductors. Phys. Rev. B 84, 153402, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.84.153402 (2011).
 61.
Ramasubramaniam, A. Large excitonic effects in monolayers of molybdenum and tungsten dichalcogenides. Phys. Rev. B 86, 115409 (2012).
 62.
Kang, J., Tongay, S., Zhou, J., Li, J. & Wu, J. Band offsets and heterostructures of twodimensional semiconductors. Appl Phys Lett 102, 012111 (2013).
 63.
Cheiwchanchamnangij, T. & Lambrecht, W. R. Quasiparticle band structure calculation of monolayer, bilayer, and bulk MoS_{2}. Phys. Rev. B 85, 205302 (2012).
 64.
Zibouche, N., Kuc, A., Musfeldt, J. & Heine, T. Transitionmetal dichalcogenides for spintronic applications. Ann Phys 526, 395–401, doi: 10.1002/andp.201400137 (2014).
 65.
Dal Corso, A. & Conte, A. M. Spinorbit coupling with ultrasoft pseudopotentials: Application to Au and Pt. Phys. Rev. B 71, 115106 (2005).
 66.
Smogunov, A., Dal Corso, A. & Tosatti, E. Magnetic phenomena, spinorbit effects, and landauer conductance in Pt nanowire contacts: Densityfunctional theory calculations. Phys. Rev. B 78, 014423 (2008).
 67.
Roland, W. Spinorbit coupling effects in twodimensional electron and hole systems. Springer Tracts in Modern Physics, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg 191 (2003).
 68.
Aivazian, G. et al. Magnetic control of valley pseudospin in monolayer WSe_{2}. Nat Phys, doi: 10.1038/nphys3201 (2015).
 69.
Srivastava, A. et al. Valley Zeeman effect in elementary optical excitations of monolayer WSe_{2}. Nat Phys, doi: 10.1038/nphys3203 (2015).
 70.
Augustin, J. et al. Electronic band structure of the layered compound Td WTe_{2}. Phys. Rev. B 62, 10812 (2000).
 71.
Zhang, H., Lin, X. & Tang, Z.K. Stable ScS_{2} nanostructures with tunable electronic and magnetic properties. Solid State Commun 220, 12–16 (2015).
 72.
Kwon, K. D., Refson, K. & Sposito, G. Defectinduced photoconductivity in layered manganese oxides: A density functional theory study. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 146601 (2008).
 73.
Goodenough, J. B. Spinorbitcoupling effects in transitionmetal compounds. Phys. Rev. 171, 466–479, doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.171.466 (1968).
 74.
Motizuki, K., Ido, H., Itoh, T. & Morifuji, M. Electronic structure and magnetism of 3dtransition metal pnictides. Springer Series in Materials Science, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg 142 (2009).
 75.
Lafond, A., Deudon, C. & Meerschaut, A., A. and Sulpice. Xray structure determination and magnetic properties of a new misfit layered compound: yttrium chromium sulfide; (Y0.93()0.07S)1.28CrS_{2}. Eur. J. Solid State Inorg. Chem. 31, 967.
 76.
Van Bruggen, C., Haange, R., Wiegers, G. & De Boer, D. CrSe_{2}, a new layered dichalcogenide. Physica B + C 99, 166–172 (1980).
 77.
Ronneteg, S., Lumey, M.W., Dronskowski, R. & Berger, R. The magnetic structure of TlCrTe_{2}. J. Alloy Compd. 403, 71–75 (2005).
 78.
Mak, K. F., Lee, C., Hone, J., Shan, J. & Heinz, T. F. Atomically thin MoS_{2}: A new directgap semiconductor. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 136805, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.136805 (2010).
 79.
Ross, J. S. et al. Electrical control of neutral and charged excitons in a monolayer semiconductor. Nat Commun 4, 1474 (2013).
 80.
Mar, A., Jobic, S. & Ibers, J. A. Metalmetal vs telluriumtellurium bonding in WTe_{2} and its ternary variants TaIrTe_{4} and NbIrTe_{4}. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 114, 8963–8971 (1992).
 81.
Loh, G. C. & Pandey, R. Versatile electronic properties of atomically layered ScO_{2}. J. Mater. Chem. C 3, 6627–6644, doi: 10.1039/C5TC01096A (2015).
 82.
Kan, M., Zhou, J., Sun, Q., Kawazoe, Y. & Jena, P. The intrinsic ferromagnetism in a MnO_{2} monolayer. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 4, 3382–3386 (2013).
 83.
Datta, S. & Das, B. Electronic analog of the electrooptic modulator. Appl. Phys. Lett. 56, 665–667 (1990).
 84.
Giannozzi, P. et al. Quantum espresso: a modular and opensource software project for quantum simulations of materials. J Phys: Condensed Matter 21, 395502 (2009).
 85.
License, G. G. P. Free software foundation. GNU Project URL http://www.fsf.org/copyleft/gpl.html Date of access:15/07/15 (1991).
 86.
Rappe, A. M., Rabe, K. M., Kaxiras, E. & Joannopoulos, J. D. Optimized pseudopotentials. Phys. Rev. B 41, 1227–1230, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.41.1227 (1990).
 87.
Perdew, J. P. et al. Atoms, molecules, solids, and surfaces: Applications of the generalized gradient approximation for exchange and correlation. Phys. Rev. B 46, 6671–6687, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.46.6671 (1992).
 88.
Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3868, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 (1996).
 89.
Monkhorst, H. J. & Pack, J. D. Special points for Brillouinzone integrations. Phys. Rev. B 13, 5188–5192, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.13.5188 (1976).
Acknowledgements
JARR is grateful with CONACYT for funding his postdoctoral research at Universidad Iberoamericana, Mexico City (UIA). FCS acknowledge funding from the Physics and Mathematics Department and the Research Division within UIA. Part of the computational work was performed at the Centro Nacional de Supercómputo (ThubatKaal) in San Luis Potosí, MX. Both authors acknowledge support from the Physics and Mathematics Department.
Author information
Affiliations
Universidad Iberoamericana, Departamento de Física y Matemáticas, Prolongación Paseo de la Reforma 880, Lomas de Santa Fe, Mexico City, 01219, México
 J. A. ReyesRetana
 & F. CervantesSodi
Authors
Search for J. A. ReyesRetana in:
Search for F. CervantesSodi in:
Contributions
J.R. proposed the idea and performed calculations. J.R. and F.C. discussed the results, contributed with ideas, wrote and revised the manuscript.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Corresponding author
Correspondence to J. A. ReyesRetana.
Supplementary information
PDF files
Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
About this article
Further reading

1.
Scientific Reports (2018)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.