Abstract
Tetrapyrrole biosynthesis is an essential and tightly regulated process and glutamyl-tRNA reductase (GluTR) is a key target for multiple regulatory factors at the post-translational level. By binding to the thylakoid membrane protein FLUORESCENT (FLU) or the soluble stromal GluTR-binding protein (GBP), the activity of GluTR is down- or up-regulated. Here, we reconstructed a ternary complex composed of the C-terminal tetratricopepetide-repeat domain of FLU, GBP and GluTR, crystallized and solved the structure of the complex at 3.2 Å. The overall structure resembles the shape of merged two binary complexes as previously reported and shows a large conformational change within GluTR. We also demonstrated that GluTR binds tightly with GBP but does not bind to GSAM under the same condition. These findings allow us to suggest a biological role of the ternary complex for the regulation of plant GluTR.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Plants synthesize δ-aminolevulenic acid (ALA), the precursor for all tetrapyrrole molecules, from glutamate via a three-step pathway1. The first step is ligation of glutamate to tRNAGlu catalyzed by glutamyl-tRNA synthetase. Then glutamyl-tRNA reductase (GluTR) reduces the tRNAGlu-bound glutamate to glutamate-l-semialdehyde (GSA) in an NADPH-dependent manner. GSA is subsequently isomerized to ALA by a vitamin B6-dependent enzyme, glutamate-l-semialdehyde aminomutase (GSAM). ALA synthesis is the key regulatory point for the entire tetrapyrrole biosynthetic pathway and particularly GluTR is subjected to a tight control at the post-translational level2,3.
Three mechanisms have been characterized for plant GluTR activity regulation, which are (i) the end-product feedback inhibition by heme4, (ii) repression by a membrane protein FLUORESCENT (FLU)5 and (iii) formation of complex with a soluble GluTR-binding protein (GBP)6. The two inhibitors, heme and FLU, are suggested to concurrently interact with different sites on GluTR7. GluTR consists of three domains: an N-terminal catalytic domain, an NADPH-binding domain and a C-terminal dimerization domain8. FLU directly interacts with GluTR’s dimerization domain through its tetratricopepetide-repeat (TPR) domain7,9,10. Plant GluTRs have an ~30-residue conserved fragment in the N-terminal region and truncation of this fragment results in resistance to heme inhibition4. This putative heme-binding fragment, however, is flexible and hence not observed in the GluTR-GBP complex structure11. GBP has been proposed to protect GluTR from FLU inhibition during darkness to ensure heme synthesis when the need for chlorophyll declines12 and a membrane anchoring protein specific for GBP has been speculated13. Recent structural studies of the GluTR-GBP complex11 and of FLU’s TPR domain (FLUTPR) complexed with GluTR’s dimerization domain10 have revealed that FLU and GBP bind to different sites on GluTR. These findings indicate that the three post-translational mechanisms of GluTR regulation may function simultaneously.
Transcriptional regulation of enzymes involved in ALA synthesis has been characterized in Arabidopsis thaliana. Among the three GluTR genes (HEMA1, HEMA2 and HEMA3), expression of HEMA1 that encodes the dominant GluTR in the photosynthetic tissues is regulated by light14,15,16. Light also regulates expression of the genes encoding GSAM14 and ALA dehydratase, the enzyme subsequent to GSAM in the tetrapyrrole biosynthetic pathway17. Expression of FLU and GBP, however, is not sensitive to light change6,7. The loss-of-function mutation of either flu or gbp is lethal5,6, highlighting a critical role for these two constitutively expressed proteins.
Aside from FLU and GBP, GSAM is proposed to form complex with GluTR to enable GSA channeling from GluTR to GSAM8. The GluTR-GSAM complex has been observed for these two enzymes from Escherichia coli18 and from the unicellular green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii19. However, in plants, there is no biological evidence for the GluTR-GSAM complex formation. Enzymes after ALA synthesis and before the heme-chlorophyll branch point (protoporphyrin IX) are speculated to physically interact to form transient substrate-channeling complexes13,20. It is therefore worthy to test whether a stable plant GluTR-GSAM complex exists by using an in vitro system.
GluTR and its three partner proteins, FLU, GBP and GSAM, are homodimers. The 2:2 FLUTPR-GluTR complex and the 2:2 GluTR-GBP complex have been reconstructed10,11. In the present study, we obtained the 2:2:2 FLUTPR-GluTR-GBP complex and solved its structure. We show that GBP has higher affinity to GluTR than FLUTPR when quantified by isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) experiment. ITC did not detect GSAM binding to GluTR or to the GluTR-GBP complex. These results advance the understanding of plant GluTR regulation at the molecular level and provide a clue to the spatial organization of these proteins.
Results
Reconstruction, crystallization and structure determination of the ternary complex
The purified recombinant GluTR, GBP and FLUTPR were mixed at molar ratio of 2:3:3 and the mixture was then subjected to size-exclusion chromatography. A stable FLUTPR-GluTR-GBP ternary complex was obtained with excess amounts of GBP and FLUTPR (Fig. 1A). No complex formation between FLUTPR and GBP was observed. Fractions corresponding to the ternary complex were concentrated for crystallization. Crystals grew under a totally different condition from the GluTR-GBP complex11 or FLUTPR in complex with GluTR’s dimerization domain (GluTRDD)10. The ternary complex crystals belong to space group C2, while the GluTR-GBP binary complex crystals belong to P212121 and the FLUTPR-GluTRDD binary complex crystals belong to P6522. The ternary complex packs in a symmetric way along its local 2-fold axis, whereas the GluTR-GBP complex arrays in an asymmetric way along the axis (Fig. 1B). The structure of the ternary complex was determined by the molecular replacement method using template coordinates of GluTR-GBP and FLUTPR-GluTRDD and refined to a resolution of 3.2 Å (Table 1).
Structure of the ternary complex
The ternary complex resembles the shape of a merged structure of the two binary complexes (Fig. 2A). However, it does not fit well with either GluTR-GBP or FLUTPR-GluTRDD. The positions of GluTR’s C-terminal region are quite different when the ternary complex and GluTR-GBP are superimposed (Fig. 2B). GBP and the remainder of GluTR have no significant change, except that the linker between NADPH-binding domain and the long “spinal” helix of GluTR cannot be traced in the ternary complex. Conversely, the linker between the two C-terminal helices of GluTR that is missing in GluTR-GBP or FLUTPR-GluTRDD can be observed in the ternary complex. Compared with FLUTPR-GluTRDD, there is an extra ionic bond between the catalytic domain of GluTR and the third TPR motif of FLUTPR (Fig. 2C). GluTR’s C-terminal region appears more compact in the ternary complex than in FLUTPR-GluTRDD.
Flexibility of GluTR’s spinal helix
The two chains of GluTR in the ternary complex, together with the previous observation in the GluTR-GBP complex11, demonstrate the flexibility of GluTR’s spinal helix across a large range. When the catalytic domains of the four chains are superimposed, the stem end exhibits maximum shift of approximate 15 Å (Fig. 3A). The two spinal helices in the ternary complex are almost identical, which is reminiscent of Methanopyrus kandleri GluTR8. Indeed, the root-mean-square deviation between the two chains of GluTR in the ternary complex is only 0.72 Å for 419 Cα aligned. When the stem of the GluTR dimer in the GluTR-GBP binary complex is superimposed with that in the ternary complex, the angle between the two Y-shaped arms has a difference of ~5 degrees (Fig. 3B).
GluTR’s interaction with GSAM and GBP
GSAM is a flexible enzyme undergoing open/close conformational change21,22. Synchronized events between GluTR and GSAM are likely required for GluTR-GSAM interaction. A stable GluTR-GSAM complex has been verified for this pair of enzymes from E. coli and C. reinhardtii18,19. In contrast, direct interaction between plant GluTR and GSAM has not been reported. We employed ITC to detect such interaction (Fig. 4). No heat change was observed for titration of GSAM to GluTR. Also, no heat change was observed for titration of GSAM to the GluTR-GBP complex. Notably, the GluTR-GBP complex is stable and has a low apparent dissociation constant (Kd). The Kd value (41.3 ± 3.7 nM) is about one-fortieth that of FLUTPR and GluTR as measured previously10, which indicates that GBP binds significantly more tightly than FLUTPR to GluTR.
Discussion
As the rate-limiting step for the formation of ALA, the common precursor for all tetrapyrrole molecules, the GluTR-catalyzed glutamyl-tRNAGlu reduction by NADPH is a key regulatory point of the tetrapyrrole biosynthetic pathway2,3. The membrane-anchored protein FLU were identified as a negative regulator for GluTR5,7,9. The soluble protein GBP was initially found in chloroplast stroma23 and then later in a thylakoid membrane-bound 300-kDa protein complex6. Direct GluTR-GBP interaction has also been found in an interactome screen24. With the components of the 300-kDa protein complex remaining unresolved, the FLUTPR-GluTR-GBP ternary complex presented here provides a clue to address this issue. A membrane-bound FLU-containing metabolic complex has been detected by an immunoprecipitation/mass spectrometry study25. In this complex, light-dependent protochlorophyllide oxidoreductase (LPOR) is one of the specific FLU-interacting partners. LPOR catalyzes the reduction of the fourth ring of protochlorophyllide and exists as dimers or tetramers26. With a monomeric molecular weight of ~36 kDa, when a LPOR dimer binds to the ternary complex of full-length FLU-GluTR-GBP that has a combined molecular weight of ~224 kDa, the resulting LPOR-FLU-GluTR-GBP quaternary complex might explain the post-translational regulation of ALA synthesis by light6,27. Further biological studies are needed to characterize such a macromolecular assembly.
How GBP exerts its regulatory role on GluTR activity remains an open question. GBP has higher binding affinity to GluTR compared with FLUTPR. This indicates that GluTR is more prone to bind to GBP than FLU under the same condition. GBP may regulate GluTR activity by the following three mechanisms: (i) to shift GluTR conformation and render GluTR preferable for NADPH accommodation within the NADPH-binding domain and thus prevent GluTR’s esterase activity; (ii) to retain GSA in GluTR’s interior before GSAM interaction; (iii) to be involved in chloroplast vitamin B6 metabolism and hence related to GSAM activation.
The failure to detect GluTR-GSAM interaction using ITC does not preclude the existence of a GluTR-GSAM complex in plants. Nevertheless, such a complex might be less stable than its counterparts from E. coli and C. reinhardtii18,19. It should be noticed that, similar to a GluTR dimer, a GSAM dimer has both asymmetric and symmetric states21,22,28. A synchronized conformational change of both GluTR and GSAM is likely required for their recognition. In addition, whether and how dissociation of the GluTR-GBP complex is involved in GSAM interaction remains unclear and awaits future biochemical characterization.
Methods
Protein expression and purification
The expression vectors of Arabidopsis GluTR, GBP and FLUTPR were constructed as previously described10,11. Briefly, the genes of GluTR (At1g58290) and GBP (At3g21200) without their chloroplast localization sequences (residues 73–543 and 42–317) and the FLU (At3g14110) truncation (residues 195–316), were constructed into expression vectors pMAL-c5X (New England Biolabs), pET-28a(+) and pET-22b(+) (Novagen), respectively. The mature Arabidopsis GSAM (At3g48730), starting at residue 38, was cloned into the pETMALc-H vector29 between BamHI and NotI sites. The constructs were transferred into E. coli BL21(DE3) cells and protein expression was induced by 0.2 mM isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside when the cell density reached an optical density at 600 nm of 0.8. The induced cells were grown at 18 oC for 16 hours before harvest by centrifugation.
The cell pellets expressing GluTR were re-suspended in buffer A (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 500 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA and 5 mM dithiothreitol) and disrupted by sonication. After centrifugation, the cleared lysate was passed through a maltose binding protein (MBP) affinity column pre-equilibrated with buffer A. The bound protein was eluted with 40 mM maltose in buffer A and the MBP tag was then cleaved using tobacco etch virus protease. The reaction mixture was then subjected to a HiLoad 16/60 Superdex 200 pg column (GE Healthcare) pre-equilibrated and eluted with buffer A. Protein aggregates and the MBP tag were removed and the GluTR dimer fractions were collected. Purification of GBP and FLUTPR was described previously10,11. GSAM was purified following the same procedure used for GluTR as described above.
Reconstruction of the ternary complex
For preparation of the ternary complex, the GluTR dimer fractions were mixed with GBP and FLUTPR at a molar ratio 2:3:3 and incubated for 1 hour at 4 oC. The mixture was loaded on a HiLoad 16/60 Superdex 200 pg column (GE Healthcare) pre-equilibrated and eluted with buffer containing 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 200 mM NaCl and 4 mM dithiothreitol. The purified ternary complex was pooled and concentrated to 15 mg ml−1 for crystallization.
Crystallization and data collection
Crystals of the ternary complex were obtained in 0.1 M sodium malonate, pH 7.0, 14.5% (w/v) polyethylene glycol 3,350, 2.5% (v/v) 2-methyl-2,4-pentanediol, 0.5 M lithium chloride by the sitting-drop vapor diffusion method at 16 oC. For data collection, the crystals were transferred step by step into drops of the crystallization liquid supplemented with 5%, 10%, 20% (v/v) ethylene glycol before being flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen. All X-ray diffraction data sets were collected at beamline BL17U of Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility (Shanghai, China) at 100 K and processed using HKL2000 (HKL Research, Inc.).
Structure solution and refinement
The structural model of the ternary complex was built using molecular replacement with Phaser30. The search templates were the GluTR-GBP complex (PDB entry 4N7R) where residues after Arg421 of GluTR were removed and FLUTPR-GluTRDD (PDB entry 4YVQ). Manual correction was done in Coot31 according to the 2Fo − Fc and Fo − Fc electron density maps. Further refinement was performed with phenix.refine32. The diffraction data used for structure refinement was extended to 3.0 Å according to CC1/2 values33 and the final resolution was cut off to 3.2 Å based on traditional restriction. The overall quality of final structure was assessed by MolProbity34 with 96.7% in favored, 3.0% in general allowed and 0.3% in disallowed regions. Data collection and structure refinement statistics are summarized in Table 1. The protein structure figures were prepared with the program PyMOL (Schrödinger, LLC).
Isothermal titration calorimetry
ITC experiments were performed on a MicroCal iTC200 calorimeter (Malvern Instruments Ltd) at 25 oC. The purified recombinant proteins were changed into a buffer containing 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5 and 150 mM NaCl. Each titration experiment consisted of 20 injections of 2 μl aliquots of the protein at a concentration of 0.5 mM into a 200 μl cell filled with protein at a concentration of 50 μM. Control experiments were carried out by injecting protein into the buffer and the resulting heat of dilution was subtracted. The first injection was discarded and the data were fitted to a one-site binding model using MicroCal Origin software.
Additional Information
Accession codes: Atomic coordinates and structure factors have been deposited with the Protein Data Bank under accession code 5CHE.
How to cite this article: Fang, Y. et al. The Arabidopsis glutamyl-tRNA reductase (GluTR) forms a ternary complex with FLU and GluTR-binding protein. Sci. Rep. 6, 19756; doi: 10.1038/srep19756 (2016).
References
Beale, S. I. Biosynthesis of the tetrapyrrole pigment precursor, δ-aminolevulinic acid, from glutamate. Plant Physiol. 93, 1273–1279 (1990).
Tanaka, R. & Tanaka, A. Tetrapyrrole biosynthesis in higher plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 58, 321–346 (2007).
Mochizuki, N. et al. The cell biology of tetrapyrroles: a life and death struggle. Trends Plant Sci. 15, 488–498 (2010).
Vothknecht, U. C., Kannangara, C. G. & von Wettstein, D. Barley glutamyl tRNAGlu reductase: Mutations affecting haem inhibition and enzyme activity. Phytochemistry 47, 513–519 (1998).
Meskauskiene, R. et al. FLU: a negative regulator of chlorophyll biosynthesis in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 12826–12831 (2001).
Czarnecki, O. et al. An Arabidopsis GluTR binding protein mediates spatial separation of 5-aminolevulinic acid synthesis in chloroplasts. Plant Cell 23, 4476–4491 (2011).
Goslings, D. et al. Concurrent interactions of heme and FLU with Glu tRNA reductase (HEMA1), the target of metabolic feedback inhibition of tetrapyrrole biosynthesis, in dark- and light-grown Arabidopsis plants. Plant J. 40, 957–967 (2004).
Moser, J. et al. V-shaped structure of glutamyl-tRNA reductase, the first enzyme of tRNA-dependent tetrapyrrole biosynthesis. EMBO J. 20, 6583–6590 (2001).
Meskauskiene, R. & Apel, K. Interaction of FLU, a negative regulator of tetrapyrrole biosynthesis, with the glutamyl-tRNA reductase requires the tetratricopeptide repeat domain of FLU. FEBS Lett. 532, 27–30 (2002).
Zhang, M. et al. The non-canonical tetratricopeptide-repeat (TPR) domain of Fluorescent (FLU) mediates complex formation with glutamyl-tRNA reductase. J. Biol. Chem. 290, 17559–17565 (2015).
Zhao, A. et al. Crystal structure of Arabidopsis glutamyl-tRNA reductase in complex with its stimulator protein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111, 6630–6635 (2014).
Czarnecki, O. & Grimm, B. New insights in the topology of the biosynthesis of 5-aminolevulinic acid. Plant Signa.l Behav. 8, e23124 (2013).
Wang, P. & Grimm, B. Organization of chlorophyll biosynthesis and insertion of chlorophyll into the chlorophyll-binding proteins in chloroplasts. Photosynth. Res. doi: 10.1007/s11120-015-0154-5 (2015).
Ilag, L. L., Kumar, A. M. & Söll, D. Light regulation of chlorophyll biosynthesis at the level of 5-aminolevulinate formation in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 6, 265–275 (1994).
McCormac, A. C., Fischer, A., Kumar, A. M., Söll, D. & Terry, M. J. Regulation of HEMA1 expression by phytochrome and a plastid signal during de-etiolation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 25, 549–561 (2001).
McCormac, A. C. & Terry, M. J. Light-signalling pathways leading to the co-ordinated expression of HEMA1 and Lhcb during chloroplast development in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 32, 549–559 (2002).
Tang, W. et al. Transposase-derived proteins FHY3/FAR1 interact with PHYTOCHROME-INTERACTING FACTOR1 to regulate chlorophyll biosynthesis by modulating HEMB1 during deetiolation in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 24, 1984–2000 (2012).
Lüer, C. et al. Complex formation between glutamyl-tRNA reductase, glutamate-1-semialdehyde 2,1-aminomutase in Escherichia coli during the initial reactions of porphyrin biosynthesis. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 18568–18572 (2005).
Nogaj, L. A. & Beale, S. I. Physical and kinetic interactions between glutamyl-tRNA reductase and glutamate-1-semialdehyde aminotransferase of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 24301–24307 (2005).
Sobotka, R. Making proteins green; biosynthesis of chlorophyll-binding proteins in cyanobacteria. Photosynth. Res. 119, 223–232 (2014).
Hennig, M., Grimm, B., Contestabile, R., John, R. A. & Jansonius, J. N. Crystal structure of glutamate-1-semialdehyde aminomutase: an α2-dimeric vitamin B6-dependent enzyme with asymmetry in structure and active site reactivity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94, 4866–4871 (1997).
Schulze, J. O., Schubert, W. D., Moser, J., Jahn, D. & Heinz, D. W. Evolutionary relationship between initial enzymes of tetrapyrrole biosynthesis. J. Mol. Biol. 358, 1212–1220 (2006).
Jung, H. S. et al. Arabidopsis thaliana PGR7 encodes a conserved chloroplast protein that is necessary for efficient photosynthetic electron transport. PLoS One 5, e11688 (2010).
Arabidopsis Interactome Mapping Consortium. Evidence for network evolution in an Arabidopsis interactome map. Science 333, 601–607 (2011).
Kauss, D., Bischof, S., Steiner, S., Apel, K. & Meskauskiene, R. FLU, a negative feedback regulator of tetrapyrrole biosynthesis, is physically linked to the final steps of the Mg++-branch of this pathway. FEBS Lett. 586, 211–216 (2012).
Heyes, D. J. & Hunter, C. N. Making light work of enzyme catalysis: protochlorophyllide oxidoreductase. Trends Biochem. Sci. 30, 642–649 (2005).
Richter, A. et al. Rapid dark repression of 5-aminolevulinic acid synthesis in green barley leaves. Plant Cell Physiol. 51, 670–681 (2010).
Stetefeld, J., Jenny, M. & Burkhard, P. Intersubunit signaling in glutamate-1-semialdehyde-aminomutase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 13688–13693 (2006).
Pryor, K. D. & Leiting, B. High-level expression of soluble protein in Escherichia coli using a His6-tag and maltose-binding-protein double-affinity fusion system. Protein Expr. Purif. 10, 309–319 (1997).
McCoy, A. J. et al. Phaser crystallographic software. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 40, 658–674 (2007).
Emsley, P., Lohkamp, B., Scott, W. G. & Cowtan, K. Features and development of Coot. Acta Crystallogr., Sect. D: Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 486–501 (2010).
Afonine, P. V. et al. Towards automated crystallographic structure refinement with phenix.refine. Acta Crystallogr., Sect. D: Biol. Crystallogr. 68, 352–367 (2012).
Karplus P. A. & Diederichs K. Linking crystallographic model and data quality. Science 336, 1030–1033 (2012).
Chen, V. B. et al. MolProbity: All-atom structure validation for macromolecular crystallography. Acta Crystallogr., Sect. D: Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 12–21 (2010).
Acknowledgements
We thank Ming-Zhu Wang at the Institute of Biophysics of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (IBP-CAS) and the Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility beamline scientists for technical support. We thank Yuan-Yuan Chen and Zhen-Wei Yang at the Core Facility for Protein Research, IBP-CAS, for assistance with the ITC experiments. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31370759 and 31500243), the National Basic Research Program of China (2011CBA00901) and the Key Research Program of CAS (KGZD-EW-T05).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Y.F. and L.L. designed the projects; Y.F., S.Z., F.Z., A.Z. and W.Z. performed the experiments; Y.F., M.Z. and L.L. analyzed the data; Y.F. and L.L. wrote the manuscript.
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Fang, Y., Zhao, S., Zhang, F. et al. The Arabidopsis glutamyl-tRNA reductase (GluTR) forms a ternary complex with FLU and GluTR-binding protein. Sci Rep 6, 19756 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep19756
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep19756
This article is cited by
-
Effect of chlorophyll biosynthesis-related genes on the leaf color in Hosta (Hosta plantaginea Aschers) and tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.)
BMC Plant Biology (2021)
-
Cold acclimation can specifically inhibit chlorophyll biosynthesis in young leaves of Pakchoi
BMC Plant Biology (2021)
-
Crystal structure of Arabidopsis thaliana glutamyl-tRNAGlu reductase in complex with NADPH and glutamyl-tRNAGlu reductase binding protein
Photosynthesis Research (2018)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.