Abstract
In dissipationless linear media, spatial disorder induces Anderson localization of matter, light and sound waves. The addition of nonlinearity causes interaction between the eigenmodes, which results in a slow wave diffusion. We go beyond the dissipationless limit of Anderson arrays and consider nonlinear disordered systems that are subjected to the dissipative losses and energy pumping. We show that the Anderson modes of the disordered Ginsburg-Landau lattice possess specific excitation thresholds with respect to the pumping strength. When pumping is increased above the threshold for the band-edge modes, the lattice dynamics yields an attractor in the form of a stable multi-peak pattern. The Anderson attractor is the result of a joint action by the pumping-induced mode excitation, nonlinearity-induced mode interactions and dissipative stabilization. The regimes of Anderson attractors can be potentially realized with polariton condensates lattices, active waveguide or cavity-QED arrays.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
After more than fifty years since its birth, Anderson localization still remains in the focus of studies1,2. During the last decade it became almost ubiquitous in experimental physics, being observed with electromagnetic3, acoustic4 and matter waves5,6,7,8. In the theoretical domain, a generalized problem of localization in presence of nonlinearity and interactions was brought to the forefront of the studies9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18. The predicted wave packet delocalization and chaotic subdiffusion has already received an impressive support in the pioneering experiments with interacting ultracold atoms expanding in effectively one dimensional (1D) optical potentials19,20,21.
Most of the current activity in the field remains restricted to a dissipationless limit, when the dynamics of a system is fully specified by its Hamiltonian. Otherwise, since Anderson localization is a phenomenon relying on interference22, one expects the destructive effect of dissipation due to rising of decoherence effects. Indeed, absorption of light in waveguide arrays (and, optionally, gain) and disorder have proved to produce an intricate interplay instead of pure Anderson localization, though permitting strongly suppressed diffusion23,24. Likewise, it has been demonstrated for quantum particles that scattering25 and spectral26 properties of localizing systems are deteriorated, though survive weak dissipation or coupling to a Hamiltonian bath, respectively. Noteworthy, dissipation in ordered lattices have proved to be destructive for the originally ballistic transport. Namely, it evokes the mobility transition towards diffusive light propagation, when introduced homogeneously27 and exponential localization, when randomized28. Instructively, the dissipation introduced at the boundaries of passive chains (or mimicked by semi-infinite propagating leads) organizes non-trivial transitions in the scaling of relaxation29, transparency30 and arising asymmetry of wave propagation31, depending on the levels of disorder and nonlinearity.
The first example of the constructive interplay was recently found in a random laser operating in the Anderson regime, when localization reduced the spatial overlap between lasing modes, preventing their competition and improving stability32. Importantly, distinct lasing thresholds for Anderson modes in pumping strength were observed, enabling sequential excitation and control. It was also argued that interactions between the modes get suppressed in the strong localization and vanishing dissipation limit, although with significant deviations found beyond33.
A new room for dissipation effects was created by the recent progress in experimental manipulations with exciton-polariton condensates34,35,36,37,38. A condensate can be considered as an active system balancing between excitation (by a pumping source) and decay (due to the continuous light emission). Further on, one can arrange 1D arrays of condensate centers by synthesizing spatial inhomogeneities35,39,40,41 or by rotating ring-shaped optical potentials and switching to the co-moving frame42,43. Spatial interaction appears due to polariton diffraction and diffusion and, importantly, would include both Josephson and dissipative terms (the former typically prevails). The resulting collective dynamics is a blend of excitation and lasing effects and can be modeled with Ginzburg-Landau type equations (GLE)44. In this framework, dissipative effects act as internal decay mechanisms and their influence on the center dynamics is accounted by additional imaginary terms in the model equations36,38,45,46. The recent pioneering theoretical and experimental studies have already demonstrated a rich nonlinear dynamics of traveling and immobile gap solitons in periodic 1D condensate center arrays40,47 and further stretched to spatially quasiperiodic structures to uncover the fractal energy spectrum41.
Altogether, these advances naturally lead to the question of Anderson localization in active arrays, where pumping and dissipation join the old players, nonlinearity and disorder. Some collective phenomena in such systems are well studied, for example, synchronization48 and oscillation death49,50,51. However, most of the related studies address lattices that crumble into a set of uncoupled oscillators in the linear conservative limit.
In this Report we demonstrate and study Anderson attractors in 1D active arrays, as described by a disordered22 version of the discrete complex GLE52. We find that the increase of the pumping strength leads to the formation of a stationary multipeak pattern formed by a set of excited and interacting Anderson modes. We determine the transition from the regime of Anderson attractors to delocalized collective oscillations upon the increase of pumping. Both excitation and delocalization thresholds scale with the strength of the dissipative coupling and increase with the increase of disorder. Finally, we show that the increase of pumping beyond the delocalization threshold leads to a multi-mode chaos followed by cluster synchronization.
Results
We consider a one-dimensional disordered discrete Ginsburg-Landau equation, a generalization of the original Anderson lattice equations22 that suitably accounts for non-equilibrium condensate dynamics46
where Δl ∈ [−W/2, W/2] are independent uniformly distributed random numbers and W is the disorder strength. Further on, α is the pumping rate, σ is the nonlinear dissipation coefficient and η is the strength of dissipative coupling between adjacent sites. Without loss of generality we set conservative nonlinearity and coupling coefficients to one. In numerics, we study finite systems and do not find appreciable finite size-effects for reasonably large array lengths, N > 100. Zero boundary conditions are assumed for definiteness, z0 = zN + 1 = 0.
In the linear dissipationless limit, α = η = 0 and |zl|2→0, the stationary solutions zl = Ale−iλt satisfy
which by reduces to the standard Anderson eigenvalue problem. All eigenstates are exponentially localized, ~ , with lv and ξλ denoting a center of mass and localization length of the mode, respectively. The eigenvalues are restricted to a finite interval, λv ∈ [−W/2, 4 + W/2]. In the limit of weak disorder, W ≪ 1 and far from the band edges, 0<λv<4, the localization length is approximated by53
Switching to the Anderson mode basis , we recast the original equation (1) in the form:
where and . These equations contain both the linear and nonlinear terms that account for dissipation and pumping. Nonlinear terms are responsible for the mode interaction. However, due to the exponential localization of the eigenstates, interactions are confined to localization volume Vloc(λ) ≈ 3.3ξλ54.
We start the analysis of Eq. (1) by considering the net norm Z = Σ|zl|2. The dynamics of the norm is given by
It follows that the zero solution is globally stable for all α ≤ 0. It also suggests that homogeneous in-phase solutions zl + 1 ≈ zl are more energetically favorable than anti-phase ones, zl + 1 ≈ − zl. To study stability of the zero solution, we assign increments pv to the small-amplitude Anderson modes, and substitute them into Eq. (1). Linearization gives
The zero solution is stable when max pv < 0. This quantity depends only on the strength W and particular realization {Δl} of the disorder and also on the ratio between incoherent pumping rate and dissipative coupling, . Irrespective of the strength and particular realization of disorder, the scaled excitation threshold
is bounded, . As the Anderson modes have finite localization lengths for finite disorder strength W and, hence, inside localization volume we have ~ , there is a finite excitation threshold for finite W.
Figure 1 presents the results of numerical simulations for a particular realization of disorder. Profiles for different values of α were obtained as independent attractor solutions, by setting the system into an initial random low-energy state |zl(0)|≪ 1 and letting it evolve until the corresponding amplitude profile is stabilized. (We observed single-attractor regimes in all performed numerical tests, although multistability is not excluded, in principle.) The key feature of the attractor patterns is the multipeak structure, well pronounced above a certain threshold (e.g. α ≈ 0.006 for W = 1, η = 0.1, σ = 1, N = 1000, Fig. 1). The positions of the peaks remain unaffected by the further increase of the pumping strength. Zooming into a single peak, we find that it extends over many sites, top right panel of Fig. 1. By going into the reciprocal Anderson space, we find that the excitation is well-localized at a single Anderson mode, bottom right panel of Fig. 1. This observation supports the conjecture that the attractor peaks are produced through excitation of Anderson modes.
Mode specific excitation conditions can be further analyzed by using the linearized version of equations (4),
In the weak disorder limit, W ≪ 1, the localization length of the modes that are far from the band edges is large, ξλ ≫ 1. Since within the localization volume , the terms with can be neglected. It follows immediately that the rescaled excitation threshold of v-th Anderson mode can be approximated well by its eigenvalue,
This also means that the modes closer the lower band edge will be excited first. However, the localization length of such modes can substantially decrease, potentially, up to ξλ ~ 1, so that corrections to Eq. (8) due to terms might become significant.
The instability threshold can be estimated more accurately by using Eq. (7). Neglecting exponentially decaying tails of the modes, Al = 0, l ∉ [lv − Vloc/2, lv + Vloc/2]= 0 and minimizing under normalization constraint , we obtain:
Finally, by substituting the localization length ξ0 ≈ 8 W−2/3 for the modes with λv ≈ 055 in Vloc ≈ 3.3ξλ, we arrive at:
Note, that this approach is also valid in the strong disorder limit, W ≫ 1, when all Anderson modes are essentially single-site excitations: substituting Vloc = 1 in (10) one obtains . Moreover, taking into account the strong decay of the mode amplitudes, ~, one finds that the mode specific excitation thresholds (7) are approximated by
It follows, that they tend to the limiting value as W→∞.
To test the analytical results, we calculate mode excitation thresholds according to (7) and plot them as a function of the numerically calculated eigenvalues λv, Fig. 2. The obtained statistical dependencies corroborate approximation (9) for the modes far from the band edges, especially well in the limit of weak disorder. The values of minimal excitation thresholds correspond to λv ≈ 0 and the estimate (11) is in a good agreement with numerical results, see inset of Fig. 2. By approximating the dependence around its dip by and taking into account the finiteness of the density of Anderson states at λ = 0, we get that the density of excited states scales .
By getting over the oscillation threshold one would not immediately excite all modes near the band edge. These modes are well-localized and their interaction with other modes is exponentially weak. In addition, next-neighbor mode interaction remains significantly damped since mode eigenvalues differ substantially due to the level repulsion.
As a result, Anderson modes from the vicinity of the band edge arise in a one-by-one manner as the pumping rate exceeds thresholds . Mode amplitudes saturate because of the nonlinear dissipation and amplitude asymptotic values can be estimated, by using Eq. (4), as:
As the pumping strength increases further, the set of excited modes becomes dense and mode interaction starts contributing to the formation of the system attractor. Multi-mode nonlinear dynamics has two well-known trademarks: chaos and synchronization48. Both appear in our model system, see Fig. 3. By gradually increasing the pumping strength, we first observe a transition from the Anderson attractors to the regime of delocalized oscillations, Fig. 3 (middle panel). The delocalized regime is characterized by irregular spatio-temporal patterns. In terms of the localized modes, this is a well-developed mode chaos. When the pumping is increased further, we observe formation of synchronization clusters with the typical size of the Anderson localization length.
We can estimate the transition to delocalized oscillations by assuming that it happens when the sum of the localization volumes of the excited modes becomes of the order of the system size, . An average localization volume that measures the ratio of effectively excited sites is , where the non-excited modes are formally assigned Vloc = 0. By using expression (9) for the mode excitation thresholds, neglecting contributions of the highly localized modes near the lower band edge and approximating the density of states in the weak disorder limit as , we obtain
and get the transition value:
In the strong disorder limit the mode excitation thresholds (12) converge to , which, therefore, also approximates the onset of delocalized oscillations, .
For a numerical test we average |zl|2 over observation time and calculate the participation number (a quantity commonly used to estimate the number of effectively excited sites) normalized by the system size:
Since the maximally possible P = 1 requires a uniform distribution of |zl|, we use P = 1/2 as the threshold value to indicate localization-delocalization transition. The left panel of Fig. 4 presents the results obtained by averaging over ten disorder realizations. For weak dissipative coupling η ≪ 1, the scaled curves fall closely to each other, in accord to the theoretical prediction, Eq. (15). It also estimates the numerical thresholds reasonably well, e.g. compare for W = 1, Eq. (15), to , as read from Fig. 4. When the dissipative coupling becomes of the order of the conservative one, , estimate (15) with the scaling are no longer valid and the actual delocalization threshold is significantly different from (15). In this limit one cannot neglect the last term in Eq. (8) which is responsible for dissipative interaction between the modes.
In order to quantify the transition to the mode chaos regime, we calculate the largest Lyapunov exponent as a function of the pumping strength, Fig. 4 (right panel). Comparing the exponents, obtained for different values of dissipative coupling constant η, with the results presented in Fig. 4, we confirm that the transition to delocalized oscillations is a precursor of the mode chaos. Remarkably, a further increase of the pumping above α ≈ 1 leads to the drop of the largest Lyapunov exponents to zero thus marking the transition back to regular dynamics. This transition is weakly dependent of η and corresponds to the emergence of synchronized clusters48, see Fig. 3 (bottom panel).
Discussion
Anderson localization in active disordered systems is a combined effect produced by the energy pumping, dissipation and nonlinearity. It results in the formation of the Anderson attractor consisting of many localized weakly-interacting modes. We have found that the pumping excitation thresholds for the Anderson modes are mode-specific and those with lowest values correspond to the modes located near the lower band edge. Sequential excitation of Anderson modes by tuned pumping leads to the transition from Anderson attractors to the mode chaos and attractor patterns in the form of delocalized oscillations.
These results pose a broad range of theoretical challenges, as studying Anderson attractors in higher dimensions, which allow for a mobility edge or criticality, in other types of localizing potentials and their counterparts in open quantum systems. It would also be of interest to consider non-uniform dissipation, e.g. absorbing boundaries only. For the experimental perspective, lattices of exciton-polariton condensates and active waveguide arrays are most promising candidates for the realization of Anderson attractors. The recent study of another localizing—quasiperiodically modulated—1D polariton condensate arrays has paved a way41 and the on-chip random lasing in the Anderson regime is, probably, the first already present example32. Other candidates (although on the model level at the moment) are cavity-QED arrays with the cavities filled up with two-level atoms or qubits, where the dynamics the mean-field states in the adjoint cavities can be described by using GLE-type equation56,57 and plasmonic nanostructures58. Finally, Anderson attractor regimes can be generalized to the systems of coupled disordered Josephson junction arrays, marked by the recent rise of interest to dissipative response effects59.
Additional Information
How to cite this article: Laptyeva, T. V. et al. Anderson attractors in active arrays. Sci. Rep. 5, 13263; doi: 10.1038/srep13263 (2015).
References
Evers, F. & Mirlin, A. Anderson transitions. Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 1355 (2008).
Abrahams, E. (ed.) 50 Years of Anderson Localization (World Scientific, 2010).
Segev, M., Silberberg, Y. & Christodoulides, D. Anderson localization of light. Nature Photonics 7, 197–204 (2013).
Hu, H., Strybulevych, A., Page, J. H., Skipetrov, S. E. & Van Tiggelen, B. A. Localization of ultrasound in a three-dimensional elastic network. Nature Physics 4, 945–948 (2008).
Billy, J. et al. Direct observation of Anderson localization of matter waves in a controlled disorder. Nature 453, 891–894 (2008).
Roati, G. et al. Anderson localization of a non-interacting Bose-Einstein condensate. Nature 453, 895–898 (2008).
Kondov, S. S., McGehee, W. R., Zirbel, J. J. & DeMarco, B. Three-dimensional Anderson localization of ultracold matter. Science 334, 66–68 (2011).
Jendrzejewski, F. et al. Three-dimensional localization of ultracold atoms in an optical disordered potential. Nature Physics 8, 398–403 (2012).
Shepelyansky, D. L. Delocalization of quantum chaos by weak nonlinearity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 1787–1790 (1993).
Molina, M. I. Transport of localized and extended excitations in a nonlinear Anderson model. Phys. Rev. B 58, 12547–12550 (1998).
Pikovsky, A. S. & Shepelyansky, D. L. Destruction of Anderson localization by a weak nonlinearity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 094101 (2008).
Fishman, S., Krivolapov, Y. & Soffer, A. On the problem of dynamical localization in the Nonlinear Schrödinger Equation with a random potential. J. Stat. Phys. 131, 843 (2008).
Flach, S., Krimer, D. O. & Skokos, C. Universal spreading of wave packets in disordered nonlinear systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 024101 (2009).
Laptyeva, T. V., Bodyfelt, J. D., Krimer, D. O., Skokos, C. & Flach, S. The crossover from strong to weak chaos for nonlinear waves in disordered systems. Europhys. Lett. 91, 30001 (2010).
Johansson, M., Kopidakis, G. & Aubry, S. Kam tori in 1D random discrete nonlinear Schrödinger model? Europhys. Lett. 91, 50001 (2010).
Basko, D. M. Weak chaos in the disordered nonlinear Schrödinger chain: destruction of Anderson localization by Arnold diffusion. Annals of Physics 326, 1577–1655 (2011).
Michaely, E. & Fishman, S. Effective noise theory for the Nonlinear Schrödinger Equation with disorder. Phys. Rev. E 85, 046218 (2012).
Skokos, C., Gkolias, I. & Flach, S. Nonequilibrium chaos of disordered nonlinear waves. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 064101 (2013).
Sanchez-Palencia, L. & Lewenstein, M. Disordered quantum gases under control. Nature Physics 6, 87–95 (2010).
Deissler, B. et al. Delocalization of a disordered bosonic system by repulsive interactions. Nature Physics 6, 354–358 (2010).
Lucioni, E. et al. Observation of subdiffusion in a disordered interacting system. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 230403 (2011).
Anderson, P. W. Absence of diffusion in certain random lattices. Phys. Rev. 109, 1492–1505 (1958).
Frank, R., Lubatsch, A. & Kroha, J. Theory of strong localization effects of light in disordered loss or gain media. Phys. Rev. B 73, 245107 (2006).
Yamilov, A. et al. Position-dependent diffusion of light in disordered waveguides. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 023904 (2014).
Fyodorov, Y. Induced vs. spontaneous breakdown of s-matrix unitarity: Probability of no return in quantum chaotic and disordered systems. JETP Letters 78, 250–254 (2003).
Nandkishore, R., Gopalakrishnan, S. & Huse, D. Spectral features of a many-body-localized system weakly coupled to a bath. Physical Review B 90, 064203 (2014).
Eichelkraut, T. et al. Mobility transition from ballistic to diffusive transport in non-hermitian lattices. Nat. Commun. 4, 2533 (2013).
Basiri, A., Bromberg, Y., Yamilov, A., Cao, H. & Kottos, T. Light localization induced by a random imaginary refractive index. Phys. Rev. A 90, 043815 (2014).
Kottos, T. & Weiss, M. Current relaxation in nonlinear random media. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 190604 (2004).
Tietsche, S. & Pikovsky, A. Chaotic destruction of Anderson localization in a nonlinear lattice. Europhys. Lett. 84, 10006 (2008).
Lepri, S. & Casati, G. Asymmetric wave propagation in nonlinear systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 164101 (2011).
Liu, J. et al. Random nanolasing in the Anderson localized regime. Nature Nanotechnology 9, 285–289 (2014).
Stano, P. & Jacquod, P. Suppression of interactions in multimode random lasers in the Anderson localized regime. Nature Photonics 7, 66–71 (2013).
Kasprzak, J. et al. Bose-Einstein condensation of exciton polaritons. Nature 443, 409 (2006).
Balili, R., Hartwell, V., Snoke, D., Pfeiffer, L. & West, K. Bose-Einstein condensation of microcavity polaritons in a trap. Science 316, 1007 (2007).
Deng, H., Haug, H. & Yamamoto, Y. Exciton-polariton Bose-Einstein condensation. Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1489–1537 (2010).
Carusotto, I. & Ciuti, C. Quantum fluids of light. Rev. Mod. Phys. 85, 299 (2013).
Byrnes, T., Kim, N. & Yamamoto, Y. Exciton-polariton condensates. Nat. Phys. 10, 803–813 (2014).
Lai, C. W. et al. Coherent zero-state and p-state in an exciton-polariton condensate array. Nature 450, 526 (2007).
Tanese, D. et al. Polariton condensation in solitonic gap states in a one-dimensional periodic potential. Nat. Commun. 4, 1749 (2013).
Tanese, D. et al. Fractal energy spectrum of a polariton gas in a Fibonacci quasiperiodic potential. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 146404 (2014).
Franke-Arnold, S. et al. Optical ferris wheel for ultracold atoms. Opt. Express 15, 8619–8625 (2007).
Dreismann, A. et al. Coupled counterrotating polariton condensates in optically defined annular potentials. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111, 8770–8775 (2014).
Aranson, I. & Kramer, L. The world of the complex Ginzburg-Landau equation. Rev. Mod. Phys. 74, 99–143 (2002).
Keeling, J. & Berloff, N. Spontaneous rotating vortex lattices in a pumped decaying condensate. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 250401 (2008).
Cristofolini, P. et al. Optical superfluid phase transitions and trapping of polariton condensates. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 186403 (2013).
Ostrovskaya, E. A., Abdullaev, J., Fraser, M. D., Desyatnikov, A. S. & Kivshar, Y. S. Self-localization of polariton condensates in periodic potentials. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 170407 (2013).
A. S. Pikovsky, M. R. & Kurths, J. Synchronization: A Universal Concept in Nonlinear Sciences (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2001).
Osipov, G. V. & Sushchik, M. M. Synchronized clusters and multistability in arrays of oscillators with different natural frequencies. Phys. Rev. E 58, 7198–7207 (1998).
Rubchinsky, L. & Sushchik, M. Disorder can eliminate oscillator death. Phys. Rev. E 62, 6440–6446 (2000).
Rubchinsky, L., Sushchik, M. & Osipov, G. Patterns in networks of oscillators formed via synchronization and oscillator death. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation 58, 443–467 (2002).
Akhmediev, N. & Ankiewicz, A. (eds.) Dissipative Solitons: From Optics to Biology and Medicine, vol. 751 of Lecture Notes in Physics (Springer, Berlin, 2008).
Thouless, D. J. Percolation and localization, 1–62. In: Ill-condensed Matter, Eds. R. Balian, R. Maynard & G. Toulouse (North-Holland, 1979).
Krimer, D. O. & Flach, S. Statistics of wave interactions in nonlinear disordered systems. Phys. Rev. E 82, 046221 (2010).
Derrida, B. & Gardner, E. Lyapounov exponent of the one dimensional Anderson model: weak disorder expansions. J. Physique 45, 1283 (1984).
Sedov, E. S. et al. Bright solitons in cavity-QED arrays containing two-level atoms. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 393, 012030 (2012).
Chen, I.-H. et al. Solitons in cavity-QED arrays containing interacting qubits. Phys. Rev. A 86, 023829 (2012).
Shi, X., Chen, X., Malomed, B., Panoiu, N. & Ye, F. Anderson localization at the subwavelength scale for surface plasmon polaritons in disordered arrays of metallic nanowires. Phys. Rev. B 89, 195428 (2014).
Basko, D. M. & Hekking, F. W. J. Disordered josephson junction chains: Anderson localization of normal modes and impedance fluctuations. Phys. Rev. B 88, 094507 (2013).
Acknowledgements
T.L. and M.I. acknowledge support of Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation (Research Assignment No. 1.115.2014/K). A.T. and O.K. acknowledge support of Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation (Agreement No. 02.B.49.21.0003). T.L. also acknowledges support of Dynasty Foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
T.L. and M.I. conceived the study, developed the theory, analyzed the results and wrote the manuscript. A.T. and O.K. conducted the numerical experiments and analyzed the results. All authors reviewed the manuscript.
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Laptyeva, T., Tikhomirov, A., Kanakov, O. et al. Anderson attractors in active arrays. Sci Rep 5, 13263 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep13263
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep13263
This article is cited by
-
Coexistence of dynamical delocalization and spectral localization through stochastic dissipation
Nature Photonics (2021)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.