Inactivation of group II intron RmInt1 in the Sinorhizobium meliloti genome

Dolores Molina-Sánchez, María; Toro, Nicolás

doi:10.1038/srep12036

Download PDF

Article
Open access
Published: 09 July 2015

Inactivation of group II intron RmInt1 in the Sinorhizobium meliloti genome

María Dolores Molina-Sánchez¹ &
Nicolás Toro¹

Scientific Reports volume 5, Article number: 12036 (2015) Cite this article

964 Accesses
2 Citations
Metrics details

Subjects

Abstract

Group II introns are self-splicing catalytic RNAs that probably originated in bacteria and act as mobile retroelements. The dispersal and dynamics of group II intron spread within a bacterial genome are thought to follow a selection-driven extinction model. Likewise, various studies on the evolution of group II introns have suggested that they are evolving toward an inactive form by fragmentation, with the loss of the intron 3′-terminus, but with some intron fragments remaining and continuing to evolve in the genome. RmInt1 is a mobile group II intron that is widespread in natural populations of Sinorhizobium meliloti, but some strains of this species have no RmInt1 introns. We studied the splicing ability and mobility of the three full-length RmInt1 copies harbored by S. meliloti 1021 and obtained evidence suggesting that specific mutations may lead to the impairment of intron splicing and retrohoming. Our data suggest that the RmInt1 copies in this strain are undergoing a process of inactivation.

DNA glycosylases provide antiviral defence in prokaryotes

Article Open access 17 April 2024

Improving prime editing with an endogenous small RNA-binding protein

Article Open access 03 April 2024

Genome engineering with Cas9 and AAV repair templates generates frequent concatemeric insertions of viral vectors

Article 08 April 2024

Introduction

Sinorhizobium meliloti is a nitrogen-fixing bacterium that establishes a symbiotic interaction with legumes of the genera Medicago, Melilotus and Truncatula. The S. meliloti genome carries many different mobile genetic elements, including group II introns, which are self-splicing catalytic RNA and mobile retroelements^1,2. RmInt1 is a mobile group II intron that is widespread in natural populations of S. meliloti³ and was first described in the GR4 strain⁴. The complete genome sequence of this strain has recently been reported⁵. It contains 10 copies of RmInt1 distributed between the different replicons harbored by this strain, including the chromosome. The number of RmInt1 copies has been shown to differ between S. meliloti strains for which complete genome sequences are available, but it has been estimated that 90% of S. meliloti isolates harbor this intron and that strains lacking RmInt1, such as RMO17, remain suitable for intron colonization^6,7.

Group II introns consist of a structured RNA that folds into a conserved three-dimensional structure organized into six double-helical domains, DI to DVI⁸. Bacterial group II introns generally have an open reading frame (ORF) encoding an intron-encoded protein (IEP) in DIV that acts as a reverse transcriptase, followed by an RNA-binding domain with RNA splicing or maturase activity, and, in some intron lineages, a C-terminal DNA-binding and endonuclease domain^9,10,11. The mobility of group II introns, a process known as retrohoming^1,2,12, is based on the formation of a ribonucleoprotein (RNP) complex consisting of the intron-encoded protein (IEP) and the spliced intron lariat RNA, which remains associated with the IEP. The RNP recognizes its intron target via both the IEP and the intron lariat RNA. The exon binding sites (EBS) of the lariat RNA base pair with the intron insertion site of the complementary region of the DNA target, the intron-binding site (IBS) and the target flanking regions are recognized by the IEP. These retroelements are highly specific, recognizing a target of ∼25–30 nts in length, but they are nevertheless able to invade locations other than the usual homing site (ectopic transposition), albeit at low frequency.

The natural target site of RmInt1 lies within the IS630 family insertion sequence ISRm2011-2 (ISRm11)¹³ and in other closely related IS elements^14,15,16. RmInt1 can also invade the oxi1 gene^3,14, which carries IBS sequences resembling those present in ISRm2011-2. Unlike RmInt1, this IS has been found in all the S. meliloti strains and isolates tested.

It has been suggested that, like other mobile elements, group II introns will follow a colonization/extinction model, with the elimination of highly colonized genomes from the population by purifying selection¹⁷. However, group II introns may also follow a model of inactivation within the bacterial genome, decreasing the selective pressure on the population. Various studies of the evolution of group II introns in the bacterial genome have suggested a process of evolution toward an inactive form by fragmentation, with the loss of the intron 3′-terminus^18,19. We have also reported that the gradual elimination of group II introns by the host during evolution would be unlikely to result in the complete eradication of intron sequences in all cases, with some intron fragments instead remaining and continuing to evolve within the genome²⁰.

We report here the splicing and retrohoming abilities of the three full-length RmInt1 copies of S. meliloti 1021, which display minor sequence divergences, but carry common and specific point mutations affecting both the intron ribozyme RNA and the IEP. We identified unanticipated specific mutations leading to the inactivation of intron splicing and retrohoming. Our results suggest that the RmInt1 copies of strain 1021 are undergoing a process of intron inactivation.

Results

The splicing ability of the RmInt1 copies of S. meliloti 1021

As previously reported, the S. meliloti 1021 genome contains five full-length (2 in pSymA and 3 in pSymB) and one fragmented group II intron (in pSymB)¹⁵. Three of these full-length introns are copies of RmInt1 (hereafter referred as to S. meliloti GR4 RmInt1 sequence deposited in GenBank accession n° Y11597), diverging only slightly in sequence (99% identical): SMa1801, SMb21708 and SMb21699 (hereafter referred as to S.me_1021_pA_1, S.me_1021_pB_1 and S.me_1021_pB_2, respectively; see table 1). The sequence differences between these introns concern several domains in the ribozyme (DI, DII and DV) and mostly correspond to silent mutations in the intron-encoded protein sequence (DIV, Fig. 1). The three RmInt1 variants of strain 1021 display a U-to C-transition at position 389, which is located in the major loop region of DII. They also carry two silent mutations (F63 and A124) and a conservative missense mutation (R246K) in the ORF. S.me_1021_pA_1 and S.me_1021_pB_2 have two additional coding sequence mutations: a silent mutation affecting domain 3 of the reverse transcriptase (L146) and another preceding the maturase domain (R301W). Furthermore, S.me_1021_pA_1 displays a C-to-U nucleotide exchange at position 232, with no apparent effect on secondary structure because base-pairing to the G residue in position 323 is conserved. Similarly, a C1832-G1819 base pair has been replaced by a U◦G pair, just before the unpaired region of DV in the S.me_1021_pB_1 ribozyme.

Table 1 Full-length RmInt1-like group II introns in different S.meliloti strains.

Full size table

We previously showed that RmInt1 expressed from a plasmid was splicing-competent in the genetic background of S. meliloti 1021¹⁵. However, intron excision rates were significantly lower than the splicing rate observed in S. meliloti RMO17. We investigated whether any of the three copies of RmInt1 from S. meliloti 1021 were active introns, by analyzing their ability to excise in the S. meliloti RmInt1-less strain RMO17. We performed primer extension analysis on RNA isolated from RMO17 harboring the corresponding pICG intron-donor plasmids. Reverse transcription was achieved with a primer complementary to positions 80-97 in RmInt1 DI (Fig. 2A). RmInt1 and its splicing-deficient derivative RmInt1-DV, which contains a mutation of the catalytic triad in DV, were used as the references for splicing rate (Fig. 2B, lanes 4 and 5). The introns originally located in pSymB (S.me_1021_pB_1 and S.me_1021_pB_2) had slightly lower excision rates than RmInt1 (Fig. 2B, lanes 2 and 3). However, the third copy found in S. meliloti 1021 pSymA (S.me_1021_pA_1) displayed almost no splicing (Fig. 2B, lane 1). These results are consistent with a core contribution of the C232-G323 base pair preceding the EBS2 loop to RmInt1 maturation, all the other point mutations being tolerated and having only minor effects on intron excision.

The mobility of the RmInt1 copies of S. meliloti 1021 is impaired

By contrast to our findings for splicing, there was strong evidence to suggest that intron mobility was impaired in S. meliloti 1021, with mobility rates much lower than those for strain GR4, which has 10 RmInt1 copies distributed between its five replicons, or the intron-less strain RMO17^15,21. It has been suggested that the final steps in RmInt1 retrohoming are impaired in S. meliloti 1021, potentially affecting functions essential for the completion of the process²¹. We increased the sensitivity of analyses of invasion rates for S. meliloti 1021 RmInt1 variants, by using a two-plasmid system in S. meliloti RMO17 (Fig. 2C). The donor constructs express the intron under the control of the constitutive promoter Syn²², whereas the target site was present in pBB0.6²³. The reference value for homing rate was provided by RmInt1 (Fig. 2D, lane 7). A homing product (H) was detected only in the plasmid samples extracted from S. meliloti RMO17 harboring pICG_S.me_1021_pB_2 (Fig. 2D, lane 5). No homing products were observed for the remaining introns (lanes 1 and 3). Moreover, the retrohoming efficiency of S.me_1021_pB_2 was slightly lower than that of RmInt1, possibly due to the lower splicing activity of this intron copy. Remarkably, the mobility of S.me_1021_pB_1, which was excised at a similar rate to S.me_1021_pB_2, was completely inhibited. The point mutation at position C1832 therefore seems to abolish the reverse splicing ability of the intron, but not its forward splicing.

Point mutations inactivate RmInt1 in S. meliloti 1021

As the RmInt1 intron copies in strain 1021 have accumulated additional mutations, we introduced point mutations at positions C232 and C1832 into the reference RmInt1 from strain GR4, to determine whether these changes were responsible for the impairments of splicing and intron retrohoming, respectively, in this strain (Fig. 3). The replacement of C232 with a U residue greatly decreased splicing efficiency, as assessed by primer extension (Fig. 3A, lane 1). This defect may be directly related to the abolition of retrohoming in this mutant (Fig. 3B, lane 1). By contrast, the C1832 to U transition mutation decreased the rate of RmInt1 splicing by 33% (Fig. 3A, lane 2). We were unable to detect any homing events for this mutant (Fig. 3B, lane 2). Thus, point mutations at both positions gave results consistent with previous findings, indicating that the observed effects were due to the specific intron mutations studied. These results suggest that the RmInt1 copies in S. meliloti 1021 are probably undergoing an inactivation process.

RmInt1 sequence variation between S. meliloti strains

We investigated whether the full-length RmInt1 sequences harbored by the various strains of S. meliloti had any mutations in common (Table 1), by aligning nucleotide sequences with identities of 99 to 100% (Supplementary Fig. 1).

The three intron copies in S. meliloti strains 1021 and 2011 were identical, displaying the nucleotide changes described above (Fig. 1). Seven of the 10 RmInt1 copies in S. meliloti GR4 were identical, including that used as the reference sequence (Y11597). Thus, only three introns presented two types of variation (all affecting the ribozyme DII) with respect to the reference RmInt1 sequence: all three (S.me_GR4_pC_3, S.me_GR4_pC_1 and S.me_GR4_pC_4) had a T residue in the C407 position, corresponding to the main loop of DII and S.me_GR4_pC_1 and S.me_GR4_pC_4 had an additional mutation converting the T384 residue into an A residue, thereby disrupting the Watson-Crick U-A pairing at the upper site of the proximal stem of DII. The five RmInt1 copies annotated in S. meliloti BL225C were identical and displayed a single T-to-A transversion in position 384. Similarly, the T-to-C transition at position 735, in DIV, was common to three copies in strain 1021 and the five copies present in SM11, which also displayed four additional changes: residue C492T (DIII), G897A, T918C and G1283A, these last three changes affecting DIV. The T918C and G1283A point mutations were also found in the three RmInt1 copies of strain 1021. The only copy found in S. meliloti Rm41 was identical to RmInt1, whereas the copy located in pSymB in S. meliloti 102F51 presented two nucleotide exchanges (C638G and C1673G in DIV). Our results indicate that there are strain-specific and common mutations in the RmInt1 copies harbored by different S. meliloti strains and that some of these mutations may lead to intron inactivation.

Discussion

We studied the splicing and retrohoming capabilities of the three full-length RmInt1 intron copies harbored by S. meliloti strain 1021 and showed that this strain is undergoing a process of inactivation. We identified specific nucleotide exchanges that have limited intron functionality. The replacement of the C residue in position 1832 in DV with a U residue had only a slight effect on intron excision, but abolished mobility. By contrast, replacement of the C residue in position 232 in DI with a U residue resulted in the severe impairment of both forward and reverse splicing. A comparison of the sequences of the full-length RmInt1 copies present in S. meliloti strains revealed that some carried strain-specific and common mutations potentially driving intron inactivation.

Group II introns are currently seen as selfish genetic elements that have survived in bacteria due to their preferential retrotransposition to sites outside of functional genes, generally within intergenic regions or other mobile genetic elements. Group II introns are thought to follow a colonization/extinction cycle similar to that described for other mobile genetic elements¹⁷. This hypothesis appears to be applicable to the introns of S. meliloti, in which the RmInt1 intron has spread very successfully, due to the high abundance of its usual target site, the ISRm2011-2 insertion sequence. However, RmInt1 is absent from 10% of S. meliloti strains and isolates and S. meliloti RMO17 is the best characterized intron-less strain^6,7. Despite lacking RmInt1, RMO17 harbors other types of intron (Toro, unpublished) and displays no restriction to the functionality and colonization of its genome by acquired mobile RmInt1⁶. By contrast, other S. meliloti strains, such as GR4 harbor many RmInt1 copies, at least some of which are highly mobile⁴. Interestingly, we also found other strains with smaller numbers of intron copies, such as S. meliloti 1021, in which the spread of the intron throughout the genome appears to have been restricted by point mutations affecting mobility and excision activities.

The catalysis of group II introns clearly requires functional ribozyme domains I and V²⁴. Domain V, which contains the catalytic triad AGC and the Mg²⁺ coordination bulged nucleotides, is the most conserved element of group II introns²⁵. The unpaired region of domain V in RmInt1 is flanked by a U◦G pair at the proximal stem and a G-C base pair at the distal stem of the hairpin, resulting in a secondary structure resembling that generally suggested for group II introns²⁶. This G-C base pair and the paired residues immediately preceding it are part of the λ-λ’ long-range interaction (Fig. 1), which links the upper stem of domain V to a looped region in domain I and the 5′ splice site (G5) in the ai5γ intron²⁷. Recent crystallographic studies of the Oceanobacillus iheyensis group IIC intron revealed that the nucleotide preceding the bulged residues of domain V forms part of the z-anchor structure responsible for maintaining catalytic core integrity and is also involved in metal coordination^28,29,30. Consequently, any change to residue C1832 could result in distortions to the structure of domain V that might block the activities of RmInt1. Intriguingly, reverse splicing is completely abolished, but the excision capacity of the intron is conserved. We conclude from this that this residue must be critical for positioning the 5′ end of the intron in the catalytic core, to attack either the 3′ splice site for excision or the exon junction in the target during retrohoming. It therefore appears likely that we observed an impairment of the second step of splicing that could not be distinguished on primer extension experiments, but that is directly related to homing inhibition, given the decrease in the efficiency of the first step of reverse splicing.

The defect in splicing and intron mobility observed in the C232U mutant was particularly striking. A G-C base pair is conserved at the same site in the organellar intron ai5γ, despite the presence of different flanking residues in the stem²⁷. By contrast, the ID(iv) stem is identical to that described for the P.li.LSUI2 intron³¹. However, no particular function has ever been attributed to the penultimate base pair preceding the EBS2 loop. The weaker interactions around this region suggest possible destabilization of the local structure, potentially leading to misrecognition of the EBS2 sequence. A previous study showed that the EBS2-IBS2 interaction was not absolutely required for RmInt1 intron excision, whereas intron retrohoming involved not only this pairing, but also the EBS1-IBS1 and EBS3-IBS3 interactions^32,33. There is, therefore, no obvious explanation for the strong decrease in excision efficiency observed in this mutant. Further investigations are required to elucidate the key role of this residue in intron activities.

Strains GR4, 1021 and RMO17 may be at different stages of the intron colonization/inactivation/extinction cycle. RMO17 appears to be at “time zero” ready for colonization, whereas GR4 seems to be close to the end of the process of colonization of available target sites by introns and the start of intron inactivation and 1021 seems to be at the inactivation step.

Methods

Bacterial strains and growth conditions

The splicing and homing assays were carried out in S. meliloti RMO17 derivatives harboring the corresponding plasmids and genomic DNA from S. meliloti 1021 was used for the amplification of intron copies. Escherichia coli DH5α was used for plasmid construction. S. meliloti strains were cultured at 28 °C on TY medium³⁴, whereas E. coli was grown on LB medium at 37 °C. When required, growth media were supplemented with selective concentrations of different antibiotics: tetracycline at a concentration of 10 μg·ml⁻¹; and kanamycin at 200 μg.ml⁻¹ for rhizobia and 50 μg.ml⁻¹ for E. coli.

Plasmid constructs

pICG plasmids are derivatives of pMP220, to which the constitutive Syn promoter has been added upstream from the lacZ gene and have been described elsewhere as intron donor constructs²². We cloned the RmInt1-like intron sequences found in S. meliloti 1021 by successive PCRs with total DNA from S. meliloti 1021 as a template. As there is only one copy of ISRm10-1 in the whole S. meliloti 1021 genome, S.me_1021_pB_1 was amplified directly with the LMS7 (5′-GGGAGCTCCTAGGGCCGGGGTGAGTAGGCCG-3′) and LMS8 (5′-GGGAGCTCACGTGGCTGATCTTCATCGATGAAA-3′) primers, which include BlnI and BbrPI restriction endonuclease sites, respectively. Likewise, the two introns inserted into ISRm2011-2 were amplified from the flanking regions with the oligonucleotide primers LMS1 (5′-ATCACACTGCTGCATCTCAGTCGTC-3′) and LMS2 (5′-CTGCAGCTCTTGTGAGTACGCAGGC-3′) for S.me_1021_pA_1 and LMS5 (5′-GAGCCCGTGATTTGCCTCTCATCC-3′) and LMS6 (5′-CTCTTCCTTAGATCGGGGCAGGAGC-3′) for S.me_1021_pB_2. The flanking exons were shortened further by PCR with the primers BlnSac (5′-GGGAGCTCCTAGGCCAGGGGTGAGTAGGCCGG-3′) and SacBbr (5′-GGGAGCTCACGTGCCTCGTTTTCATCGATGAGA-3′). The final products were inserted into pICG2 as AvrII/PmlI fragments and their integrity was confirmed by sequencing. For homing assays, the pBB0.6 recipient plasmid is a derivative of pBBR322 carrying a DNA fragment derived from ISRm2011-2 spanning the intron homing site from −175 to the +466 position and its target-deleted (deletion spanning from −125 to the +4 position of the homing site) derivative pBBΔ129 was used as a negative control²³.

Isolation of S. meliloti genomic DNA

DNA was extracted with the RealPure genomic DNA extraction kit (Durviz, S.L.U., Valencia, Spain), according to a modified version of the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, 6 ml of a saturated bacterial culture was centrifuged at 10,000 x g and the pellet was washed with 0.1% L-laurylsarcosine in TE buffer pH 8. Cells were lysed by incubation for 5 minutes at 80 °C and the resulting lysate was treated with “RNAse solution” at 37 °C for 60 minutes. The proteins were removed by adding a high-concentration salt solution and the DNA was precipitated with cold 2-propanol. The dried DNA pellet was resuspended in a final volume of 100 μl of MilliQ water. Purified DNA was quantified spectrophotometrically (Nanodrop, PeqLab, Erlangen, Germany). Highly pure genomic DNA (A₂₆₀/A₂₈₀ ratio of 1.8–2.0) was obtained at a final concentration of about 1.5 μg/μl.

Total RNA extraction from S. meliloti

Total RNA was isolated from cultures of free-living S. meliloti RMO17 containing plasmids that express reference or mutant RmInt1, as previously described³⁵. Briefly, exponentially growing bacterial culture (6 OD₆₀₀ units) was harvested and washed with 0.1% L-laurylsarcosine in TE buffer pH 8. Bacterial lysis were carried out by adding 600 μl of lysis buffer (1.4% SDS, 4 mM EDTA pH8, 0.4 mg/ml proteinase K) and samples were incubated at 65 °C for 10 minutes. 300 μl of NaCl 5 M were then added to the lysed cells and incubated 10 minutes on ice. The lysates were cleared by centrifugation at 10,000 xg and 4 °C. The supernatants were treated with cold ethanol 100% to precipitate the nucleic acids. After sedimentation by centrifugation, samples were digested with 50 units of DNAse I (Roche) to remove all the DNA traces. Samples were further cleaned by phenol extraction and precipitated with cold ethanol. Finally, RNA preparations were resuspended in 20 μl of RNAse-free water. RNA concentration was determined on a Nanodrop spectrophotometer, RNA quality was checked by gel electrophoresis and RNA purity was evaluated by PCR.

Primer extension

Primer extension reactions were carried out with oligonucleotide P, as previously described³⁶. Samples were resolved by electrophoresis in a denaturing 6% polyacrylamide gel. cDNA bands corresponding to the resolved extension products, spliced intron RNA (L) and unspliced precursors (Pr) were quantified with the Quantity One software package (Bio-RAD Laboratories) and intron splicing was measured as 100 [L/(L+Pr)]. Splicing efficiency was plotted as percentage of wild-type values (reference RmInt1).

Homing assays

RmInt1 mobility in S. meliloti RMO17 was assessed by Southern hybridization, with a two-plasmid system²³. Plasmids were mobilized from E. coli DH5α into S. meliloti by tri-parental mating³⁷. We used pICG27²² and derivatives containing the full-length intron flanked by −20/+5 exons as donor plasmids. The recipient plasmid was pBB0.6, a pBBR1MCS2 derivative carrying a 640 bp fragment of ISRm2011-2 including the intron insertion site²³. As a negative control, S. meliloti RMO17 was cotransformed with pICG derivatives and pBBΔ129, which lacks the RmInt1 target site. The isolated plasmid pool obtained by standard alkaline lysis procedure was analyzed by XbaI restriction, agarose gel electrophoresis and blotting onto nylon membranes. Further hybridization with ISRm2011-2 (spanning positions 562–1025) and RmInt1 (spanning positions 147–594) DIG-labeled probes generated by PCR was carried out and mobility events were identified on the basis of differences in plasmid migration. Hybridizing bands corresponding to homing products (H) and recipient plasmid (R) were analyzed with Quantity One software (Bio-Rad Laboratories) and invasion efficiency of each target site calculated as 100[H/(H+R)]. Homing efficiency was plotted as percentage of wild-type values (reference RmInt1).

Sequence alignment

Full-length RmInt1 sequences found in different S. meliloti strains (Table 1) were aligned, using the MUSCLE algorithm in Geneious R7.1.7.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Molina-Sánchez, M.D and Toro, N. Inactivation of group II intron RmInt1 in the Sinorhizobium meliloti genome. Sci. Rep. 5, 12036; doi: 10.1038/srep12036 (2015).

References

Toro, N., Jiménez-Zurdo, J. I. & García-Rodríguez, F. M. Bacterial group II introns: not just splicing. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 31, 342–358 (2007).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Lambowitz, A. M. & Zimmerly, S. Group II introns: mobile ribozymes that invade DNA. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol . 3, 10.1101/cshperspect.a003616 (2011).
Muñoz, E., Villadas, P. J. & Toro, N. Ectopic transposition of a group II intron in natural bacterial populations. Mol. Microbiol. 41, 645–652 (2001).
Article Google Scholar
Martínez-Abarca, F., Zekri, S. & Toro, N. Characterization and splicing in vivo of a Sinorhizobium meliloti group II intron associated with particular insertion sequences of the IS630-Tc1/IS3 retroposon superfamily. Mol. Microbiol. 28, 1295–1306 (1998).
Article Google Scholar
Martínez-Abarca, F., Martínez-Rodríguez, L., López-Contreras, J. A., Jiménez-Zurdo, J. I. & Toro, N. Complete genome sequence of the alfalfa symbiont Sinorhizobium/Ensifer meliloti strain GR4. Genome announc . 1, 10.1128/genomeA.00174-12 (2013).
Nisa-Martínez, R., Jiménez-Zurdo, J. I., Martínez-Abarca, F., Muñoz-Adelantado, E. & Toro, N. Dispersion of the RmInt1 group II intron in the Sinorhizobium meliloti genome upon acquisition by conjugative transfer. Nucleic Acids Res. 35, 214–222 (2007).
Article Google Scholar
Toro, N., Martínez-Abarca, F. & Nisa-Martínez, R. Complete genome sequence of the RmInt1 group II intronless Sinorhizobium meliloti strain RMO17. Genome Announc . 2, 10.1128/genomeA.01001-14 (2014).
Michel, F., Costa, M. & Westhof, E. The ribozyme core of group II introns: a structure in want of partners. Trends Biochem. Sci. 34, 189–199 (2009).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Mohr, G., Perlman, P. S. & Lambowitz, A. M. Evolutionary relationships among group II intron-encoded proteins and identification of a conserved domain that may be related to maturase function. Nucleic Acids Res. 21, 4991–4997 (1993).
Article CAS Google Scholar
San Filippo, J. & Lambowitz, A. M. Characterization of the C-terminal DNA-binding/DNA endonuclease region of a group II intron-encoded protein. J. Mol. Biol. 324, 933–951 (2002).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Toro, N. & Martínez-Abarca, F. Comprehensive phylogenetic analysis of bacterial group II intron-encoded ORFs lacking the DNA endonuclease domain reveals new varieties. PLoS One. 8, e55102 (2013).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
Lambowitz, A. M. & Zimmerly, S. Mobile group II introns. Annu. Rev. Genet. 38, 1–35 (2004).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Selbitschka, W. et al. The insertion sequence element ISRm2011-2 belongs to the IS630-Tc1 family of transposable elements and is abundant in Rhizobium meliloti. Gene. 163, 59–64 (1995).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Martínez-Abarca, F. & Toro, N. RecA-independent ectopic transposition in vivo of a bacterial group II intron. Nucleic Acids Res. 28, 4397–4402 (2000).
Article Google Scholar
Toro, N., Martínez-Abarca, F., Fernández-López, M. & Muñoz-Adelantado, E. Diversity of group II introns in the genome of Sinorhizobium meliloti strain 1021: splicing and mobility of RmInt1. Mol. Gen. Genomics . 268, 628–636 (2003).
CAS Google Scholar
Biondi, E. G., Toro, N., Bazzicalupo, M. & Martínez-Abarca, F. Spread of the group II intron RmInt1 and its insertion sequence target sites in the plant endosymbiont Sinorhizobium meliloti. Mob. Gen. Elem . 1, 2–7 (2011).
Article Google Scholar
Leclercq, S. & Cordaux, R. Selection-driven extinction dynamics for group II introns in Enterobacteriales. PLoS One, 7, e52268 (2012).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
Dai, L. & Zimmerly, S. Compilation and analysis of group II intron insertions in bacterial genomes: evidence for retroelement behavior. Nucleic Acids Res. 30, 1091–1102 (2002).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Fernández-López, M., Muñoz-Adelantado, E., Gillis, M., Willems, A. & Toro, N. Dispersal and evolution of the Sinorhizobium meliloti Group II RmInt1 intron in bacteria that interact with plants. Mol. Biol. Evol. 22, 1518–1528 (2005).
Article Google Scholar
Toro, N., Martínez-Rodríguez, L. & Martínez-Abarca, F. Insights into the history of a bacterial group II intron remnant from the genomes of the nitrogen-fixing symbionts Sinorhizobium meliloti and Sinorhizobium medicae. Heredity. 113, 306–315; 10.1038/hdy.2014.32 (2014).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Martínez-Abarca, F., Barrientos-Durán, A., Fernández-López, M. & Toro, N. The RmInt1 group II intron has two different retrohoming pathways for mobility using predominantly the nascent lagging strand at DNA replication forks for priming. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, 2880–2888 (2004).
Article Google Scholar
Chillón, I., Martínez-Abarca, F. & Toro, N. Splicing of the Sinorhizobium meliloti RmInt1 group II intron provides evidence of retroelement behavior. Nucleic Acids Res. 39, 1095–1104 (2011).
Article Google Scholar
Martínez-Abarca, F., García-Rodríguez, F. & Toro, N. Homing of a bacterial group II intron with an intron-encoded protein lacking a recognizable endonuclease domain. Mol. Microbiol. 35, 1405–1412 (2000).
Article Google Scholar
Qin, P. Z. & Pyle, A. M. The architectural organization and mechanistic function of group II intron structural elements. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 8, 301–308 (1998).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Sigel, R. K. et al. Solution structure of domain 5 of a group II intron ribozyme reveals a new RNA motif. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 11, 187–192 (2004).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Costa, M., Christian, E. L. & Michel, F. Differential chemical probing of a group II self-splicing intron identifies bases involved in tertiary interactions and supports an alternative secondary structure model of domain V. RNA . 4, 1055–1068 (1998).
Article CAS Google Scholar
de Lencastre, A., Hamill, S. & Pyle, A. M. A single active-site region for a group II intron. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 12, 626–627 (2005).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Toor, N., Keating, K. S., Taylor, S. D. & Pyle, A. M. Crystal structure of a self-spliced group II intron. Science. 320, 77–82 (2008).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
Marcia, M. & Pyle, A. M. Visualizing group II intron catalysis through the stages of splicing. Cell. 151, 497–507 (2012).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Truong, D. M., Sidote, D. J., Russell, R. & Lambowitz A. M. Enhanced group II intron retrohoming in magnesium-deficient Escherichia coli via selection of mutations in the ribozyme core. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 10.1073/pnas.1315742110 (2013).
Robart, A. R., Chan, R. T., Peters, J. K., Rajashankar, K. R. & Toor, N. Crystal structure of a eukaryotic group II intron lariat. Nature . 514, 193–197; 10.1038/nature13790 (2014).
Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Jiménez-Zurdo, J. I., García-Rodríguez, F. M., Barrientos-Durán, A. & Toro, N. DNA target site requirements for homing in vivo of a bacterial group II intron encoding a protein lacking the DNA endonuclease domain. J. Mol. Biol. 326, 413–423 (2003).
Article Google Scholar
Barrientos-Durán, A., Chillón, I., Martínez-Abarca, F. & Toro, N. Exon sequence requirements for excision in vivo of the bacterial group II intron RmInt1. BMC Mol. Biol. 12, 24; 10.1186/1471-2199-12-24 (2011).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Beringer, J. E. R factor transfer in Rhizobium leguminosarum. J. Gen. Microb . 84, 188–198 (1974).
CAS Google Scholar
Molina-Sánchez, M. D., Martínez-Abarca, F. & Toro, N. Excision of the Sinorhizobium meliloti group II intron RmInt1 as circles in vivo. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 28737–28744 (2006).
Article Google Scholar
Molina-Sánchez, M. D., Martínez-Abarca, F. & Toro, N. Structural features in the C-terminal region of the Sinorhizobium meliloti RmInt1 group II intron-encoded protein contribute to its maturase and intron DNA insertion function. FEBS J. 277, 244–254 (2010).
Article Google Scholar
Ditta G., Stanfield, S., Corbin, D. & Helinski, D. R. Broad host range DNA cloning system fro Gram-negative bacteria. Construction of a gene bank of Rhizobium meliloti. Proc. Natl. Acad. USA 77, 7347–7351 (1980).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
Barnett, M. J. et al. Nucleotide sequence and predicted functions of the entire Sinorhizobium meliloti pSymA megaplasmid. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 9883–9888 (2001).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
Finan, T. M. et al. The complete sequence of the 1,683-kb pSymB megaplasmid from the N2-fixing endosymbiont Sinorhizobium meliloti. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 9889–9894 (2001).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
Sallet, E. et al. Next-generation annotation of prokaryotic genomes with EuGene-P: application to Sinorhizobium meliloti 2011. DNA Res . 20, 339–354; 10.1093/dnares/dst014 (2013).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Schneiker-Bekel, S. et al. The complete genome sequence of the dominant Sinorhizobium meliloti field isolate SM11 extends the S. meliloti pan-genome. J. Biotech. 155, 20–33 (2011).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Galardini, M. et al. Exploring the symbiotic pangenome of the nitrogen-fixing bacterium Sinorhizobium meliloti. BMC Genomics. 12, 235; 10.1186/1471-2164-12-235 (2011).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Weidner, S. et al. Genome sequence of Sinorhizobium meliloti Rm41. Genome Announc . 1, 10.1128/genomeA.00013-12 (2013).
Guo, X. et al. DNA diversification in two Sinorhizobium species. J. Bacteriol. 189, 6474–6476 (2007).
Article CAS Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Ascensión Martos and Jose Maria del Arco for technical assistance. This work was supported by research grants CSD 2009-0006 from the Consolider-Ingenio program, BIO2011-24401 and BIO2014-51953-P from the Spanish Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad all including ERDF (European Regional Development Funds).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Grupo de Ecología Genética, Estación Experimental del Zaidín, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Calle Profesor Albareda 1, Granada, 18008, Spain
María Dolores Molina-Sánchez & Nicolás Toro

Authors

María Dolores Molina-Sánchez
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Nicolás Toro
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

M.D.M.S. carried out the experiments. M.D.M.S. and N.T. designed study. Both authors wrote, read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Electronic supplementary material

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dolores Molina-Sánchez, M., Toro, N. Inactivation of group II intron RmInt1 in the Sinorhizobium meliloti genome. Sci Rep 5, 12036 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep12036

Download citation

Received: 30 November 2014
Accepted: 15 June 2015
Published: 09 July 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep12036

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.