Article | Open

Magnetic properties in α-MnO2 doped with alkaline elements

Published online:


α-MnO2 nanotubes were fabricated using a hydrothermal technique. Li, Na and K ions were introduced into MnO2 nanotubes to tailor their magnetic properties. It was found that with a doping concentration lower than 12 at%, the nanotubes showed ferromagnetic-like ordering at low temperature (<50 K), while antiferromagnetic coupling dominated their physical behavior with doping concentrations beyond 12 at%. Such experimental phenomenon was in very good agreement with associated first principle calculations. The ferromagnetic-like ordering originates from the breaking of equivalence between two different Mn-O octahedrals in α-MnO2 due to the filling of alkaline ions in the tunnels. Both small charge transfer and lattice distortion play important roles in the ferromagnetic ordering.


Manganese dioxide, MnO2, has been widely used as catalysts, cathodes of lithium batteries and sieves in industry due to its unique physical and chemical properties, as well as its relative abundance in nature1,2,3,4,5,6. As the precursor material for the lithium battery, an important feature of MnO2 is the presence of mesoporous channels formed by the stacking of MnO6 octahedrons, which can host K, Na, or Li ions. The framework of these mesopore channels, called octahedral molecular sieve structures, can form infinite alternating 1 × 1 and 2 × 2 tunnels. β-MnO2 has 1 × 1 tunnels, whilst α-MnO2 has 2 × 2 tunnels by sharing the edges and corners of the MnO6 octahedrons7,8. Detailed studies have shown that many elements can be doped into the structures due to the relatively large voids of these tunnels, such as cations of alkaline, alkaline earth elements, as well as heavy metals9,10,11.

The properties of α-MnO2 can be tuned for practical applications through careful selection of doping elements. It is well known that the Li ion has a small atomic radius (0.076 nm), in comparison with the size of the tunnels (0.48 nm). As such, a cluster of Li ions can be housed in the tunnels and can migrate freely in these tunnels under electrochemical stimulus. Such physical behaviour is promising for many applications such as supercapacitors and batteries2,12,13,14,15,16,17.

The ground state of α-MnO2 is antiferromagnetic due to the symmetric nature of Mn-O-Mn bonds. However, α-MnO2 nanorods prepared through a hydrothermal method using KMnO4 as the precursor have been discovered to show ferromagnetic-like behaviour at very low temperatures (i.e. 5 K)18,19,20,21,22. Furthermore, the saturation magnetization or coercivity can be tuned by varying the doping concentrations of K ions. It has been experimentally shown that a lower concentration of K ions could induce stronger such ferromagnetism. When the doping concentration of K+ is greater than 15 at%, the ferromagnetic-like behaviour disappears due to the appearance of antiferromagnetism. The mechanism of this phenomenon still remains unclear. The geometrical frustration on the triangular lattices and the mixture of Mn3+ and Mn4+ ions have been considered to be attributed to the ferromagnetic-like properties19. However, there is no clear experimental evidence to support this hypothetical suggestion. Density function theory (DFT) calculations on K-doped MnO2 have shown that Mn3+ is formed due to the electron transfer for the K+ doping, which results in the overlap of the Fermi level with the conduction band, leading to metallic behaviour23. However, Mn3+ has never been observed and the magnetic properties of K-MnO2 by DFT calculation have never been reported. Since the tunnel is as large as 0.48 nm in diameter, the doping from K+ may not change the geometry significantly at low doping concentrations. Furthermore, antiferromagnetism appears in these samples when the doping concentration of K+ is higher than 15 at%. This suggests that the lattice distortion alone may not be the origin of ferromagnetic-like properties18. So far, there are many contradictions in the proposed mechanisms and observed phenomena. Therefore, a more detailed investigation is needed to identify unambiguously the mechanism generating such ferromagnetic-like behaviour in this material.

In this work, we studied the ferromagnetic behaviour in K-doped MnO2 nanotubes. X-ray absorption near edge spectroscopy (XANES) indicates that Mn is very close to 4+ valency rather than 3+, suggesting very weak charge transfer and this weak charge transfer alone may not be the origin of ferromagnetic-like behaviour. Detailed investigations reveal that neighbouring tunnels which may be filled and unfilled lead to differences in the magnetic moment of Mn atoms in the apex site and plane site, thus breaking the balance of Mn-O-Mn bonds. This results in the ferromagnetic-like ordering. Furthermore, we can also fill Li or Na ions into these tunnels by exchanging Li/Na ions with K+ and this leads to filling behaviour and induced ferromagnetic properties that are similar to that observed by K+ doping. α-MnO2 is one of the most promising anode materials for lithium batteries. However, the existence of K+ during fabrication has impeded charging/discharging of these batteries. This work has shown that Li or Na ions can totally replace K+ through a solution exchanging method. The understanding of Li or Na filling mechanism in MnO2 may be of importance for the development of high performance batteries.

Results and Discussion

Characterization of MnO2 nanorods

We first examine the X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of K-doped MnO2 nanotubes. This demonstrates that the phase of all the samples is α-MnO2 and no secondary phase is observed (Fig. S1a). In addition, the intensities of the peaks for 16 at% K-doped MnO2 is much lower than that of the others, suggesting disordering in this sample due to the high concentration of K doping. If we enlarge the (211) peak, which has the strongest intensity (Fig. S1b), we can see that with increasing doping concentration, the peaks shift to a lower 2θ value, suggesting d spacing expansion caused by the incorporation of K in the tunnel. The XRD spectra of the Li and Na-doped MnO2 are similar to that of K-doped MnO2. No secondary phases were observed in either sample.

To further verify the effects of doping, Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analysis was used to investigate the microstructure of the doped oxides as shown in Fig. 1. The shape of the nanotubes is similar to that in the literature (Fig. 1a)19 The inset of Fig. 1a shows a typical square shaped MnO2 nanotube under low magnification TEM imaging. All the tubes with doping concentrations lower than 12 at% show strong crystalline structures as seen from Fig. 1b–1e. Whereas, the high resolution TEM image of 16 at% K-doped MnO2 exhibits some localised disordering (Fig. S2), which is consistent with the XRD measurements. D-spacing analysis using digital micrograph software indicates that 2 at%, 6 at% and 12 at% K-doped MnO2 samples have a d-spacing values of 0.506, 0.511 and 0.514 nm in the (200) plane of α-MnO2 respectively (Fig. 1b to 1d). This indicates that K doping leads to lattice expansion and the higher the doping concentration the greater the lattice expansion, confirming that introducing K ions into MnO2 results in geometry change. Li and Na-doped MnO2 have a lattice spacing of 0.510 and 0.512 nm in the (200) plane, respectively, which are smaller than that of K-MnO2 with 6 at% K doping. This may be due to the relatively lower dopant concentration and relatively smaller radii of Li+ (0.9 nm) and Na+ (0.116 nm) (Fig. 1e and 1f).

Figure 1: SEM and TEM images of alkaline element doped MnO2.
Figure 1

(a) SEM image of α-MnO2 nanotubes. The inset is the TEM image of a single MnO2 nanotube at low magnification. The data bar is 100 nm. (b) – (f) are high resolution TEM images in the (200) plane of the 2 at%, 6 at%, 12 at% K-doped MnO2, 6 at% Li and 6 at% Na doped MnO2 respectively. The insets are SAED patterns of the corresponding samples.

As discussed, the mixture of Mn3+ and Mn4+ valence state in α-MnO2 has been considered as one of the reasons for the ferromagnetic ordering/spin glass behaviour at low temperature18. To determine the valence state of Mn in doped MnO2, X-ray absorption fine structure (XAFS) measurements were performed for all the samples, as shown in Fig. 2. From the XAFS spectra in Fig. 2a, it can be seen that all the spectra have similar chemical shifts, which corresponds to the presence of Mn4+. No trace of Mn3+ species can be observed in the spectra. Fig. 2b shows the XANES spectra of the 6 at% K-MnO2 compared to other forms of manganese oxide, such as MnO, MnO2, Mn2O3 and Mn3O4. It is found that the XANES of the 6 at% K-MnO2 in the near edge overlaps with that of MnO2, indicating a Mn4+ valence state for this sample. These results indicate that charge transfer between K and Mn is very weak, which is not readily detected by XAFS analysis.

Figure 2: XAFS of alkaline element doped MnO2.
Figure 2

(a) XAFS spectra of K-MnO2 at different doping concentrations and Li/Na doped MnO2; (b) Fourier transform of the XAFS data in (a); (c)XAFS in the near edge of different forms of manganese oxides; (d) Fourier transformation of 2 at% K-doped MnO2 and MnO2 at different phases.

Fourier transform of the XAFS data and the fitting to the first Mn-O shell indicate that 2% K-MnO2 has very small distortion in its structure (Fig. 2b). 6 at% and 12 at% K-MnO2 has an eminent distortion in the first Mn-O shell (Table SI in the supporting information), suggesting that the inclusion of K in the tunnels induces geometric frustration of the triangular lattices, which may destroy the balance of Mn-O-Mn antiferromagnetic ordering, leading to ferromagnetic-like ordering. Though Jahn-teller distortion due to the existence of Mn3+ has been proposed in MnO223,24, in this work, XAFS cannot detect Mn3+ in these samples. From the structure of α-MnO2, the tunnel has a diameter larger than 0.48 nm. A small amount of K doping should not induce lattice distortion. It has been reported that the tunnels in α-MnO2 are usually supported by doped ions to avoid the collapse of these structures23. In our experiments, the K concentration has been strongly diluted by HCl exchange. Whilst a collapse of structure was not observed, suggesting that the OH, H2O or H3O+ may always act to support the scaffold9,25. Therefore, a small amount of K doping may still induce some degree of lattice distortion. For samples with a doping concentration higher than 16 at%, there is a small distortion in MnO6 octahedrons of the first shell, but a large distortion in the high order shells, similar to that of a short range ordered material (Debye Waller factor 0.0114 from Table S1 in the supporting information). It is known that the α-MnO2 has 12.5 at% tunnels, which may be fully filled if the concentration of K ions is higher than 12.5 at%. This uniform distribution may reduce the extent of distortion in MnO6. Certainly, some tunnels may be filled with more than one K ion, leading to small distortion. While, some other K ions may reside in the interstitial sites of MnO6 rather than tunnels, producing a more disordered structure. Similarly, 6 at% Li or Na doping does not induce a large distortion in the first MnO6 shell. This is due to the relatively lower dopant concentration of Li and Na. The small atomic radius of Li+ (0.09 nm) and Na+ (0.116 nm) may also explain the smaller distortion in MnO6.

MnO2 is polymorphic with α, β, ε and γ phases. Fig. 2d shows the Fourier transform spectra of both 6 at% K-MnO2 and standard traces for the α, β, ε and γ phases. From the comparison of Mn-O and Mn-Mn shells, it confirms that all the nanotubes fabricated in this work are α-MnO2 and this is consistent with the XRD analysis.

Magnetic properties measurement

Ferromagnetic-like behavior of K-MnO2 has been observed in previous studies18. In this work, we found that when K doping concentration is lower than 12 at%, the hysteresis loop with eminent coercivity appears at 5 K, indicating ferromagnetic ordering at low temperatures (Fig. 3a). 6 at% K-MnO2 presents the highest saturation magnetization (5.2 emu/g at 30 kOe) and coercivity (7500 Oe). The mechanism for the high coercivity is not very clear. It may be associated with the exchange coupling between antiferromagnetic phase and ferromagnetic-like phase as that in NiO nanostructures26,27. The decreasing coercivity with increasing doping concentration may be due to the increasing antiferromagnetic phase with small ratio of ferromagnetic-like phase26,28,29. It is interesting to note when the doping concentration is higher than 12 at% a linear M-H curve is observed and the magnetization is much smaller than that of MnO2 with the lower doping concentrations. This suggests that the sample may become antiferromagnetic again. In order to study the M-H curves in detail, we enlarged the M-H curves for 12 at% and 16 at% K-MnO2 over a narrow scale as shown in Fig. 3b. For the 12 at% K-doped MnO2, the curve is almost linear, suggesting the antiferromagnetic signal in dominant. However, a small coercivity (25 Oe) can still be detected in the sample, suggesting very weak ferromagnetic-like ordering. For the 16 at% K-doped MnO2, a coercivity of nearly 650 Oe was observed, indicating relatively strong ferromagnetic-like ordering in this sample in addition to the more dominant antiferromagnetic signal. This results suggest that ferromagnetic-like behavior may not only originate from the electron charge transfer by K doping and also the Mn3+ related to Jahn-teller distortion as the increase of K doping concentration should lead to more charge transfer, thus enhances the ferromagnetic-like ordering if the ferromagnetic-like behavior is arisen from charge transfer alone. However, it has been discovered that 12 at% K doped MnO2 has a very weak ferromagnetic-like ordering compared to that of 6 at% K doped MnO2. It should be noted that we did not measure pure α-MnO2 nanotubes without K, Li or Na doping since it is impossible to achieve totally alkaline element free MnO2 tubes with a chemical synthesis technique using KMnO4 as a precursor. Fig. 3c shows the hysteresis loops of 6 at% K-MnO2, 6 at% Li-MnO2 and 6 at% Na-MnO2 taken at 40 K, respectively. K-MnO2 has the highest saturation magnetization among the samples at the same doping concentration. While Li and Na doped MnO2 nanotubes have similar saturation magnetization and coercivities. The M-H curves of 6 at% Li-MnO2 and 6 at% Na-MnO2 measured at 5 K are shown in supporting information Fig. S5. The coercivities in these two samples are comparable to that of 6 at% K-MnO2.

Figure 3: M-H loopes of Li, Na, K doped MnO2 nanotubes.
Figure 3

(a) M-H loops of K-MnO2 with different doping concentrations; (b) Narrow scale of M-H loops of 12 at% and 16 at% K doped MnO2; (c) M-H loops of Li-MnO2, Na-MnO2 and K-MnO2 taken at 40 K.

Since Mn impurities, such as Mn3O4, is ferrimagnetic, which may contribute to the magnetic ordering in MnO2 nanorods. Our TEM, XRD and EXAFS have not detected any impurities phases other than α-MnO2 nanotubes. The resolution is better than 1%. From Ref. 30, the saturation magnetization of Mn3O4 is around 20 emu/g. Hence, the contribution from Mn3O4 is only 0.2 emu/g, which is negligible for the sample with a saturation magnetization of 5.2 emu/g. In addition, the Curie temperature of Mn3O4 nanoparticles is around 40 K, while in our work, the Curie temperature is around 50 K. Furthermore, by increasing or decreasing alkaline doping concentration, the magnetization and coercivity will vary accordingly, supporting that the magnetization in our samples are not from Mn3O4 impurities.

From zero field cooling/field cooling (ZFC/FC) measurements, the critical temperature of ferromagnetic-like ordering was measured as shown in Fig. 4. 2 at% K-doped MnO2 has a Curie temperature of 50.4 K. The reverse susceptibility indicates that the nanotubes also have a negative susceptibility, which indicates the samples have a mixture of ferromagnetic-like and antiferromagnetic phase. It is known that pure MnO2 is antiferromagnetic. Hence, the antiferromagnetic signal should come from antiferromagnetic MnO2 itself. The ferromagnetic-like signal is from alkaline element doping. When the doping concentration is 6 at%, the Curie temperature increases to 55.8 K and the antiferromagnetic phase is undetectable. Continual increase of the doping concentration leads to a decrease of critical temperature. 12 at% K-doped MnO2 has the lowest critical temperature (43.7 K). From the M-H measurements, a very weak ferromagnetic-like signal is detected (Fig. 3), thus having the lowest ordering temperature. There are two sharp peaks present in the ZFC curves. This suggests that three transitions may occur in the samples. This phenomenon has been reported elsewhere18. The irreversible peak at 24 K is related to spin glass behavior18. The peak at 34 K may be related to some disordered structures due to the spin frustration induced by the large amount of K doping, since there is no peak in the FC curve with an applied field as small as 500 Oe18. The reverse susceptibility in the inset shows that there is a large amount of antiferromagnetic phase in 12 at% K-MnO2. Hence, the ferromagnetic-like ordering is very weak. However, the 16 at% K-doped MnO2 has similar ZFC and FC curves to that of 12 at% K-MnO2, as shown in the Fig. S6.

Figure 4: ZFC and FC curves with different doping concentrations.
Figure 4

The applied field is 50 Oe. (a) 2 at%; (b) 6 at%; (c) 8 at%; and (d) 12 at% K-doped MnO2. The inset is the reverse susceptibility of corresponding samples.

First principles calculations

In order to understand the mechanism of ferromagnetic-like behavior in MnO2 nanotubes, we employ first principle calculations to investigate the origin of ferromagnetic-like behavior. For pure MnO2, the most stable spin configuration is the antiferromagnetic state as shown by the density of states (DOS) (Fig. 5b), consistent with previous calculations23. It shows semiconductor behavior and the Fermi level is inside the energy gap. The bandgap is approximately 1.44 eV, in good agreement with other theoretical and experiments results23,25. However, after the incorporation of 6.25% K, the spin degeneracy around the Fermi level is broken as shown in Fig. 5c and the entire system shows magnetic properties. The Fermi level is increased to the conduction band, indicating half metallic property.

Figure 5: Crystal structure and DOS of alkaline element doped MnO2.
Figure 5

(a) Staking of MnO6 octahedrons in the structures of α-MnO2, the oxygen position is shown; (b) DOS of α-MnO2 without doping; (c) DOS of 6.25 at% K-doped MnO2; (d) DOS of 12.5 at% K-doped MnO2; (e) and (f) are the DOS of 6.25 at% Li doped MnO2 and 6.25 at% Na-doped MnO2.

In this case, one unit cell has a magnetic moment of 1 µB, corresponding to 0.0625 µB/Mn. It is noted that K and O do not show any magnetic moment from our calculations. A saturation magnetization of 5.2 emu/g (at 30 kOe) was experimentally observed in K doped MnO2, corresponding to 0.085 µB/Mn, agrees well with theoretical calculations. Further increasing the doping concentration, K ions will be incorporated in neighboring tunnels. The K doping then affects the two different Mn-O octahedrals (purple and blue in Fig. 5a) equally. The magnetic MnO2 becomes antiferromagnetic again (Fig. 5d). The difference of the DOS between MnO2 without K doping and with 12 at% K doping is the position of Fermi level. The latter one is inside the conduction band, indicating conductive antiferromagnetism instead of semiconductive/insulator antiferromagnetism for MnO2 without K doping. Theoretically, if the doping concentration is increased to more than 12.5%, the balance of the homogeneously distributed K atoms may be broken, resulting in the ferromagnetic-like phase again. The stronger ferromagnetic-like ordering in 16 at% K-doped MnO2 (Fig. 3b) than that in 12 at% K-doped MnO2 was verified by the results of calculations. From our calculations, 18.5 at% K-MnO2 shows a half-metallic behavior (Fig. S7 in the supporting information), which means that the antiferromagnetic coupling in 12 at% K-doped MnO2 changes to ferromagnetic-like coupling with increasing doping concentration. It is noted that in this case one tunnel of MnO2 may contain more than one K ions. The magnetic measurement from these experiments shows that the M-H curve of 12 at% K-MnO2 is near linear, indicating that antiferromagnetic coupling dominates. However, a very small coercivity has been observed if the X axis scale is enlarged (Fig. 3b). The minor discrepancy between the experimental and theoretical results may be due to the inhomogeneous distribution of K ions in these samples. Different from the ideal condition of theoretical calculation, in the 12 at% K doping sample, the slightly non-uniform K doping may induce some degree of ferromagnetic-like ordering. However, the main signal from the magnetic measurement by SQUID is antiferromagnetic. From the experimental results analyzed by XAFS, if the doping concentration is higher than 16 at%, the disordered structure was detected, suggesting that K may enter interstitial sites in MnO2. Such a disordered structure may result in a paramagnetic behavior. This is different from the periodical model of first principle calculations. Therefore, the sample with higher K doping concentration will not be further discussed in this work.

Similarly, first principle calculations were also employed to calculate Li and Na doped MnO2. It shows that both 6.25 at% Li-MnO2 and 6.25 at% Na-MnO2 show half-metallic behavior, which is similar to that for K doping (Fig. 5e and 5f). Experimentally, it shows that 6 at% Li or Na doped MnO2 has very strong ferromagnetic-like ordering at low temperature (i.e. 5 K), which is similar to that 6 at% K-doped MnO2, as shown in Fig. 3 and Fig. S5. However, 12.5 at% Li and Na doping in these samples result in the antiferromagnetic coupling again, similar to that of the K-doped MnO2. The results have shown that the ferromagnetic-like ordering can be achieved in all the three alkaline elements. The ferromagnetic-like ordering can be tailored by tuning the doping concentration.

This doping effect on magnetic properties can be understood by the special crystal structure of α-MnO2. α-MnO2 is one of the hollandite-romanechite families with 2x2 tunnel structure, similar to β or rutile-MnO2. A Mn-O octahedral is expected in every side of tunnel (as shown in Fig. 5a). The two Mn-O octahedrals (blue and purple shown Fig. 5a) are equivalent in the pure α-MnO2 and share the O atoms each other. For O atoms in α-MnO2, each O atom is shared by two Mn-O octahedrals and occupies the different sites of these two octahedrals: the apex of one octahedral and plane corner of another. Thus, the change of such an O atom has a different effect on these two octahedrals and also the neighboring Mn atoms. If one tunnel is doped with K ions (I in Fig. 6a) while the neighboring tunnel is undoped, i.e. empty (II in Fig. 6a), the interaction between K and such O atom breaks the symmetry between blue and purple Mn-O octahedrals, which ensures the antiferromagnetic coupling between neighboring Mn atoms in pure MnO2. Although the geometrical distortion and charge transfer are only minor due to such doping, symmetry breaking of two kinds of Mn-O octahedral transforms the antiferromagnetic state of pure MnO2 into ferromagnetic-like state. Fig. 6b and Fig. 6c show the partial DOS (PDOS) projected on to the blue and purple Mn atoms (belong to two different kinds of octahedrals) close to the K atoms after doping. The remarkable difference of the two PDOSs can be observed. The blue Mn atom has a much larger magnetic moment (3.03 µB) than that of the purple Mn (2.9 μB) around the Fermi level. Hence, the symmetry between the purple and blue Mn-O octahedrals is broken, resulting in ferromagnetic-like properties observed in the experiment31. Our further calculation (Fig. S7) indicates that the ferromagnetic-like ordering is a combined effect of K doping induced lattice distortion and small charge transfer between K and Mn. The distortion of the lattice leads to the asymmetry of energy splitting and the small charge transfer leads to the overlap of the Fermi level in the conduction band. Because the doping concentration is low, the overall valence state change is very small. For example, for the 6 at% K-doped MnO2 sample there will be charge transfer of 6 electrons to MnO2 given that the cell size has 100 Mn atoms. Then, the transferred electrons will change the Mn valance from 4+ to +3.94, which is a very small change that may not be detected by XAFS examination.

Figure 6: K doping effect on the crystal structure and PDOS of MnO2.
Figure 6

(a) 2 × 2 tunnel structure of α-MnO2 indicating the position of O and Mn. K doping has different effects on two Mn sites (blue and purple) bonded with apex site and plane site of octahedral O respectively; (b) PDOS of Mn bonded with apex site of O; (c) PDOS of Mn bonded with plane site of O.


We have synthesized K-MnO2 with different doping concentrations using a hydrothermal method with KMnO4 as the precursor. K-doped MnO2 nanotubes with doping concentration lower than 12 at% show ferromagnetic-like ordering. 6 at% alkaline ions doping in MnO2 leads to the maximum saturation magnetization. Doping concentration higher than 12 at% leads to disordered structure since some of K ions may enter the interstitial sites due to the higher doping concentration. Li and Na doping also lead to ferromagnetic-like behavior. The results of first principle calculations are consistent with the experimental data. The ferromagnetic-like ordering is due to incomplete filling of K ions in the tunnels, which affects the symmetry of Mn plane, forming ferromagnetic-like ordering.


Synthesis and characterization

α-MnO2 nanotubes were prepared using a hydrothermal method, similar to that previously reported18,19. KMnO4 was used as the precursor and was dissolved in HCl solution for 12 hours at 413 K. All chemicals in this work were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich with a purity of 99.99%. The prepared α-MnO2 nanotubes contain approximately 8 at% K that was measured using inductively coupled plasma (ICP, ICPMS, PerkinElmer quadrapole Nexion ICPMS) analysis. In order to control the K doping concentration in the MnO2 nanotubes, the prepared MnO2 nanotubes were soaked into 1 M HCl or 1 M KOH solution for different durations from 1 hr to 6 hrs at 413 K. The nanotubes soaked in the KOH solution showed an increase in the K doping concentration. On the other hand, the nanotubes soaked in the diluted HCl solution resulted in a decrease in doping concentration. It was found that K doping concentration is proportional to soaking time. Through the control of the soaking time combined with the ICP analysis, the K doping concentration was estimated to be approximately 2 at%, 6 at%, 8 at%, 12 at% and 16 at% in atomic ratio respectively. Similarly, 1 M NaOH and 1 M LiOH solutions were also used for the doping process for Li or Na, respectively. MnO2 nanotubes were first heated in a diluted HCl solution for more than 24 hrs at 413 K. The amount of residual K in the MnO2 tubes was reduced and eventually could not be detected by energy disperse X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) attached to a scanning electron microscope. After soaking the nanotubes in either 1 M NaOH or 1 M LiOH, K ions could not be detected by ICP. The concentration of Li was subsequently measured with ICP. In this work, we prepared Li/Na doped samples with a concentration of approximately 6 at% by controlling the soaking time. X-ray diffraction (XRD, PANalytical Xpert Multipurpose X-ray Diffraction System, Cu Kα radiation), scanning electron microscopy (SEM, FEI Nova NanoSEM 230) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM, JEM-2010, JEOL) were used for the characterization of phases and microstructures. A superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID, Quantum Design XL-5) was used for magnetic property measurements. X-ray absorption fine structure (XAFS) spectra were measured in transmission mode at the XDD beamline at Singapore Synchrotron Light Source (Singapore).

First principles calculations

First-principles calculations were performed using density functional theory from Vienna ab initio simulation package with a plane wave basis32. The generalized gradient approximation (GGA) with spin-polarized Perdew–Burke–Ernzerhof (PBE)33,34 scheme was employed for calculating the exchange and correlation functional. The core electrons were represented by the projector-augmented-wave (PAW) potential. Kinetic energy cutoff was set at above 400 eV and k-point sampling on the unit cell was 2×2×10. The structure optimization was performed with the criteria of force convergence at 0.01 eV/Å. The optimized lattice constant for α-MnO2 is a = b = 0.96 nm and c = 0.28 nm, which is in agreement with previous experimental measurements35,36,37.


  1. 1.

    et al. Non-Hydrothermal Synthesis of 1D Nanostructured Manganese-Based Oxides: Effect of Cation Substitution on the Electrochemical Performance of Nanowires. Adv. Funct. Mater. 17, 2949–2956 (2007).

  2. 2.

    , , & Coaxial MnO2/Carbon Nanotube Array Electrodes for High-Performance Lithium Batteries. Nano Lett. 9, 1002–1006 (2009).

  3. 3.

    , , , & α-MnO2 nanotubes: high surface area and enhanced lithium battery properties. Chem. Commun. 48, 6945–6947 (2012).

  4. 4.

    et al. α-MnO2 as a cathode material for rechargeable Mg batteries. Electrochem. Commun. 23, 110–113 (2012).

  5. 5.

    , & Manganese oxide porous crystals. J. Mater. Chem. 9, 319–333 (1999).

  6. 6.

    et al. Manganese Oxide Octahedral Molecular Sieves: Preparation, Characterization, and Applications. Science 260, 511–515 (1993).

  7. 7.

    , , , & Stabilized Alpha-MnO2 Electrodes for Rechargeable 3 V Lithium Batteries. J. Electrochem. Soci. 144, 2279–2283 (1997).

  8. 8.

    , , , & Alpha manganese dioxide for lithium batteries: A structural and electrochemical study. Mater. Res. Bull. 27, 221–230 (1992).

  9. 9.

    et al. α-MnO2 as a cathode material for rechargeable Mg batterises, Electrochem. Commu. 23, 110–113 (2012).

  10. 10.

    & The crystal structure of hollandite, the related manganese oxide minerals, and α-MnO2. Acta Crystallographica 3, 146–154 (1950).

  11. 11.

    , , & J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 18, 3745–3752 (2006).

  12. 12.

    & in Energy Storage in the Emerging Era of Smart Grids [Carbone R. (ed.) Chapter 12, 251–278 (InTech, Rijeka, 2011).

  13. 13.

    , , , & Rational synthesis of α-MnO2 and γ-Mn2O3 nanowires with the electrochemical characterization of α-MnO2 nanowires for supercapacitor. Soli. Stat. Commun. 136, 94–96 (2005).

  14. 14.

    Development and utility of manganese oxides as cathodes in lithium batteries. J. Powe. Sour. 165, 559–565 (2007).

  15. 15.

    et al. Enhancing the supercapacitor performance of graphene/MnO2 nanostructured electrodes by conductive wrapping. Nano Lett. 11, 4438–4442 (2011).

  16. 16.

    et al. Self-Assembly of Mesoporous Nanotubes Assembled from Interwoven Ultrathin Birnessite-type MnO2 Nanosheets for Asymmetric Supercapacitors. Sci. Rep. 4, 3878 (2014).

  17. 17.

    et al. Hierarchically Structured Co3O4@Pt@MnO2 Nanowire Arrays for High-Performance Supercapacitors. Sci. Rep. 3, 2978(2013).

  18. 18.

    et al. Tuning magnetic properties of α-MnO2 nanotubes by K+ doping. J. Phys. Chem. C 114, 8782–8786 (2010).

  19. 19.

    et al. Spin-glasslike behavior of K+-containing α-MnO2 nanotubes. J. Appl. Phys. 105, 093925–093925-5 (2009).

  20. 20.

    & Supermagnetism. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 42, 013001 (2009).

  21. 21.

    et al. Magnetic properties of Ni/NiO nanowires deposited onto CNT/Pt nanocomposites. Adv. Funct. Mater. 18, 616–621 (2008).

  22. 22.

    et al. Abnormal magnetic behaviors in unique square alpha-MnO2 nanotubes. preprint arXiv,1207.3350 (2012).

  23. 23.

    & First-principles DFT + U studies of the atomic, electronic, and magnetic structure of α-MnO2 (cryptomelane). Chem. Phys. Lett. 544, 53–58 (2012).

  24. 24.

    Electronic structure of CMR manganites (invited). J. Appl. Phys. 81, 5330–5335 (1997).

  25. 25.

    et al. Microstructures and Spectroscopic Properties of Cryptomelane-type Manganese Dioxide Nanofibers. J. Phys. Chem. C 112, 13134–13140 (2008).

  26. 26.

    et al. Size-dependent magnetism and spin-glass behavior of amorphous NiO bulk, clusters, and nanocrystals: Experiments and first-principles calculations. Phys. Rev. B 76, 224402–224402-5 (2007).

  27. 27.

    , , & High coercivity and exchange coupling of Ni/NiO nanocomposite film. J. Appl. Phys. 97, 10K306-310K306-303 (2005).

  28. 28.

    , , & MnO and NiO nanoparticles: synthesis and magnetic properties. J. Mater. Chem. 16, 106–111 (2006).

  29. 29.

    et al. Size and surface effects on the magnetic properties of NiO nanoparticles. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 13, 9561–9567 (2011).

  30. 30.

    , & Magnetization reversal of two-dimensional superlattices of Mn3O4 nanocubes and their collective dipolar interaction effects. J. Appl. Phys. 108, 043912–043912-8 (2010).

  31. 31.

    & Electronic and magnetic properties of α-MnO2 from ab initio calculations. Phys. Rev. B 88, 144428–144428-7 (2013).

  32. 32.

    & From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 59, 1758–1775 (1999).

  33. 33.

    Projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 50, 17953 (1994).

  34. 34.

    et al. Restoring the Density-Gradient Expansion for Exchange in Solids and Surfaces. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 136406–136406-4 (2008).

  35. 35.

    et al. Structural and electrochemical studies of α-manganese dioxide (α-MnO2). J. Powe. Sour. 68, 570–577 (1997).

  36. 36.

    , , , & Crystal structure of an open-tunnel oxide α-MnO2 analyzed by Rietveld refinements and MEM-based pattern fitting. J. Soli. Stat. Chem. 177, 1258–1267 (2004).

  37. 37.

    , , & Lithium ion insertion and extraction reactions with Hollandite-type manganese dioxide free from any stabilizing cations in its tunnel cavity. J. Soli. Stat. Chem. 178, 2741–2750 (2005).

Download references


This work is funded by Australia Research Council discovery project (DP110105338 and DP140103041) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 2137692 and 11374009).

Author information


  1. School of Materials Science and Engineering, University of New South Wales, Kensington, 2052, NSW, Australia

    • Li-Ting Tseng
    • , Yiren Wang
    • , Xi Luo
    • , Paul Munroe
    • , Sean Li
    •  & Jiabao Yi
  2. School of Material Science and Engineering, Zhejiang University, 310027, China

    • Yunhao Lu
  3. Shanxi Key Laboratory of Degradable Biomedical Materials, School of Chemical Engineering, Northwest University, Xi'an, Shanxi 710069, China

    • Hai Ming Fan
  4. Institute for Synchrotron Radiation. Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany

    • Tao Liu


  1. Search for Li-Ting Tseng in:

  2. Search for Yunhao Lu in:

  3. Search for Hai Ming Fan in:

  4. Search for Yiren Wang in:

  5. Search for Xi Luo in:

  6. Search for Tao Liu in:

  7. Search for Paul Munroe in:

  8. Search for Sean Li in:

  9. Search for Jiabao Yi in:


J.Y. and L.T. did the characterization of materials. H.F. prepared the samples. Y.L. performed the first principle calculations. X. L. did XRD analysis. T.L. did the XAS analysis. M. P. carried out TEM analysis. J. Y. drafted the manuscript. Y. L. drafted the part of calculations. Y.W. revised the part of manuscript on calculations. L.T., S. L. and M.P. gave revision of the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jiabao Yi.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Information

    Magnetic properties in α-MnO2 doped with alkaline elements


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder in order to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit