Introduction

The electric-field effect with a field-effect transistor structure is a powerful approach for externally tuning the carrier density of a material and investigating the associated changes in electronic properties1. In the past decade, significant progress has been made in field-effect experiments for functional transition-metal oxides such as high-Tc cuprates and colossal magnetoresistive manganites. In particular, the field effect with ionic liquid electrolytes demonstrating field-induced superconductivity2,3 and carrier-induced ferromagnetism4 in insulators, in addition to electronic phase switching in strongly electron correlated systems5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14, has furthered this field. This method is characterized by an ultrathin capacitor-like structure formed by electrolyte ions at the electrolyte/oxide interface, called the electric double layer (EDL)15. The very strong electric field generated within the EDL makes it possible to accumulate a high density of charge carriers on the oxide channel (as high as 1014–15 cm−2), without being restricted by the hetero-structuring processes generally required for experiments with solid gate dielectrics. Because functional transition-metal oxides often have metallic carrier densities, EDL gating is widely used as the most effective means for modifying the electronic properties of functional transition-metal oxides.

EDL gating effects in transition-metal oxides have so far been interpreted mainly in terms of electrostatic carrier doping, as in conventional semiconductor field-effect transistors. Recent studies of EDL devices with VO216,17, SmNiO318,19, spinel ZnxFe3−xO420 and so on21,22 have, however, revealed the role of gate-induced redox reactions. Indeed, the electric field produced by EDL gating can be as high as 10 MV cm−1, sufficiently strong to cause motions of constituent atoms/ions and vacancies in those oxides. Those chemical contributions can be identified as non-volatile (persistent) changes in transport properties induced by gate-electric bias (VG), which cannot be explained by the volatile electrostatic effect. Whether or not the electronic and chemical field effects contradict each other and how the dominant field effect can be controlled in a given material are not yet clear. Here, we demonstrate the coexistence of the two distinct field effects in electrolyte-gated spinel ZnxFe3−xO4. By varying the Zn substitution level x, we find that the dominant field-effect contribution can be controlled to be either virtually electronic or chemical. The significant role played by composition that has not yet been reported to date would be a new approach to fabricating oxide EDL devices with desirable properties.

Results

Device structure

We fabricated EDL devices with epitaxial thin films of spinel ZnxFe3−xO423,24 grown on single-crystal (001) MgO substrates by pulsed-laser deposition25, shown in Fig. 1(a) (see the Methods section). Films with nominal Zn contents (x) of 0, 0.5 and 0.8 were used. Cross-sectional transmission electron microscopy observations, shown in Fig. 1(b), confirmed the coherent interface structure with an epitaxial orientation of (001)[100]ZnxFe3−xO4||(001)[100]MgO. The device consisted of a Hall-bar-shaped channel with Au/Ti source, drain and potential probe electrodes and a separate side gate electrode (Fig. 1(a)). The channel length L and width W were 100 μm and 30 μm, respectively and the thickness was controlled to be between 6 and 7 nm. The EDL capacitor was formed between the channel and gate electrode by bridging them with an ionic liquid electrolyte, N,N-diethyl-N-(2-methoxyethyl)-N-methylammonium bis-trifluoromethylsulfonyl)-imide.

Figure 1
figure 1

Electric double-layer device with a spinel ferrite channel.

(a), Schematic structure of the device. The ZnxFe3−xO4 channel is connected to Au/Ti metal electrodes for electrical measurements. IL denotes the ionic liquid electrolyte. (b), Cross-sectional transmission electron microscopy images of a Zn0.5Fe2.5O4 film on a (001) MgO substrate (left; scale bar, 100 nm) and an enlarged view of the interface region (right; scale bar, 2 nm).

EDL gating effect on conductivity

The Zn content x was sensitively reflected in the electrical conductivity. We measured the drain current (ID) as a function of VG with a constant drain voltage (VD) at 300 K, using the setup shown in Fig. 1(a). VG was scanned at a rate of 3.3 mV s−1 (see Supplementary Note 1 and Fig. S1 for the scan-rate dependence). Figure 2 summarizes channel conductance G = ID/VD versus VG plots (transfer characteristics) for the ZnxFe3−xO4 EDL devices with different levels of x. Zn2+ ions are substituted for Fe3+ ions in the spinel A-sites24; for the sake of charge neutrality, Fe2+ ions in the B-sites that supply t2g electron carriers are converted into Fe3+ ions, resulting in a decrease in carrier density and conductivity. The systematic decrease in G with increasing x is consistent with results previously reported for bare thin films23,24, indicating that our ZnxFe3−xO4 channels were not degraded by the fabrication procedure.

Figure 2
figure 2

Gate-induced change in the channel conductance.

(a–c), VG dependencies of G( = ID/VD) were measured for the devices fabricated with the ZnxFe3−xO4 films of x = 0 (a), 0.5 (b) and 0.8 (c). For all devices, VG was scanned in the numerical order shown in (a).

In Fig. 2, it is commonly observed that the application of a positive (negative) VG induces an increase (a decrease) in G. Recently we reported that the large GVG hysteresis and the bi-stable, non-volatile conductance states at VG = 0 were induced in the Zn0.5Fe2.5O4 EDL device by polarity-dependent reversible changes in the oxygen content by EDL gating20. Electric-field-induced oxygen diffusion/migration21 promoted by the extremely strong electric field of the EDL might be of microscopic origin. Similar features observed in the Fe3O4 device indicate that the underlying mechanism for the conductance change is essentially identical to that in the Zn0.5Fe2.5O4 device. However, we observed a noticeable difference between these lightly substituted systems and Zn0.8Fe2.2O4 with regard to hysteresis behaviour. For the former cases, the application of a positive or negative VG, respectively, induces non-volatile high-G and low-G states at VG = 0 (Fig. 2(a) and (b)), whereas for Zn0.8Fe2.2O4 there is only a slight difference in G at VG = 0 (Fig. 2(c)) and the characteristic hysteresis virtually disappears. It suggests that the non-volatile contribution becomes weaker for the Zn0.8Fe2.2O4 device as compared with the other contribution(s). In fact, the almost-linear GVG behaviour is rather similar to the properties of ZnxFe3−xO4 field-effect devices fabricated with a solid gate dielectric25, in which electrostatic carrier doping is responsible for the field effect. These observations revealed the coexistence of two types of field effects in the ZnxFe3−xO4 EDL devices and their compositional dependencies.

Compositional dependence

With the aim of separately tracking the evolution of non-volatile and volatile contributions with changes in x, we extracted the corresponding components from the GVG curves. Our procedure is depicted schematically in Fig. 3(a). First, the change in G due to the non-volatile field effect, ΔGnonvol, was given by the difference between high and low Gs at VG = 0 V induced by a positive and negative gating, respectively. The remaining change in G, given by ΔGtotal − ΔGnonvol, where ΔGtotal is the total change in G between VG = +1.5 and −1.5 V, was then defined as the contribution from the volatile field effect. To compare those devices with different G values, ΔGtotal, ΔGnonvol and ΔGvol were scaled to the base G values measured at VG = 0 V after the negative gating cycle, G0low, as shown in Fig. 3(a).

Figure 3
figure 3

Evolution of non-volatile and volatile conductance changes with Zn substitution.

(a), The definition of non-volatile contribution (ΔGnonvol) to the total conductance change (ΔGtotal) is shown schematically. (b), ΔGtotal, ΔGvol and ΔGnonvol plotted versus x. The error bars represent the standard deviations of the measured data.

We present in Fig. 3(b) the normalized values of ΔGtotal, ΔGnonvol and ΔGvol plotted versus x, where their contrasting dependencies on x can be clearly seen. For the Fe3O4 (x = 0) and Zn0.5Fe2.5O4 (x = 0.5) EDL devices, ΔGnonvol is as large as 7–8%, which is approximately twice ΔGvol (3–5%). Consequently, in low-x devices, the non-volatile contribution occupies a significant part of the conductance modulation (~70%). A further increase in x drastically alters the field-effect mode; in the Zn0.8Fe2.2O4 (x = 0.8) EDL devices, the non-volatile contribution in turn becomes as small as 3.5% and the volatile contribution rapidly increases up to ~12.5%.

Discussion

We first consider the origin of the volatile contribution ΔGvol. Spinel Zn ferrites have been reported to have metallic carrier densities in the range of x investigated in the present work23. Even in such metallic systems, because of the large capacitance of EDL (typically as large as 1–10 μF cm−2), electrostatic carrier doping should affect G when VG is applied. Because it is difficult to anticipate the presence of chemical reactions that do not leave any trace after the removal of VG, electrostatic carrier doping is thought to be the origin of the volatile field effect. Indeed, the observed ΔGvol was explained by electrostatic carrier doping and the x-dependent bulk carrier density nbulk. The introduction of Zn2+ ions into the A-sites of spinel Fe3O4 reduces nbulk, as mentioned above23,24. The number of charge carriers that can be externally modulated by electrostatic carrier doping, nFE, is determined by the capacitance of EDL and the applied VG, which should remain unchanged irrespective of x for the present case. Electrostatic carrier doping is therefore expected to be strong with increasing nFE/nbulk and hence 1/nbulk. In Fig. 4, 1/nbulk is plotted as a function of x. The carrier density extracted from the ordinal Hall term of the anomalous Hall effect at 300 K23 was used as nbulk. One can see that this plot reproduces well the experimental trend of ΔGvol (Fig. 3(b)). The increase in ΔGvol as x increases from 0 to 0.5 is a factor of ~1.5, which is less than the change in 1/nbulk. This is because of the variation in mobility in the low-x regime (see Supplementary Fig. S2); the reduction in mobility suppresses the enhancement in G. The effective enhancement in G taking nbulk and mobility contributions into account is a factor of ~1.2, very close to the increase in ΔGvol observed. Note here that the mobility variation does not play an essential role in the evolution of ΔGvol. In the high-x regime where mobility saturates (Supplementary Fig. S2), the increase in ΔGvol as x increases from 0.5 to 0.8 is a factor of ~2.8, which is in excellent agreement with the change in 1/nbulk of ~2.7. These correlations between ΔGvol and 1/nbulk support that the volatile field effect observed in our devices originates from the electrostatic carrier doping effect.

Figure 4
figure 4

Variations in bulk carrier density and electronic screening length versus x.

The values of nbulk were deduced from the anomalous Hall effect23. An external magnetic field of up to 9 T was applied perpendicular to the film plane and the transverse Hall voltage was measured by a voltmeter. The electronic screening length was calculated using the estimated nbulk based on Thomas-Fermi screening.

Evidence for the almost electrostatic operation in the high-x Zn0.8Fe2.2O4 EDL device was obtained by field-effect mobility μFE calculations. Based on the slope of the G( = ID/VD) − VG curve (Fig. 2(c)), μFE was estimated to be 3–5 × 10−3 cm2 V−1 s−1 using the general relation: , where C is the capacitance per unit area of the ionic liquid. We adopted a typical C value of 10 μF cm−2 from the literature26. The μFE value agrees well with the independently measured value for Zn0.8Fe2.2O4 field-effect transistors with a solid parylene gate dielectric exhibiting n-type field-effect behaviour (μFE = 4.0 × 10−3 cm2 V−1 s−1). On the basis of these results, it is reasonable to consider that the high-x EDL devices are located on the extension of the conventional solid gate dielectric-based field-effect transistors. The contribution of electrostatic carrier doping is thus effectively modulated by varying x and the subsequent changes in nbulk.

The GVG hysteresis becomes obvious with decreasing x and weakening electrostatic carrier doping owing to the relatively enhanced non-volatile contribution ΔGnonvol. One interesting point that should be noted from Fig. 3(b) is that ΔGnonvol also shows a dependence on x. Although the microscopic redox mechanism responsible for the non-volatile field effect has not yet been fully understood, we can provide the following tentative explanation based on a previously proposed picture in which we speculated that electric-field-induced oxygen diffusion was the root of the redox20. In systems with metallic carrier densities, charge carriers accumulate in the limited thickness of the channel owing to the short screening length Ls, giving rise to a steep potential gradient, i.e., electric field, at the electrolyte/oxide interface. The interfacial electric field is considered to have a characteristic depth profile; its detailed function remains to be determined. Instead, we here assume that the electric-field strength scales roughly inversely with Ls and use 1/Ls as an index of the relative strength. In Fig. 4, 1/Ls is plotted versus x. Ls was deduced using the typical relative dielectric constant of conductive ferrites from the literature27,28 and nbulk, based on Thomas-Fermi screening. This plot mimics the overall trend of ΔGnonvol (Fig. 3(b)), in that both Ls and ΔGnonvol slowly decrease with increasing x. The suppression of ΔGnonvol in the high-x regime can be understood as being due to the increased Ls and the resulting reduction in the interfacial electric field. To get additional insight into the redox origin and the correlation between Ls and ΔGnonvol, a system exhibiting much larger ΔGnonvol should be identified. Such a discovery would allow one to evaluate the compositional dependence much more quantitatively. Materials with high oxygen diffusion constants and high carrier densities, such as fuel cell electrode materials, may be interesting targets for addressing these issues.

In parallel with the progress of oxide field-effect devices, the oxide research community has recently produced a new type of non-volatile memory element called the resistive switching device29,30,31. The device structure consists of a metal/oxide/metal stack; by applying an electric-field bias between the two metal electrodes, non-volatile electrical resistance switching can be induced. Although the detailed switching mechanism depends on the physical and chemical properties of the oxide medium and the device geometry employed, it is widely accepted that redox reactions such as metal cation and/or oxygen anion diffusion promoted by strong electric field and/or current density play crucial roles32. So far, oxide field-effect devices, which are, in principle, based on purely electronic effects, have been categorized as a different class of devices from redox-based switching devices. In the light of the similarities between the non-volatile field effect in EDL devices and the resistive switching effect, however, non-volatile EDL devices may be regarded as a three-terminal analogue of resistive switching devices. At this point, we may have opportunities to fabricate high-performance (e.g., large on/off ratio, fast switching speed), non-volatile EDL devices by using insights accumulated from research of resistive switching devices.

Another feature commonly observed in EDL devices and resistive switching devices is the influence of environment, i.e., surrounding atmosphere, on electrical properties33. The presence of oxygen and/or water in the ionic liquid electrolyte was reported to affect EDL gating behaviour16,17,19,22. Given electric-field-induced oxygen diffusion/migration as the mechanism of the gate-induced non-volatile conductance, such environment effects might be more clearly observed in materials with high oxygen diffusion constants such as rutile16,17,22 and perovskite compounds18,19 than in spinels.

In summary, in spinel ZnxFe3−xO4 gated with an ionic liquid electrolyte, we revealed the dual contributions of non-volatile and volatile field effects to gate-induced conductance modulation and their dependencies on x. The control of the dominant field-effect mode via a simple composition variation demonstrated here should work for a variety of transition-metal oxides and hence be important for exploring their exotic electronic states with EDL gatings, as well as fabricating oxide EDL devices with specifically designed properties.

Methods

Film growth

Epitaxial thin films of ZnxFe3−xO4 were grown on (001) surfaces of MgO substrates by pulsed-laser deposition using an ArF excimer laser. Prior to deposition, the MgO substrates were annealed at 700°C using an oxygen pressure of 1 atm to obtain atomically smooth surfaces34. The film deposition was performed at 400°C in an oxygen pressure of 1 × 10−4 Pa. The thicknesses of the films were evaluated by atomic force microscopy.

Device fabrication

The films were patterned into a Hall-bar-shaped channel by photolithography and Ar ion milling. The electrodes were prepared using an electron-beam-deposited bilayer film of 50-nm-thick Au and 5-nm-thick Ti. The other device surfaces were covered with a 30-nm-thick SiO2 film by radio-frequency sputtering (not depicted in Fig. 1(a)) to form an EDL capacitor structure only between the channel and gate electrode. After dropping a small amount of the ionic liquid electrolyte on the channel area, the devices were evacuated to a high vacuum (~5 × 10−5 Pa) to remove contaminations that could possibly exist in the ionic liquid. The devices were then immediately loaded into a Quantum Design Physical Property Measurement System.

Electrical measurements

Transfer characteristics were measured at 300 K using a Keithley 2612A SourceMeter and a 6482 Picoammeter. A VD of 0.1 V was applied for x = 0 and 0.5; a VD of 0.25 V was applied for x = 0.8. The gate leakage current in the VG range measured was less than 0.5 nA, which was negligibly small compared with the gate-induced change in ID.