Abstract
In classical superconductors an energy gap and phase coherence appear simultaneously with pairing at the transition to the superconducting state. In high-temperature superconductors, the possibility that pairing and phase coherence are distinct and independent processes has led to intense experimental search of their separate manifestations. Using femtosecond spectroscopy methods we now show that it is possible to clearly separate fluctuation dynamics of the superconducting pairing amplitude from the phase relaxation above the critical transition temperature. Empirically establishing a close correspondence between the superfluid density measured by THz spectroscopy and superconducting optical pump-probe response over a wide region of temperature, we find that in differently doped Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ crystals the pairing gap amplitude monotonically extends well beyond Tc, while the phase coherence shows a pronounced power-law divergence as T → Tc, thus showing that phase coherence and gap formation are distinct processes which occur on different timescales.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Anomalous normal state behavior above the critical temperature appears to be a hallmark of unconventional superconductivity and is present in many different classes of materials. A pseudogap (PG) state has been suggested to be associated with a wide range of possible phenomena preceding the onset of macroscopic phase coherence at the superconducting (SC) critical transition temperature at Tc: pre-formed pairs1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9, a spin-gap10, the formation of a Bose metal11, a Fermi or Bose glass, or a state composed of “dirty bosons”12,13,14 and more recently a charge-density-wave state15,16.
In addition to the PG response below the temperature designated as T*, the response attributed to “superconducting fluctuations” above Tc has been observed in a number of experiments17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27. The temperature region Tc < T < Tonset where such fluctuations are observable is significantly wider than in conventional superconductors, but smaller than T*. The open and obvious question is whether the pseudogap, or the superconducting fluctuations can be attributed to pairing.
The problem in separating the response due to superconducting fluctuations from the PG is that so far, inevitably, one has had to make extrapolations, or assumptions about the response functions underlying temperature dependences and line shapes in transport17,18,28,29,30, magnetic susceptibility26,31, specific heat20,21 or photoemission (ARPES)22, which may at best introduce inaccuracies in the temperature scales and at worst lead to erroneous conclusions. Alternatively one can suppress superconductivity by high magnetic fields up to 60 T32, although there exists a risk of inducing new states by such a high field33. Thus, so far it has not been possible to satisfactorily characterize superconducting fluctuations and discriminate between fluctuations of the amplitude δψ (related to the pairing gap) and phase δθ of the complex order parameter Ψ = ψeiθ.
In pump-probe experiments three relaxation components shown in Fig. 1 a) are typically observed34: 1) the quasiparticle (QP) recombination in the SC state, 2) pseudogap state response below T* and 3) energy relaxation of hot electrons. The QP dynamics has been shown to be described very well by the Rothwarf-Taylor (R-T) model35,36 and the response related to the presence of non-equilibrium QPs is thus unambiguous. Importantly, the presence of the QP response is directly related to the presence of a pairing gap for QP excitations.
Pump-probe experiments have already shown the coexistence of the pseudogap excitations with superconductivity below Tc over the entire range of phase diagram37,38,39,40,41. However, little attention has been paid to the region of superconducting fluctuation. In this paper we present measurements by a 3-pulse technique which allows us to single out the response of superconducting gap fluctuations. The approach is based on selective destruction of the superconducting state by a femtosecond laser pulse42 which allows us to discriminate pseudogap excitations from superconducting fluctuation seen in transient reflectivity signals, thus avoiding the necessity of making extrapolations or assumptions in separating the different contributions. We then compare these data with a.c. conductivity (THz) measurements from43 and establish proportionality of the amplitude of superconducting component in pump-probe experiment to the bare phase stiffness ρ0, measured by THz experiments. This is directly proportional to the bare pair density ns23,43, which in turn coincides with the superfluid density when the latter is measured on a timescale on which changes of the order parameter due to either de-pairing or movement of the vortices can be neglected. Comparison of the critical behavior of the amplitude and phase correlation times above Tc leads us to the conclusion that two quantities arise from different microscopic processes.
We perform measurements on under- (UD), near optimally-(OP) and over-(OD) doped Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ (Bi2212) with Tcs of 81, 85 and 80 K respectively. In the discussion we focus on the underdoped sample and discuss comparisons with the optimally and overdoped samples, where applicable.
Results
Measurements of pairing amplitude above Tc
To separate the SC component from the PG component we use a 3 pulse technique described in Refs. 44,45,46,47 and schematically represented in Fig. 1f). A pulse train of 800 nm 50 fs pulses produced by a 250 kHz regenerative amplifier is divided into three beams with variable delays. First a relatively strong “destruction” (D) pulse, with fluence just above the superconducting state photodestruction threshold, 48, destroys the superconducting condensate49. The ensuing recovery of the signal is measured by means of the 2 pulse Pump-probe (P-pr) response at a variable delay tD−P between D and P pulses. There is no effect of the D pulse on the PG response within the noise level of indicated by measurements at 120 K shown in Fig. 1e). A typical result of the 3 pulse experiment is presented in Fig. 1g). In the absence of the D pulse the signal consists of a positive SC and a negative PG component. After the arrival of the D pulse we see a disappearance of the SC part and only the PG component is present (dark-red line in Fig. 1c)). With increasing tDP the superconducting response gradually re-emerges (blue line on Fig. 1c)). As most of the condensate in the probe volume is “destroyed” by the D pulse we can extract the superconducting component by subtracting the signal remanent after the destruction (measured 200 fs after the D pulse) from the signal obtained in the absence of the D pulse. Such an extracted superconducting component is plotted in Fig. 1b). The signal is detectable up to Tonset = 104 K, which is 0.28 Tc above Tc but much lower than T* ≈ 2.5 Tc. In Fig. 1h) we show the recovery of the amplitude of the superconducting component Asc as a function of the time delay tD−P after the D pulse for 90 K. The temperature dependence of the amplitude of the SC component measured by 3-pulse technique is shown in Fig. 2b).
For comparison, standard pump-probe measurements need to separate the SC relaxation from the PG relaxation by subtraction of the high temperature response extrapolated into the superconducting region. This approach suffers from the same uncertainties as other techniques such as conductivity, heat capacity, diamagnetism and ARPES. The actual T-dependence of the PG response can vary with doping, pump fluence and probe wavelength48,50. But, in Fig. 2b) we show that the subtraction procedure - with the use of a model48 - gives results in agreement with the direct 3 pulse measurements. The remaining discrepancies in the amplitude can be explained by an incomplete destruction of fluctuating superconducting state in the 3 pulse experiment and errors in the PG subtraction.
In Fig. 2a) we see that the QP relaxation time obtained by fitting an exponential function to the data Fig. 1b) decreases rather gradually with increasing T above Tc and nearly coincide with the QP relaxation time obtained by the pseudogap subtraction procedure . The recovery time τrec obtained from exponential fits to the recovery of the SC response above Tc (Fig. 1 h) shows a similar T-dependence. The experiments thus show that the recovery of the SC gap and the QP relaxation show very similar dynamics above Tc.
Comparison of optical and a.c. conductivity measurements
We now compare these data with THz measurements of the order parameter correlation time and bare phase stiffness19,43. The agreement between ρ0 and Asc shown in Fig. 2b) is seen to be remarkably good over the entire range of measurements 0.8 Tc < T < 1.3 Tc. This agreement is important because, taking into account ns ~ |Ψ|2, it validates the approximation that the pump-induced changes in the reflectivity or dielectric constant for small ns are related to the order parameter Ψ as δR ~ δε ~ |Ψ|2.
In contrast to ASC and ρ0, remarkable differences are seen in the temperature dependences of the characteristic lifetimes shown in Fig. 2a) obtained by optical techniques and THz conductivity measurements. The phase correlation time determined from the THz conductivity19 dies out very rapidly with increasing temperature, while the T-dependence of the amplitude relaxation (, or τREC) is much more gradual.
Measurements on an optimally doped sample (Fig. 3c, d))) show qualitatively the same results with Tonset ~ 102 K, which is 17 K above Tc and slightly faster decrease of both amplitude and QP relaxation time with temperature. For the overdoped sample, becomes comparable to , so the superconducting component cannot be significantly suppressed without affecting the pseudogap. Nevertheless the superconducting component is clearly observable in the 2-pulse response up to Tonset ~ 93 K, i.e. 13 K above Tc. Comparison of 2-pulse data for different doping levels is shown in Fig. 3 e)–g), showing qualitatively similar behavior of the SC amplitude above Tc.
Discussion
The co-existence and distinct dynamics of the PG and SC excitations above Tc highlights the highly unconventional nature of these states. A possible explanation for the coexistence of the SC and PG excitations is that the SC and PG quasiparticles which are giving rise to the observed processes are associated with relaxation at different regions on the Fermi surface. Recent Raman and cellular dynamical mean-field studies51 have suggested that the PG may originate from the states inside the Mott gap, which are characterized by s-wave symmetry and very weak dispersion. Such a localized nature of the PG state excitations is consistent with previous assignments made on the basis of pump-probe experiments39,48. In contrast, the superconducting gap fluctuations have predominantly d-wave symmetry52 and are more delocalized. This would explain the simultaneous presence of the SC fluctuations and PG components in pump-probe experiments.
Perhaps the most widely discussed model in the context of distinct pairing and phase coherence phenomena is the Berezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thouless (BKT) transition53,54,55 by which decreasing temperature through Tonset and approaching Tc causes freely moving thermally activated vortices and anti-vortices to form pairs, thus allowing the condensate to acquire long range phase coherence in an infinite-order phase transition sharply at Tc. The bare pair density is finite to much higher temperatures (up to Tonset), where pairing is caused by a different mechanism and the pseudogap is considered to be an unrelated phenomenon56,57,58,59. The effect is characterised in terms of a phase stiffness ρs, a quantity which characterizes the destruction of phase coherence by thermal fluctuations at a temperature Tc = TBKT = πρs/8. In cuprates ρs is small due to reduced dimensionality and the low carrier density. Within this approach a.c. (THz) conductivity19,43, heat capacity20,21, diamagnetism26,31, ARPES22 and Nernst effect23,24,25,60 measurements were interpreted.
The BSCCO family is the most two-dimensional of the cuprate materials, so here the BKT mechanism for describing the order above Tc would be expected to be most applicable43. However, the data in Fig. 2a) show that the drop in τθ is not nearly as abrupt as the BKT model predicts. One possibility is that this broadening arises from chemical inhomogeneity of the sample, but the absence of a peak in the heat capacity at Tonset20 also appears to exclude the possibility of a pure BKT transition and implies amplitude fluctuations might be present between Tc and Tonset as well21. Thus additional mechanisms beyond BKT may also be present which would broaden the phase coherence transition, such as interlayer phase fluctuations. In this case the observed T-dependence would reflect the interlayer de-coherence19,43.
In more traditional approaches using time-dependent Ginzburg-Landau (TDGL) theory61, thermal fluctuations are small for temperatures higher than ~2 K above Tc62, but can give an observable contribution to the conductivity in this temperature range17,18,28,29,30. Relaxation within TDGL theory has a “longitudinal” relaxation time τΔ, which corresponds to the relaxation of the magnitude of the SC order parameter and a “transverse” relaxation time τθ which corresponds to the relaxation of its phase. They are related to each other in magnitude, but have the same temperature dependence near Tc, namely τGL ~ 1/(T − Tc)63. Perhaps unexpectedly, the temperature dependence of nearly coincides with the behavior predicted for τθ by time-dependent Ginzburg Landau theory for Gaussian fluctuations. Fig. 2a) suggests that phase coherence within this system is established in a narrow, ~5 K temperature interval. However, the distinctly different critical behavior of the pair amplitude dynamics speaks in favor of unconventional models of superconductivity in which pairing and phase coherence occur independently, by different mechanisms. The implication is that the observed pairing amplitude which extends to more than 25 K above Tc reflects the response of an inhomogeneous ensemble of gapped patches which are not mutually phase coherent. The weak temperature dependence of the amplitude cannot be described either by TDGL or BKT models.
Beyond the BKT vortex and TDGL scenario, other phase-locking scenarios, such as Bose-Einstein condensation of bipolarons2,3,64 and phase-coherence percolation4,5 may also be consistent with the observed behaviour. In both of these cases pairing and phase coherence are also distinct processes. The former comes from the condensation of pairs at Tc as preformed pair kinetic energy is reduced, while percolation dynamics is associated with the time dynamics of Josephson tunneling between fluctuating pairs or superconducting patches. The percolation timescale τJ is given by the Josephson energy EJ = Icφ0/2π, where Ic is the critical current and φ0 is the flux quantum. In cuprates, , which is compatible with the dynamics of phase shown in Fig. 2a).
A picture highlighted by Fig. 2 thus emerges in these materials where the relaxation of the phase θ is faster than relaxation of the amplitude ψ of the complex order parameter Ψ = ψeiθ, the dynamics of ψ and θ being governed by microscopically different processes. It is worth remarking here that the opposite situation is found in charge density wave dynamics, where the phase relaxation is slow compared to the amplitude relaxation and the dynamics can be described by TDGL equations for the amplitude ψ, neglecting phase relaxation θ45.
Methods
Samples
The samples used in this work were under-, near optimally- and over- doped Bi2212 with Tcs of 81, 85 and 80 K respectively. Samples were grown by the traveling solvent floating zone method. Critical temperatures were obtained from susceptibility measurements (e.g. inset in Fig. 1a) for the underdoped sample).
References
Alexandrov, A. S. & Andreev, A. F. Gap and subgap tunnelling in cuprates. Europhys. Lett. 54, 373–379 (2001).
Alexandrov, A. & Ranninger, J. Bipolaronic superconductivity. Phys. Rev. B 24, 1164–1169 (1981).
Alexandrov, A. S. Theory of high-temperature superconductivity in doped polar insulators. Europhys. Lett. 95, 27004 (2011).
Mihailovic, D., Kabanov, V. V. & Müller, K. A. The attainable superconducting Tc in a model of phase coherence by percolating. Europhys. Lett. 57, 254–259 (2002).
Kresin, V. Z. & Wolf, S. a. Inhomogeneous Superconducting State and Intrinsic Tc: Near Room Temperature Superconductivity in the Cuprates. J. Supercond. Nov. Magn. 25, 175–180 (2011).
Ovchinnikov, Y. & Kresin, V. Inhomogeneous superconductor in an ac field: Application to the pseudogap region. Phys. Rev. B 65, 214507 (2002).
Geshkenbein, V. B., Ioffe, L. B. & Larkin, A. I. Superconductivity in a system with preformed pairs. Phys. Rev. B 55, 3173–3180 (1997).
Alexandrov, A. Bose-Einstein condensation of charged bosons in a magnetic field. Phys. Rev. B 48, 10571–10574 (1993).
Solov'ev, A. L. & Dmitriev, V. M. Fluctuation conductivity and pseudogap in YBCO high-temperature superconductors (Review). Low Temp. Phys. 35, 169 (2009).
Emery, V. J. Spin-gap proximity effect mechanism of high-temperature superconductivity. Phys. Rev. B 56, 6120–6147 (1997).
Phillips, P. & Dalidovich, D. The elusive Bose metal. Science 302, 243–7 (2003).
Das, D. & Doniach, S. Existence of a Bose metal at T = 0. Phys. Rev. B 60, 1261–1275 (1999).
Das, D. & Doniach, S. Bose metal: Gauge-field fluctuations and scaling for field-tuned quantum phase transitions. Phys. Rev. B 64, 134511 (2001).
Vojta, M. Quantum phase transitions. Rep. Prog. Phys. 66, 2069–2110 (2003).
Torchinsky, D. H., Mahmood, F., Bollinger, A. T., Božović, I. & Gedik, N. Fluctuating charge-density waves in a cuprate superconductor. Nat. Mater. 12, 387–91 (2013).
Sugai, S., Takayanagi, Y. & Hayamizu, N. Phason and Amplitudon in the Charge-Density-Wave Phase of One-Dimensional Charge Stripes in La2−xSrxCuO4 . Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 137003 (2006).
Silva, E., Sarti, S., Fastampa, R. & Giura, M. Excess conductivity of overdoped Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8 + x crystals well above Tc . Phys. Rev. B 64, 144508 (2001).
Truccato, M., Agostino, a., Rinaudo, G., Cagliero, S. & Panetta, M. Possible dominance of the Maki-ThompsonThompson process in the fluctuation conductivity of Bi-2212 superconducting whiskers. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 18, 8295–8312 (2006).
Orenstein, J., Corson, J., Oh, S. & Eckstein, J. Superconducting fluctuations in Bi2Sr2Ca1−xDyxCu2O8+δ as seen by terahertz spectroscopy. Ann. Phys. 15, 596–605 (2006).
Junod, A., Roulin, M., Revaz, B. & Erb, A. Experimental survey of critical fluctuations in the specific heat of high-temperature superconductors. Physica B Condens. Matter 280, 214–219 (2000).
Tallon, J. L., Storey, J. G. & Loram, J. W. Fluctuations and critical temperature reduction in cuprate superconductors. Phys. Rev. B 83, 092502 (2011).
Kondo, T. et al. Disentangling Cooper-pair formation above the transition temperature from the pseudogap state in the cuprates. Nat. Phys. 7, 21–25 (2010).
Wang, Y., Li, L. & Ong, N. Nernst effect in high-Tc superconductors. Phys. Rev. B 73, 1–20 (2006).
Rullier-Albenque, F. et al. Nernst Effect and Disorder in the Normal State of High-Tc Cuprates. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 2–5 (2006).
Pourret, a. et al. Observation of the Nernst signal generated by fluctuating Cooper pairs. Nat. Phys. 2, 683–686 (2006).
Li, L. et al. Diamagnetism and Cooper pairing above Tc in cuprates. Phys. Rev. B 81, 1–9 (2010).
Mihailović, D., Zgonik, M., Čopič, M. & Hrovat, M. Quasiparticle excitations in the superconducting state observed in light scattering. Phys. Rev. B 36, 3997–3999 (1987).
Ghosh, A. K. & Basu, A. N. Fluctuation-induced conductivity in quenched and furnace-cooled Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ Aslamazov-Larkin or short-wavelength fluctuations. Phys. Rev. B 59, 11193–11196 (1999).
Balestrino, G., Crisan, A., Livanov, D., Manokhin, S. & Milani, E. Fluctuation magnetoconductivity of BSCCO-2212 films in parallel magnetic field. Phys. C Supercond. 355, 135–139 (2001).
Bhatia, S. N. & Dhard, C. Excess conductivity and pair-breaking effects in Y Ba2Co3O7 and Bi2Sr2Ca1−xYxCu2O8+δ systems. Phys. Rev. B 49, 206–215 (1994).
Wang, Y. et al. Field-Enhanced Diamagnetism in the Pseudogap State of the Cuprate Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ Superconductor in an Intense Magnetic Field. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 247002 (2005).
Rullier-Albenque, F., Alloul, H. & Rikken, G. High-field studies of superconducting fluctuations in high-Tc cuprates: Evidence for a small gap distinct from the large pseudogap. Phys. Rev. B 84, 014522 (2011).
Chen, Y. & Ting, C. Magnetic-field-induced spin-density wave in high-temperature superconductors. Phys. Rev. B 65, 180513 (2002).
Gay, P., Smith, D. C., Stevens, C. J., Chen, C. & Ryan, J. F. Femtosecond Dynamics of BSCCO-2212. Journal of Low Temperature Physics 117, 1025–1029 (1999).
Kaindl, R. A., Carnahan, M. A., Chemla, D. S., Oh, S. & Eckstein, J. N. Dynamics of Cooper pair formation in Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ . Phys. Rev. B 72, 060510 (2005).
Kabanov, V. V., Demsar, J. & Mihailovic, D. Kinetics of a Superconductor Excited with a Femtosecond Optical Pulse. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 147002 (2005).
Demsar, J., Podobnik, B., Kabanov, V. V., Wolf, T. & Mihailovic, D. Superconducting Gap Δc, the Pseudogap Δp and Pair Fluctuations above Tc in Overdoped Y1−xCaxBa2Cu3O7−δ from Femtosecond Time-Domain Spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 4918–4921 (1999).
Kusar, P., Demsar, J., Mihailovic, D. & Sugai, S. A systematic study of femtosecond quasiparticle relaxation processes in La2−xSrxCuO4 . Phys. Rev. B 72, 014544 (2005).
Kabanov, V. V., Demsar, J., Podobnik, B. & Mihailovic, D. Quasiparticle relaxation dynamics in superconductors with different gap structures: Theory and experiments on Y Ba2Cu3O7−δ . Phys. Rev. B 59, 1497–1506 (1999).
Liu, Y. et al. Direct Observation of the Coexistence of the Pseudogap and Superconducting Quasiparticles in Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+y by Time-Resolved Optical Spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 1–4 (2008).
Nair, S. K. et al. Quasiparticle dynamics in overdoped Bi1.4Pb0.7Sr1.9CaCu2O8+δ Coexistence of superconducting gap and pseudogap below Tc . Phys. Rev. B 82, 212503 (2010).
Kusar, P. et al. Controlled Vaporization of the Superconducting Condensate in Cuprate Superconductors by Femtosecond Photoexcitation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 227001 (2008).
Corson, J., Mallozzi, R., Orenstein, J., Eckstein, J. & Bozovic, I. Vanishing of phase coherence in underdoped Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ . Nature 398, 221–223 (1999).
Kusar, P. e. a. Coherent trajectory through the normal-to-superconducting transition reveals ultrafast vortex dynamics in a superconductor. arXiv:1207.2879v2 (2013).
Yusupov, R. et al. Coherent dynamics of macroscopic electronic order through a symmetry breaking transition. Nat. Phys. 6, 681–684 (2010).
Kusar, P. et al. Anharmonic order-parameter oscillations and lattice coupling in strongly driven 1 T-TaS2 and TbTe3 charge-density-wave compounds: A multiple-pulse femtosecond laser spectroscopy study. Phys. Rev. B 83, 035104 (2011).
Mertelj, T. et al. Incoherent Topological Defect Recombination Dynamics in TbTe3 . Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 156401 (2013).
Toda, Y. et al. Quasiparticle relaxation dynamics in underdoped Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ by two-color pump-probe spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. B 84, 174516 (2011).
Stojchevska, L. et al. Mechanisms of nonthermal destruction of the superconducting state and melting of the charge-density-wave state by femtosecond laser pulses. Phys. Rev. B 84, 180507 (2011).
Coslovich, G. et al. Competition Between the Pseudogap and Superconducting States of Bi2Sr2Ca0.92Y0.08Cu2O8+δ Single Crystals Revealed by Ultrafast Broadband Optical Reflectivity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 107003 (2013).
Sakai, S. et al. Raman-Scattering Measurements and Theory of the Energy-Momentum Spectrum for Underdoped Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ Superconductors: Evidence of an s-Wave Structure for the Pseudogap. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 107001 (2013).
Toda, Y. et al. Dynamics of broken symmetry nodal and anti-nodal excitations in Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ probed by polarized femtosecond spectroscopy. arXiv:1311.4719 (2013).
Berezinskii, V. Destruction of Long-range Order in One-dimensional and Two-dimensional Systems having a Continuous Symmetry Group I. Classical Systems. JETP 32, 493 (1971).
Berezinskii, V. L. Destruction of Long-range Order in One-dimensional and Two-dimensional Systems Possessing a Continuous Symmetry Group. II. Quantum Systems. JETP 34, 610 (1972).
Kosterlitz, J. M. & Thouless, D. J. Ordering, metastability and phase transitions in two-dimensional systems. J. Phys. C 6, 1181–1203 (1973).
Emery, V. J. & Kivelson, S. A. Importance of phase fluctuations in superconductors with small superfluid density. Nature 374, 434–437 (1995).
Emery, V., Kivelson, S. & Zachar, O. Pairing and phase coherence in high temperature superconductors. Phys. C Supercond. 282–287, 174–177 (1997).
Emery, V. & Kivelson, S. Crossovers and phase coherence in cuprate superconductors. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 59, 1705–1710 (1998).
Fisher, D., Fisher, M. & Huse, D. Thermal fluctuations, quenched disorder, phase transitions and transport in type-II superconductors. Phys. Rev. B 43, 130–159 (1991).
Mukerjee, S. & Huse, D. Nernst effect in the vortex-liquid regime of a type-II superconductor. Phys. Rev. B 70, 014506 (2004).
Larkin, A. & Varlamov, A. Theory of Fluctuations in Superconductors (Oxford University Press, 2005).
van der Beek, C., Colson, S., Indenbom, M. & Konczykowski, M. Supercooling of the Disordered Vortex Lattice in Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ . Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 4196–4199 (2000).
Schuller, I. & Gray, K. E. Experimental Observation of the Relaxation Time of the Order Parameter in Superconductors. Phys. Rev. Lett. 36, 429–432 (1976).
Alexandrov, A. S. High-temperature superconductivity: the explanation. Phys. Scr. 83, 038301 (2011).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
T.K., Y.T. and M.O. has grown the samples and done magnetic characterisation, I.M. did optical measurements. I.M. and P.K. performed data analysis. I.M., Y.T., T.M. and D.M. interpreted the data. I.M and D.M. wrote the manuscript.
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder in order to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Madan, I., Kurosawa, T., Toda, Y. et al. Separating pairing from quantum phase coherence dynamics above the superconducting transition by femtosecond spectroscopy. Sci Rep 4, 5656 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep05656
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep05656
This article is cited by
-
Collapse of superconductivity in cuprates via ultrafast quenching of phase coherence
Nature Materials (2018)
-
Nonequilibrium Quasiparticle Dynamics in Bi-Based Superconductors Measured by Modulation Photoexcitation Spectroscopy
Journal of Superconductivity and Novel Magnetism (2018)
-
On Local Pairs vs. BCS: Quo Vadis High- T c Superconductivity
Journal of Superconductivity and Novel Magnetism (2017)
-
Evidence for carrier localization in the pseudogap state of cuprate superconductors from coherent quench experiments
Nature Communications (2015)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.