Introduction

Electrocardiographs (ECGs) have been used to monitor the electrical activity of the heart for many years and are still routinely used in many situations. They are rarely used in routine outpatient dental practice. However, for many years it has been shown that unexpected and asymptomatic disorders of cardiac rhythm and conduction may be discovered during examination of apparently healthy individuals. Brady-arrhythmias (including sinus arrhythmia, sinus bradycardia and nocturnal A-V block) are common findings and detectable in up to 50% of a young adult population (Fig. 1).1

Figure 1
figure 1

Anterior lead tracing

During the last decade, cardiovascular side effects have been discovered resulting from drugs which were introduced for non-cardiac indications. For example, local anaesthetic agents designed to alter ionic fluxes across peripheral nerve membranes may have a potent effect on cardiac electrophysiology.

The potential effect of local anaesthetic on cardiac rhythm has also been reported in the literature.2,3,4 Moreover, the anxiety associated with both minor surgery and the injection of local anaesthetic may induce a catecholamine surge which could increase myocardial oxygen demand and may be arrhythmogenic.5,6 Thus, overly anxious patients often exhibit signs of vaso-depression, pallor, tachycardia and palpitation. Systemic reactions during local anaesthesia may also be of psychological origin, as many people suffer mild anxiety about dental treatment and emotional stress is a common occurrence. The dose of local anaesthetic agent employed for most surgical procedures is not in general associated with a cardio-depressant effect, although some cardiovascular depression may also occur following extensive use of local anaesthesia.7,8

In 1964 Hunter reported that traction of the trigeminal root during neurosurgical manoeuvring could precipitate irregularities of cardiac rhythm.9 This suggests that oral surgery may be a particularly potent motivator of sympatho-adrenal response. The potential effect of post-operative analgesia also needs to be considered. The ECG recordings were taken during the throughput of a clinical study using two pharmacologically dissimilar analgesics (ibuprofen/pregabalin) for post surgery analgesia. Ibuprofen is a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agent which inhibits cyclo-oxygenase activity and, as a result, synthesis of prostaglandin and thromboxane is reduced.10 Pregabalin is a 3-alkylated gamma amino–butyric acid (GABA) derivative with known analgesic properties. Its analogue Gabapentin has several uses including pain management.11,12

The purpose of this study was:

  • To determine the incidence of ECG abnormalities in a healthy adults undergoing a surgical extraction of third molar teeth pre-and post-operatively

  • To study the effect of local anaesthetics, surgical stress and analgesics on cardiac rhythm (Fig. 2).

    Figure 2
    figure 2

    ECG tracing

Materials and methods

This study examined the ECG abnormalities among healthy adults who were scheduled for elective oral surgery. All patients required the extraction of one lower third molar (+ an ipsi-lateral upper) under local anaesthetic. Plain prilocaine 4% without vasoconstrictor was used in all cases as a standard local anaesthetic. The mandibular third molar had to be impacted such that bone removal was required. Standard 12-lead ECG recordings were made at the screening visit, and 30 minutes post-operatively. Patients were then asked to indicate when they felt any post-operative discomfort and were prescribed analgesics when they developed at least moderate pain. In this study patients were administered one of three analgesics: Ibuprofen 400 mg, Pregabalin (50 mg or 300 mg) or placebo (Fig. 3).

Figure 3
figure 3

Normal P- QRS-T complex

One hundred and ninety-eight patients were recruited in the oral surgery department of Cardiff Dental Hospital. Standard inclusion/exclusion criteria were used and all patients had to have a body mass of 50 kg or more.

Tracings were performed in each of the patients with the use of a 12-lead ECG and a 2-minute rhythm strip was recorded. The ECGs were carried out by an ECG technician and then analysed by a consultant cardiologist (AGS) (Fig. 4).

Figure 4
figure 4

ECG 2 minute rhythm strip

Results

Screening visit abnormalities

None of the pre-surgery findings were clinically significant and all patients were asymptomatic. However, of the 198 patients studied, the ECGs were considered to show minor abnormalities in 44 patients (Table 1) (Fig. 5).

Table 1 ECG abnormalities on the screening visit
Figure 5
figure 5

Ventricular complex labelling

Post-operative ECG changes

Abnormalities occurred in a total of 60 patients (Tables 2 and 3).

Table 2 ECG abnormalities post analgesic dose
Table 3 ECG abnormalities pre- and post-study medication

Discussion

Of one hundred and ninety-eight patients studied, ECG abnormalities were present in 44 patients on the screening visit and in 60 patients 30-45 minutes post study medication. Of these, no patient was regarded as having a significant abnormality requiring treatment or further investigation before surgery. Only four had significant ECG changes after surgery and no patient reported any cardiac symptoms. Most of the minor abnormalities were unaffected by the surgery or analgesia and were probably of no significance.

Interestingly, non-specific ST elevation was noticed in seven patients during the screening visit and in seven patients following analgesia. The changes in the shape of ST segment and T-wave should be interpreted with great caution because of distortion produced by the recording system and by changes in position and activity.13

An abnormal P-wave axis was noticed in six patients both on their screening visit and post-analgesia recordings. This implies that either the sinus node was in an abnormal position or that atrial depolarisation was not initiated by the sinus node.

Short PR intervals with short delta waves were noticed in three patients. These abnormalities were unaffected by the surgical and anaesthetic process. This represents an accessory electrical pathway between atria and ventricles. The coexistence of a short PR interval and asymptomatic tachycardia is called Wolff Parkinson White syndrome. The prevalence of Wolff Parkinson White syndrome in the adult population is approximately 0.3%.14 In the current study, three patients (1.5%) showed the ECG features of Wolff Parkinson White syndrome but all were asymptomatic with no history of palpitation. In a healthy adult, this implies that the accessory pathway does not have the electrophysiological characteristics to allow the development of supra-ventricular tachycardia and therefore can be ignored.

A prolonged PR interval was not found in any of the study subjects.

Sinus arrhythmia was noticed in 11 patients 30-45 minutes post medication, whereas it was present in only three patients during screening visit, but it is a very common finding. Sinus arrhythmia has been renamed irregular sinus rhythm by the World Health Authority Working Party on terms relating to cardiac rhythm.15

Atrial premature beats were found in 28 of 50 patients (56%)3 and it was noticed that a total of 260 of 299 patients (87%) had one or more atrial premature beats.5 Finally, ECG abnormalities have been detected as a premature atrial contraction in 1.6% of healthy young adult outpatients.16 This abnormality was noted on four occasions in the current study and was not considered to be related to the medications.

Electrocardiographic signs of left ventricular hypertrophy (R v2+S v5 >35 mm) were detected in two patients without ST changes. However, these changes are not uncommon in a healthy, slim young adult and are considered to be within normal variation.

Minor sinus bradycardia was noticed in three patients (43-55 minutes) but this was unlikely to be of clinical importance in the absence of symptoms and was unrelated to any medication.

Only one patient showed two ventricular premature beats (LBBB morphology); this was not present in 30-45 minutes post drug regimen but there was relative sinus bradycardia. Ventricular ectopic beats are very common. The morphology suggests an origin in the right ventricular outflow tract. This can be found in minor forms of right ventricular dysplasia but, in the absence of symptoms or a positive family history, further investigation is unnecessary.

In total, only four patients showed abnormalities that the cardiologist thought might be related to the surgery, drug study, psychological stress or the effect of local anaesthesia. The effect of oral surgery under local anaesthesia on the heart rate has been the subject of sporadic reports over the years.2,3,4 ECG changes have also been associated with the use of local anaesthesia during oral surgery.4 In this study, prilocaine 4% was used without vasoconstrictor in all cases as local anaesthetic. Although the agent contains no vasoconstrictor, several authors have demonstrated that vasoconstrictors in the local anaesthetic do not increase the incidence of arrhythmias.2 Interestingly, the cardiovascular stress of extraction under local anaesthetic, assessed by the heart rate and on the occurrence of arrhythmias, is much less than under general anaesthesia.4

One ECG abnormality was reported (in a patient who received 300 mg of pregabalin post-operatively) as an acute injury pattern with marked ST elevation (>5-8 mm) in V2 and 2-3 mm in V1. This had completely resolved two hours later. The patient was referred for cardiological assessment and is awaiting an exercise thallium scan. The aetiology of this cannot be certain.

Finally, in one patient the screening ECG was normal but the 30-45 minutes post dose (Ibuprofen 400 mg) the ECG showed a RBBB pattern with broad QRS (180 mm) and T- wave inversion. This can be associated with Brugada syndrome but is more likely to be related to the stress of surgery or the medication. Again, however, there is little reason to relate it to the analgesic.

Conclusion

This study has shown that ECG changes in clinically healthy individuals are quite common. The stress of dental surgery and the possibility that local anaesthetics or analgesics may directly affect the myocardium should always be borne in mind by the surgeon. Even though the majority of variations are within normal limits a small number of the cases detected in this study were clinically significant and one case was potentially serious. This research gives no suggestion that a specific analgesic may have induced any of the cardiac arrhythmias that were seen.