Abstract
Study design:
Prospective, nonrandomized, observational cohort study.
Objectives:
To analyze procalcitonin (PCT) level in acute traumatic spinal cord injury patients with and without postoperative infectious complications, and to determine whether PCT is a prognostic parameter of infectious complications in the early postoperative period compared with other inflammatory markers.
Setting:
Spine center of Chongqing, China; Trauma center of Chinese People's Liberation Army, China.
Methods:
A total of 339 consecutive patients with acute spinal cord injury undergone surgery were evaluated. All patients underwent measurement of leukocyte count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), and serum PCT preoperatively and 24–48 h postoperatively.
Results:
In all, 26 (7.7%) of 339 participants experienced postoperative infectious complication. Patients with infection exhibited significantly higher PCT and CRP levels compared with noninfection (both P<0.01). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that PCT and CRP levels were independent predicators for postoperative infection. The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve of PCT and CRP were 0.82 (95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.74–0.91) and 0.68 (95%CI, 0.57–0.78), respectively. A PCT cutoff of 0.1 ng ml−1 had a reasonable sensitivity of 92% to exclude an infection and antibiotics can be initially withheld. However, in patients with PCT level above 0.5 ng ml−1, a rapid initiation of antibiotics may be warranted.
Conclusions:
Serum PCT is a more reliable biologic marker for the early prediction of postoperative infectious complications in patients with acute traumatic spinal cord injury compared with CRP. PCT can early identify postoperative infections for establishing effective antibiotic therapy.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Postoperative infectious complication is a significant problem in patients with acute traumatic spinal cord injury. Infection rates in the postoperative period reported in the literature range from 0.7 to 11%.1, 2 Once diagnosed, aggressive treatment should be taken carefully and seriously in most cases to eradicate the infection, prevent potential seeding of the spine and retain instrumentation and stability. However, distinguishing diagnosis is difficult in the early postoperative course because traditional indicators of infection such as fever, leukocytosis, pain, delirium and wound drainage are commonly present during this period in the absence of infection. So, timely and accurate diagnosis of postoperative infections is of major importance because it strongly influences further therapeutic decision making.3
Facing this clinical dilemma, there is major interest in a valid tool for predicting postoperative infectious complications in these patients. Commonly, laboratory tests, primarily leukocyte count, C-reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), are detected when there is a suspicion of postoperative infection. These tests are markers of inflammation that rise in the presence of systemic inflammation. None of these parameters are specific for infection and may be elevated because of an infection unrelated to surgery or other noninfectious complications such as deep vein thrombosis or myocardial infarction.4
Procalcitonin (PCT) is a calcitonin precursor that was first defined as an inflammatory biomarker in the plasma of patients with infection and sepsis in the 1990s.5 Measurement of PCT in particular has gained interest because it is a quantitative test that exhibits predictable value and is more responsive to postoperative events compared with CRP and ESR.6, 7, 8 Nevertheless, in current clinical practice, PCT are not widely used as routine screening tests in the early postoperative period, with most surgeons relying on the leukocyte count, CRP and ESR despite evidence that these are poor diagnostic tests.9 PCT was already used in several other studies to predict postoperative infections after several different operations,5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11 however, the predictive value of serum PCT in detecting postoperative infectious complications in spinal cord injury patients has not been studied.
The aims of the current study were to analyze the PCT level in acute traumatic spinal cord injury patients with and without postoperative infectious complications, and to determine PCT as a prognostic parameters of infectious complications in the early postoperative period compared with other inflammatory markers.
Patients and methods
Patient population
Data were collected prospectively from consecutive patients with acute traumatic spinal cord injury who met inclusion criteria and underwent spinal surgery by one of the six well-trainned spine surgeons between January 2007 and September 2010. Inclusion criteria were of at least 18 years of age, single level or greater decompression or fusion, and length of stay of at least 4 days after surgery. Exclusion criteria were acquired or inherited immunodeficiency, history of inflammatory disorder, hepatitis or liver disease, and tumor or cancer. The study was approved by the local hospital ethics committee. Oral consent was obtained from each patient before study enrollment.
Laboratory analyses included the determination of the white blood cell count, CRP, ESR and PCT. Blood specimens were collected before surgery and 24–48 h after surgery. Samples were centrifuged at 2000 g for 15 min to separate serum from cellular blood contents and the serum were stored at −20 °C until analysis. PCT was quantified by an immunoluminometric assay, which has a functional assay sensitivity of 0.06 ng ml−1. CRP was measured by an automated nephelometry. ESR was a manual test in which the level of blood collected in a Westergren sedimentation rate tube was read by a technologist after a specific time period.
Patient data collected included age and gender. Clinical characteristitcs was obtained from the preoperative history and physical examination. Surgery data included injury region (cervical, thoracic or lumbar), cause of injury (Traffic incident, fall, violence and other), the American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale, surgical type (fusion or decompression), number of levels, approach (anterior, posterior or combined), operative time from skin incision to closure, estimated blood loss and length of stay postoperatively. All patients received prophylactic antibiotics intravenously within 1 h of incision consisting of cefotiam 1 g every 12 h or in the presence of a penicillin allergy, vancomycin 1 g every 12 h and continued 24 h after surgery or until postoperative drains were discontinued, usually on the second postoperative day. If the surgery exceeded 8–12 h, the antibiotics were readministered as above. During the patient's hospitalization, daily progress notes, discharge summaries, diagnostic tests, microbiology tests and laboratory tests were reviewed for evidence or suspicion of a postoperative infectious complication.
Infectious complications
The common infectious complications consisted of urinary tract infection, deep wound infection and pneumonia, others included cellulitis, bacteremia, gastroenteritis. Diagnostic criteria of infectious complications were established on the basis of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention definitions.12, 13, 14, 15, 16 In brief, the presence of urinary tract infection was defined as (1) substantial leukocyturia (>10 white blood cell per visual field on microscopy of sediment per high-power field) or (2) substantial bacteriuria (>105 microorganisms per cm3 of urine); pneumonia was defined as the presence of (1) at lease one respiratory symptom (cough, purulent sputum, dyspnea or pleuritic pain) and at least one finding during auscultation (rales or crepitation), or (2) one sign of infection (a core body temperature of >38.0 °C, shivering or a white blood cell count of >10 × 109 per l or <4 × 109 per l) and a new or progressive infiltrate on a chest radiographic examination; deep wound infection was defined as (1) purulent draining or a deep incision spontaneously dehisces, or (2) organisms isolated from an aseptically obtained culture of fluid or tissue from the surgical incision, or (3) an abscess or other evidence of infection involving the deep incision is found on direct examination, during reoperation, or by histopathologic or radiologic examination and bloodstream infection (bacteremia) was defined as growth of relevant bacteria in blood cultures.
Statistical analysis
All statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS 16.0 statistical software package (SPSS Corp, Chicago, IL, USA). The quantitative variables are expressed as the median and interquartile range, or mean and standard deviation. Qualitative variables are expressed as frequencies and percentages. The Student's t-test or Mann–Whitney U test was used to investigate differences between groups (patients with suspected or unsuspected infection) depending on the distribution of data. Uni- and multivariate binary logistic regression analysis was used to determine the significant variable in predicting the presence and absence of postoperative infectious complications in patients with acute spinal cord injury. To investigate the prognostic impact of the factors considered, receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted and areas under the curves were assessed. The Optimal Cutoff Point on the ROC curve was determined by the maximum of the Youden index. Differences were considered significant when the P-value was less than 0.05.
Results
Clinical profile of patients
A total of 339 acute spinal cord injured individuals met inclusion criteria and were included in the study. According to whether a postoperative infectious complication eventually developed, the patients were separated into two groups: one group of patients who eventually developed infection (infected group, n=26; 7.7%) and another group of patients who did not (noninfected group, n=313; 92.3%). Patient characteristics, surgery information and hospitalization information are presented in Table 1. Postoperative infectious complications developed on median postoperative day 5 (2–10), including four deep wound infections necessitating surgical incision and drainage. Table 2 showed suspected infectious complications after surgery in patients with acute traumatic spinal cord injury. Among 26 patients with infectious complications, 19 bacteriologic samples were positive. Pathogens included seven gram-positive cocci (four Staphylococcus sp., 20%; two Enterococcus sp., 10%; one Streptococcus sp., 5%); 12 gram-negative rods (eight Enterobacteriaceae, 40%; three Pseudomonas sp., 15%; one Miscellaneous, 5%); and one anaerobe (Bacteroides fragilis, 5%). One sample had two microorganism growing.
Prognostic clinical parameters
Using univariate and multivariate binary logistic regression models, PCT and CRP within 48 h after surgery could be identified as the significant independent predictors of postoperative infectious complications of all the parameters analyzed (Table 3). The adjusted odds ratios for possible risk factors related to postoperative infections were 1.347 (95% Confidence Interval (CI) 1.116–1.626, P=0.002) for PCT and 1.007 (95% CI 1.001–1.013, P=0.030) for CRP.
PCT and CRP levels early after surgery were illustrated in Figure 1. Patients with infection exhibited significantly higher PCT and CRP levels compared with noninfection (both P<0.01). However, there were no statistically significant difference between infected and noninfected group for white blood cell count ((9.0±3.8) × 109 per l vs (8.5±3.5) × 109 per l, P=0.445) and ESR (8 (6–10) mm h−1 vs 7 (4–10) mm h−1, P=0.196), respectively.
ROC
The area under the receiver operating characteristic curves of PCT (0.82, 95% CI 0.74–0.91, P<0.001) was greater than that of CRP (0.68, 95% CI 0.57–0.78, P=0.003), as shown in Figure 2. The Optimal Cutoff Points on the ROC curve were 0.5 ng ml−1 for PCT and 40 mg l−1 for CRP. The characteristics of the PCT and CRP measurements for predicting postoperative infection are summarized in Table 4.
Discussion
It has been largely confirmed that PCT is the only one among a large array of biochemical parameters, which closely correlates with the inflammatory host response to microbial infections.6, 17 Many studies found that PCT was an excellent early predictor or diagnostic parameter superior to CRP.6, 7 Early diagnosis of a postoperative infectious complication is essential for timely and adequate treatment of this condition. However, some subsequent studies have shown opposite results,10, 18 and the prognostic and/or diagnostic value of this parameter still remains controversial. In the absence of relative study, we addressed this issue by conducting a prospective observational cohort study to determine the role of PCT in predicting postoperative infectious complication in spinal cord injury patients.
In this study, we found that a total of 26 (7.7%) of 339 patients with acute traumatic spinal cord injury were infected after surgery, which was similar to those reported in the literature.1, 2, 19 Elevated leukocyte and ESR levels were more prominent in infected patients, although this did not reach statistical significance. Serum PCT and CRP concentrations early postoperatively were significantly higher in infected patients. Infections in the postoperative period of patients with spinal cord injury can lead to prolonged stay, increased morbidity and mortality, and high costs. Timely administration of adequate and effective antibiotic therapy is an important factor to solve those problems, and a thorough clinical examination and diagnostic workup is mandatory. Some reports showed that the administration of antibiotics alone had no effect on elevated PCT concentration20 and simply administering antibiotics in the absence of an infection has no effect on CRP values,21 suggesting that preoperative antibiotics might not direct influence on the PCT and CRP levels, however, it could have indirect effect on the PCT and CRP levels with presence or absence of infection or other relative condition. On the other hand, many previous studies demonstrated that PCT could be used to guide antibiotic therapy in patients with infection.22, 23, 24 In patients with a new onset of infection after a procedure, various laboratory parameters such as CRP and ESR level may be misleading as they are increased in all patients in the postoperative period and are not specific for underlying infection.11 A trauma itself and the inflammatory reaction caused by the trauma surgery may stimulate the production of cytokine, leading to a nonspecific increase of these commonly used markers of inflammation. Thus, there is unmet need for specific markers of infection after surgical procedure. A number of studies showed that PCT was less influenced by the different types of surgery and therefore was superior to other inflammatory markers.8, 25 However, a few of literature showed that CRP was a predictor of early postoperative infectious complications after surgery,26, 27 but not compared with PCT. Our study conforms in a cohort of postoperative patients with acute traumatic spinal cord injury that PCT is a reliable and useful biomarker for predicting postoperative infection compared with other inflammatory parameters. Some previous studies have showed that PCT could early predict or diagnose localized infections like urinary tract infection,28 surgical site infection8 or pneumonia.29
In a multivariate logistic regression analysis, both PCT and CRP concentrations were identified as independent, early predictive indicators of postoperative infectious complications. In addition, we presented receiver-operating characteristic curves evaluating the sensitivities and specificities at any given PCT cutoff point to compare the accuracy of PCT to diagnose postoperative infectious complications, and the results demonstrated that the biochemical markers PCT correlated well with postoperative infectious complications. Using cutoff points of 0.1, 0.5, and 2.0 ng ml−1 for PCT showed excellent sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios, with a cutoff value of 0.5 ng ml−1 producing the best performance (Table 4). In addition, PCT was superior to CRP as an indicator of postoperative infection, because the ROC curve for specificity and sensitivity and the area under the ROC curve were greater for PCT than for CRP. At a cutoff of 0.1 ng ml−1, PCT had a reasonable sensitivity of 92% of to exclude an infection. Conversely, in patients with PCT concentration above the cutoff of 0.5 ng ml−1, the likelihood for underlying bacterial infection became high, which should be considered to diagnose an infectious etiology. Our findings suggest that, in patients with PCT levels <0.1 ng ml−1, antibiotics can be initially withheld if no obvious clinical manifestation of infection is present and the patient is in good general health. However, these patients should be reassessed the next day with a thorough clinical examination and repeat blood analysis. In contrast, in patients with PCT values of >0.5 ng ml−1, a rapid initiation of antibiotics may be warranted.
Several limitations merit consideration in this study. First, the serum markers were measured at a single time point after surgery, so we cannot exclude variability in the levels of these markers with time. However, previous studies showed that peak PCT levels are reached within 24–48 h postoperatively.30 Second, clinical evaluation of the patients was performed on the basis of a comprehensive diagnostic and/or microbiological workup and/or the assessment by an infectious diseases consultant as diagnostic standard, so not all infectious complications met the diagnostic gold standards. Third, the case number in this study was relatively small in the infected group. Hence, findings from this study require validation in a larger population. Fourth, the determination of PCT is expensive, which is not readily accessible in all hospital.
In conclusion, this study suggests that serum PCT level is a reliable, accurate biologic marker for early predicting or diagnosing postoperative infectious complications in patients with acute spinal cord injury and exhibits greater sensitivity and specificity than CRP. Based on the results of this study, PCT can early identify postoperative infections in order to establish effective antibiotic therapy, and avoid unnecessary antimicrobial treatment in patients without infection. Obviously, postoperative infections are far too heterogeneous and complex to be reliably diagnosed on the basis of a specific cutoff value for any single surrogate marker, particularly in patients who have recently undergone surgery. So, the results are considered preliminary and need to be verified by additional large-scale multicenter prospecitve randomized controlled trials.
References
Fang A, Hu SS, Endres N, Bradford DS . Risk factors for infection after spinal surgery. Spine 2005; 30: 1460–1465.
Pull ter Gunne AF, van Laarhoven CJ, Cohen DB . Incidence of surgical site infection following adult spinal deformity surgery: an analysis of patient risk. Eur Spine J 2010; 19: 982–988.
Schroeder S, Hochreiter M, Koehler T, Schweiger AM, Bein B, Keck FS et al. Procalcitonin (PCT)-guided algorithm reduces length of antibiotic treatment in surgical intensive care patients with severe sepsis: results of a prospective randomized study. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2009; 394: 221–226.
Black S, Kushner I, Samols D . C-reactive Protein. J Biol Chem 2004; 279: 48487–48490.
Assicot M, Gendrel D, Carsin H, Raymond J, Guilbaud J, Bohuon C . High serum procalcitonin concentrations in patients with sepsis and infection. Lancet 1993; 341: 515–518.
Muller F, Christ-Crain M, Bregenzer T, Krause M, Zimmerli W, Mueller B et al. Procalcitonin levels predict bacteremia in patients with community-acquired pneumonia: a prospective cohort trial. Chest 2010; 138: 121–129.
Fioretto JR, Martin JG, Kurokawa CS, Carpi MF, Bonatto RC, de Moraes MA et al. Comparison between procalcitonin and C-reactive protein for early diagnosis of children with sepsis or septic shock. Inflamm Res 2010; 59: 581–586.
Hunziker S, Hugle T, Schuchardt K, Groeschl I, Schuetz P, Mueller B et al. The value of serum procalcitonin level for differentiation of infectious from noninfectious causes of fever after orthopaedic surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010; 92: 138–148.
Takahashi J, Ebara S, Kamimura M, Kinoshita T, Itoh H, Yuzawa Y et al. Early-phase enhanced inflammatory reaction after spinal instrumentation surgery. Spine 2001; 26: 1698–1704.
Worthington T, Dunlop D, Casey A, Lambert R, Luscombe J, Elliott T . Serum procalcitonin, interleukin-6, soluble intercellular adhesin molecule-1 and IgG to short-chain exocellular lipoteichoic acid as predictors of infection in total joint prosthesis revision. Br J Biomed Sci 2010; 67: 71–76.
Castelli GP, Pognani C, Cita M, Paladini R . Procalcitonin as a prognostic and diagnostic tool for septic complications after major trauma. Crit Care Med 2009; 37: 1845–1849.
Ksycki MF, Namias N . Nosocomial urinary tract infection. Surg Clin North Am 2009; 89: 475–481, ix-x.
Morrow LE, Kollef MH . Recognition and prevention of nosocomial pneumonia in the intensive care unit and infection control in mechanical ventilation. Crit Care Med 2010; 38 (8 Suppl): S352–S362.
Mok JM, Guillaume TJ, Talu U, Berven SH, Deviren V, Kroeber M et al. Clinical outcome of deep wound infection after instrumented posterior spinal fusion: a matched cohort analysis. Spine 2009; 34: 578–583.
Emori TG, Culver DH, Horan TC, Jarvis WR, White JW, Olson DR et al. National nosocomial infections surveillance system (NNIS): description of surveillance methods. Am J Infect Control 1991; 19: 19–35.
Garner JS, Jarvis WR, Emori TG, Horan TC, Hughes JM . CDC definitions for nosocomial infections, 1988. Am J Infect Control 1988; 16: 128–140.
Simon L, Gauvin F, Amre DK, Saint-Louis P, Lacroix J . Serum procalcitonin and C-reactive protein levels as markers of bacterial infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis 2004; 39: 206–217.
Bargues L, Chancerelle Y, Catineau J, Jault P, Carsin H . Evaluation of serum procalcitonin concentration in the ICU following severe burn. Burns 2007; 33: 860–864.
Wimmer C, Gluch H, Franzreb M, Ogon M . Predisposing factors for infection in spine surgery: a survey of 850 spinal procedures. J Spinal Disord 1998; 11: 124–128.
Rau B, Steinbach G, Gansauge F, Mayer JM, Grunert A, Beger HG . The potential role of procalcitonin and interleukin 8 in the prediction of infected necrosis in acute pancreatitis. Gut 1997; 41: 832–840.
Khan MH, Smith PN, Rao N, Donaldson WF . Serum C-reactive protein levels correlate with clinical response in patients treated with antibiotics for wound infections after spinal surgery. Spine J 2006; 6: 311–315.
Bouadma L, Luyt CE, Tubach F, Cracco C, Alvarez A, Schwebel C et al. Use of procalcitonin to reduce patients′ exposure to antibiotics in intensive care units (PRORATA trial): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2010; 375: 463–474.
Kopterides P, Siempos II, Tsangaris I, Tsantes A, Armaganidis A . Procalcitonin-guided algorithms of antibiotic therapy in the intensive care unit: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Crit Care Med 2010; 38: 2229–2241.
Daniels JM, Schoorl M, Snijders D, Knol DL, Lutter R, Jansen HM et al. Procalcitonin vs C-reactive protein as predictive markers of response to antibiotic therapy in acute exacerbations of COPD. Chest 2010; 138: 1108–1115.
Pavcnik-Arnol M, Bonac B, Groselj-Grenc M, Derganc M . Changes in serum procalcitonin, interleukin 6, interleukin 8 and C-reactive protein in neonates after surgery. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2010; 20: 262–266.
Mok JM, Pekmezci M, Piper SL, Boyd E, Berven SH, Burch S et al. Use of C-reactive protein after spinal surgery: comparison with erythrocyte sedimentation rate as predictor of early postoperative infectious complications. Spine 2008; 33: 415–421.
Welsch T, Muller SA, Ulrich A, Kischlat A, Hinz U, Kienle P et al. C-reactive protein as early predictor for infectious postoperative complications in rectal surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis 2007; 22: 1499–1507.
Kotoula A, Gardikis S, Tsalkidis A, Mantadakis E, Zissimopoulos A, Deftereos S et al. Comparative efficacies of procalcitonin and conventional inflammatory markers for prediction of renal parenchymal inflammation in pediatric first urinary tract infection. Urology 2009; 73: 782–786.
Holm A, Pedersen SS, Nexoe J, Obel N, Nielsen LP, Koldkjaer O et al. Procalcitonin versus C-reactive protein for predicting pneumonia in adults with lower respiratory tract infection in primary care. Br J Gen Pract 2007; 57: 555–560.
Carboni GL, Fahrner R, Gazdhar A, Printzen G, Schmid RA, Hoksch B . Comparison of procalcitonin and CrP in the postoperative course after lung decortication. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2008; 33: 777–780.
Acknowledgements
We thank the staff and patients from Chongqing Spine Center, Trauma Center of Chinese People’s Liberation Army, for their contributions and participation in this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nie, H., Jiang, D., Ou, Y. et al. Procalcitonin as an early predictor of postoperative infectious complications in patients with acute traumatic spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 49, 715–720 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2010.190
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2010.190
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
A prospective study to identify preoperative serum parameters for spinal implant infection detected by sonication fluid culture
European Spine Journal (2023)
-
The role of procalcitonin in reducing antibiotics across the surgical pathway
World Journal of Emergency Surgery (2021)
-
Usefulness of inflammatory markers and clinical manifestation for an earlier method to diagnosis surgical site infection after spinal surgery
International Orthopaedics (2020)
-
Searching for predictors of surgical complications in critically ill surgery patients in the intensive care unit: a review
Surgery Today (2015)
-
Revision Surgery for Failed Cervical Spine Reconstruction
HSS Journal ® (2015)