Original Article

Psychological factors affecting alcohol use after spinal cord injury

  • Spinal Cord volume 49, pages 637642 (2011)
  • doi:10.1038/sc.2010.160
  • Download Citation
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published online:

Abstract

Study design:

Cross-sectional.

Objective:

The purpose of this study is to assess risk factors, including personality and socioeconomic indicators, with alcohol use among persons with spinal cord injury (SCI).

Setting:

A large rehabilitation hospital in the Southeastern United States.

Methods:

A total of 1549 participants responded to a survey on outcomes after SCI. We used polychotomous logistic regression to assess the relationships of personality and socioeconomic factors with alcohol use.

Results:

In this study population, 19.3% were heavy drinkers, 29.4% moderate and 51.7% abstinent. Annual household income and education were both associated with heavy alcohol use, with persons with higher income or education more likely to be heavy drinkers. Impulsive sensation seeking, neuroticism-anxiety and aggression-hostility were associated with increased odds of heavy drinking.

Conclusion:

This study adds to the body of evidence indicating a substantial portion of individuals with SCI are heavy drinkers, and that personality and socioeconomic status are associated with heavy drinking.

Introduction

Heavy alcohol use after spinal cord injury (SCI) has been linked with serious outcomes, including pain, lower satisfaction with life1 and mortality.2 In a community-based sample, alcohol abusers were more likely to perceive their overall health as worse, were more depressed, and experienced more stress in daily life than non-alcohol abusers.3 Heavy alcohol use has been linked to secondary conditions after SCI, including subsequent injuries4 and pressure ulcers.5 As there are serious consequences to alcohol abuse, it is important to identify pertinent risk factors to alcohol abuse after SCI.

Most studies that assess alcohol use after SCI utilize self-report interviews or surveys. The CAGE is a 4 item screening tool that assesses whether each of the following symptoms has ever occurred: cutting down on drinking, annoyance at other's concern, guilt about drinking, and using alcohol as an eye opener in the morning. A recent study using the CAGE from the Model SCI Systems found 14.2% were likely to have abused alcohol at some time.1 In this study, they also assessed drinking similarly to the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System conducted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. They found 15% reported binge drinking during the previous month and 7.2% of participants who drank reported drinking on average five or more drinks per occasion. A community-based study, using the short version of the Michigan Alcohol Screening Test, found 21% of persons in their study met the criteria for alcohol abuse.3 Kolakowsky–Haner and associates6 used a version of the Quantity–Frequency-Variability Index and found 16.7% of persons seen at one Model SCI Systems Center (n=30) were heavy drinkers at 1-year post-injury. Tate et al.1 assessed risk factors for heavy drinking and found persons who were younger, single, male and had less education were more likely to be heavy drinkers. They did not assess other environmental or psychological factors.

Measurement of personality has been structured in different ways, including the Big Five and the Alternative Five. The Big Five describe five basic dimensions of personality; openness, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness and neuroticism.7 Zuckerman et al.8 used factor analysis and developed an alternative five factor model (Zuckerman–Kuhlman Personality Questionnaire; ZKPQ) of personality. Their factors include: impulsive sensation seeking, neuroticism–anxiety, aggression–hostility, sociability and activity.

The ZKPQ has been used in previous studies of drug and alcohol use. Among cocaine users, neuroticism–anxiety, impulsive sensation seeking and aggression–hostility were related to drug abuse and addiction severity.9 Zuckerman and Kuhlman10 found impulsive sensation seeking, aggression–hostility and sociability to be positively correlated with drinking among males and females; although, the correlation between impulsive sensation seeking and drinking was much higher for women than men. A relationship between impulsive sensation seeking and alcohol use has also been seen in a small (n=44) study of persons after SCI.11 In addition to alcohol use, the ZKPQ has been associated with increased risk for injury after SCI.4 Specifically, impulsive sensation seeking was associated with one or more injuries in the past year.

In addition to conceptual issues related to personality, alcohol misuse is an important parameter in the theoretical risk model of secondary conditions and mortality outlined by Krause.12 According to the model, inclusion of psychological factors, such as personality and environmental factors, including socioeconomic status indicators as proxy variables, will significantly enhance prediction of health behaviors (alcohol use) beyond that of demographic/injury factors. Alcohol misuse is a type of risk behavior that could ultimately lead to an elevated risk of secondary conditions and mortality according to the model. Previous research has indicated general support for the model, particularly as related to each of the risk components (health behaviors, psychological factors and environmental factors) in the prediction of mortality.13, 14

The purpose of this study is to assess risk factors, including personality and socioeconomic indicators, associated with alcohol use after SCI. We hypothesize: (1) persons with personalities higher in impulsive sensation seeking, aggression–hostility, sociability and activity will be more likely to be heavy drinkers, and (2) persons with lower income/education will be more likely to be heavy drinkers.

Methods

Participants

Participants were identified through a rehabilitation hospital in the Southeast United States. Survey inclusion criteria included: (1) 18 years or older, (2) at least 1-year post-injury and (3) residual impairment from their injury. Of 2480 potential participants, 1549 (62.5% response rate) persons participated. Of these, 75 reported no residual impairment from their injury, 1 completed the survey less than 1-year post-injury and 38 did not have complete information on alcohol use, leaving 1435 eligible participants.

We assessed differences between those with and without complete information on alcohol use. There were no significant differences by gender, injury severity, years post-injury, age at injury or age at time of survey. Blacks were more likely to be missing information on alcohol use than whites (χ2=6.84; P<0.001).

Procedures

This study was a follow-up to data collected from 1997–1998. Data collection for this study was initiated in 2007 and completed in 2009. All who participated at baseline were contacted for this study and additional participants were also contacted. Potential participants were sent an initial letter introducing them to the study and informing them of the forthcoming survey. The survey was then mailed, and two additional mailings were sent for non-respondents. Lastly, follow-up calls were made, and additional materials sent if requested. Remuneration was $50 for participation.

Statement of ethics

We certify that all applicable institutional and governmental regulations concerning the ethical use of human volunteers were followed during the course of this research.

Measures

Three questions from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System were asked to assess alcohol use in the past month.15 Questions asked were: ‘During the past month, how many days per month did you drink any alcoholic beverages, such as, beer, wine, wine coolers or liquor?’; ‘On the days when you drank, how many drinks per day did you drink on average?’; and ‘Considering all types of alcoholic beverages, how many times during the past month did you have five or more drinks on an occasion?’ These questions were used to classify heavy drinking similar to the National Institute of Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism definition.16 Heavy drinking was defined for men younger than 65 years as binge drinking and/or more than 14 drinks per week. Heavy drinking was defined for all women and for men over 65 years of age as binge drinking, having more than seven drinks a week, and/or having more than three drinks per day. Moderate drinking was defined for men younger than 65 as up to 14 drinks a week and no episodes of binge drinking. Moderate drinking was defined for all women and for men over the age of 65 as up to seven drinks per week, no episodes of binge drinking and fewer than three drinks a day. Abstinent was defined as not drinking alcohol (for all men and women). We decided not to use the CAGE as the focus of this manuscript was on usage, whereas the CAGE reflects an individual's perception of their problem.

Personality was assessed at baseline using the ZKPQ,8 a 99-item measure-generating information on five scales. Impulsive sensation seeking was designed to measure lack of planning and tendency to act impulsively, and served as a proxy for reckless and dangerous behavior. Neuroticism–anxiety measures tension, worry and fearfulness. Aggression–hostility reflects items that express rude, thoughtless or antisocial behavior. Activity has items describing a need for high-energy activity, and sociability reflects social contacts and friends. The latter two scales served as proxies for protective behaviors required to develop needed support networks. The ZKPQ is a highly reliable instrument, with test-retest reliability ranging from 0.70–0.86.8

Education was categorized as less than high school, high school diploma or some college and a bachelor's degree or more. Annual household income was categorized as less than $25 000; $25 000-$74 999; and $75 000 or more. Demographic variables were age, gender and race. Injury severity was categorized as C1-C4, non-ambulatory; C5-C8, non-ambulatory; non-cervical, non-ambulatory and ambulatory regardless of level.

Analyses

Descriptive statistics were calculated on all relevant variables. Our outcome, alcohol use, was categorized as: abstinent, moderate or heavy drinking. We first examined relationships between the independent variables and outcome using χ2 tests for categorical variables and analysis of variance for continuous.

After the descriptive analyses, we conducted regression analyses. As the outcome had three levels, we used polychotomous logistic regression for our multivariable modeling. A test for appropriateness of proportional odds showed the assumption to be unreasonable (χ2=54.97, DF=13, P<0.0001), thus we used a generalized logistics model for nominal responses. Variables with a significance of 0.15 or less in the preliminary analyses were considered for the multivariable model. All variables were entered simultaneously, and the least significant variables were removed from the model one at a time until all variables were significant (P<0.05). Goodness of fit was assessed using the Hosmer–Lemeshow test17 by assessing the fit of the two logistic models separately (Heavy vs Abstinent, Moderate vs Abstinent) and are described with the results.

Missingness

A total of 212 participants had one or more variables with missing data, and were excluded from the final analysis. Excluded participants were not associated with alcohol use, gender or injury severity. Persons who were missing information were older than those with complete information (t=−2.58, P<0.05).

Results

Descriptive

Of those included in the analysis (n=1223), 74.2% were white and 73.8% male. The average age of respondents at follow-up was 44.8±13.3, with an average age at injury of 32.0±13.1 and average years since injury at follow-up of 18.6±6.4. In all, 36.5% participants had a cervical injury and were not ambulatory. A total of 27.6% had at least a bachelor's degree and 21.8% had an annual household income of $75 000 or greater.

Alcohol use patterns

Of participants, 48.7% reported drinking alcohol in the previous month. Of those reporting drinking, the average number of days of alcohol consumption during the previous month was 7.8±8.4 and the average number of drinks consumed per occasion was 2.5±2.0. Also, of persons who drank, 36.4% reported binge drinking at least once during the previous month. Using the criteria established by National Institute of Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism,16 19.3% were heavy drinkers, 29.4% moderate drinkers and 51.7% abstinent.

Modeling

There were significant differences in alcohol use by gender, injury severity, age at survey and age at injury (Table 1). Persons with higher education and higher income were more likely to be moderate or heavy drinkers than persons with lower income or education. Four ZKPQ scales were significantly associated with drinking. Impulsive sensation seeking, aggression–hostility and sociability were highest among heavy drinkers, whereas neuroticism–anxiety was highest among persons who were abstinent.

Table 1: Characteristics of persons by alcohol use

In the multivariable model, of the psychological variables, only impulsive sensation seeking, neuroticism–anxiety and aggression–hostility were significantly associated with drinking (Table 2). The odds of heavy drinking increased 50% for each one s.d. of impulsive sensation seeking, and the odds of moderate drinking increased 32% for each one s.d. of impulsive sensation seeking. Similarly, the odds of heavy drinking increased 53% for each s.d. of aggression–hostility. Neuroticism–anxiety was protective against both heavy and moderate drinking. Both environmental factors were predictive of drinking at follow-up. Persons with lower annual household income were less likely to be moderate or heavy drinkers than persons with high annual income (>$75 000). Similarly, persons with lower education were less likely to be heavy or moderate drinkers than persons with a bachelor's degree or higher. Of the demographic and injury characteristics, gender, injury severity and age at survey remained significant, and age at injury was marginally significant (P=0.0560). Males were more likely to be heavy drinkers than females and persons with more severe injuries were less likely to be heavy drinkers than persons who were ambulatory. Lastly, odds of heavy and moderate drinking decreased with increasing age.

Table 2: Crude and adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for moderate and heavy drinking at baselinea

Discussion

This study adds to evidence indicating a substantial portion of individuals with SCI are heavy drinkers,1, 3 as we found 19.3% of the participants were heavy drinkers, slightly higher than the 17.0% found by Tate et al.1 using the same National Institute of Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism criteria. The unique aspect of this study was utilization of environmental and personality scores in prediction of alcohol behaviors after SCI.

Personality was highly related to alcohol use patterns. The most important characteristic was the impulsive sensation seeking scale, which was significantly related with heavy drinking, even when controlling for all other factors. Additionally, aggression–hostility was significantly related to heavy drinking. In contrast, neuroticism–anxiety was associated with a greater likelihood of moderate drinking. It is not surprising that impulsive sensation seeking was related to heavy drinking, as this factor has been previously linked with increased risk behavior in persons with SCI.4, 11 As many persons with SCI sustain their injury through risky behavior, it is not surprising that risky behavior continues even after the injury. Identification of persons who possess these personality traits early after SCI could result in more directed prevention strategies.

Our results were consistent with Krause's theoretical risk model.12 His model predicts psychological and environmental factors (socioeconomic indicators are proxies for environmental factors) would be more immediate predictors of health behavior than demographic/injury factors. We found psychological and environmental factors added to the modeling of heavy drinking beyond the demographic/injury factors but did not mediate the relationship of demographic/injury variables with heavy alcohol use.

Additionally, results fit the rationale behind the personality scales, particularly the impulsive sensation seeking scale, which measures tendency to act impulsively (that is, heavy drinking).7 Consistent with our results, previous research using the ZKPQ showed impulsive sensation seeking to be positively correlated with drinking10, 11 as well as with drug abuse and addiction severity.9

Our results showing a relationship between income and education with alcohol use are supported by previous research in the general population. Keyes and Hasin18 found income was significantly positively related to hazardous alcohol use, and Hasin et al.19 found persons with higher education and those with higher income were more likely to have an alcohol abuse disorder over a lifetime. However, these results are opposite from what was found by Tate et al. in a study of persons with SCI.1 Other interesting findings included a lower risk of heavy drinking among those who had high level cervical injuries (non-ambulatory). Men were also more likely to report heavy drinking, whereas age was negatively associated with heavy drinking.

Limitations

Our data are self-report, and could be subject to recall bias. However, most of our questions were limited in scope to the previous year as to minimize recall bias. Additionally, a previous study of traumatic brain injury and alcohol use concluded that a participant's self-reported alcohol use was concordant with what their relative reported about them.20 Second, we were limited in our measurement of socioeconomic status (SES) and psychological factors, including only education, household income and personality. Third, blacks were more likely to be missing data on the outcome than whites. This could affect findings regarding the relationship between race and alcohol use, which was nonsignificant. Fourth, we used a single measure of personality. Other measures, including the traditional big five characteristics, may provide additional insights.

Future research

Future studies should expand the measurement of personality and psychological characteristics to explore further relationships with alcohol use post-SCI. Studies predictive of other substance misuse, such as illicit or prescription-drug use would be beneficial. Combinations of more diverse psychological measures and behavioral measures will help us to better understand their relationship with health-risk behavior.

References

  1. 1.

    , , , , . Patterns of alcohol and substance use and abuse in persons with spinal cord injury risk factors and correlates. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004; 85: 1837–1847.

  2. 2.

    , , , , , . Mortality after spinal cord injury in Norway. J Rehabil Med 2007; 39: 145–151.

  3. 3.

    , , , , . Alcohol and marijuana use in a community-based sample of persons with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1995; 76: 525–532.

  4. 4.

    . Factors associated with risk for subsequent injuries after the onset of traumatic spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004; 85: 1503–1508.

  5. 5.

    , , , . Alcohol abuse history and adjustment following spinal cord injury. Rehabil Psychol 2002; 47: 278–290.

  6. 6.

    , , , , , . Post-injury substance abuse among persons with brain injury and persons with spinal cord injury. Brain Inj 2002; 16: 583–592.

  7. 7.

    , . NEO-PI-R Professional Manual. Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc: Odessa, 1992.

  8. 8.

    , , , , . A comparison of three structural models for personality, The Big Three, The Big Five and The Alternate Five. J Personal Soc Psychol 1993; 65: 757–768.

  9. 9.

    , . A five-factor model of personality and addiction, psychiatric, and AIDS risk severity in pregnant and postpartum cocaine misusers. Subst Use Misuse 1997; 32: 25–41.

  10. 10.

    , . Personality and risk-taking: common biosocial factors. J Pers 2000; 68: 999–1029.

  11. 11.

    . Sensation seeking as a psychological trait of drug abuse among persons with spinal cord injury. Rehabil Counsel Bull 1994; 389: 154–163.

  12. 12.

    . Secondary conditions and spinal cord injury: A model for prediction and prevention. Top Spinal Cord Injury Rehabil 1996; 2: 217–227.

  13. 13.

    , , , . Psychologic factors and risk of mortality after spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2009; 90: 628–633.

  14. 14.

    , . Risk of mortality after spinal cord injury: Relationship with social support, education, and income. Spinal Cord 2009; 47: 592–596.

  15. 15.

    CDC. In: Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Survey Questionnaire. US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Atlanta, GA, 1996.

  16. 16.

    US Department of Health and Human Services, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism. 10th special report to the US congress on alcohol and health: highlights from current research from the secretary of health and human services. Washington, DC, 2000.

  17. 17.

    , . Applied logistic regression, 2nd edn. John Wiley and Sons: New York, New York, 2000.

  18. 18.

    , . Socio-economic status and problem alcohol use: the positive relationship between income and the DSM-IV alcohol abuse diagnosis. Addiction 2008; 103: 1120–1130.

  19. 19.

    , , , . Prevalence, correlates, disability, and comorbidity of DSM-IV alcohol abuse and dependence in the United States: results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2007; 64: 830–842.

  20. 20.

    , , . Alcohol use after traumatic brain injury: concordance of patients′ and relatives′ reports. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1997; 78: 138–142.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The contents of the publication were developed under grant from the Department of Education, NIDRR Grant number H133G050165. However, those contents do not necessarily represent the policy of the Department of Education, and one should not assume endorsement by the Federal Government. This publication was made possible by Grant Number 1R01 NS 48117 from the National Institutes of Health.

Disclaimer

The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. College of Health Professions, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA

    • L L Saunders
    •  & J S Krause

Authors

  1. Search for L L Saunders in:

  2. Search for J S Krause in:

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L L Saunders.